WPC! U:V % 0w@r 4   0  0D 0J9 0T 0^ 0h5 0r 0| 0 0 1u 0dU *zB) BDC AM-z.Wv~.v D3 0@ AOA 0D! D/K! Bz!,cAZ"Arial RegularX(`$TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7GXXdXXd7  EDDӀڃ"3|x((3$ `!TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T7XXdXXd7    `   0  (#$  0  2 0Indent123  2" 0Indent20 23  2, 0Indent30 0 23  26 0Indent40 0 0 23  2@ 0Indent50 0 0 0 23  2J 0Indent60 0 0 0 0 23  2T 0Indent70 0 0 0 0 0 23  2^ 0Indent80 0 0 0 0 0 0 23    ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P 8Mac DefaultMac Default ` X<  9p`(Arial% Line 7 d d7Border 1dd- C << G  !  #d#    ! \RA'\#d#      YYY FILEDX October1,1997CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerk   !#d#     \RA'\#d#   \RA'\7XXdXXd7     Theappellantsbriefargues, InordertosustaintheDefendantsposition,theCourtwillhavetointerpretthestatementofJudgeWittasevidencinganintenttorunthesentencesconcurrently. M !#d#     \RA'\#d#        Moreover,wenotethattheappellantfiledthisappealmorethanthirtydaysafterthejudgmenthadbeenenteredinviolationofTenn.R.App.P4(a).However,intheinterestsofjustice,wewaivejurisdictiononthefilingofthenoticeofappeal.Tenn.R.App.P.4(a).PtPtHH(FG(HH(d'hStyl{WP}01  HH  2$HH  Geneva  <Px443!#4$*$$*$ KK  Geneva  Geneva .,6 Geneva   h HD: Geneva  h HD: Geneva 'dxd("$    -C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$   1  ' dxdP Pd ! .      \RA'\#Xd##Xd#   4   4   R!" A1-j|` e `@R @ INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE@ ATKNOXVILLE@ SEPTEMBERSESSION,1997JOESEIGLE,   )     ) No.03C019610CR00364 Appellant   )     ) SULLIVANCOUNTYvs.     )     ) Hon.FrankL.Slaughter,JudgeOSCARMASON,Tennessee )DepartmentofCorrections, ) (WritofHabeasCorpus)DOUGCLUCK,Tennessee ) BoardofParoles,and  )STATEOFTENNESSEE,  )     ) Appellee   ) FortheAppellant:    FortheAppellee: ThomasR.Bandy,III    CharlesW.Burson P.O.Box1127    AttorneyGeneralandReporterKingsport,TN37662      TimothyF.Behan       AssistantAttorneyGeneral      CriminalJusticeDivision      450JamesRobertsonParkway      Nashville,TN372430493                H.GreeleyWells,Jr.       DistrictAttorneyGeneral      RobertM.Montgomery       Asst.DistrictAttorneyGeneral      BlountvilleTN37617      OPINIONFILED:򀀀AFFIRMED DavidG.Hayes Judge@ OPINION  Theappellant,JoeSeigle,appealsthetrialcourtsdismissalofhispetitionforwritofhabeascorpus.OnMay10,1993,theappellantpledguiltyintheSullivanCountyCriminalCourttoonecountofpassingaworthlesscheckinexcessof$60,000,aclassBfelony.Thelengthandmannerofserviceofthesentenceweretobedeterminedbythetrialcourt.ThetrialcourtimposedatenyearsentenceintheDepartmentofCorrection.Onthedateofthesentencinghearing,theappellantwasinfederalcustodyservingafiveyearsentence.Therecordindicatesthattheappellanthadadditionalfederalchargespending.TheappellantiscurrentlyconfinedatthefederalcorrectionalfacilityinLexington,Kentucky. Atthesentencinghearing,theprosecutorarguedthatthestateandfederalsentencesshouldrunconsecutiveandnotedthat,ifthejudgmentofconvictionwassilentonthisissue,undertherulesofcriminalprocedure,thesentenceswouldbeconsecutive.Wefindthistobeacorrectstatementoflaw.SeeRule32(c)(2),Tenn.R.Crim.P.Appellantstrialcounselarguedagainsttheimpositionofconsecutivesentences.Thejudgmentofconvictionenteredbythetrialcourtmakesnoreferencetotheappellantsfederalconviction.TheappellanthasreceivednoticethattheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrectionconsidershisstateandfederalsentencestobeconsecutive.OnApril1,1996,theappellant,proceedingprose,filedtheinstantpetitionforwritofhabeascorpus.OnJuly11,1996,thetrialcourtdismissedthepetition.Afterareview,weaffirm.Althoughtheappellantfailstoarticulatetheissuewhichwearetoreview,asrequiredbyTenn.R.App.P.27(a)(4),weconcludefromhisbriefthatheseeksreviewofthesentencingcourtsdecisionwhichresultedintheimpositionofconsecutivesentences. #    Writsofhabeascorpuswillissueonlyinthecaseofavoidjudgmentortofreeaprisonerheldincustodyafterhistermofimprisonmenthasexpired.Const.Art.115;Tenn.CodeAnn.2921101etseq.(1980);SeePottsv.State,833S.W.2d60(Tenn.1992);SeealsoArcherv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993);Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Theappellantspetitiondoesnotallegeeitherofthesegroundsforrelief. $   ׀Second,theappellantiscurrentlyinfederalcustody;therefore,hedoesnothavestandingtopetitionforhabeascorpusreliefandwillnotaslongasheremainsincarceratedatthefederalpenitentiary.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.2921102;Taylorv.Morgan,909S.W.2d17,20(Tenn.Crim.App.1995).Finally,asweinitiallynoted,theappellant,ineffect,seeksrelieffromthejudgmentofconvictionenteredbythetrialcourt.Thus,theappellantattemptstoutilizehabeascorpusprocedureasavehiclefordirectappeal.Apetitionforhabeascorpusreliefisaninappropriateprocedureinwhichtoreviewpotentialerrorsofatrialcourt.Richmondv.Barksdale,688S.W.2d86,88(Tenn.Ct.App.1984)(quotingStateexrel.Anglinv.Mitchell,575S.W.2d284(Tenn.1979)). Fortheforegoingreasons,weaffirmthetrialcourtsdismissaloftheappellantspetitionforwritofhabeascorpus.     ____________________________________      DAVIDG.HAYES,JudgeCONCUR:_____________________________________JOHNH.PEAY,Judge_____________________________________WILLIAMM.BARKER,Judge