ÿWPC£ ZrÛ•ÄK±%‚PÏ…^W°} òrÏÿQ¡„TC~W¡ìL"q[ó­Ü?¼ÇÚcâDù«-!>NLÀõSÞñÕHì@&z ÔyȬVxiØbÌÝV}J"îä¢h†ñ7ód‰óƒ×cÛʃUú‡¨?½Ž>ÈùTܙݎ„= ·\h N~ ubt³Z4Ñ•w„¨3øíúC¦½‰ÆÞ“IŒÖ¢Ëë~ìý^›å$øÆsxS¢*x0\s oÍ<¯„Ø7À㜊0Wﺫ¼u㬜=l“úÐRïDæ€éjÎC#Œr³p"óØOST¾9¸Õ :hgËÍe[%Î1žn`醣ø ìb %\^ b 0ˆnU+NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ Ð 0Dã Æ' Æí Ƴ Æy #Á?NU@JBEŒŒŒŒŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽb–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 0ëžžžž B‰‰ 0¤¦ D5J D- 0K¬¬ AS÷ÆJ 0¤ 0D´ A«ø»Ø¡t+â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*ê:i¢Ø+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Ý ƒR¦‰$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô§ ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThis€error€has€no€significance€as€it€relates€to€the€conviction€for€possession€of€cocaine.€€We€affirm€thatÐ ° Ðconviction.€€(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman  @Ý ƒR¦‰$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô§ ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔThe€defendant€does€not€challenge€his€conviction€for€simple€possession€of€cocaine.€€However,€we€conclude€theÐ ° Ðevidence€is€sufficient€to€sustain€this€conviction. - ù-(|G2¦‰$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô§ ò»»Ô d(|3ÿ_$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿ_$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€%»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼%»»»ÔÑ8€[éXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îd%ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼%»îîd #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€September€25,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡X[éX»¼%ÔÌò òÔ#†¼%»XX[é #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JIMMY€JOE€Ô_ÔRITTENBERRYÔ_ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Anderson€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€98CR0280€€€€€€James€B.€Scott,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„02722„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐNovember€20,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓÓÓÌÓÓThe€defendant€was€convicted€by€a€jury€on€one€count€of€sale€of€marijuana,€a€Class€E€felony,€and€oneÐ P  Ðcount€of€possession€of€cocaine,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€In€this€appeal,€the€defendant€contends€(1)Ð <Œ Ðthe€evidence€is€insufficient€to€sustain€the€sale€of€marijuana€conviction;€(2)€the€trial€court€erroneouslyÐ (x Ðadmitted€rebuttal€testimony€regarding€an€undisclosed,€out„of„court€statement€made€by€the€defendant;Ð d Ðand€(3)€the€trial€court€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€on€simple€possession€of€marijuana€as€a€lesser„Ð P Ðincluded€offense.€€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€conclude€(1)€the€evidence€is€sufficientÐ ì< Ðto€sustain€the€convictions;€(2)€the€failure€of€the€state€to€disclose€the€out„of„court€statement€madeÐ Ø( Ðduring€the€defendantððs€interrogation€violated€Tenn.€R.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€P.€16(a)(1)(A);€and€(3)€the€trial€courtÐ Ä Ðerroneously€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€on€simple€possession€of€marijuana€as€a€lesser„included€offense.€Ð ° ÐThe€conviction€for€sale€of€marijuana€is€reversed;€the€conviction€for€possession€of€cocaine€is€affirmed;Ð œì Ðand€this€matter€is€remanded€for€a€new€trial€on€the€sale€of€marijuana.€€Ð ˆØ ÐÓÛÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Reversed€in€Part;Ð `° ÐAffirmed€in€Part;€and€Remanded.Ô#†¼%»XX[é¢#ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ô€Ô#†¼%»XX[é #ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ôó óÐ L œ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼%»àX[éO #ÔÔ‡X[éX.¼%ÔJoe€G.€Riley,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_ÔóóÔ#†¼%»XX[é¹ #ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ô€andòòÔ#†¼%»àX[és #ÔÔ‡X[éX.¼%Ô€Alan€E.Ð $"t! ÐGlenn,óó€JJ.,€joinedÔ#†¼%»XX[é¼ #ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ô.€€òòóóÔ#†¼%»XX[é0 #ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%ÔÐ #`" ÐÌJ.€Thomas€Marshall,€Jr.,€District€Public€Defender,€for€the€appellant,€Jimmy€Joe€Ô_ÔRittenberryÔ_Ô.Ð è$8 $ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€A.€Ô_ÔFulksÔ_Ô,Ô#†¼%»XX[é{ #ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ô€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ô#†¼%»XX[éÃ#ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%ÔÐ À&"& ÐJames€N.€Ramsey,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Jan€Hicks,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð ¬'ü"' Ðfor€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼%»XX[é!#ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%Ô€Ô#†¼%»XX[é#ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%ÔÐ ˜(è#( ÐÓŠ ÓÌò òÌÌÌÐ 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_ÔOPINIONó óÔ#†¼%»XX[éT#ÔÔ‡X[éX»¼%ÔÐ ° ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼%»XX[éõ#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X[éX»¼%Ôà@!ìàò òFACTUAL€BACKGROUNDó óˆÐ ˆØ ÐÌà  àJames€White€agreed€to€become€a€police€informant€after€officers€found€marijuana€plantsÐ `° Ðgrowing€at€his€residence.€€White€notified€officers€he€could€ð ðbuy€some€[drugs]€from€[the€defendant].ððÐ L œ ÐWith€the€assistance€of€White,€officers€initiated€a€controlled€buy€from€the€defendant,€from€whichÐ 8 ˆ Ðthese€charges€arose.€€Ð $ t ÐÌÌà@22#ìàò òTRIAL€TESTIMONYó óˆÐ è 8  ÐÌà  àSuzannah€Cooper,€an€Anderson€County€Deputy€Sheriff,€testified€she€assisted€in€the€organizedÐ À  Ðdrug€buy€on€May€29,€1998.€€After€arriving€that€day€at€the€drug€office,€she€searched€White€andÐ ¬ü  ÐWhiteððs€vehicle,€finding€no€weapons€or€drugs.€€White€was€equipped€with€a€hidden€ð ðwireðð€and€givenÐ ˜è  Ðcurrency,€consisting€of€two€$50€bills€and€one€$100€bill.€€White€drove€his€truck,€and€Cooper€sat€to€hisÐ „Ô  Ðimmediate€right.€€They€arrived€at€the€prearranged€site,€a€grocery€parking€lot,€and€waited€for€theÐ pÀ Ðdefendantððs€arrival.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€arrived€in€his€vehicle,€circled€the€parking€lot,€and€parked€immediately€besideÐ 4„ ÐWhiteððs€truck.€€At€that€point,€White€exited€the€truck€and€walked€to€the€defendantððs€driverððs€window.€Ð  p ÐCooper€stated€she€observed€the€two€converse€momentarily;€White€handed€the€defendant€money€withÐ  \ Ðone€hand;€and€the€defendant,€simultaneously,€handed€White€a€baggy€containing€what€later€tested€toÐ øH Ðbe€25€grams€of€marijuana.€€Cooper€stated€she€observed€White€with€the€bag€in€his€hand.€€Immediately,Ð ä4 Ðthe€supporting€officers€initiated€an€arrest€of€the€defendant€and€mock€arrests€of€Cooper€and€White€inÐ Ð  Ðorder€to€conceal€their€identities.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àDeputy€Alan€Gromstorm€was€present€at€the€scene.€€Gromstorm€testified€he€pulled€theÐ ”ä Ðdefendant€out€of€his€vehicle,€forced€him€on€the€ground,€and€handcuffed€him.€€When€GromstromÐ €Ð Ðrolled€the€defendant€over,€he€saw€the€money€on€the€ground.€€Gromstorm€then€searched€theÐ l¼ Ðdefendantððs€vehicle€and€found€cocaine€located€in€a€cigarette€package€inside€the€vehicleððs€console.€Ð X ¨ ÐThe€cocaine€was€subsequently€determined€to€weigh€0.3€grams.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àDeputy€Gromstorm€further€testified€that€following€the€defendantððs€arrest,€the€defendant€wasÐ #l! Ðtransported€to€the€drug€enforcement€office€for€the€purpose€of€securing€his€cooperation€in€future€drugÐ $X" Ðenforcement€efforts.€€There,€the€defendant€signed€a€statement€written€by€Gromstorm,€which€was€readÐ ô$D # Ðinto€the€record€as€€follows:€€Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àAfter€being€arrested€for€selling€an€ounce€of€marijuana€to€aÐ ¸'#& Ðsubject€in€Hensleyððs€parking€lot€this€date€approximately€at€5:00€p.m.Ð ¤(ô#' Ðand€then€deputies€finding€a€half€of€gram€of€cocaine,€I€talked€to€DeputyÐ )à$( ÐGronstrom€after€he€read€my€rights€to€me,€which€I€understood€andÐ |*Ì%) Ðhave€agreed€to€work€with€Anderson€County€Sheriffððs€Office€DrugÐ h+¸&* ÐEnforcement€Unit€as€an€informant.€€I€am€aware€that€the€charges€I€wasÐ ° Ðarrested€on€can€be€brought€up€to€the€Grand€Jury€and€I€can€be€indicted.€Ð œì ÐI€realize€that€no€promises€have€been€made€to€me€and€that€no€coercionÐ ˆØ Ðwas€used€to€make€me€decide€to€work€with€the€Drug€EnforcementÐ tÄ ÐUnit.€€I€find€no€harm€in€being€arrested,€taken€into€custody€and€thenÐ `° Ðbeing€released€without€being€charged.€€I€am€not€intoxicated€or€underÐ L œ Ðthe€influence€of€drugs.€€Written€by€Alan€Gronstrom€for€Jimmy€JoeÐ 8 ˆ ÐRittenberry€per€his€request.€€Ð$ t` x` x ÐÌThe€defendant€was€then€released€from€police€custody.€€Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àSergeant€Thurman€Baird€of€the€Anderson€County€Sheriffððs€Department€also€assisted€in€theÐ Ô$  Ðcontrolled€buy.€€Following€the€defendantððs€arrest,€he€found€the€marijuana€which€Deputy€CooperÐ À  Ðidentified€as€that€which€was€handed€to€White.€€Baird€stated€he€found€the€marijuana€located€in€ð ðaÐ ¬ü  Ðfactory€molded€type€tray€that€is€inside€the€door€of€the€panel€of€the€vehicle,ðð€and€it€was€ð ðlaying€in€theÐ ˜è  Ðtray€there,€on€top.ðð€€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àWhite€did€not€testify,€and€his€whereabouts€were€unknown€at€the€time€of€trial.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€he€was€Whiteððs€friend€and€mechanic.€€He€stated€he€worked€onÐ 4„ ÐWhiteððs€truck€on€Tuesday€prior€to€his€arrest.€€White€informed€the€defendant€he€was€unable€to€payÐ  p Ðhim€until€he€was€paid€on€the€following€Friday.€€Subsequently,€they€agreed€to€meet€on€Friday€at€theÐ  \ Ðgrocery€store€in€order€for€White€to€pay€the€defendant€for€the€work,€which€totaled€$160.€€TheÐ øH Ðdefendant€testified€that€when€he€arrived,€White€showed€him€the€money,€and€officers€immediatelyÐ ä4 Ðinitiated€the€arrest.€€The€defendant€testified€he€neither€handed€marijuana€to€White€nor€met€him€withÐ Ð  Ðthe€intention€of€selling€marijuana.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àIn€rebuttal,€Deputy€Gronstrom€testified€over€objection€that€during€the€interview€subsequentÐ ”ä Ðto€the€defendantððs€arrest,€the€defendant€ð ðtold€[him]€he€went€there€to€sell€that€package€of€marijuanaÐ €Ð Ðto€another€subject.ðð€€Ð l¼ ÐÌÌà@  ìàò òI.€€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEó óˆÐ 0"€  ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€sustain€his€conviction€for€sale€ofÐ $X" Ðmarijuana.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€We€respectfully€disagree.€€Ð ô$D # ÐÌò òÌÌÐ ¤(ô#' ÐA.€€Standard€of€Reviewó óÐ ° ÐÌÔ‡X[éXXX[éÔà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€court€must€review€theÐ ˆØ Ðrecord€to€determine€if€the€evidence€adduced€during€the€trial€was€sufficient€"to€support€the€findingsÐ tÄ Ðby€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt."€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€This€rule€isÐ `° Ðapplicable€to€findings€of€guilt€predicated€upon€direct€evidence,€circumstantial€evidence€or€aÐ L œ Ðcombination€of€direct€and€circumstantial€evidence.€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€932€S.W.2d€1,18€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð 8 ˆ ÐApp.1996).€€Ð $ t ÐÌ€à  àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€court€does€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€theÐ ü L  Ðevidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.1978).€€This€court€is€required€to€afford€theÐ è 8  Ðstate€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonableÐ Ô$  Ðand€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Tuttleóó,€914€S.W.2d€926,Ð À  Ð932€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1995).€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌÔ#†X[éXXX[é*#Ôò òB.€€Analysisó óÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àDeputy€Cooper€testified€she€saw€the€defendant€hand€a€baggy€containing€a€green€leafyÐ \¬ Ðsubstance€to€White€in€exchange€for€money€and€saw€White€actually€holding€the€bag€just€beforeÐ H˜ Ðofficers€moved€in€for€the€arrest.€€The€substance€was€found€ð ðlaying€in€the€[door]€trayðð€of€theÐ 4„ Ðdefendantððs€vehicle.€€The€substance€was€later€chemically€analyzed€and€identified€as€25€grams€ofÐ  p Ðmarijuana.€€Although€the€defendant€testified€he€did€not€sell€marijuana€to€White,€it€was€within€theÐ  \ Ðjury's€province€to€determine€credibility.€€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€554,€558€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð øH Ð1991)€(the€credibility€of€the€witnesses€is€entrusted€to€the€sound€discretion€of€the€jury€as€the€trier€ofÐ ä4 Ðfact).€€The€evidence€was€more€than€sufficient€to€support€the€conviction.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌÌà@ÿ ÿ ìàò òII.€€DEFENDANTððS€STATEMENTó óˆÐ ”ä ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€challenges€the€admission€of€his€statement,€offered€as€rebuttal€testimony,€thatÐ l¼ Ðð ðhe€went€there€to€sell€that€package€of€marijuana€to€another€subject,ðð€claiming€it€was€improperÐ X ¨ Ðrebuttal€testimony;€it€was€not€provided€to€him€through€pretrial€discovery;€and€the€statement€wasÐ D!” Ðinvoluntary.€€We€conclude€the€oral€statement€was€admitted€in€violation€of€the€discovery€rule,€and€theÐ 0"€  Ðfailure€of€the€state€to€furnish€it€was€prejudicial€to€defendant.€€Ð #l! ÐÌò òA.€€Improper€Rebuttal€Testimonyó óÐ ô$D # ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€on€direct€examination€that€he€did€not€go€to€the€parking€lot€for€theÐ Ì&"% Ðpurpose€of€selling€marijuana.€€The€testimony€of€the€officer€directly€contradicted€defendantððsÐ ¸'#& Ðtestimony.€€Rebuttal€testimony€is€that€which€explains€or€controverts€other€evidence.€€òòCozzolino€v.Ð ¤(ô#' ÐStateóó,€584€S.W.2d€765,€768€(Tenn.€1979).€€Defendantððs€contention€that€this€was€not€proper€rebuttalÐ )à$( Ðis€without€merit.€€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðò òB.€€Discovery€Violationó óÐ ° ÐÌà  àTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€16(a)(1)(A)€states:€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌÒ°ÒÓ XÓUpon€request€of€a€defendant€the€State€shall€permit€the€defendant€to€inspect€and€copyÐ `° Ðor€photograph:€€any€relevant€written€or€recorded€statements€made€by€the€defendant,Ð L œ Ðor€copies€thereof,€within€the€possession,€custody€or€control€of€the€State,€the€existenceÐ 8 ˆ Ðof€which€is€known,€or€by€the€exercise€of€due€diligence€may€become€known,€to€theÐ $ t Ðdistrict€attorney€general;€€òòthe€substance€of€any€oral€statement€which€the€State€intendsÐ  ` Ðto€offer€in€evidence€at€the€trial€made€by€the€defendant€whether€before€or€after€arrestÐ ü L  Ðin€response€to€interrogations€by€any€person€then€known€to€the€defendant€to€be€a€lawÐ è 8  Ðenforcement€officer€.€.€.€.ó󀀀РÔ$  ÐÌÒ°&8ÒÓ X48Ó(Emphasis€added).€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€state€is€required€to€reveal€the€substance€of€any€oral€statement€made€by€an€accused€inÐ „Ô  Ðresponse€to€an€officerððs€interrogation€if€it€is€intended€to€be€used€in€either€its€case„in„chief€or€rebuttal.€Ð pÀ ÐòòState€v.€Jenkinsóó,€859€S.W.2d€364,€365€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòState€v.€Balthropóó,€752€S.W.2d€104,Ð \¬ Ð107€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€€To€necessitate€a€reversal€due€to€a€discovery€violation,€the€defendantÐ H˜ Ðmust€prove€prejudice.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Payneóó,€791€S.W.2d€10,€16€(Tenn.€1990),€òòaffððdóó,€501€U.S.€808,€111Ð 4„ ÐS.€Ct.€2597,€115€L.€Ed.€2d€720€(1991).€€Ð  p ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€made€a€timely€request€for€any€written,€recorded,€or€oral€statements€made€byÐ øH Ðthe€defendant€pursuant€to€Rule€16.€€The€state€provided€the€defendant€with€the€written€statementÐ ä4 Ðsigned€by€him,€but€failed€to€provide€the€substance€of€the€oral€admission€of€the€defendant;€namely,Ð Ð  Ðthat€he€went€to€the€parking€lot€to€sell€marijuana€to€White.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àThe€written€statement€and€oral€statement€were€markedly€different.€€Although€the€writtenÐ ”ä Ðstatement€conceded€the€defendant€had€been€arrested,€it€did€not€directly€inculpate€the€defendant.€€TheÐ €Ð Ðoral€statement,€on€the€other€hand,€was€a€direct€admission.€€Accordingly,€we€conclude€the€defendantÐ l¼ Ðwas€not€provided€ð ðthe€substance€of€[his]€oral€statementðð€in€his€discovery€request,€as€required€byÐ X ¨ ÐTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€16(a)(1)(A).€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àFurthermore,€we€conclude€the€stateððs€failure€to€provide€the€defendant€with€the€substance€ofÐ #l! Ðhis€oral€statement€was€prejudicial.€€Defendant€filed€a€pre„trial€motion€to€suppress€the€writtenÐ $X" Ðstatement€but€subsequently€withdrew€it,€believing€it€was€not€incriminatory.€€When€the€trial€courtÐ ô$D # Ðindicated€at€trial€that€the€undisclosed€oral€statement€would€be€admissible,€defendant€twice€movedÐ à%0!$ Ðfor€a€suppression€hearing,€alleging€the€statement€was€involuntary.€€This€was€the€first€opportunity€theÐ Ì&"% Ðdefendant€had€to€suppress€this€statement€since€he€was€unaware€of€it€until€after€the€defendant€testifiedÐ ¸'#& Ðat€trial.€€The€trial€court€did€not€conduct€a€suppression€hearing,€and€the€officerððs€testimonyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðimmediately€followed.€€We€do€not€know€whether€the€request€to€suppress€had€merit€since€no€hearingÐ )à$( Ðwas€allowed.€€Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àFor€these€reasons,€we€conclude€the€failure€of€the€state€to€disclose€pre„trial€the€substance€ofÐ ° Ðthe€oral€statement€was€a€violation€of€Rule€16(a)(1)(A),€and€the€defendant€was€prejudiced€by€notÐ œì Ðbeing€allowed€to€pursue€a€motion€to€suppress.׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌÌà@ ìàò òIII.€€LESSER„INCLUDED€OFFENSEó óˆÐ L œ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€alleges€the€trial€court€erroneously€failed€to€instruct€the€jury€on€the€lesser„Ð $ t Ðincluded€offense€of€simple€possession€of€marijuana.€€We€agree€and€find€the€omission€was€notÐ  ` Ðharmless€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt.€€Ð ü L  ÐÌÓ  Óò òB.€€òòBurnsóó€Analysisó óÐ Ô$  ÐÌÓ  Óà  àSimple€possession€of€a€controlled€substance€is€a€lesser„included€offense€of€the€sale€of€aÐ ¬ü  Ðcontrolled€substance€under€part€(a)€of€the€òòBurnsóó€test.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€466€(Tenn.Ð ˜è  Ð1999);€òòState€v.€Curtis€Emery€Dukeóó,€No.€M2000„00350„CCA„R3„CD,€2001€WL€252080,€at€*4€(Tenn.Ð „Ô  ÐCrim.€App.€filed€Mar.€14,€2001,€at€Nashville)€òòperm.€to€app.€pendingóó€(concluding€simple€possessionÐ pÀ Ðof€cocaine€is€a€lesser„included€offense€of€sale€of€cocaine).€ò òó ó€Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àOur€analysis,€however,€must€not€conclude€there€for€we€must€now€conduct€a€two„part€inquiryÐ 4„ Ðto€determine€if€the€trial€court€should€have€instructed€the€jury€on€this€lesser„included€offense.€€òòBurnsóó,Ð  p Ð6€S.W.3d€at€468.€€First,€we€must€determine€ð ðwhether€any€evidence€exists€that€reasonable€minds€couldÐ  \ Ðaccept€as€to€the€lesser-included€offense€.€.€.€[viewing€the€evidence]€liberally€in€the€light€mostÐ øH Ðfavorable€to€the€existence€of€the€lesser-included€offense€without€making€any€judgments€on€theÐ ä4 Ðcredibility€of€such€evidence.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€469.€€Next,€we€must€determine€ð ðif€the€evidence,€viewed€in€thisÐ Ð  Ðlight,€is€legally€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction€for€the€lesser-included€offense.ðð€€òòId.óó€€Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àDeputy€Cooper€testified€she€saw€the€defendant€hand€White€the€marijuana€while€White€handedÐ ”ä Ðthe€defendant€money.€€However,€the€defendant€testified€he€never€transferred€marijuana€to€White,€but€Ð €Ð Ðinstead,€only€received€payment€for€repairs€he€made€to€Whiteððs€vehicle.€€Furthermore,€the€marijuanaÐ l¼ Ðwas€found€inside€of€the€defendantððs€vehicle€following€his€arrest.€€Clearly,€reasonable€minds€couldÐ X ¨ Ðaccept€the€lesser„included€offense,€and€the€evidence€was€legally€sufficient€to€sustain€a€conviction€forÐ D!” Ðsimple€possession.€€Accordingly,€the€trial€court€erroneously€neglected€to€charge€the€jury€on€simpleÐ 0"€  Ðpossession.€€Ð #l! ÐÌÓ  Óò òB.€€Harmless€Erroró óÐ ô$D # ÐÌÓ  Óà  àAlthough€we€have€concluded€the€trial€court€erroneously€neglected€to€charge€the€jury€onÐ Ì&"% Ðsimple€possession€of€marijuana,€we€must€now€determine€if€the€failure€was€harmless€beyond€aÐ ¸'#& Ðreasonable€doubt.€€Our€state€supreme€court€has€applied€the€harmless€error€doctrine€where€the€juryÐ ¤(ô#' Ðwas€instructed€on€at€least€one€higher€lesser„included€offense,€and€the€jury,€nevertheless,€convictedÐ ° Ðon€the€greater€offense.€€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€977€S.W.2d€101,€105€(Tenn.€1998);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.Ð œì ÐSwindleóó,€30€S.W.3d€289,€294€(Tenn.€2000).€€Such€harmless€error€must€be€established€beyond€aÐ ˆØ Ðreasonable€doubt.€€òòState€v.€Elyóó,€48€S.W.3d€710,€714€(Tenn.€2001).€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àIn€the€instant€case,€the€trial€court€charged€the€jury€on€the€lesser„included€offense€of€attemptedÐ L œ Ðsale€of€marijuana,€a€Class€A€misdemeanor,€and€the€jury€rejected€this€charge€and€found€the€defendantÐ 8 ˆ Ðguilty€of€the€greater€offense€of€sale€of€marijuana,€a€Class€E€Felony.€€However,€simple€possession€ofÐ $ t Ðmarijuana€and€attempted€sale€of€marijuana€are€both€Class€A€misdemeanors,€so€the€òòWilliamsóóharmlessÐ  ` Ðerror€analysis€does€not€literally€apply.€€Although€it€is€arguable€the€jury€would€likewise€have€declinedÐ ü L  Ðto€convict€on€simple€possession€of€marijuana,€we€are€unable€to€reach€this€conclusion€beyond€aÐ è 8  Ðreasonable€doubt€in€light€of€the€facts€and€circumstances€of€this€case.€€For€these€reasons,€we€areÐ Ô$  Ðunable€to€conclude€the€error€was€harmless.€€Ð À  ÐÌÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àWe€affirm€the€defendantððs€conviction€for€possession€of€cocaine,€reverse€his€conviction€forÐ \¬ Ðsale€of€marijuana,€and€remand€for€a€new€trial€on€the€charge€of€sale€of€marijuana.€€Ð H˜ ÐÓ  Óòòóóà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ä4 Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGE