WPC 3!?1xVJfTj@3k[8fc[TT $A0D7O/L5[qG<)Tϐ*\78~x̖SH@}hq/%Z*4vhL'aadx-lč"1} ,)"^euU]GdF?%:*5d"斔պ"TC*=jg)Ame=Si} u >HxMYjnNP{ kVbCJӬVnV{Fm9[4 A{.Q 8=HWZSfQVG6MjOYl̀&#{Ҕ]f;eGTS<ﴀ`  $-\:g:bpiu!mE_H~Q.s6('âRY~+j!_#b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz   _ %  UNNEb 0     B 0 D5 D- 0K ASd 0} 0D! AeHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0v) (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular"q~)+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2[X$ !.8@d d 8         0  #@ d(|3 $ !.8@d d 8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3 $ !.8@d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8Kd d8     _   8:XXdd 8@ttֱINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#ֱ #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefs @  @` November8,2000 L XlX #XXl#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.DONALLENRODGERSXlX  J  AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforMadisonCounty  J @@No.98136,98232RoyB.Morgan,Jr.,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200000714CCAR3CDFiledDecember6,2000   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thedefendantappealsthetrialcourtsrevocationofhiscommunitycorrectionssentenceandthe x  impositionofincarcerationintheDepartmentofCorrection.Findingnoabuseofthetrialcourts d discretioninmakingeitherdetermination,weaffirm. P  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed.  (x   #Xl#XlX.James_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_and P DavidH.Welles,JJ.,joined. < StephenP._Spracher_,AssistantPublicDefender,fortheAppellant,DonAllenRodgers#XXl#XlX.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter,PatriciaC._Kussman_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,  JamesG._Woodall_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,JodyPickens,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,for  theAppellee,StateofTennessee. t P@@OO& OPINION #XXlJ#XlX $"t!      ` Thedefendant,DonAllenRodgers,appealstheMadisonCountyCircuitCourts #L# revocationofhiscommunitycorrectionssentence.Pursuanttothedefendantsguiltypleas,thetrial $8 $ courtonSeptember22,1998convictedthedefendantofaggravatedburglaryandthirteencountsof %$!% forgery.Itimposedaneffectivetenyearsentence,withnineyearstobeservedoncommunity &"& correctionsafterservingthefirstyearintheTeenChallengedrugtreatmentprogram.OnFebruary '"' 22,2000,thestatefiledrevocationwarrants,andafteraMarch20,2000revocationhearing,thetrial (#( courtfoundthatthedefendant,whileservinghiscommunitycorrectionssentence,usedcocaineand )$) committedtheftandforgery.Itrevokedthecommunitycorrectionssentenceandorderedthe p*%* defendanttoservehissentenceintheDepartmentofCorrection(DOC),witharecommendationthat \+&+ theDOCplacethedefendantinaspecialneedsprogramforhisdrugdependencyproblem.The H,', defendantappealstherevocationofhiscommunitycorrectionssentenceandtheordertoservehis 4-(- _sentenceinconfinement.Afterareviewoftherecord,thebriefsoftheparties,andtheapplicable  law,weaffirmtherevocation.     ` Theevidenceattherevocationhearingshowedthatthedefendantadmittedtohis t casesupervisorthatheusedcocaineduringhiscommunitycorrectionssentence.Also,aJackson ` policeofficertestifiedthatthedefendantadmittedstealingandforgingcheckswhileoncommunity L  correctionsplacement.Atthetimeoftherevocationhearing,chargesforthesenewoffenseshad 8  beenfiledandwerepending.Thedefendanttestified,andalthoughheacknowledgedtheuseof $ t cocaine,hedeniedtellingthepoliceofficerthathehadengagedintheftandforgery.Whencross  ` examinedabouttheseoffenses,thedefendantprofessedalackofmemoryandattributedhislackof  L  memoryandhisotherfailingswhileoncommunitycorrectionstohisdrugaddiction.Healso  8  blamedthetrialcourtandthecommunitycorrectionspersonnelforhisfailings,becausetheyhadnot $  persistedinprovidinghimwithdrugrehabilitation.      ` Thedecisiontorevokeacommunitycorrectionssentencerestswithinthesound   discretionofthetrialcourtandwillnotbedisturbedonappealunlessthereisnosubstantialevidence   tosupportthetrialcourtsconclusionthataviolationhasoccurred.Statev.Haskins,811S.W.2d p 79,82(Tenn.1991).Inreviewingthetrialcourtsfinding,itisourobligationtoexaminetherecord \ anddeterminewhetherthetrialcourthasexercisedaconscientiousjudgmentratherthananarbitrary H one.Statev.Mitchell,810S.W.2d733,735(Tenn.Crim.App.1991).Iftheevidenceissufficient, 4 thetrialcourtmay,withinitsdiscretionaryauthority,revokethecommunitycorrectionssentenceand  p requirethedefendanttoservehissentenceinconfinement.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(e)(3)  \ (Supp.1998). H    ` Onappeal,thedefendantarguesthatthetrialcourteithershouldhavecontinuedthe   defendantoncommunitycorrectionsfordrugtreatmentprogramsorshouldhaveutilizedsomeother   rehabilitativeprogramshortofincarceration.Wemustdisagree.Weconcludethatthetrialcourt  actedwellwithinitsdiscretioninrevokingthecommunitycorrectionssentenceandimposing  confinement.     ` Therecordreflectsnotone,buttwobasesforrevokingthecommunitycorrections X  sentence.Thedefendantadmittedtheuseofcocaine,andthetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendant D! committedthetheftandforgery.Hewasconvincinglyimplicatedintheselatteroffensesbyhis 0"  confessiontoapoliceofficer.Thedefendantwasgiventhebenefitofanalternativesentence;yet, #l! hehasdemonstratedthathewillcontinuecommittingtheftstosupporthisdrughabituntilheis $X" preventedfromdoingsobyconfinement.Therecordcogentlysupportsthetrialcourtsaction. $D #    ` Forthesereasons,weaffirmthetrialcourtsrevocationofthecommunitycorrections &"% sentenceandimpositionofconfinement.#XXl7 #XlX '#&    `     h     ___________________________________ )$(    `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE