ÿWPC Ÿ~'{®êOýÚ¥&K¹ЪTŽÐ2Uì’íª˜í0É¥êTý¦§:l9gѵKÁãÂ_‡Íxoš|ãõQ†Õ>þvz/n =vQøåšäÓmw}$­¢æÃëû³ð#i¹ZFJ˹`÷ªš(œ„Èpšg^ª*ïÛ Þiæ2ã3‰d4?ÀÇcаŽ)´„‡ºÑÁ¯O™®êÛÁø¦Øâ—ÔÂaµ tõnº|ÝlGü™[»dƒ8{)4 °kwl†nZ5lyô1™}¦î\~•JŽt §¾ c«¼¦£ÐþØ'¢;ÞoæXÈg¹È”±<~g•O/Þ‰tå 6‰˜Ï» ÓìŸã‰nކ;S&@õôe²%޾»¡®]†˜ªm ]3œÛ£d½^\3\ªƒ²ì4oáN¿!)&ŠpU¸×FJWÑGº`ÑüíêÙÁb×ʰ n¶²<¼¶Œß»¬¿p‚æ£Hö J§®W¾‡6Oè¾ã.ºQþfœ9hèÎÝ£¹±gY]8ÎÙŽÆH ê ¤ÍÆ(†XÔÚîåÇ*ÙéS©ö\G¬*‰6³ÔëõÞ| *b#É\ %% ú+ 0ˆ% UN­ 0Dû á? z Òš¼l^ (w448ÆLÆÆØÆždNsu mwEŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽŽb 0똘˜˜ Bƒƒ 0¤  D5D D-y 0K¦¦ ASñÆD 0¤  0D® A«ò˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0» ðÝ ƒRDF$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³Äò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà ` àò òó óThe€parties€testified€at€the€trial€on€May€23,€2002,€that€they€were€then€engaged€to€be€married.€€(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ×Ý ƒRDF$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³Äò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà ` àò òó óThe€assault€offense€was€charged€in€the€alternative€in€one€count.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€sectionÐ ° Ð40„13„206€(a)€arguably€supports€this€practice.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„13„206(a)€(2003)€(ð ðWhen€the€offense€may€beÐ qÁ Ðcommitted€by€different€forms,€by€different€means€or€with€different€intents,€such€forms,€means€or€intents€may€be€allegedÐ 2‚ Ðin€the€same€count€in€the€alternative.ðð).€€€In€our€view,€however,€the€better€practice€is€to€allege€alternative€modes€of€assaultÐ óC Ðin€separate€counts.òòóó€ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt SCHRANTZTipton J.J.RasnakeMarneyWoodallElllington Crimoffense[sPendergrassDuchacArwoodRicky T]heu]nderfear[ed EvidlimineCrockettAshbyCURWOOD WITTEllington•¦ˆ/Ï yö.ê:i¢×+00Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ- ù-(|G2DF$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–á»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô³Äò»»Ô d(|3ÿº$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–á»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿº$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–á»»dXXdé8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€–á»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼–á»»»ÔÑ8€ÜXXdé»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@hhìàÔ‡îp^–áÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼–á»îîp^#ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€June€3,€2003Ð öF ÐÔ‡XÜX»¼–áÔÌò òÔ#†¼–á»XXÜ#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JAMIE€JOHN€SCHRANTZòòóóÔ‡XÜX»¼–áÔó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Madison€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€01„708€€€€€€Roy€B.€Morgan,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2002„01507„CCA„R3„CD€€„€Filed€December€2,€Ô_Ô2003Ô_ÔÐ ŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Jamie€John€Schrantz,€appeals€from€his€Madison€County€Circuit€Court€jury€convictionÐ V¦  Ðof€assault.€€He€claims€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€the€conviction,€that€the€trial€courtÐ ? Ðerred€in€limiting€the€defendantððs€cross„examination€of€a€prosecution€witness,€and€that€the€trial€courtÐ (x Ðerred€in€ordering€the€assault€sentence€served€consecutively€to€prior€sentences.€€We€affirm€the€lowerÐ a Ðcourtððs€judgment.Ð úJ ÐÔ#†¼–á»XXÜŽ#ÔÔ‡XÜX»¼–áÔÓ°ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ Ì ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼–á»àXÜò#ÔÔ‡XÜX.¼–áÔJames€Curwood€Witt,€Jr.,€óóJ.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Tiptonóó€andÐ Ÿï ÐòòDavid€G.€Hayes,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌMichael€D.€Rasnake,€Jackson,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Jamie€John€Schrantz.Ð Zª ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Elizabeth€B.€Marney,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ,| ÐJames€G.€Woodall,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Jody€S.€Pickens,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ e ÐGeneral,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð þN ÐÓÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼–á»XXÜ®#ÔÔ‡XÜX»¼–áÔÐ Ð! ! ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼–á»XXÜO #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÜX»¼–áÔò òó óà  àà ` àThe€assault€conviction€emanates€from€an€incident€at€the€Fast€Lane€gas€station€inÐ £#ó# ÐJackson€on€April€1,€2001.€€The€defendant€accompanied€the€victim,€Diana€Todd,€into€the€store.€€TheÐ Œ$Ü$ Ðdefendant€and€the€victim€had€been€involved€in€a€relationship,€but€in€the€hours€preceding€the€eventsÐ u%Å % Ðat€the€Fast€Lane,€they€had€argued€about€the€defendant€staying€out€until€the€wee€hours€on€April€l€withÐ ^&®!& Ðthe€victimððs€sister.ò ò׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×ó ó€€Ð G'—"' ÐÌà  àà ` à€In€the€Fast€Lane€store,€the€couple€argued€over€how€many€packs€of€cigarettes€theÐ )i$) Ðvictim€should€buy,€and€the€victim€left€the€store€with€the€defendant€following€behind€her.€€Ð *R%* ÐÐ ë*;&+ý ÐÔ_Ôà  àà ` àThe€victim,€who€was€called€as€a€witness€by€the€state,€testified€that€after€leaving€theÐ ° Ðstore,€she€got€behind€the€wheel€of€her€sport€utility€vehicle€and€locked€the€doors.€€The€defendantÐ ™é Ðtestified€that€he€panicked€when€he€found€the€passenger€side€door€locked.€€He€went€to€the€rear€of€theÐ ‚Ò Ðvehicle€and€opened€the€unlocked€hatch€door.€€Then,€by€all€accounts,€the€six„foot„seven„inch,€293„Ð k» Ðpound€defendant€climbed€through€the€rear€of€the€vehicle€and€over€the€rear€seat.€€The€victim€and€theÐ T¤ Ðdefendant€both€testified€that€the€defendant€tried€to€get€the€keys€from€the€vehicle€switch€and€that€theÐ =  Ðvictim€struck€him€several€times€in€the€face€with€her€wallet€€ð ðto€get€his€attention.ðð€€They€both€deniedÐ & v Ðthat€the€defendant€struck€the€victim.Ð  _ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€victim€left€the€vehicle,€went€in€to€the€store,€and€asked€the€store€clerk€to€call€911.€Ð á 1  ЀThe€victim€and€the€defendant€testified€that€when€the€victim€went€to€the€store,€the€defendantÐ Ê   Ðoccupied€the€driverððs€seat€of€the€vehicle€and€refused€to€budge€when€the€victim€returned€and€tried€toÐ ³  Ðpull€him€out.€€The€victim€and€the€defendant€testified€that€the€defendant€did€not€strike€the€victim€atÐ œì  Ðany€time€during€the€episode€at€the€Fast€Lane.€€The€victim€testified€that€she€was€not€fearful€of€theÐ …Õ  Ðdefendant,€characterizing€him€as€ð ða€big€teddy€bearðð€who€would€not€harm€her.€€Ð n¾  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€victim€denied€that€she€told€investigating€Jackson€Police€Officer€Mark€EllingtonÐ @ Ðthat€the€defendant€had€hit€her.€€When€she€learned€the€day€after€the€incident€that€the€defendant€hadÐ )y Ðbeen€incarcerated,€she€reviewed€the€incident€report,€which€stated€that€the€defendant€had€assaultedÐ b Ðthe€victim.€€She€called€Officer€Ellington€and€told€him€the€report€was€inaccurate€and€that€theÐ ûK Ðdefendant€had€not€struck€her.Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€Fast€Lane€clerk€testified€that€after€the€argument€inside€the€store,€the€victim€left,€Ð ¶ Ðan€angry€defendant€followed€her,€and€the€victim€got€into€her€vehicle.€€The€clerk€saw€the€defendantÐ Ÿï Ðclimb€through€the€hatch€door€and€testified€that€the€defendant€began€hitting€the€victim€with€openÐ ˆØ Ðhands€and€fists€on€the€head€and€in€the€face.€€The€clerk€testified,€ð ðHe€just€kept€hitting€her€and€hittingÐ qÁ Ðher.ðð€€The€victim€then€came€back€into€the€store€in€an€agitated€state€and€asked€the€clerk€to€call€911,Ð Zª Ðwhich€the€clerk€did.€€The€clerk€testified€that€the€victim€returned€to€the€vehicle€and€that€the€defendantÐ C“ Ðand€the€victim€engaged€in€ð ðconstant€fightingðð€while€standing€outside€the€vehicle.€€She€described€theÐ ,| Ðvictimððs€efforts€as€defensive.€€Ð e Ðà  àÌà  àà ` àA€customer€of€the€Fast€Lane€testified€that€he€was€pumping€gas€when€he€saw€theÐ ç 7 Ðdefendant€enter€the€victimððs€vehicle€through€the€rear€hatch.€€The€customer,€who€was€an€off„dutyÐ Ð!   Ðdeputy€sheriff€in€another€county,€testified€that€the€defendant€began€hitting€the€victim.€€He€testifiedÐ ¹" ! Ðthat€when€he€went€into€the€store€to€pay€for€his€gas,€the€clerk€screamed,€ð ðHeððs€beating€her!ðð€€TheÐ ¢#ò" Ðcustomer€told€the€clerk€to€call€911€before€the€victim€came€to€the€door€to€make€the€same€request.€€Ð ‹$Û# ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€Jackson€officers€who€investigated€the€incident€testified€that€they€found€the€victimÐ ]&­!% Ðin€an€upset,€hysterical,€and€ð ðflushedðð€condition.€€They€testified€that€she€told€them€that€the€defendantÐ F'–"& Ðhad€hit€her.€€The€defendant€was€arrested€and€transported€to€the€jail.€Ð /(#' ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€his€testimony€at€trial,€the€defendant€acknowledged€being€upset€and€emotional€overÐ *Q%) Ðthe€prospect€of€the€couple€breaking€up€and€that€he€raised€his€voice€during€the€argument€over€theÐ ê*:&* Ðcigarettes.€€He€denied€that€he€was€angry.€€He€panicked€when€he€found€the€vehicle€door€lockedÐ Ó+#'+ Ðbecause€he€thought€the€victim€was€going€to€drive€away€and€leave€him.€€He€entered€the€vehicleÐ ° Ðthrough€the€hatch€and€tried€to€get€the€keys.€€He€denied€that€he€ever€struck€the€victim.€€He€admittedÐ ™é Ðthat€he€had€sixteen€prior€felony€convictions€for€thefts,€forgeries,€and€bad€check€charges.€€He€alsoÐ ‚Ò Ðadmitted€that€he€was€on€parole€on€April€1,€2001,€and€that€as€a€result€of€the€incident€on€that€date,€hisÐ k» Ðparole€had€been€revoked.€€Ð T¤ ÐÌÓ  Óà @ àà @` àà @¸ àIÐ & v ÐÓÆ!ÓÌà  àà ` àIn€his€first€issue,€the€defendant€assails€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence.€Ð ø H ÐWhen€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€is€challenged€on€appeal,€the€appellate€court€must€view€theÐ á 1  Ðevidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€indulge€the€state€the€benefit€of€all€inferences€thatÐ Ê   Ðmay€reasonably€be€drawn€from€the€evidence,€and€determine€whether€any€reasonable€person€couldÐ ³  Ðfind€the€accused€guilty€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€after€deferring€to€the€trier€of€fact€to€weigh€theÐ œì  Ðevidence,€resolve€factual€disputes,€and€judge€the€credibility€of€witnesses.€€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€13(e);Ð …Õ  ÐòòState€v.€Reidóó,€91€S.W.3d€247,€276€(Tenn.€2002).òò€€óóÐ n¾  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€the€present€case,€the€defendant€was€convicted€of€assault€via€Tennessee€CodeÐ @ ÐAnnotated€section€39„13„101(a),€an€offense€committed€by€one€who€intentionally,€knowingly€orÐ )y Ðrecklessly€causes€bodily€injury€to€another€òòor€óówho€intentionally€or€knowingly€causes€another€toÐ b Ðreasonably€fear€imminent€bodily€injury.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„101(a)(1),€(2)€(2003).€€Ð ûK ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€claims€on€appeal€that€the€state€failed€to€prove€that€the€victim€sustainedÐ Í Ðany€bodily€injury,€leaving€the€offense€alternative€of€reasonable€fear€of€imminent€bodily€injury€as€theÐ ¶ Ðonly€other€basis€for€conviction.ò ò׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€ó ó€As€to€this€basis,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€victim€vehementlyÐ Ÿï Ðdenied€being€fearful€of€any€bodily€injury€and€that€only€the€victim€could€establish€whether€she€wasÐ ‹Û Ðafraid.€€The€state€counters€that€it€circumstantially€established€the€victimððs€fear€of€bodily€injuryÐ tÄ Ðthrough€witnesses€who€variously€described€her€as€being€ð ðhysterical,ðð€ð ðscared,ðð€ð ðpretty€upset,ððÐ ]­ Ðð ðcrying,ðð€ð ðshaking,ðð€ð ðflushed,ðð€and€ð ðfrantic.ðð€€Ð F– ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendantððs€argument€is€intriguing,€but€it€runs€headlong€into€the€general€rule€thatÐ h Ðð ðcriminal€offense[s]€may€be€established€exclusively€by€circumstantial€evidence.ðð€òòState€v.Ð  Q ÐPendergrassóó,€13€S.W.3d€389,€393€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòDuchac€v.€Stateóó,€505€S.W.2dÐ ê : Ð237€(Tenn.€1973);€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€901€S.W.2d€393,€396€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€Ð Ó!#  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€òòState€v.€Tommy€Arwood,€Jr.óó,€No.€01C01„9505„CC„00159€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,Ð ¥#õ" ÐNashville,€May€24,€1996),€this€court€reviewed€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€in€an€assault€case.€€TheÐ Ž$Þ# Ðvictim,€a€store€employee€who€suspected€the€defendant€of€shoplifting€cigarettes,€followed€theÐ w%Ç $ Ðdefendant€and€confronted€him.€€After€the€defendant€threatened€to€fight€the€victim,€the€defendant€Ð `&°!% Ðð ðshoved€[the€victim]€with€both€hands€backwards€into€the€ice€machine.ðð€€òòId.óó,€slip€op.€at€3.€€€After€theÐ ° Ðdefendant€left,€the€victim€swore€out€an€assault€warrant€against€the€defendant.€€Although€the€victimÐ ™é Ðdid€not€ð ðspecifically€[testify]€that€the€defendantððs€words€and€actions€caused€him€to€fear€imminentÐ ‚Ò Ðbodily€injury,ðð€this€court€held€that€ð ðthere€was€sufficient€circumstantial€evidence€for€the€jury€toÐ k» Ðconclude€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€[the€victim]€had€experienced€such€fear€as€a€result€of€theÐ T¤ Ðdefendantððs€conduct.ðð€€òòId.óó,€slip€op.€at€6.€€The€circumstances€relied€upon€by€the€court€in€òòTommyÐ =  ÐArwood,€Jr.óó€were€that€the€victim€hit€the€defendant€with€an€empty€soda€bottle€as€a€gesture€of€self„Ð & v Ðdefense,€the€victim€was€unable€to€recite€the€defendantððs€license€number€following€the€attack,€andÐ  _ Ðthe€victim€responded€to€the€attack€by€calling€the€police.€òòId.óó€(concerns€about€self„defense,€inabilityÐ ø H Ðto€concentrate,€and€turning€to€the€police€for€help€are€indicia€of€fearfulness).€€Ð á 1  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€òòState€v.€Ricky€Atkinsóó,€No.€03C01„9812„CC„00432€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,Ð ³  ÐNov.€10,€1999),€this€court€reviewed€an€assault€that€emanated€from€yet€another€convenience€storeÐ œì  Ðcigarette€incident.€€Atkins€fled€a€store€with€stolen€cigarettes,€and€the€store€clerk€followed.€€ð ð[T]heÐ …Õ  Ðdefendant€turned€to€face€the€victim,€displayed€a€weapon,€and€threatened€[the€victimððs]€lifeðð€whileÐ n¾  Ðstanding€approximately€ten€feet€from€the€victim.€€òòId.óó,€slip€op.€at€6.€€The€victim€retreated€to€the€storeÐ W§  Ðand€called€911.€€€òòId.óó€€€Even€though€the€victim€did€not€specifically€testify€that€he€was€fearful,€thisÐ @ Ðcourt€held€that€ð ð[u]nder€the€circumstances,€the€jury€was€entitled€to€infer€that€the€victim€ððreasonablyÐ )y Ðfear[ed]€imminent€bodily€injuryðð€as€required€by€the€[assault]€statute.ðð€€òòId.€€Ð b ÐÌà  àà ` àóóThese€two€cases€not€only€establish€that€a€victimððs€fear€of€imminent€bodily€injury€mayÐ â2 Ðbe€inferred€from€circumstantial€evidence,€but€they€also€point€to€circumstances€that€suggest€the€victimÐ Ë Ðexperienced€fear.€€Although€òòRicky€Atkinsóó€is€somewhat€attenuated€as€guidance€in€the€present€caseÐ ´ Ðbecause€the€circumstances€involved€Atkinsðð€wielding€a€weapon,€that€case,€along€with€òòTommyÐ í ÐArwood,€Jr.óó,€mention€the€victimsðð€respectively€turning€to€the€police€for€help€following€the€assaults.€Ð †Ö ÐIn€òòTommy€Arwood,€Jr.óó,€the€court€emphasized€the€victimððs€attempts€at€self„defense€as€suggestive€ofÐ o¿ Ða€personððs€fear€of€personal€injury.€€Both€these€factors€apply€in€the€present€case.€€Witnesses€observedÐ X¨ ÐMs.€Todd€striking€at€the€defendant€defensively,€and€it€is€undisputed€that€the€victim€came€into€theÐ A‘ Ðstore€to€ask€the€clerk€to€call€911.€€In€addition,€the€victim€entered€her€vehicle€and€locked€the€doorsÐ *z Ðwhen€she€left€the€store€following€the€argument.€€Most€significantly,€witnesses€observed€theÐ c Ðdefendant,€a€large€man,€striking€the€victim€both€inside€and€outside€the€vehicle€€The€customerÐ üL Ðtestified€that€the€store€clerk€screamed,€ð ðHeððs€beating€her!ðð€€Following€the€altercation,€variousÐ å 5 Ðwitnesses,€without€objection,€described€the€victim€as€ð ðfrantic,ðð€ð ðcrying,ðð€ð ðhysterical,ðð€and€ð ðscared.ðð€Ð Î!  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àWe€conclude€that€given€the€circumstances€in€the€present€case€and€based€upon€theÐ ‰$Ù# Ðlegal€authority€of€òòTommy€Arwood,€Jr.óó€and€òòRicky€Atkinsóó,€the€evidence€was€sufficient€to€justify€theÐ r% $ Ðjury€in€inferring€that€the€victim€reasonably€feared€imminent€bodily€injury.€€€Furthermore,€theÐ [&«!% Ðevidence€supports€a€finding€of€all€of€the€elements€of€assault€via€intentionally€or€knowingly€puttingÐ D'”"& Ðthe€victim€in€reasonable€fear€of€imminent€bodily€injury.Ð -(}#' ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àIIÐ Ñ+!'+ Їà  àà ` àIn€his€next€issue,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€disallowedÐ ° Ðhim€to€cross„examine€a€prosecution€witness,€Officer€Ellington,€about€receiving€a€one„day€suspensionÐ ™é Ðwithout€pay€in€connection€with€the€officer€failing€to€detect€the€defendantððs€possession€of€cigarettesÐ ‚Ò Ðduring€his€search€of€the€defendant€incidental€to€arrest€on€the€night€of€April€1,€2001.€€€In€a€jury„outÐ k» Ðhearing,€Ms.€Todd€testified€that,€when€she€confronted€Officer€Ellington€about€what€she€viewed€asÐ T¤ Ðan€inaccurate€incident€report,€he€responded€that€the€defendant€was€the€one€who€ð ðcost€[him]€a€dayÐ =  Ðoff€without€pay.ðð€€Ms.€Todd€then€posited€that€the€report€was€in€retaliation€for€Officer€EllingtonÐ & v Ðreceiving€a€suspension.€€The€court€ruled€that€evidence€of€Officer€Ellingtonððs€one„day€suspension€wasÐ  _ Ðirrelevant€to€the€issue€whether€the€incident€report€was€retaliatory€because€Ellington€did€not€prepareÐ ø H Ðthe€report€and€that€the€defendant€could€not€cross„examine€Officer€Ellington€about€the€day€off€withoutÐ á 1  Ðpay.€Later,€Officer€Ellington€testified€before€the€jury€that€he€was€the€first€officer€to€arrive€at€the€FastÐ Ê   ÐLane€on€April€1,€2001,€but€that€he€was€not€the€one€who€authored€the€incident€report.€€On€cross„Ð ³  Ðexamination,€he€testified€that€he€had€no€problems€with€the€defendant.€€€Ð œì  ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€appeal,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€evidence€was€relevant€to€show€OfficerÐ n¾  ÐEllingtonððs€prejudice€against€the€defendant.€€The€defendant€claims€that€impeachment€of€the€witnessÐ W§  Ðthrough€a€showing€of€prejudice€was€critical€to€the€defense€and€should€have€been€allowed€pursuantÐ @ Ðto€Tennessee€Rule€of€Evidence€616€and€his€due€process€rights€to€a€fair€trial.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Evid.€616Ð )y Ð(ð ðA€party€may€offer€evidence€by€cross„examination,€extrinsic€evidence,€or€both,€that€a€witness€isÐ b Ðbiased€in€favor€of€or€prejudiced€against€a€party€or€another€witness.ðð);€òòState€v€Brownóó,€29€S.W.3d€427,Ð ûK Ð435€(Tenn.€2000)€(constitutional€right€to€present€a€defense€may€be€violated€by€exclusion€of€hearsayÐ ä4 Ðtestimony).Ð Í ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€our€view,€this€issue€has€been€waived.€€The€issue€of€the€impeachment€of€OfficerÐ Ÿï ÐEllington€through€prejudice€was€first€raised€pretrial€by€the€stateððs€oral€motion€òòin€limineóó.€€€The€stateÐ ˆØ Ðasked€the€trial€court€to€disallow€cross„examination€of€Officer€Ellington€concerning€his€one„dayÐ qÁ Ðsuspension;€the€state€posited€that€the€suspension€could€not€have€resulted€in€prejudice€òòin€preparingÐ Zª Ðthe€incident€reportóó€because€Officer€Freeman,€not€Officer€Ellington,€prepared€the€report.€€On€theÐ C“ Ðother€hand,€in€the€pretrial€hearing€on€the€issue,€the€defendant€argued€that€Officer€EllingtonððsÐ ,| Ðsuspension€was€an€issue€of€prejudice€insofar€as€Ellingtonððs€òòtrial€testimonyóó€was€concerned.€€The€trialÐ e Ðcourt€discerned€the€distinction€between€the€two€positions€and€deferred€a€ruling€until€the€point€in€theÐ þN Ðtrial€when€the€defendant€wished€to€present€the€evidence.€€That€point€came€during€the€cross„Ð ç 7 Ðexamination€of€Ms.€Todd,€who€was€the€person€to€whom€Officer€Ellington€admitted€that€he€had€beenÐ Ð!   Ðsuspended€on€the€defendantððs€account.€€Ms.€Todd€testified€in€the€jury„out€hearing€that€OfficerÐ ¹" ! ÐEllingtonððs€reference€to€the€suspension€and€his€refusal€to€modify€the€report€caused€her€to€believe€thatÐ ¢#ò" Ðthe€report€was€the€result€of€Officer€Ellingtonððs€prejudice.€€The€state€then€revisited€its€earlierÐ ‹$Û# Ðargument€that€the€claim€of€prejudice€related€to€the€preparation€of€the€report,€and€both€the€trial€courtÐ t%Ä $ Ðand€the€defendant€responded€in€the€same€vein.€€€When€the€trial€judge€announced€following€the€jury„Ð ]&­!% Ðout€hearing€that€the€defendant€could€not€cross„examine€Officer€Ellington€about€the€suspensionÐ F'–"& Ðbecause€he€had€not€been€the€author€of€the€report,€the€defendant€took€no€issue€with€the€courtððsÐ /(#' Ðrationale€and€did€not€pursue€an€argument€that€Ellingtonððs€anticipated€òòtrial€testimony€óówas€the€resultÐ )h$( Ðof€prejudice€and€should€be€allowed€via€Rule€616.€€When€Officer€Ellington€later€testified,€theÐ *Q%) Ðdefendant€neither€attempted€a€Rule€616€cross„examination€nor€sought€a€further€ruling€from€the€trialÐ ê*:&* Ðcourt.€Ð Ó+#'+ Їà  àà ` àIn€our€view,€the€tacit€basis€for€objecting€and€the€trial€courtððs€rationale€for€overrulingÐ ° Ðthe€objection€are€at€odds€with€the€Rule€616€and€due€process€issues€the€defendant€raised€in€his€motionÐ ™é Ðfor€new€trial€and€in€his€appellate€brief.€€The€aggrieved€party€on€appeal€may€not€obtain€relief€inÐ ‚Ò Ðcontravention€of€the€province€of€the€trier€of€fact.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36€(a).€€In€other€words,€theÐ k» Ðaggrieved€party€may€not,€on€appeal,€rely€upon€a€different€theory€for€the€admission€of€evidence€thanÐ T¤ Ðthat€asserted€in€the€trial€court.€€òòSee€e.g.,€State€v.€Garlandóó,€617€S.W.2d€176,€186€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð =  Ð1981).€€We€believe€that€the€defendant€runs€afoul€of€this€rule€and€conclude€that€the€issue€as€framedÐ & v Ðon€appeal€is€waived.Ð  _ ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àIIIÐ á 1  ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€his€final€issue,€the€defendant€claims€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€imposing€theÐ ³  Ðeleven„month„twenty„nine„day€sentence€in€the€present€case€to€run€consecutively€with€his€sentencesÐ œì  Ðin€a€large€number€of€convictions€imposed€by€courts€in€four€counties.€ò ò€ó óThe€record€before€us€showsÐ …Õ  Ðthat€the€defendant€was€convicted€on€various€charges€of€forgery€and€violating€the€bad€check€law€inÐ qÁ  ÐMadison,€Henderson,€Crockett,€and€Perry€Counties.€€The€most€recent€adjudications€occurred€inÐ Zª  ÐSeptember€1998,€when€he€received,€in€addition€to€several€misdemeanor€convictions,€a€felony€theftÐ C“ Ðconviction€in€Henderson€County€and€felony€theft€and€forgery€convictions€in€Madison€County.€€OnÐ ,| Ðthat€date,€he€received€sentences€of€up€to€two€years€for€various€convictions€in€both€Henderson€andÐ e ÐMadison€Counties.€ò òó ó€He€was€apparently€on€parole€on€April€1,€2001,€when€the€instant€offenses€wereÐ þN Ðcommitted.Ð ç7 ÐÌà  àà ` àWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,Ð ¹  Ðit€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novo€óóreview€of€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€theÐ ¢ò Ðdeterminations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d)€(2003).€Ð ‹Û ÐThis€presumption€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtÐ tÄ Ðconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Ð ]­ ÐS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€€Ð F– ÐÌà  àà ` àAlthough€consecutive€sentencing€is€not€òòmandated€óóby€the€terms€of€Tennessee€CodeÐ h ÐAnnotated€section€40„35„115(b)€or€by€Tennessee€Rule€of€Criminal€Procedure€32(c)(3),€theÐ  Q Ðconsecutive€sentencing€order€in€this€case€is€amply€supported€by€the€permissive€provisions€of€CodeÐ ê : Ðsection€40„35„115(b)(2),€which€authorizes€the€trial€court€to€utilize€consecutive€sentencing€when€theÐ Ó!#  Ðoffender€has€an€ð ðextensiveðð€record€of€criminal€activity.€€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„115€(b)(2)Ð ¼" ! Ð(2003).€€No€word€describes€the€defendantððs€record€of€criminal€activity€better€than€ð ðextensive.ðð€Ð ¥#õ" ÐAccordingly,€the€trial€court€was€justified€in€imposing€the€instant€sentence€to€run€consecutively€toÐ Ž$Þ# Ðthe€previous€sentences.Ð w%Ç $ ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` à€à0 ¸ àà0¸ (#¸ (#àà0h(#(#àà0Àh(#h(#àIVÐ)k$(À(#À(# ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€conclusion,€we€find€no€reversible€error€and€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€lower€court.Ð í*=&* ÐÐ Ö+&'+ ЇÌà  àà ` à€Ð ™é Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð ‚Ò Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE