ÿWPC4 „]ÈŒµ™‰XÕë%ÎÑÖ¼lïãËfnEó`¼0¦õ´ øï¶®:b ´r;æ6/W,H:#åoIÏËÉÁ|€ ò®±ó†<1ªÚ0»”=”̽Õ¶òÈtNÔr’+A»˜iGqd?^Z§ä™)Î3I0ÀA}¦±‰úZTfÀ Ûä Žo¿©õÞ_üï6Å‘b÷hŽïÌéÕ¦c=š%Ã#Õ>‡ÕmŒö O'iΔ§i w ®\Ï®jñgô^s”Úã·3>†¸ß†z“b|¨ïT´´O¿j/éz:ãõ‰0@]WýûC>šR› é!HÃQW/¥¡ã”ãM ¹ð‘þ3é¡xÒ¢mú9_E#iC–| . .ΓHw‹(Œ¯·[Æ»ŸÆçökl»¡6A͈Yü«ÆM×ìÙ´%ÜuÌÄ‹8ž/í3”9:ÔZNŠ˜®Ýy ÏÈ¥½ ¶Z^c²;Sxb×÷è4Ìô’ ÄïrÌÃX0}[ª8¬ÚóH-7{®s;xÒë4â@¦„âL=x,“îáUl™ùþQª¢^‚‘9ÍC>ùukÓÎ|9gË÷’™ö”ŠzÓgÔp ¹t÷Ò“­‰çíÄ ¸Y/˜µ‚tY3s&'¤NÍb#Á\ % ^ # 0ˆ/ U8N· w 4 z Ò— i x mz =‘ ÆÎ Æ” ÆZÆ  0DæN*,ó4E''''''''''''''''''''''''b)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0ë1111 B 0¤9 D3Ý D- 0K== ASˆÆÛ 0¤¡ 0DE A«‰˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0»÷”)â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularq\;'ˆ¤k1@$¤ ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ 3Ý ƒR6$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÞ¼ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€will€likewise€òòóóanalyze€the€petition€as€a€request€for€habeas€corpus€relief,€a€post„conviction€petition,€and€asÐ ° Ða€petition€for€writ€of€error€coram€nobis.€€Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  éÝ ƒR6$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÞ¼ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€note€that,€by€his€own€admission€on€the€federal€habeas€application,€the€petitioner€did€not€appeal€the€stateÐ ° Ðconviction.€€Thus,€he€does€not€get€the€benefit€of€waiting€until€the€ruling€of€the€highest€appellate€court€to€start€the€runningÐ xÈ Ðof€the€statute€of€limitations.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„201(a)€(1990€&€Supp.€1995).- ù-(|G26$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€§¤»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôÞ¼ò»»Ô d(|3$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€§¤»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€§¤»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€§¤»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼§¤»»»ÔÑ8€¶SXXdð»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îôG§¤ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼§¤»îîôG #ԈРÜ, ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àMay€2000€SessionÐ X ÐÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÌò òÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶S#ÔDWIGHT€Ô_ÔSEATONÔ_Ôòòóó€v.€STATE€OF€TENNESSEEÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ôó óÐ  ` ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔSevierÔ_Ô€CountyÐ  h Ðà@@øøìàNo.€96„313„I€€€€€€Ben€W.€Hooper,€II,€JudgeÐ  X ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` AßÐ Ø(  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„01312„CCA„R3„CDÐ ×'  ÐAugust€21,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ Ç  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<¶` AßÐ ·  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThis€appeal€arises€from€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€the€petitioner'sòò€pro€seóó€application€€for€habeas€corpusÐ ¶ Ðrelief,€based€on€his€claim€that€his€1988€guilty€plea€to€a€state€aggravated€assault€charge€was€invalid.€Ð ¦ö ÐThe€petitioner€was€subsequently€convicted€in€federal€court€of€being€a€felon€in€possession€of€aÐ –æ Ðfirearm,€and€the€federal€sentence€was€enhanced€using€the€state€conviction€based€on€the€allegedlyÐ †Ö Ðinvalid€guilty€plea.€€The€trial€court€analyzed€the€petition€as€a€post„conviction€petition,€a€petition€forÐ vÆ Ðwrit€of€habeas€corpus,€and€as€a€petition€for€writ€of€error€coram€Ô_ÔnobisÔ_Ô,€based€on€the€various€argumentsÐ f¶ Ðof€the€petitioner,€and€denied€relief€under€any€of€these€vehicles.€€òòóóAfter€a€careful€review€of€the€record,Ð V¦ Ðwe€affirm€the€trial€court's€denial€of€the€petitioner's€request€for€relief.€€€€€€€€Ð F– ÐÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶S#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÓïÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ &v ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼§¤»àX¶S #ÔÔ‡X¶SX.¼§¤ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ôóó€and€òòJohnÐ V ÐEverett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð öF ÐÌDwight€Ô_ÔSeatonÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔEstillÔ_Ô,€South€Carolina,€Pro€Se.Ð Ö& ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€E.€Davidson,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð ¶!  ÐAl€C.€Ô_ÔSchmutzerÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Steven€R.€Hawkins,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ ¦"ö! ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð –#æ" ÐÓ© ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶SØ #ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÐ v%Æ $ ÐÌÓ  Óà  àOn€December€6,€1988,Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶Sí #ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô€the€petitioner,€Dwight€Ô_ÔSeatonÔ_Ô,€pled€guilty€in€the€Ô_ÔSevierÔ_Ô€County€CircuitÐ V'¦"& ÐCourt€to€a€charge€of€aggravated€assault.€€On€October€31,€1995,€the€United€States€District€Court€forÐ F(–#' Ðthe€Eastern€District€of€Tennessee,€sitting€at€Knoxville,€used€this€conviction€to€enhance€his€sentenceÐ 6)†$( Ðfor€being€an€armed€felon€in€violation€of€18€U.S.C.€ðð€922(g)(1).€€On€March€26,€1996,€the€petitionerÐ &*v%) Ðfiled€a€federal€habeas€corpus€application€in€the€Ô_ÔSevierÔ_Ô€County€Circuit€Court,€in€which€he€claimed€thatÐ +f&* Ðthe€state€assault€conviction€was€invalid€and€should€not€have€been€used€to€enhance€the€federalÐ ,V'+ Ðsentence.€€The€petitioner€alleged€that€he€was€not€informed€at€the€time€of€his€1988€guilty€plea€that€theÐ ö,F(, Ðconviction€could€be€used€as€an€enhancement€factor€in€future€proceedings,€in€effect,€claiming€that€hisÐ æ-6)-ý– ÐÔ_Ôguilty€plea€was€not€knowingly€or€voluntarily€entered.€€He€claims€that€his€attorney€was€not€aware€ofÐ ° Ðthe€fact€that€the€state€conviction€could€be€used€for€enhancement€purposes€and€failed€to€so€advise€him.Ð  ð ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€dismissed€Seatonððs€petition€on€November€23,€1999.€€Giving€the€òòpro€seóóÐ €Ð Ðpetitioner€substantial€leeway€in€his€characterization€of€his€request€for€relief,€the€trial€court€treated€theÐ pÀ Ðrequest€as€a€petition€for€post„conviction€relief,€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus,€and€a€writ€of€error€coramÐ ` ° Ðnobis€in€determining€if€the€petitioner€was€entitled€to€any€relief.€€The€court€denied€relief€afterÐ P   Ðdetermining€that:€(1)€the€petitioner€was€not€entitled€to€habeas€relief,€and€federal€prisoners€wereÐ @  Ðexcluded€from€state€courts€pursuant€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€29„21„102;€(2)€the€three„yearÐ 0 € Ðstatute€of€limitations€had€run€on€a€post„conviction€petition;€and€(3)€a€writ€of€error€coram€nobis€wasÐ  p  Ðlikewise€not€the€proper€vehicle€for€the€petitioner€to€obtain€relief.€€The€petitioner€appealed€to€thisÐ `  Ðcourt.€€Based€upon€our€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€dismissal€of€the€petitionerððs€request€forÐ P  Ðrelief.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð ð@  ÐÌà@GG ìàò òHabeas€Corpus€ReliefˆÐ Ð  Ðó óÌà  àIt€is€well„established€in€Tennessee€that€the€remedy€provided€by€a€writ€of€habeas€corpus€isÐ ° Ðlimited€in€scope€and€may€only€be€invoked€where€the€judgment€is€void€or€the€petitionerððs€term€ofÐ  ð Ðimprisonment€has€expired.€€òòState€v.€Ritchieóó,€20€S.W.3d€624€(Tenn.€2000);€€òòState€v.€Davenportóó,€980Ð à ÐS.W.2d€407,€409€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998);€òòPassarella€v.€Stateóó,€891€S.W.2d€619,€626€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð €Ð ÐApp.),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó,€(Tenn.€1994)Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶Sq #ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ôòòóó.Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶Së#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô€€A€void,€as€opposed€to€a€voidable,€judgment€has€beenÐ pÀ Ðdefined€by€our€supreme€court€as€ð ðone€in€which€the€judgment€is€facially€invalid€because€the€court€didÐ `° Ðnot€have€the€statutory€authority€to€render€such€judgment.ðð€€òòDykes€v.€Comptonóó,€978€S.W.2d€528,€529Ð P  Ð(Tenn.€1998);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòTaylor€v.€Stateóó,€995€S.W.2d€78,€83€(Tenn.€1999).€€Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S4#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔThe€judgment€of€a€courtÐ @ Ðof€general€jurisdiction€is€conclusive€and€presumed€to€be€valid,€and€òòóóÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶S#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ôsuch€a€judgment€can€only€beÐ 0€ Ðimpeached€if€the€record€affirmatively€shows€that€the€rendering€court€was€without€personal€or€subjectÐ  p Ðmatter€jurisdiction.€€òòArcher€v.€Stateóó,€851€S.W.2d€157,€162€(Tenn.€1993)Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶SÎ#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ôòòóó;Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô€òòPassarellaóó,€891€S.W.2d€atÐ ` Ð626òòóóÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶SO#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô.Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶SÏ#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô€€Thus,€habeas€corpus€relief€is€available€only€when€ð ðððit€appears€upon€the€face€of€the€judgementÐ P Ðor€the€record€of€the€proceedings€upon€which€the€judgement€is€renderedðð€that€a€convicting€court€wasÐ ð@ Ðwithout€jurisdiction€or€authority€to€sentence€a€defendant,€or€that€a€defendantððs€sentence€ofÐ à0 Ðimprisonment€.€.€.€has€expired.ðð€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€164€(citation€omitted).€Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àTo€obtain€habeas€corpus€relief,€the€petitioner€must€show€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidenceÐ °"  Ðthat€his€conviction€is€void€and€not€merely€voidable.€€òòSeeóó€òòDavenportóó,€980€S.W.2d€at€409;€òòPassarellaóó,Ð  #ð! Ð891€S.W.2d€at€627.€€Consequently,€a€petitioner€cannot€collaterally€attack€a€facially€valid€judgmentÐ $à" Ðof€the€trial€court€in€a€petition€for€habeas€corpus€relief.€€òòArcheróó,€851€S.W.2d€at€162.€€The€properÐ €%Ð # Ðmeans€of€challenging€a€facially€valid€judgment€based€on€a€constitutional€violation€is€through€aÐ p&À!$ Ðâ âpetition€for€post„conviction€relief.€€òòLewis€v.€Metropolitan€Gen.€Sessions€Court€for€Nashvilleóó,€949Ð `'°"% ÐS.W.2d€696,€699€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó,€(Tenn.€1997);€Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S!#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔòòFredrick€v.€Stateóó,€906Ð ° ÐS.W.2d€927,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).Ð  ð Ðâ âÌà  àUpon€reviewing€the€record,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€was€correct€in€denying€theÐ €Ð Ðpetitioner€habeas€relief.€€The€petitioner€has€not€alleged€that€the€state€court€was€without€jurisdictionÐ pÀ Ðor€authority€to€convict€him€in€1988€based€on€the€guilty€plea.€€Therefore,€the€petitioner€has€not€shownÐ ` ° Ðthat€his€state€conviction€is€void,€as€required€to€obtain€habeas€relief.Ð P   ÐÌà@ìàò òPost„Conviction€Reliefó ó€ˆÐ 0 € ÐÌà  àBecause€the€petitioner€filed€his€òòpro€seóó€petition€on€March€26,€1996,€it€is€governed€by€the€1995Ð `  ÐPost„Conviction€Procedure€Act.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„201€et.€seq.€(1990€&€Supp.€1995)Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S¿$#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô.€OnÐ P  Ðappeal,€we€are€bound€by€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€unless€the€record€preponderates€againstÐ ð@  Ðthose€findings.€€òòÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶Sk(#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔState€v.€Keithóó,€978€S.W.2d€861,€864€(Tenn.€1998).Ð à0  ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„30„210(f)€(1997)€requires€that€a€post„conviction€petitionerÐ À Ðprove€by€ð ðclear€and€convincing€evidenceðð€his€allegations€regarding€constitutional€claims.€€ClaimsÐ ° Ðof€ð ðdeficient€performance€by€counsel€and€possible€prejudice€to€the€defense€are€mixed€questions€ofÐ  ð Ðlaw€and€fact,ðð€meaning€that€the€review€is€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Burnsóó,€6€S.W.3d€453,€461€(Tenn.€1999)Ð à Ð(citing€òòGoad€v.€Stateóó,€938€S.W.2d€363€(Tenn.€1996)).Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€note€that€a€post„conviction€petition€was€the€proper€vehicle€for€the€petitioner€toÐ `° Ðchallenge€a€constitutionally€defective€guilty€plea€and€subsequent€conviction.€€Although€the€1995€ActÐ P  ÐÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶ST)#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ôrequires€that€a€post„conviction€petition€must€be€filed€within€one€year€of€the€date€on€which€the€stateÐ @ Ðcourt€judgment€became€final,€there€is€an€exception€in€the€Act.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€1986€version€of€the€€Post„Ð 0€ ÐConviction€Act€that€was€in€effect€at€the€time€of€petitionerððs€1988€conviction€had€a€three„year€statuteÐ  p Ðof€limitations,€and,€if€the€petitionerððs€post„conviction€petition€was€not€time„barred€when€the€newÐ ` Ðstatute€of€limitations€took€effect,€he€would€still€have€had€one€year€from€May€10,€1995,€to€file€hisÐ P Ðpetition€under€the€1995€Act.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„30„102€(1982€&€Supp.€1988);€Tenn.€Pub.€Act,Ð ð@ ÐCh.€207,€ðð€3.€€Unfortunately€for€the€petitioner,€his€post„conviction€petition€was€not€filed€until€someÐ à0 Ðseven€years€and€three€months€after€the€entry€of€his€conviction€on€the€state€charge;€thus,€the€three„yearÐ Ð  Ðstatute€of€limitations€under€the€1986€Act€had€long€expired.€€As€the€trial€court€found,€the€statute€ofÐ À! Ðlimitations€began€to€run€on€December€6,€1988,€and€petitionerððs€right€to€file€his€petition€for€post„Ð °"  Ðconviction€relief€was€extinguished€three€years€after€his€conviction€on€December€6,€1991.€€He€failedÐ  #ð! Ðto€file€within€that€time€frame,€and€his€petition€is€time„barred.€€Thus,€we€agree€with€the€trial€court€thatÐ $à" Ðrelief€was€not€available€to€the€petitioner€pursuant€to€the€Post„Conviction€Procedure€Act€because€theÐ €%Ð # Ðpetitionerððs€application€was€not€filed€within€the€applicable€statute€of€limitations.Ð p&À!$ ÐÌÐ  P( #& Ðà@OOìàò òWrit€of€Error€Coram€NobisˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àó óA€petition€for€writ€of€error€coram€nobis€is€used€to€challenge€a€courtððs€judgment€and,€like€aÐ à Ðpost„conviction€petition,€is€subject€to€a€one„year€statute€of€limitations.€€òòVan€Tran€v.€Stateóó,€6€S.W.3dÐ €Ð Ð257,€264€(Tenn.€1999).€€The€petitionerððs€writ€was€not€filed€within€that€time€period€and€was€properlyÐ pÀ Ðdismissed€by€the€trial€court.€€In€addition,€a€petition€for€writ€of€error€coram€nobis€is€not€the€properÐ ` ° Ðmeans€for€this€petitioner€to€obtain€relief,€as€the€relief€afforded€by€such€a€writ€is€very€narrow€and€isÐ P   Ðonly€appropriate€when€an€issue€was€not€addressed€or€could€not€be€addressed,€because€it€wasÐ @  Ðsomehow€hidden€from€the€trial€court.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„26„105€(1990);€òòNewsome€v.€Stateóó,€995Ð 0 € ÐS.W.2d€129,€133€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998),€òòpermóó.€òòappóó.€òòdeniedóó,€(Tenn.€1999).€€No€such€allegationsÐ  p  Ðhave€been€made€in€this€case,€and,€even€if€the€statute€of€limitations€had€not€expired,€the€petitioner€hasÐ `  Ðno€cognizable€claim€for€relief€under€a€writ€of€error€coram€nobis.€Ð P  ÐÌà  àIn€his€appellate€brief,€the€petitioner€has€claimed,€for€the€first€time,€that€a€writ€of€auditaÐ à0  Ðquerela€should€issue€as€to€his€conviction.€€This€is€a€common€law€writ€affording€ð ðrelief€to€a€judgmentÐ Ð  Ðdebtor€against€a€judgment€or€execution€because€of€some€defense€or€discharge€arising€subsequent€toÐ À Ðthe€rendition€of€the€judgment€or€the€issue€of€the€execution.ðð€€òòUnited€States€v.€Fonseca„Martinezóó,€36Ð ° ÐF.3d€62,€64€(9òòthóó€Cir.€1994)€(quoting€11€Wright€and€Miller,€òòFederal€Practice€and€Procedureóó,€ðð€2867Ð  ð Ðat€235€(1973)).€€òòSeeóó€òòalsoóó€òòBlackððs€Law€Dictionaryóó€131€(6òòthóó€ed.€1990)€(The€writ€lies€to€allow€aÐ à Ðdefendant€ð ðto€obtain€relief€against€the€consequences€of€the€judgment€on€account€of€some€matter€ofÐ €Ð Ðdefense€or€discharge€arising€since€its€rendition€and€which€could€not€be€taken€advantage€ofÐ pÀ Ðotherwise.ðð).Ð `° ÐÌà  àApparently,€this€writ€is€utilized,€upon€occasion,€in€the€federal€courts€in€an€attempt€to€vacateÐ @ Ðan€allegedly€unfair€conviction.€€However,€as€stated€in€òòFonseca„Martinezóó,€36€F.3d€at€65,€no€federalÐ 0€ Ðappellate€court€has€utilized€a€writ€of€audita€querela€ð ðto€vacate€an€otherwise€valid€conviction€forÐ  p Ðsolely€equitable€reasons.ðð€€Initially,€as€to€the€petitionerððs€claim€that€the€writ€should€issue€as€to€hisÐ ` Ðconviction,€we€note€that€he€failed€to€present€this€claim€to€the€trial€court€and€cannot€now€raise€it€forÐ P Ðthe€first€time€on€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805€S.W.2d€776,€781€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòpermóó.Ð ð@ Ðòòappóó.€òòdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1990).€€Additionally,€his€appellate€brief,€in€contravention€of€Rule€27,€TennesseeÐ à0 ÐRules€of€Appellate€Procedure,€and€Rule€10(b),€Rules€of€the€Tennessee€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals,Ð Ð  Ðcontains€no€citations€to€appropriate€authorities€in€support€of€this€argument.€€Accordingly,€theÐ À! Ðargument€has€been€waived.€€However,€even€if€we€were€to€consider€his€argument€on€the€merits,€toÐ °"  Ðwhatever€extent€this€writ€is€still€viable€in€Tennessee,€the€petitioner€has€failed€to€present€a€claimÐ  #ð! Ðentitling€him€to€relief.€€He€simply€has€not€demonstrated€any€post„judgment€occurrence,€which€wouldÐ $à" Ðentitle€him€to€issuance€of€this€writ.€€Ð €%Ð # ÐÌÐ  `'°"% Ðà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONˆÐ ° ÐÌà  àó óBased€upon€the€foregoing€authorities€and€reasoning,€we€affirm€the€order€of€the€trial€courtÐ à Ðdenying€relief€to€the€petitioner.Ð €Ð Ðò òó óÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶S-#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤Ô€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ô#†¼§¤»XX¶S‹D#ÔÔ‡X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÐ pÀ ÐòòóóÔ#†¼§¤»XX¶SÜD#ÔÔ€X¶SX»¼§¤ÔÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 0 € Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE