ÿWPCÖ Øk¬§‘z†ðNßb×WæÚö¥'íéuðo€hÆ{Þ~F±TÕøXJAdªÖBË¿Q©oC«¢Ö 0±·£GžÅO % °?Äü­WöF­9ÃÅ%â°cÓUÿù|*5esî 3Ÿí  üÍ#`v±5þœÚYÖÐAà@$’ÛŒplŠBgo߯öþ"ÏJ¦EœÑ.|ƒÚ0Šô$5ž,¨48Þö–Q Î˜ÐùR®ðdßô,ÍõКéè-­F¢³…w3¿ê·Ïô Ç1®dBIS’6î'~3•¬ÒZšfq öž…)9k¨Î#½æíÃÍáÃb2Á j•œm˜n< Jj1T#„·Ûòí'Û'Ü%‘¼:Ób#Á\ % N# 0ˆ% U N­ ­ ­ zû Òu zG ÒÁ ^ “ wŸ Æ£ Æi Æ/Æõ4»NÏÑàEâ mäU!@û 0D;;;U>…ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃbËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËËË 0ëÓÓÓÓ B¾¾ 0¤Û D3 D-² 0Kßß AS*Æ} 0¤C 0Dç A«+˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt/’+â Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5yG*Œ*ödJoAnne3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÆúI Z‹(Times New Roman (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó üÝ ƒRsâ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôîò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€ôîòòôîÔThe€first€four€criteria€are€found€in€òòGrayóó.€€A€fifth€category€in€òòGrayóó,€based€on€a€specific€number€of€prior€felonyÐ ° Ðconvictions,€may€enhance€the€sentence€range€but€is€no€longer€a€listed€criterion.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115,Ð tÄ ÐSentencing€Commission€Comments.Ô‡ôHÕ òòôîÔ<@ˆÐ9Z &Courier Regular - ù-(|G2sâ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€BM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôîò»»Ô d(|3Gz$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€BM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gz$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€BM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€BM»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼BM»»»ÔÑ8€ ÁXXdì»»d8ÑÔ€¼BM»»¼BMÔà@ttìàÔ‡îLÓBMÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼BM»îîLÓ+#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àJuly€24,€2001€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔÌò òÔ#†¼BM»XX Á2#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€STELLA€RODIFERòòóóÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Washington€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNos.€24766,€25469„71,€25681,€25682,€25684,€and€25795€€€€Robert€E.€Cupp,€Judge€Ð æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2001„00034„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐAugust€23,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Stella€Rodifer,€was€convicted€of€forgery,€a€felony;€six€counts€of€worthless€checksÐ xÈ  Ðunder€$500.00,€misdemeanors;€and€one€count€of€worthless€checks€over€$1,000.00,€a€felony.€€TheÐ d´ Ðdefendant€was€sentenced€to€consecutive€terms€of€two€and€four€years,€respectively,€on€each€of€theÐ P  Ðfelonies.€€Ô#†¼BM»XX Á¨#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔThe€trial€court€imposed€concurrent€sentences€of€11€months€and€29€days€on€eachÐ <Œ Ðmisdemeanor,€two€of€which€were€ordered€to€be€served€consecutively€for€an€effective€sentence€ofÐ (x Ðseven€years,€11€months,€and€27€days.€€The€trial€court€granted€probation€on€the€misdemeanors€andÐ d Ðsentenced€the€defendant€to€a€Community€Corrections€program€on€the€felonies.€€Four€months€later,Ð P Ðthe€trial€court€revoked€the€alternative€sentences€and€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€four€years€forÐ ì< Ðforgery;€eight€years€for€felony€worthless€checks;€and€11€months€and€29€days€(two€consecutive)€forÐ Ø( Ðeach€of€the€six€counts€of€worthless€checks,€for€an€effective€sentence€of€13€years,€11€months,€and€27Ð Ä Ðdays.€€In€this€appeal€of€right,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€revoking€her€alternativeÐ ° Ðsentences€and€by€imposing€lengthier,€consecutive€sentences.€€The€judgments€are€affirmed.€Ð œì ÐÓûÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgments€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ tÄ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼BM»àX Á’#ÔÔ‡X ÁX.¼BMÔGary€R.€Wade,€P.J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Woodallóó€andÐ L œ ÐòòRobert€W.€Wedemeyer,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌRichard€A.€Spivey,€Kingsport,€Tennessee€(on€appeal),€and€Roger€Day,€Johnson€City,€Tennessee€(atÐ #`" Ðtrial),€for€the€appellant,€Stella€Rodifer.€€€Ð ü#L# ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Angele€M.€Gregory,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð Ô%$!% Ðand€Steve€Finney,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð À&"& ÐÌÌÓ- ÓÐ  „)Ô$)ý ÐÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼BM»XX Á\ #ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔÐ ° ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼BM»XX Ár#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔÓ  ÓÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà  àOn€October€2,€2000,€the€defendant€was€placed€on€probation€for€her€misdemeanor€offensesÐ ˆØ Ðand€placed€within€the€Community€Corrections€program€for€her€felony€offenses.€€On€November€14,Ð tÄ Ð2000,€the€defendant's€probation/Community€Corrections€supervisor€alleged€that€the€defendant€hadÐ `° Ðviolated€the€conditions€of€her€alternative€sentencing€by€committing€the€crime€of€extortion€orÐ L œ Ðembezzlement€in€Unicoi€County.€€At€the€revocation€hearing,€Matt€Rice€of€the€Unicoi€CountyÐ 8 ˆ ÐSheriff's€Department€testified€that€the€defendant,€who€worked€at€a€metal€shop,€misrepresented€herselfÐ $ t Ðto€the€victim,€Jerald€E.€Peterson,€as€a€paralegal€for€a€law€firm.€€Under€the€pretense€that€she€wouldÐ  ` Ðassist€the€victim€in€the€settlement€of€a€divorceÔ#†¼BM»XX ÁÐ#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔ€and€in€conjunction€with€Loretta€Hammonds,€theÐ ü L  Ðdefendant€acquired€$39,000.00€from€the€victim,€$23,000.00€of€which€she€used€to€purchase€a€vehicle.€Ð è 8  ÐThe€defendant€directed€that€the€title€be€placed€in€her€maiden€name,€Stella€Braddock.€€The€remainingÐ Ô$  Ðmoney€taken€from€the€victim€had€not€been€accounted€for€at€the€time€of€the€hearing.€€Although€OfficerÐ À  ÐRice€stated€that€he€was€unaware€of€any€force€used€by€the€defendant€in€the€commission€of€the€crime,Ð ¬ü  Ðhe€testified€that€the€defendant€threatened€the€victim€with€bodily€injury.€€The€defendant€chose€not€toÐ ˜è  Ðtestify.€€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€determined€that€the€defendant€had€violatedÐ \¬ Ðthe€law€in€violation€of€the€terms€of€her€alternative€sentences,€recited€into€the€record€the€defendant'sÐ H˜ Ðextensive€criminal€history,€and€concluded€that€three€enhancement€factors€were€Ô_Ôapplicable:Ð 4„ ÐÔ_ÔÌà8  à(1)à0` Ð Ð àThe€defendant€had€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€and€behavior;€Ð \` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8  à(8)à0` Ð Ð àThe€defendant€had€a€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€ofÐ øH Ða€sentence€involving€release;€andÐä4` Ð ` Ð  Ðà8  à(13)à0` Ð Ð àThe€defendant€committed€a€felony€offense€while€on€probation.ÐÐ ` Ð ` Ð  ÐÌòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1),€(8),€(13).Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àWhile€the€trial€court€recognized€a€mitigating€factor,€that€the€defendant's€criminal€conductÐ €Ð Ðneither€caused€nor€threatened€serious€bodily€injury,€it€assigned€little€significance€to€that€factor.€€òòSeeóóÐ l¼ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€Because€the€defendant€had€"devoted€her€entire€life€to€committingÐ X ¨ Ðcriminal€acts€and€preying€upon€the€less€strong€people€in€these€communities,"€the€trial€courtÐ D!” Ðdetermined€that€the€defendant€was€a€professional€criminal€with€an€extensive€criminal€record€andÐ 0"€  Ðordered€consecutive€sentencing.€€Ð #l! ÐÌÔ#†¼BM»XX Áž#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔà  àOur€general€law€provides€that€a€trial€court€may€revoke€a€sentence€of€probation€upon€findingÐ ô$D # Ðby€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€has€violated€the€conditions€of€his€release.€Ð à%0!$ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„311(e)€(Supp.€2000).€€On€appeal,€a€revocation€will€be€upheld€absent€anÐ Ì&"% Ðabuse€of€discretion.€€In€order€to€establish€that€the€trial€court€has€abused€its€discretion,€the€defendantÐ ¸'#& Ðmust€show€that€there€is€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€determination€that€he€violated€hisÐ ¤(ô#' Ðprobation.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€Relief€can€be€granted€only€when€theÐ )à$( Ðtrial€court's€logic€€and€reasoning€were€improper€when€viewed€in€the€light€of€the€factual€circumstancesÐ |*Ì%) Ðand€the€legal€principles€involved.€€òòState€v.€Shafferóó,€45€S.W.3d€553€(Tenn.€2001).€€The€trial€judge€isÐ h+¸&* Ðnot€required€to€find€that€a€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation€has€occurred€beyond€a€reasonableÐ ° Ðdoubt.€€òòStamps€v.€Stateóó,€614€S.W.2d€71,€73€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980).€€Rather,€the€existence€of€aÐ œì Ðviolation€of€probation€need€only€be€supported€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ˆØ Ððð€40„35„311(e)€(Supp.€2000).€€Ô#†¼BM»XX ÁÕ#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔThe€same€principles€applicable€to€a€probation€revocation€are€relevantÐ tÄ Ðto€the€revocation€of€Community€Corrections.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€83€(Tenn.€1991).€€Ô_ÔÔ#†¼BM»XX Ás!#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔÐ `° ÐÔ_ÔÌÔ#†¼BM»XX Á…"#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔà  àThe€purpose€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985€was€to€provide€an€alternative€meansÐ 8 ˆ Ðof€punishment€for€"selected,€nonviolent€felony€offenders€in€front-end€community€based€alternativesÐ $ t Ðto€incarceration."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40-36-103.€€The€Community€Corrections€sentence€providesÐ  ` Ða€desired€degree€of€flexibility€that€may€be€both€beneficial€to€the€defendant€and€serve€legitimateÐ ü L  Ðsocietal€aims.€€òòState€v.€Griffithóó,€787€S.W.2d€340,€342€(Tenn.€1990).€€That€a€defendant€meets€theÐ è 8  Ðminimum€requirements€of€the€Community€Corrections€Act€of€1985,€however,€does€not€mean€thatÐ Ô$  Ðhe€or€she€is€entitled€to€be€sentenced€under€the€Act€as€a€matter€of€law€or€right.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,Ð À  Ð744€S.W.2d€919€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€following€offenders€are€eligible€for€CommunityÐ ¬ü  ÐCorrections:Ð ˜è  ÐÌÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(1)€Persons€who,€without€this€option,€would€be€incarcerated€in€a€correctionalÐ pÀ Ðinstitution;Ð\¬Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(2)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€property-related,€or€drug/alcohol-relatedÐ H˜ Ðfelony€offenses€or€other€felony€offenses€not€involving€crimes€against€the€person€asÐ 4„ Ðprovided€in€title€39,€chapter€13,€parts€1-5;Ð pÐ Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(3)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€nonviolent€felony€offenses;Ð \Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(4)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€felony€offenses€in€which€the€use€orÐ øH Ðpossession€of€a€weapon€was€not€involved;Ðä4Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(5)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€present€or€past€pattern€of€behaviorÐ Ð  Ðindicating€violence;м Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(6)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€pattern€of€committing€violent€offenses;Ð ¨ø Ðand€Ð”äÐ Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` àPersons€who€are€sentenced€to€incarceration€or€on€escape€at€the€time€ofÐ €Ð Ðconsideration€will€not€be€eligible.€€Ðl¼Ð Ð  ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-36-106(a)€Ô_Ô(Supp.€2000).Ô_Ô€€Ð D!” ÐÌÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà  àOnce€a€defendant€violates€the€terms€of€his€Community€Corrections€program,€the€trial€courtÐ #l! Ðmay€revoke€the€sentence€and€impose€a€new€one:Ð $X" ÐÌà8  àà ` àThe€court€shall€also€possess€the€power€to€revoke€the€sentence€imposed€at€anyÐ à%0!$ Ðtime€due€to€the€conduct€of€the€defendant€or€the€termination€or€modification€of€theÐ Ì&"% Ðprogram€to€which€the€defendant€has€been€sentenced,€and€the€court€may€resentence€theÐ ¸'#& Ðdefendant€to€any€appropriate€sentencing€alternative,€including€incarceration,€for€anyÐ ¤(ô#' Ðperiod€of€time€up€to€the€maximum€sentence€provided€for€the€offense€committed,€lessÐ )à$( Ðany€time€actually€served€in€any€community„based€alternative€to€incarceration.Ð|*Ì%)Ð Ð  ÐÐ h+¸&* ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(e)(4)€(Supp.€2000).Ð ° ÐÌà  àThe€authority€to€revoke€a€Community€Corrections€sentence€is€based€upon€the€conduct€of€theÐ ˆØ Ðdefendant€while€under€supervision.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€€A€trial€judge's€decision€to€revoke€a€defendant's€releaseÐ tÄ Ðon€Community€Corrections€should€not€be€disturbed€unless€there€is€an€abuse€of€discretion.€€òòHarkinsóó,Ð `° Ð811€S.W.2d€at€82.€€In€order€to€prevail€under€the€abuse€of€discretion€standard,€the€defendant€mustÐ L œ Ðestablish€that€the€record€contains€"no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€conclusion€of€the€trial€judgeÐ 8 ˆ Ðthat€a€violation€of€the€conditions€.€.€.€occurred."€€òòId.óóÐ $ t ÐÌà  àInitially,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€evidence€was€insufficient€to€establish€theÐ ü L  Ðprobation/Community€Corrections€violation.€€She€argues€that€"criminal€culpability€was€not€shown."€Ð è 8  ÐThis€court€disagrees.€€The€only€witness€at€the€hearing€confirmed€that€the€defendant€misrepresentedÐ Ô$  Ðherself€as€a€paralegal€as€a€means€of€acquiring€funds€unlawfully.€€In€our€view,€the€evidenceÐ À  Ðestablished€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence€that€the€defendant€violated€the€terms€of€herÐ ¬ü  Ðprobation/Community€Corrections€sentence€by€violating€a€provision€of€law.€€Ð ˜è  ÐÔ#†¼BM»XX Áí"#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔÌà  àIn€addition€to€the€probation/Community€Corrections€revocation€issue,€this€court€has€also€beenÐ pÀ Ðasked€to€review€the€propriety€of€consecutive€sentencing.€€Prior€to€the€enactment€of€the€CriminalÐ \¬ ÐSentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€the€limited€classifications€for€the€imposition€of€consecutiveÐ H˜ Ðsentences€were€set€out€in€òòGray€v.€Stateóó,€538€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.€1976).€€In€that€case€our€supremeÐ 4„ Ðcourt€ruled€that€aggravating€circumstances€must€be€present€before€placement€in€any€one€of€theÐ  p Ðclassifications.€€Later,€in€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€739€S.W.2d€227€(Tenn.€1987),€the€court€established€anÐ  \ Ðadditional€category€for€those€defendants€convicted€of€two€or€more€statutory€offenses€involving€sexualÐ øH Ðabuse€of€minors.€€There€were,€however,€additional€words€of€caution:€€Ô_ÔÐ ä4 ÐÔ_ÔÌà8  à[C]onsecutive€sentences€should€not€routinely€be€imposed€.€.€.€and€.€.€.€the€aggregateÐ ¼  Ðmaximum€of€consecutive€terms€must€be€reasonably€related€to€the€severity€of€theÐ ¨ø Ðoffenses€involved.ДäÐ Ð  ÐÌòòId.óó€at€230.€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€adopted€the€cautionary€language.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ l¼ ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„115,€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€€The€1989€Act€is,€in€essence,€the€codificationÐ X ¨ Ðof€the€holdings€in€òòGrayóó€and€òòTayloróó;€consecutive€sentences€may€be€imposed€in€the€discretion€of€theÐ D!” Ðtrial€court€only€upon€a€determination€that€one€or€more€of€the€following€criteria׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€Ô_Ôexist:Ð 0"€  ÐÔ_ÔÌÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(1)€€The€defendant€is€a€professional€criminal€who€has€knowingly€devotedÐ $X" Ð[himself]€to€criminal€acts€as€a€major€source€of€livelihood;Ðô$D #Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(2)€€The€defendant€is€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€isÐ à%0!$ Ðâ âextensive;ÐÌ&"%Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(3)€€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€mentally€abnormal€person€so€declared€byÐ ° Ðâ âa€competent€psychiatrist€who€concludes€as€a€result€of€an€investigation€prior€toÐ œì Ðsentencing€that€the€defendant's€criminal€conduct€has€been€characterized€by€a€patternÐ ˆØ Ðof€repetitive€or€compulsive€behavior€with€heedless€indifference€to€consequences;ÐtÄÐ Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(4)€€The€defendant€is€a€dangerous€offender€whose€behavior€indicates€little€orÐ `° Ðno€regard€for€human€life,€and€no€hesitation€about€committing€a€crime€in€which€theÐ L œ Ðrisk€to€human€life€is€high;€€€€à h à€€€€Ð8 ˆÐ Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(5)€€The€defendant€is€convicted€of€two€(2)€or€more€statutory€offensesÐ $ t Ðinvolving€sexual€abuse€of€a€minor€with€consideration€of€the€aggravatingÐ  ` Ðcircumstances€arising€from€the€relationship€between€the€defendant€and€victim€orÐ ü L  Ðvictims,€the€time€span€of€defendant's€undetected€sexual€activity,€the€nature€and€scopeÐ è 8  Ðof€the€sexual€acts€and€the€extent€of€the€residual,€physical€and€mental€damage€to€theÐ Ô$  Ðvictim€or€victims;ÐÀ Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(6)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€an€offense€committed€while€on€probation;Ð ¬ü  Ð[]Иè Ð Ð  ÐÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà8  àà ` à(7)€€The€defendant€is€sentenced€for€criminal€contempt.Ð„Ô Ð Ð  ÐÌÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔTenn.Ô_Ô€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b).Ð \¬ ÐÌÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_Ôà  àThe€length€of€the€sentence,€when€consecutive€in€nature,€must€always€be€"justly€deserved€inÐ 4„ Ðrelation€to€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,"€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð40„35„102(1),€and€"no€greater€than€thatÐ  p Ðdeserved"€under€the€circumstances,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(2);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€3Ð  \ ÐS.W.3d€456€(Tenn.€1999).€€Ð øH ÐÌà  àThe€defendant,€39€years€of€age,€has€a€record€of€arrests€and€convictions€which€began€in€IllinoisÐ Ð  Ðas€early€as€1982.€€She€completed€high€school€in€1980€and€claims€to€have€obtained€a€bachelor€ofÐ ¼  Ðscience€degree€from€Wright€College€in€Illinois€in€1985.€€The€presentence€report€provides€that€she€hasÐ ¨ø Ðfive€children€ranging€in€ages€from€one€to€18.€€In€this€appeal,€she€Ô#†¼BM»XX Á6#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔcomplains€that€the€trial€courtÐ ”ä Ðinappropriately€enhanced€her€felony€sentences€and,€without€adequate€basis,€increased€her€overall€Ð €Ð Ðterm€of€incarceration€by€requiring€that€several€of€the€sentences€be€served€consecutively.€Ð l¼ ÐSignificantly,€the€defendant€does€not€argue€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€the€application€of€anyÐ X ¨ Ðenhancement€factors,€which€would€affect€the€lengths€of€the€sentences€within€their€statutory€ranges.Ð D!” ÐÌà  àBecause€the€trial€court€weighed€the€applicable€enhancement€factors€against€the€singleÐ #l! Ðmitigating€factor,€the€judgments€are€entitled€to€the€presumption€of€correctness.€€Moreover,€the€trialÐ $X" Ðcourt,€after€reading€into€the€record€a€prior€criminal€history€of€innumerable€misdemeanors€andÐ ô$D # Ðfelonies€ranging€from€worthless€checks€and€forgery€to€theft€and€assault,€very€accurately€describedÐ à%0!$ Ðthe€defendant€as€one€who€had€devoted€her€life€to€"ripping€people€off."€€The€trial€court€also€accuratelyÐ Ì&"% Ðdescribed€the€defendant€as€an€offender€whose€record€of€criminal€activity€was€extensive,€anotherÐ ¸'#& Ðappropriate€basis€for€consecutive€sentencing.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115(b)(2).€€Because€oneÐ ¤(ô#' Ðmonth€earlier€the€trial€court€had€strongly€admonished€the€defendant€of€the€possible€consequences€ofÐ )à$( Ðâ âany€breach€of€the€conditions€of€her€alternative€sentences€and€because€the€prior€criminal€record€of€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðdefendant€(in€several€jurisdictions)€is€so€extensive€as€to€qualify€her€as€a€professional€criminal,€bothÐ ° Ðthe€revised€lengths€of€the€sentences€and€the€consecutive€nature€of€their€service€are€warranted.€€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àAccordingly,€the€judgments€are€affirmed.€Ô_ÔÐ tÄ ÐÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÌÔ_ÔÌÌÔ#†¼BM»XX Á£J#ÔÔ‡X ÁX»¼BMÔà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÔ#†¼BM»XX Á»R#Ô___________________________________€Ð $ t Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àÔ€X ÁX»¼BMÔGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGE