ÿWPCÎ éX?\ÇY™ùçÝÚaJ™üçcåÚ§ZÍ6”'‘—¨!o²ºrço'®)"1¶K’\¾ÛGTÒ›CN7ÅÎùó€Cø¯¤ ËàaÇŽU¦‰8“î+ñ/òÍXε*¡©|IEx‚Ùhfe&ëhtþ’®^!Å8¥y½ÁÄŸ±Í^O·=Xøù9~¯{½KVfà]ÿh¥°CÚ­ ‹ïl1¡¸Eê) ¥*}C´øåý(Í"ºÚ=]—årl¨¸2 57%½ Mö9›:²‰UÞ.6 X#ª—¸Sù ¶ŸnZ“/ð'ôNö×#6eÑÏ(öš%CT)®ä¹³kf…É©G¨è—÷&Guš¸J2aQHîíVÑy݇‘–f“wR pWj_ëŠ%N½tƒ‹§ÔC¨¾:ˆ¶=¼fVÙc`|§çƒM}Ú”žy±U5­à„€.ñ«“ ±9÷°oâP¿GCÀÐÐN o ÈœT[Ó;Õ½Jh°÷³Ž)0YBIØ:¼…@Jç½$î6&”6U^œ8ÿþ݃© $MÔ…;ãî1ÂÇe¸¼'¶H}p¼Boj[ÿÍ_à(ìaUÇ.âfÇ J©“R‰”S^Ž/½šb#É\ %% 0c+ 0ˆŽ UN ^ d wp zt Òî 4À NÔ 1uÖ 72K Æ} ÆCÆ ÆÏ•N¤¦ m¨E¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿bÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ 0ëÉÉÉÉ B´´ 0¤Ñ D5u D-ª 0K×× AS"Æu 0¤; 0Dß A«#˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularáµ1Ï  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ~‰/ê:i¢×+003#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a) i)Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(|G2µœ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô­„ò»»Ô d(|3ÀŸ$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÀŸ$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼»»»ÔÑ8€ÅŸXXdé»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@hhìàÔ‡îcÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼»îîc #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€October€5,€2004Ð öF ÐÔ‡XÅŸX»¼ÔÌò òÔ#†¼»XXÅŸ#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JEFFERY€D.€Ô_ÔRHOADESÔ_ÔòòóóÔ‡XÅŸX»¼Ôó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Dyer€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€C95„178A€€€€€€Lee€Moore,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2004„00154„CCA„R3„CD€€„€Filed€December€15,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Jeffery€D.€Ô_ÔRhoadesÔ_Ôòò,€óóappeals€from€the€Dyer€County€Circuit€Courtððs€2004€revocationÐ V¦  Ðof€his€1996€sentences€for€burglary€and€theft.€We€affirm€the€revocation€of€probation€and€the€orderingÐ ? Ðof€confinement€for€the€balance€of€the€original€effective€sentence,€but€we€modify€the€provisions€forÐ (x Ðsentence€credits€and€remand.€€Ð a ÐÔ#†¼»XXÅŸ #ÔÔ‡XÅŸX»¼ÔÓ¹ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed€as€Modified;€Ð ã3 Ðand€Remanded.ó óÐ Í ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼»àXÅŸ©#ÔÔ‡XÅŸX.¼ÔJames€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€óóJ.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€andÐ  ð ÐòòDavid€G.€Hayes,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ‰Ù ÐÌClifford€K.€Ô_ÔMcGownÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€Ô_ÔWaverlyÔ_Ô,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€Jim€W.€Horner,€District€Public€Defender;Ð [« Ðand€H.€Tod€Taylor,€Assistant€District€Public€Defender€(at€trial),€for€the€Appellant,€Jeffery€D.Ð D” ÐÔ_ÔRhoadesÔ_Ô.Ð -} ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Seth€P.€Ô_ÔKestnerÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€andÐ ÿO ÐC.€Phillip€Ô_ÔBivensÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð è 8  ÐÓeÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼»XXÅŸ”#ÔÔ‡XÅŸX»¼ÔÐ º" " ÐòòóóÔ#†¼»XXÅŸ‹ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÅŸX»¼ÔÌà  àà ` àPursuant€to€his€guilty€pleas,€the€defendant€was€convicted€on€April€30,€1996,€ofÐ $Ý$ Ðburglary€and€theft.€€For€both€offenses,€he€was€sentenced€as€a€Range€I€offender€to€concurrent,€localÐ v%Æ % Ðconfinement€terms€of€three€years,€to€be€served€via€six€months€in€confinement€and€the€balance€of€theÐ _&¯!& Ðsentences€on€probation.€The€sentences€were€also€ordered€to€be€served€concurrently€with€sentencesÐ H'˜"' Ðin€Jefferson€County,€Arkansas,€ð ðCircuit€CR„91„504ðð.€The€defendant€was€ordered€to€pay€restitutionÐ 1(#( Ðof€$6,340.08€through€monthly€installments€of€$150€each.€€Ð )j$) ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€August€15,€1997,€the€state€filed€a€probation€violation€report,€alleging€that€theÐ ì*<&+ Ðdefendant€had€absconded€because€he€moved€to€Arkansas€in€January€1997€and€had€failed€to€reportÐ Õ+%', Ðâ âto€a€probation€officer€in€that€state.€€The€report€also€alleged€that€the€defendant€had€failed€to€makeÐ ¾,(-ý ÐÔ_Ômonthly€restitution€payments.€€A€probation€violation€warrant€was€apparently€issued€on€SeptemberÐ ° Ð1,€1997.€€Ð ™é Ðâ âÌà  àà ` àOn€January€6,€2004,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€revocation€hearing.€€The€defendant,Ð k» Ðrepresented€by€counsel,€posited€that€because€the€effective€Tennessee€sentences€ran€concurrently€withÐ T¤ Ða€three„year€sentence€in€Arkansas€and€because€the€Arkansas€sentence€had€been€fully€served€inÐ =  Ðconfinement,€the€Tennessee€sentences€had€expired.€€Testifying€at€the€hearing,€the€defendantððs€pro„Ð & v Ðbation€supervisor€acknowledged€that€the€defendantððs€Tennessee€sentence€ran€concurrently€with€anÐ  _ ÐArkansas€sentence.€€She€testified€that€the€defendant€was€released€from€his€six„month€confinementÐ ø H Ðin€Tennessee€on€August€26,€1996,€at€which€time€he€asked€for€transfer€of€his€supervision€to€Arkansas.€Ð á 1  ÐOn€May€15,€1997,€Arkansas€filed€a€violation€report,€alleging€that€the€defendant€had€absconded€fromÐ Ê   Ðprobation€in€his€Arkansas€case,€and€that€state€notified€Tennessee€of€the€absconding.€€On€July€1,Ð ³  Ð1997,€Tennessee€informed€Arkansas€to€discontinue€supervision€on€the€Tennessee€probation€and€thatÐ œì  ÐTennessee€would€resume€responsibility.€Tennessee€then€filed€its€violation€report€in€the€trial€court.€Ð …Õ  ÐShe€did€not€know€whether€the€defendant€received€a€copy€of€this€report.€€She€testified€that,€as€of€theÐ n¾  Ðdate€of€the€hearing,€the€defendant€had€paid€nothing€toward€restitution.€€€€Ð W§  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€relied€upon€a€December€22,€2003€report€of€the€Arkansas€DepartmentÐ )y Ðof€Community€Corrections,€which€was€admitted€into€evidence€at€the€revocation€hearing.€€The€reportÐ b Ðreflected€that,€in€case€number€ð ðCR„91„504€(Aggravated€Robbery)ðð,€the€defendant€served€theÐ ûK Ðfollowing€periods€in€confinement:Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ à€€August€10,€1999€through€December€18,€2000Ð ¶ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à€€August€15,€2001€through€November€5,€2001Ð Ÿï Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ à€€April€19,€2002€through€January€8,€2003.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€January€13,€2004,€the€trial€court€entered€the€order€from€which€the€defendant€nowÐ Zª Ðappeals.€€It€found€that€the€defendant€violated€probation€by€failing€to€report€to€a€probation€officer€asÐ C“ Ðdirected€and€by€failing€to€pay€monthly€restitution€installments.€€In€the€order,€the€court€revoked€theÐ ,| Ðdefendantððs€probation€and€ordered€him€to€serve€the€balance€of€his€sentences€in€confinement.€TheÐ e Ðcourt€allowed€a€total€of€146€daysðð€jail€credit.€Ð þN ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€appeal,€the€defendant€challenges€neither€the€trial€courtððs€bases€for€revokingÐ Ð!   Ðprobation€nor€its€order€requiring€him€to€serve€his€original€sentence.€€Indeed,€the€record€reflects€thatÐ ¹" ! Ðthe€trial€courtððs€decision€to€revoke€probation€was€supported€by€substantial€evidence€and,€therefore,Ð ¢#ò" Ðwas€not€an€abuse€of€discretion.€òò€See€State€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991)€€(standard€ofÐ ‹$Û# Ðreview€upon€appeal€of€an€order€revoking€probation€is€abuse€of€discretion;€no€abuse€of€discretionÐ t%Ä $ Ðoccurs€when€record€contains€substantial€evidence€supporting€a€finding€that€probation€was€violated);Ð ]&­!% Ðòòsee€alsoóó€Tenn.€Code€€Ann.€ðð€40-35-311(e)€(2003)€(stateððs€burden€of€establishing€probation€violationÐ F'–"& Ðis€preponderance€of€the€evidence).€€€Upon€finding€a€violation,€the€trial€court€was€vested€with€theÐ /(#' Ðstatutory€authority€to€ð ðrevoke€the€probation€and€suspension€of€sentence€and€cause€the€defendant€toÐ )h$( Ðcommence€the€execution€of€the€judgment€as€originally€entered.ðð€òòóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(e)Ð *Q%) Ðâ â(2003);€òòsee€also€id.óó€ðð€40„35„310€(2003);òò€State€v.€Dukeóó,€902€S.W.2d€424,€427€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð ê*:&* Ð1995).€€Thus,€we€discern€no€error€in€the€trial€courtððs€decision€to€revoke€probation€and€to€order€theÐ ° Ðbalance€of€the€effective€three„year€sentence€to€be€served€in€confinement.Ð ™é Ðâ âÌà  àà ` àThe€defendantððs€complaint,€rather,€is€that€the€trial€court€awarded€him€insufficient€jailÐ k» Ðcredit€toward€the€fulfilment€of€his€original,€effective€sentence.€€The€state€argues€in€its€brief€that€theÐ T¤ Ðtrial€court€was€justified€in€denying€any€credit€for€the€defendantððs€time€served€in€Arkansas€on€theÐ =  Ðbasis€that€Tennessee€had€no€knowledge€that€the€defendant€was€in€custody€in€Arkansas.€€The€stateÐ & v Ðcitesòòóó€òòHill€v.€Stateóó,€202€Tenn.€416,€304€S.W.2d€619€(1957),€for€the€proposition€that,€during€the€timeÐ  _ Ða€probationer€is€absconding€from€supervision,€the€ð ðrunning€of€a€suspended€sentenceðð€is€tolled.€€FromÐ ø H Ðthis€juncture,€the€state€extrapolates€that,€even€though€the€defendant€had€been€apprehended€and€wasÐ á 1  Ðserving€his€Arkansas€sentence,€he€was€nevertheless€an€absconder€for€purposes€of€the€TennesseeÐ Ê   Ðsentence€because€Tennessee€was€unaware€that€he€was€in€custody.€€Ð ³  ÐÌà  àà ` àFirst,€we€agree€that€òòHillóó€does€provide€for€tolling€of€the€time€for€filing€a€revocationÐ …Õ  Ðpetition€based€upon€the€probationerððs€absconding,€but€we€fail€to€see€how€the€tolling€of€the€time€forÐ n¾  Ðfiling€a€petition€relates€to€the€present€case.€€òòSee€generally€id.óó€(probationerððs€absconding€preventedÐ W§  Ðthe€five„year€probation€period€from€expiring€before€the€petition€was€filed).€€In€the€present€case,€thereÐ @ Ðis€no€question€that€the€petition€was€filed€within€the€time€period€of€the€three„year€probation€period.Ð )y ÐSecond,€the€state€cites€no€authority€for€its€extrapolation€that€Tennesseeððs€lack€of€notice€of€theÐ b Ðdefendantððs€confinement€in€Arkansas€is€a€basis€for€defeating€a€claim€of€time€served€pursuant€to€aÐ ûK Ðconcurrent€sentencing€order.€€Indeed,€we€know€of€no€such€authority€and€do€not€understand€whyÐ ä4 ÐTennesseeððs€ignorance€of€the€concurrent€sentence€being€served€in€Arkansas€defeats€the€de„€fendantððsÐ Í Ðclaim€to€Tennessee€credit€for€the€time€served€in€Arkansas.€Ð ¶ ÐÌà  àà ` àð ðWhen€two€sentences€run€concurrently,€it€merely€means€that,€for€each€day€in€custodyÐ ˆØ Ðwhile€serving€both€sentences,€the€inmate€receives€credit€toward€each€sentence.€€Concurrent€sentencesÐ qÁ Ðdo€no[t]€necessarily€begin€and€end€at€the€same€time€ð!ð€they€simply€run€together€during€the€time€theyÐ Zª Ðoverlap.ðð€€òòBrown€v.€Tennessee€Dept.€of€Correction,óó€11€S.W.3d€911,€913€(Tenn.€Ct.€App.€1999)Ð C“ Ð(quoting€òòBullard€v.€Department€of€Correctionsóó,€949€P.2d€999,€1002€(Colo.€1997)).€€Pursuant€to€thisÐ ,| Ðdefinition,€it€is€clear€to€us€that€when€the€defendant€went€into€custody€to€serve€the€Arkansas€sentenceÐ e Ðwhich,€by€the€terms€of€the€Tennessee€judgments,€ran€concurrently€with€the€effective,€three„yearÐ þN ÐTennessee€sentence,€he€simultaneously€served€his€effective€Tennessee€sentence.€€We€see€nothing€inÐ ç 7 Ðthe€record€to€preclude€this€result,€and€the€trial€court€on€remand€shall€calculate€the€time€to€be€creditedÐ Ð!   Ðtoward€the€Tennessee€sentences€on€account€of€the€defendantððs€time€in€custody€serving€the€concurrentÐ ¹" ! ÐArkansas€sentence.€€Ð ¢#ò" ÐÌà  àà ` àBefore€concluding€our€analysis,€we€look€at€the€provisions€of€the€trial€courtððs€orderÐ t%Ä $ Ðfor€credit€for€time€served€in€Tennessee.€€The€court€properly€allowed€pretrial€jail€credit€from€AprilÐ ]&­!% Ð10,€1996,€to€April€30,€1996,€the€day€the€court€imposed€the€convictions€pursuant€to€the€defendantððsÐ F'–"& Ðguilty€pleas.€òò€Seeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„23„101(c)€(2003).€€The€court€also€allowed€credit€for€theÐ /(#' Ðdefendantððs€post„petition€time€served€in€Tennessee,€December€7,€2003,€to€December€13,€2003.€€òòSeeÐ )h$( Ðid.€óó€The€trial€court,€however,€expressly€allowed€only€a€òòtotal€óóTennessee€time„served€credit€of€146Ð *Q%) Ðâ âdays,€despite€that€the€two€credits€described€above€account€for€approximately€26€daysðð€credit€and€thatÐ ê*:&* Ðthe€defendant€was€originally€ordered€to€serve€ð!ð€and€may€have€served€ð!ð€six€months€of€his€three„yearÐ ° Ðeffective€sentence.€€Ð ™é Ðâ âÌà  àà ` àPursuant€to€Tennessee€Rule€of€Appellate€Procedure€13(b),€we€have€determined€thatÐ k» Ðthe€diminution€of€the€credit€for€the€six„month€confinement€period€to€the€number€of€days€actuallyÐ T¤ Ðserved€in€jail€is€error.€€Apparently€the€defendant€was€awarded€good€conduct€sentence€credits€duringÐ =  Ðhis€service€of€the€six„month€confinement€portion€of€his€three„year€effective€sentence.€€Indeed,€he€wasÐ & v Ðentitled€to€such€credits.€€òòState€v.€Clarkóó,€67€S.W.3d€73,€78€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001).€€Moreover,€thisÐ  _ Ðcourt€has€said€that€a€trial€court€may€not€impose€a€split„confinement€term€in€a€manner€that€denies€theÐ ø H Ðdefendant€statutory€sentencing€credits.€òòState€v.€Larry€K.€Bombaileyóó,€No.€E2003„00421„Ð á 1  ÐCCA-R3-CD,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Jan.€28,€2004)€(order€to€serve€ð ðflatðð€45Ð Ê   Ðdays€of€total€eleven„month„29„day€sentence,€without€allowing€for€applicable€sentencing€credits,€isÐ ³  Ðillegal);€òòaccord€State€v.€Melissa€A.€Mellingeróó,€òòóóNo.€M2002-01029-CCA-R3-CD,€slip€op.€at€3€n.1Ð œì  Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Dec.€10,€2003),òòperm.€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€2004);€òòsee€also€State€v.Ð …Õ  ÐHarley€B.€Upchurchóó,€€No.€M2001„03170„CCA„R3„CD,€slip€op.€at€6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,Ð n¾  ÐSept.€9,€2002)€(applying€òòClarkóó€to€the€split„confinement€term€in€a€felony€sentence).Ð W§  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€upshot€is€that€the€defendant€is€entitled€to€receive€credit€for€the€six„month€splitÐ )y Ðconfinement€term,€which€ð!ð€with€applicable€sentencing€credits€ð!ð€he€ð ðserved.ðð€€€We€recognize€theÐ b Ðpossibility€that€Dyer€County€could€rectify€the€shortage€ð ðon€the€back€sideðð€by€applying€applicableÐ ûK Ðsentencing€credits€for€the€first€six€months€when€it€computes€the€release€date€for€the€òòentire€óóthree„yearÐ ä4 Ðperiod.€€We€also€recognize,€however,€that€proper€accounting€for€credits€for€the€first€six€months€mayÐ Í Ðwell€be€overlooked€when€calculating€a€release€date,€especially€when€the€trial€courtððs€order€of€JanuaryÐ ¶ Ð13,€2004,€purports€to€settle€the€defendantððs€cumulative€sentence€credit€up€to€that€date.€€Therefore,Ð Ÿï Ðin€the€interests€of€justice€and€the€expeditious€rendering€of€same,€on€remand€the€trial€court€shallÐ ˆØ Ðdetermine€whether€its€order€dated€January€13,€2004,€disallowed€the€defendant€the€benefit€ofÐ qÁ Ðmandatory€sentencing€credits.€€If€so,€the€court€shall€modify€the€order€to€provide€for€six€monthsððÐ Zª Ðcredit,€in€addition€to€aforementioned€jail€credits€for€pretrial€and€pre„hearing€confinement.€Ð C“ ÐÌà  àà ` àAccordingly,€the€action€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed,€as€modified€in€this€opinion.€€TheÐ e Ðcause€is€remanded,€and€upon€remand,€the€trial€court€shall€(1)€make€an€appropriate€determination€ofÐ þN Ðcredit€to€be€applied€to€the€effective€Tennessee€sentence€on€account€of€the€defendantððs€serving€timeÐ ç 7 Ðon€his€concurrent€Arkansas€sentence,€and€(2)€determine€whether,€as€guided€by€this€opinion,€theÐ Ð!   Ðdefendant€should€receive€full€credit€for€the€six€monthsðð€split„confinement€previously€ordered€andÐ ¹" ! Ðserved.€€Ð ¢#ò" ÐÌòòóóÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð /(#' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE