WPC.? Uwd!0 STF*Z[9JzH3>tCUȎ윴UHiSF[A˽|z* w_uM7F"&2`)1#E)㙗υI8ρV꩷?nrd:)4}K 5J<9sKp1TyǸO eG.ŽD}>jU8>  0< 0<( 01d D+ A? @ o @ w o B- B;X 0h#U N %M(NC^ EwQ4Ui mkb: 0U 0! 0  0 0 0 0 0j 0A 0C 0X 0/ 0 0 0 0m 05 0 0@ 0 0 0! 0m" 08# 0$ 0$ 0% 00D& 0<t& 0& 0>n' 0v' 0`"( 0`( 0`( 0`B) 0`) 08* 0:* 02 + 0>+ 0::, 0Yt, 0_, 0 ,- 0j6. 0/ B*$1 D/N1 0}1 D/3 003 063 044 0:<5 0^v5 0<5 0N6U6^6U*6 16 72E7 1uw7 727 0c8b88 0H: 0D&; ASj;; 0< 09= 0D= D53>h>\  `&Times New Roman'  BADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THEB0ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE .   <:Default Para<:Footnote Ref6== 4Body Text  XXX      'dxd&Draw Object <<=8C HKKKK  WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -  WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -)Hairline d  d#|x(r-$..      ߂XX߂߂HP LaserJet 40500(uH Z6Times New Roman RegularX#-s 3j1,SQ)ltzU - - 0#CXd#  *+ (_2623  ..*G+M (_25   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *D+M (_24   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *A+M (_23  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *>+M (_22   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *;+M (_21   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *8+M (_20  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *5+M (_19   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  *2+M (_18    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  * (_1723  Ԁ*GM (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *DM (_15   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *AM (_14  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *>M (_13   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *;M (_12   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *8M (_11  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  *5M (_10   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  (2M &_9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  ( &_823  (GM &_7   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  (DM &_6   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  (AM &_5  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  (>M &_4   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  (;M &_3   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  (8M &_2  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  (5M &_1   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  &2M $_    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1      (&H2  (&H3  (&H4 XXX (&H5  (&H6  20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKX<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KX<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/KX<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7N(X7  ?Y%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7(X7&  d dM)1dxd<:zTop of For7P(X7  ?Y%2A`Arial?  S\  `&Times New RomanS7(X7M)2dxd0KS.SampleKX<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKX<6X9`(Courier NewKS\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  (O$<6X9`(Courier New%2A`Arial(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.ZI.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)\i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  - -  adh$..      bXXbb    1    _ԀStatev.Mahler,735S.W.2d226(Tenn.1987)(defendantcanknowinglyandvoluntarilypleatosentence  withinthestatutoryrangeasRangeIIoffender,eventhoughnottechnicallyqualifiedaboveRangeIstatus).((3dh$ -!..      bXXbb      0  (#$  0  defghE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3~$ -!..      bXXbb  (3~$ -!..      bXXbb  ($$   1   )!dxdxLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 -!..      bXXbb  _8uXXdd8         0p x (#X0Zb_  QhhZINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  QRR$ATKNOXVILLEZԈ    H.` hp x (#X(#HAssignedonBriefsMay21,2002 > XuXZZXXu STATEOFTENNESSEEv.DAVID_SALTZ_XuXZ  0  DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforSullivanCounty  " No.S44,304PhyllisH.Miller,Judge   -  bXXu k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KEj K Kj2 -  XuXb No.E200102422CCAR3CD _  September3,_2002_ E  -  bXXu  k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KE+ K K+2 -  XuXb    ThedefendantpledguiltytothreecountsofincestandwassentencedasaRangeIImultiple  p  offendertothreeconcurrenttermsofeightyears.Thedefendantappealsthetrialcourts V impositionofvariousenhancementfactorsanddenialofalternativesentencing.Weaffirmthe < trialcourtsjudgment. "   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed     JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichThomasT._Woodall_ j andNormaMcGeeOgle,JJ.,joined. P StephenM.Wallace,DistrictPublicDefender(attrial);LeslieS.Hale,AssistantDistrictPublic l Defender(attrial);andSteve_McEwen_,MountainCity,Tennessee(onappeal),fortheappellant, R David_Saltz_. 8 PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ChristineM._Lapps_,AssistantAttorney  General;H.GreeleyWells,Jr.,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;TeresaMurraySmith,Assistant  DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee.      OPINION  2##     XuXXXu         TheSullivanCountyGrandJuryindictedthedefendant,David_Saltz_,onthreecountsof $N % rape,ClassBfelonies,andthreecountsofincest,ClassCfelonies.Pursuanttoaplea %4!& agreement,thedefendantpledguiltytotheincestcharges,andtherapechargesweredismissed. &"' ThedefendantagreedtobesentencedasaRangeIImultipleoffendereventhoughhewas '#( actuallyaRangeIoffender.` b#  1      ׀Asentencinghearingwasheld,andthedefendantwassentencedto (#)  threeconcurrenteightyeartermsintheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Hisrequestfor |)$*  8uXXdXXd8_   _alternativesentencingwasdenied.Thisappealtimelyfollowed.Thedefendantassertsthatthe  trialcourterredindenyinghisrequestforalternativesentencing. / ݌       XuXXXu    XuXXXu    P  ݀P݌ | Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu      i  Factsi݌ b Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu       ݌̌    XuXXXu    XuXXXu        Thedefendant,DavidSaltz,pledguiltytoincest,admittingthathehadsexualintercourse . ~ withhisfifteenyearoldstepdaughteronthreeoccasions.Thedefendantswife,themotherof  d thevictim,waschargedwithfacilitationoffelonyrapeandfailuretoreportchildsexualabuse  J foraperiodofthreeyears.Mrs.Saltzpledguiltyandwasgrantedjudicialdiversion.Thetrial  0 judgesentencedthedefendantasaRangeIImultipleoffendertothreeconcurrenteightyear    terms.Aprobationhearingwasheldtodeterminethemannerofserviceofthesentence.The    evidencebeforethetrialcourtincludedapresentencereportpreparedbytheTennessee   DepartmentofCorrectionandasexoffenderriskassessmentreportpreparedbyCounselingand x  ConsultationServices,Inc.(CCS).݌ ^  Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    }    }݌̌    XuXXXu    XuXXXu        Thepresentencereportlistsonepriorfelony(grandlarceny)andseveralmisdemeanors, *z  includingpossessionofmarijuana,unlawfulpossessionofdrugparaphernalia,theft,anddriving ` undertheinfluence.Numerousprobationviolationsforprioroffensesarealsocontainedinthe F report.Thereportrevealsthatthedefendanthasbeenindrugtreatmentprogramsonprevious , occasions.Thedefendantiscurrentlyemployedatatemporaryemploymentagency.݌  Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu      >݌̌    XuXXXu    XuXXXu        Theriskassessmentofthisdefendantfoundthatheisamoderaterisktoreoffendanda  faircandidateforsexoffendertreatment.Theassessmentconcludedthatthedefendantisan t appropriatecandidateforacommunitybasedoutpatienttreatmentprogram.However,CCS Z foundthatthedefendantslevelofriskmaybedifficulttomanagethroughprobation. @ AccordingtoCCS,thedefendantssexualresponsetominorsisconsidereddeviant.The &v defendantacknowledgedsexualcontactwithfiveotherminorgirls.@ ݌  \ Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    Z#    CCSconcludedthatthedefendant:(1)usedhispositionofauthoritytogainaccesstothe ( minor,(2)usedintimidationandcoerciontocommittheoffenses,and(3)demonstratedno  regardforthepainhewasinflictingonhisdaughter.Theassessmentstatedthatanoffenders   willingnessorabilitytohonestlydiscusstheirsexualoffendingbehavioristhesinglemost   importantfactorassociatedwithsuccessfultreatment.Thedefendantinitiallyonlyadmitted p!  sexualcontactwithtwootherminors.Heonlyadmittedcontactwiththreeadditionalminors V"! afterapolygraphtest.CCSfoundthatthedefendants understandingoftheharmhehascaused <#" wassuperficial.Z##݌ "$r# Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    '    Theassessmentalsoindicatedthatthedefendantadmittedhavingsexualencounterswith %>!% severalprostitutes.Hestatedthathehadsexualencounterswithhisbrotherswife,andheand &$"& hiswifehadtwoprevioussexualencounterswithhisbrotherswife.'6(݌ ' #' Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    *    Thedefendanttestifiedthathebecamesexuallyactiveataveryyoungage.Hetestified )$) thathistwoolderbrothershadinitiatedoralsexwithhimwhenhewasachild.Additionally,he l*%* testifiedthatolderboysintheneighborhoodforcedhimtohaveintercoursewiththemwhenhe R+&+ wasthirteenyearsold.Thedefendanttestifiedthatheknewwhathedidwithhisstepdaughter 8,', waswrong,buthethoughtthatshewantedtohavesexwithhim.Hestatedthathewanted  counselingforhisproblems.Hetestifiedthathehadrecentlyfailedadrugtest,andhewas  currentlyonprobationforpossessionofmarijuana.Thedefendantstatedthathehadnot | successfullystoppedusingdrugs.**݌ b Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    p.    EugeneWorley,thedefendantslandlord,testifiedasacharacterwitnessforthe . ~ defendant.Hetestifiedthathehadknownthedefendantallofhislifeandthathedidnotthink  d thedefendantwasadangertothecommunity.Uponcrossexamination,Worleyindicatedthat  J hewasnotfullyawareofthechargesagainstthedefendant,andhedidnotreadtheprobation  0 report.p..݌    Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    ^1    Thecourtfoundfiveenhancementfactorsandnomitigatingfactors.Thecourtfound   thatthedefendant(1)hasahistoryofcriminalconvictionsandcriminalbehavior,(2)wasa x  leaderinthecommissionofanoffense,(3)committedtheoffensetogratifyhisdesire,(4)hasa ^  historyofnoncompliancewithprobation,and(5)violatedapositionoftrust.Tenn.CodeAnn. D  4035114(1),(2),(7),(8),and(15).^11݌ *z  Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    y4    Analysis  @  @`  @  @ y44݌ F Ќ    XuXXXu    XuXXXu    5        Thedefendantarguesthatthetrialcourterredinsentencinghimtoincarcerationand  denyinghimanyformofalternativesentence.ThisCourtsreviewofthesentenceimposedby  thetrialcourtisdenovowithapresumptionofcorrectness.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-401(d)  (1997).Thispresumptionisconditioneduponanaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrial t judgeconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev. Z Ashby,823S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Ifthetrialcourtfailstocomplywiththestatutory @ directives,thereisnopresumptionofcorrectness,andourreviewisdenovo.Statev.Poole,945 &v S.W.2d93,96(Tenn.1997).Theburdenisupontheappealingpartytoshowthatthesentenceis  \ improper.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-401(d),SentencingCommissionComments.5V6݌ B Ќ    XuXXXu    Inconductingadenovoreviewofasentence,thisCourtmustconsider(1)theevidence,  ifany,receivedatthetrialandsentencinghearing;(2)thepresentencereport;(3)theprinciples  ofsentencingandtheargumentsofcounselrelativetosentencingalternatives;(4)thenatureand   characteristicsoftheoffense;(5)anymitigatingorenhancingfactors;(6)anystatementsmade p!  bythedefendantinhisownbehalf;and(7)thedefendantspotentialforrehabilitationor V"! treatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-102,-103,-210;Statev.Smith,735S.W.2d859,863 <#" (Tenn.Crim.App.1987). "$r# 6  EnhancementFactors %>!% 3>8  Althoughthedefendantdoesnotexpresslychallengetheresultinglengthofhis ' #' sentence,heassertsthatthetrialcourtmisappliedtwoenhancementfactors.Specifically,the (#( defendantcontendsthatthetrialcourterroneouslyappliedenhancementfactors(1),the )$) defendanthasahistoryofcriminalconvictionsinadditiontothosenecessarytoestablishthe l*%* appropriaterange,and(2),thedefendantwasaleaderinthecommissionofanoffenseinvolving R+&+ twoormoreactors.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035114(1),(2).Hefirstcontendsthattheapplication 8,', ofenhancementfactor(1),TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035114,wasinappropriate  becausehis criminalrecordconsistsmainlyofmisdemeanorsinvolvingmarijuanapossession.  Wedisagree.Inadditiontothemisdemeanorconvictionsformarijuanapossession,areviewof | thedefendantscriminalrecordrevealsthatthedefendanthastwoconvictionsfordrivingunder b theinfluenceofanintoxicant,oneconvictionfortheft,andoneconvictionforgrandlarceny. H Thetrialcourtsapplicationofthisfactorwasappropriate. . ~   Next,thedefendantallegesthatthetrialcourtincorrectlyappliedenhancementfactor(2),  J TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035114,toenhancethedefendantssentence.We  0 disagree.Thetrialcourtfound    8  [Thedefendantswife]wasinvolvedinitwith[thedefendant].Thetwoofyou   workedtogether.Itwouldnotsurprisemeifshewasntderivingsomesortof x  sexualpleasureoutofthis,too,consideringwhatyousaidinyourstatementat ^  [CCS].Butanyway,shewasassistingyouinthis...D    Moreover,therecordreflectsthatthedefendantswife,whoisalsothevictimsmother,pled ` guiltytofacilitationofrapeandfailuretoreportchildabuseforthreeyears.Althoughtherecord F beforeusdoesnotcontainherpleaagreement,thepresentencereport,whichisincludedinthe , recordandreferencedbythetrialcourt,notesthatthevictimsmother encouragedthevictimto  havesexwiththedefendant.Alsointherecordarereferencestotaperecordedconversations  betweenthemotherandthevictimduringwhichthemothertellsthedaughtertobequietabout  theoffensesandusesthetwoyearoldsisterasareasontocooperate. t   Weconcludethattherecordsupportsthetrialcourtsapplicationofenhancementfactor @ (2).Itclearfromthemothersguiltypleatofacilitationofrapethatshewasaparticipantinthe &v defendantsoffense.Furthermore,whilehiswifeencouragedthevictimtohaveintercoursewith  \ thedefendantandurgedhernottoreporttheabuse,thedefendantwasthepersonwhoactually B engagedinsexualintercoursewiththevictim.Accordingly,thetrialcourtcouldconcludethat ( thedefendantwasaleaderinthecommissionoftheoffense.Thisissueiswithoutmerit.  z>  DenialofAlternativeSentence   L Z(5h83\      Turningtothedefendantsargumentthatthetrialcourterredindenyinganalternative V"! sentence,werecognizethattrialjudgesareencouragedtousealternativestoincarcerationunder <#" theCriminalSentencingReformActof1989.Moreover,anespeciallymitigatedorstandard "$r# offenderconvictedofaClassC,D,orEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidatefor %X $ alternativesentencingoptionsintheabsenceofevidencetothecontrary.Tenn.CodeAnn. %>!% 40-35-102(6).BecausetheinstantdefendantisaRangeIImultipleoffender,heisnotentitledto &$"& thestatutorypresumptioninfavorofanalternatesentence.However,duetothelengthofhis ' #' sentence,thedefendantisstatutorilyeligibleforprobation.Adefendantiseligibleforprobation (#( iftheactualsentenceimposeduponthedefendantiseightyearsorlessandtheoffenseforwhich )$) thedefendantissentencedisnotspecificallyexcludedbystatute.Tenn.CodeAnn. l*%* 40-35-303(a).Probationistobeautomaticallyconsideredasasentencealternativeforeligible R+&+ defendants;however,theburdenofprovingsuitabilityforprobationrestswiththedefendant.Id. 8,', 40-35-303(b).Adefendantseekingfullprobationbearstheburdenonappealofshowingthe  sentenceimposedisimproperandthatfullprobationwillbeinthebestinterestofthedefendant  andthepublic.Statev.Baker,966S.W.2d429,434(Tenn.Crim.App.1997). |   Indeterminingwhethertograntordenyprobation,atrialcourtshouldconsiderthe H circumstancesoftheoffense,thedefendantscriminalrecord,thedefendantssocialhistoryand . ~ presentcondition,theneedfordeterrence,andthebestinterestofthedefendantandthepublic.  d Statev.Grear,568S.W.2d285,286(Tenn.1978);Statev.Boyd,925S.W.2d237,244(Tenn.  J Crim.App.1995).Additionally,acourtshouldconsiderthedefendantspotential,orlackof  0 potential,forrehabilitationwhendeterminingifanalternativesentencewouldbeappropriate.    Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-103(5).Thedefendantslackofcredibilityisalsoanappropriate    considerationandreflectsonadefendantspotentialforrehabilitation.Statev.Dowdy,894   S.W.2d301,306(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Acourtmayalsoconsiderthemitigatingand x  enhancingfactorssetforthinTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsections40-35-113and-114asthey ^  arerelevanttothesection40-35-103considerations.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-210(b)(5);State D  v.Boston,938S.W.2d435,438(Tenn.Crim.App.1996). *z    Intheinstantcase,thetrialcourtfoundthat,duetothedefendantslonghistoryof F criminalconduct,confinementwasnecessarytoprotectsocietyandtoavoiddepreciatingthe , seriousnessoftheoffense.Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-103(1)(A)(C).Inconcludingthatthe  defendanthadnotestablishedhissuitabilityforprobation,thetrialcourtreliedonthe  defendantslengthycriminalhistory,includingnumerousfailedattemptsatprobation,the  findingscontainedinthesexoffenderriskassessment,andthecircumstancesoftheoffense.The t recordsupportsthetrialcourtsconclusions.Thedefendantdidnotcarryhisburdenofproving Z thatheshouldreceiveprobation,andthetrialcourtdidnoterrorabusehisdiscretionindenying @ thedefendantsrequest.Thisissueiswithoutmerit. &v   CONCLUSION  B     Accordingly,weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt.   h___________________________________ <#" JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE "$r# {  hbXXu