WPC  T)&&ACkI.} ܤQ ?F@G},pqkfL13(m `È~A{LkP{Q/Loq32ę[[Er79(OK8o*( 2/4Q&MA0ٮ~fr"{**y+&7qdR]k={7IwI [ QHŘ&T/Ӯ'-蛴I+n^Iؠ'sap`- W TcFlBߤd"H#:bm[ͩj)g0[ lB4&e+D)/'Q'ejخ {;sgvmTs-?Xsf(zƘxjrߺ/ S Ͱ!zXӽ i,v珰;p$ Ez)# >UNI % 0(U:bw@4G[U:j)U: AQ` 0D& 0Dj 0D D/ B! B> D3[ HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($,|AZ"Arial Regular- - QRSETUVWDXYӀen~<$"|xe"Arial Regular  !"   X:5XXX kX X:5   Ad FILED X:5X k   December21,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr. Z X X:5AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular !"#%C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ''' dxd dP Pd&&&&'dxd !  YY`  zXXJ zTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T      7  dXXd7eYr (<,(j 8` `@Ef ` ttx$,` rYeeeeYYeeeeeeeINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEEATJACKSONet (>.*jx` `@E B ` ttx$Dz h tߛeJUNESESSION,1998  STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )  C.C.A.NO.02C019710CR00406 `  `     h   )  `  ` Appellee,   h   ) `   `     h   ) `     h   )  SHELBYCOUNTY `  VS. `     h   )   `   `     h   )  HON.JOSEPHB.DAILEY  `   ANTONIOL.SAULSBERRY  )  JUDGE  `  &FRANKLINC.HOWARD,   )  `  `     h   )  `  ` Appellants.   h   )  (FirstUDUUdUegreeVMVVmVurder;Aggravated (#  `  `     h   )  Robbery) `    *`JOPINIONDISSENTINGINPART  X J*`    ` Theevidenceinthiscasewouldunquestionablybesufficienttosupporta #H convictionofDefendantHowardWofWXforXfelonymurderinthefirstdegree.Hisguiltoffelonymurderwouldobviouslybepredicatedonhisparticipationintheaggravatedrobbery. ` AsIunderstandourlaw,toconvictHowardofpremeditatedfirstdegreemurderwouldrequireproofthatheactedwiththeintenttoassisttheshooterinthecommissionofthepremeditatedandintentionalfirstdegreemurderofthevictim.IagreewiththemajoritythatHowardcannotescapecriminalresponsibilityforpremeditatedmurderby claiminghedidnotsharethecriminalintentorpremeditationwiththeactualtriggerman.𛀀Ourlawmandates,however,thatHowardescapecriminalresponsibilityforpremeditatedmurderunlesstheStateprovesbeyondareasonabledoubtthatHowarddidsharetheQshooters :12  QcriminalintentforpremeditatedTandintentionalTmurderSRandintentionalRS.Idonotfindthisproofintherecord.Ialsocannotagreethatapremeditatedmurderisanaturaland P  probableconsequenceofanespeciallyaggravatedrobbery. ` ImustthereforerespectfullydissentfromthemajoritysconclusionthattheevidenceissufficienttosupportDefendantHowardsconvictionofpremeditatedfirstdegreemurder.Inallotherrespects,Iconcur.YY `     h   ____________________________________ `     h   DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE