ÿWPCë  “Z¨òA‚Qßp·á¥“vCw›¦kðÌ€çû–?éõ\é½ÁJ2¢0³l.äáÖ²“jÍÏÙ/:Kö)'B¢ì“Šõ!IN%ÿt¼N Oá}¤Žú³pY9nkžç3¿«ç™ƒû Ó54ü\åZ˜]'sÚôXc®?_¸^Ûx¯âÏiÉÒ×̯ª’”ø’æø¡¿ЙË;·:›xC¾mëp˜Eƒ(Km;Õ˜¥ßsôêH·á:À_ð Á{/( ó²|"!ˆÀ›ªË—SÃ*ßÇß@—…÷£å("‰‹¾V••inåóScB‰{ÕQBK{€²(øu6`5‚{ ë)Ú~—M‚4Œ”òÃ&}¾Ê66õj|&koµöÒ÷&<è¢Ø5ÂF?PrtzwY%^¡Eîÿ–7 TÆzä{0r9o.%j£"ªrY­ëfjK¿,™ŠW¸ººmSËïèCUhÄp>ª¥?DiŽvþ0 E °Ã˜Tgƒ‹WÒ}ËÞôãv tA——½%²?ÈO²"[›\,D ì;Å.ð²°‹“à6M—üHróìþG^KOt%[ ‹ jcÒɱƒ7{ø‰ª±}§•ßx"÷w0þJâa#!NUNo %½ 0:ÃU:ý^ 7 wC 4G [ j ml U:ƒ U,½ é Hñ U,9 -e N’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ AQ” Æå 0V« 0V 0DW W D3› BÎ ˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,Ô, øð AZ‹"Arial Regular®ƒ'L tpO' 7¡3|x ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ, øð AZ"Arial Regular,c½¬AZ‹Arial   >Ý ƒ[½Þ"ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€X]¾XXXÔÔ€èCcçXX]¾ÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€ÛˆçèCcÔÐ  ÐÌDecember€29,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAŠÔó ó, øð AZArial  #Ñ#€CXÿÿd#ÑZ[\]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(.3½Þ$¢¢Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ý(.3½Þ$££Ý ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó````'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÒX°ÒÒ4°ÒÔ€X]¾XXXÔÔ€ŠÜ‹XX]¾ÔÑ€zãÑÔ_Ôßv€Y_@0,j: `€€@ÿEðf Žtt¨¦(` \vßÔ_Ôà@y y ÚàòòIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEóóˆÐ `  Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àà œ àà ô àà L àà ¤ àà ü! àà T$ àÌà@ÑÑ*ÚàòòAT€KNOXVILLEóóˆÐ X ø ÐÌà@§§&ÚàOCTOBER€1999€SESSIONˆÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à ì à*à D àC.C.A.€#€03C01„9903„CR„00098€Ð @à ÐÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ä àAppellee,à ” àà ì à*à D àGREENE€COUNTYÐ 8Ø  ÐÌVS.à Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì à*à D àHon.€James€E.€Ô_ÔBecknerÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ 0Ð  ÐÌDENNIS€J.€Ô_ÔSHELTONÔ_Ô,€JR.,€à ì à*à D à(Aggravated€Burglary;€Theft€of€Ð (È  Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à0 D àProperty€over€$1,000)Ð$ÄD€%D€% Ѐ€€€€€€à Œ àà ä àAppellant.à ” àà ì à*Ð  À ÐÌÌÌÌòòFor€Appellant:óóà < àà ” àà ì àà D àòòFor€Appellee:óóÐ  ¬ ÐÌDouglas€L.€Payne€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ì àà D àPaul€G.€SummersÐ  ¤ Ð114€South€Maine€Street€€€€€€€€€€à ì àà D àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ !  ÐÔ_ÔGreenevilleÔ_Ô,€TN€€37743à ” àà ì àà D àÐ ü!œ Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Clinton€J.€MorganÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Counsel€for€the€State€€Ì€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Nashville,€TN€€37243„0493ÌÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ì à€€€€€€€€€à0 D àCecil€C.€Mills,€Jr.€Ðä'„D€%D€% Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ì à€€€€€€€€€à0 D àAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐà(€ D€%D€% Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€109€South€Main€StreetÌ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€à ” àà ì à€€€€€€€€€€Ô_ÔGreenevilleÔ_Ô,€TN€€37743Ð Ø*x!" ÐÌòòóóÌÌOPINION€FILED:_____________________ÌÌÌÌAFFIRMEDÌÌÌÌGARY€R.€WADE,€PRESIDING€JUDGEÐ  ¨6H-. ÐÑzãÑâ âÑ8€ôGXXdìXXdì8Ñâ âÑ  ÑÔ_ÔÓÓòòà@  -ÚàOPINIONóóˆÐ `  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant,€Dennis€Shelton,€was€convicted€of€aggravatedÐ p  Ðburglary€and€theft€of€property€over€$1,000€but€less€than€$10,000.€€The€trialÐ x Ðcourt€imposed€Range€I€sentences€of€six€years€for€the€aggravated€burglaryÐ €  Ðconviction€and€four€years€for€the€theft€conviction.€€The€sentences€were€orderedÐ ˆ(  Ðto€be€served€concurrently.€€The€trial€court€also€imposed€a€fine€of€$4,000.€€InÐ 0  Ðthis€appeal€of€right,€the€following€issues€are€presented€for€review:€(1)€whetherÐ ˜8 Ðthe€evidence€is€sufficient€to€support€the€guilty€verdicts;€and€(2)€whether€theÐ  @ Ðsentence€imposed€is€excessive.Ð ¨H ÐÌà Œ àà ä àWe€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð ¸X ÐÌà Œ àà ä àOn€December€4,1997,€Donald€Tunnell€saw€two€young€males€runÐ È#h Ðfrom€the€Eugene€Britton€home€in€Greene€County€and€get€into€a€car€parked€inÐ Ð%p Ðthe€driveway.€€Tunnell,€who€was€approximately€one€hundred€yards€away,€€wasÐ Ø'x Ðunable€to€identify€either€of€the€two€young€men,€but€described€one€as€havingÐ à)€  Ðblonde€hair€with€a€long€ponytail.Ð è+ˆ"" ÐÌà Œ àà ä àJim€Ellison,€a€detective€sergeant€with€the€Greene€County€SheriffððsÐ ø/˜&& ÐDepartment,€received€a€radio€report€of€the€burglary.€€The€report€included€aÐ 2 (( Ðdescription€of€a€vehicle.€€As€the€result€of€a€second€radio€report,€DetectiveÐ 4¨** ÐEllison€drove€to€a€trailer€park€where€he€observed€four€young€males€standingÐ 6°,, Ðnear€a€dark€blue€older€model€Oldsmobile.€€Three€of€the€four€men€fled.€Ð 8¸.. ÐDetective€Ellison€testified€that€the€defendant€was€among€the€three€who€ran;€allÐ `  Ðwere€able€to€evade€arrest.€€Officers€arrested€the€fourth€young€male,€who€was€aÐ h  Ðbrother€of€the€defendant.€€The€blue€Oldsmobile€was€the€same€vehicle€that€hadÐ p  Ðpreviously€been€seen€at€the€Britton€residence.Ð x ÐÌ€à Œ àà ä àAt€trial,€Roy€Johnson,€who€lived€in€the€trailer€park,€testified€that€onÐ ˆ(  Ðthe€day€of€the€burglary€the€defendant€arrived€at€his€residence€driving€a€blueÐ 0  ÐOldsmobile.€€He€described€the€defendant€as€having€long€blonde€hair€with€aÐ ˜8 Ðpony€tail.€€Johnson€recalled€that€the€defendant,€who€was€accompanied€by€hisÐ  @ Ðthree€brothers,€asked€if€he€wanted€to€buy€a€pistol,€shotgun,€and€some€rifles.€Ð ¨H ÐThe€defendant€claimed€that€he€had€hidden€the€guns€"where€they€couldn't€beÐ °P Ðfound."€€Johnson€testified€that€when€the€police€officers€arrived,€the€defendantÐ ¸X Ðand€two€of€his€brothers€fled€on€foot.€€The€officers€arrested€Billy€Shelton,€one€ofÐ À!` Ðthe€defendantððs€brothers,€inside€the€trailer€as€he€attempted€to€flush€someÐ È#h Ðjewelry€down€the€commode.Ð Ð%p ÐÌà Œ àà ä àEugene€Britton€testified€that€two€shotguns,€two€rifles,€and€a€pistolÐ à)€  Ðwere€missing€from€his€residence.€€Various€rings€and€necklaces€belonging€toÐ è+ˆ"" Ðhis€wife€were€also€missing.€€While€admitting€he€had€never€had€the€itemsÐ ð-$$ Ðappraised,€Britton€estimated€their€total€fair€market€value€to€be€about€$6,000.Ð ø/˜&& ÐÌà Œ àà ä àThe€defendant€first€argues€that€the€evidence€is€insufficient€toÐ 4¨** Ðsupport€the€guilty€verdicts.€€He€specifically€contends€that€Tunnell€did€notÐ 6°,, Ðidentify€the€defendant,€never€saw€the€defendant€inside€the€Britton€residence,Ð 8¸.. Ðand€did€not€see€the€defendant€in€possession€of€the€stolen€goods.€€TheÐ `  Ðdefendant€also€submits€that€the€state€failed€to€adequately€establish€the€valueÐ h  Ðof€the€items€as€in€excess€of€$1,000€because€Britton€had€little€knowledge€as€toÐ p  Ðthe€value€of€his€wife's€jewelry€and€had€not€purchased€the€stolen€guns.€€TheÐ x Ðdefendant€asserts€that€he€is€entitled€to€a€judgment€of€acquittal€or,€in€theÐ €  Ðalternative,€an€entry€of€a€judgment€of€theft€of€property€less€than€$500.Ð ˆ(  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼ÔOn€appeal,€the€state€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€ofÐ ˜8 Ðthe€evidence€and€all€reasonable€inferences€which€might€be€drawn€therefrom.€Ð  @ ÐòòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€The€credibility€of€theÐ ¨H Ðwitnesses,€the€weight€to€be€given€their€testimony,€and€the€reconciliation€ofÐ °P Ðconflicts€in€the€proof€are€matters€entrusted€to€the€jury€as€triers€of€fact.€€òòByrge€v.Ð ¸X ÐStateóó,€575€S.W.2d€292,€295€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1978).€€When€the€sufficiency€ofÐ À!` Ðthe€evidence€is€challenged,€the€relevant€question€is€whether,€after€reviewingÐ È#h Ðthe€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€any€rational€trier€of€factÐ Ð%p Ðcould€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€crime€beyond€a€reasonableÐ Ø'x Ðdoubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319€(1979);€€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€657Ð à)€  ÐS.W.2d€405,€410€(Tenn.€1983),€òòcert.€deniedóó,€465€U.S.€1073€(1984);€Tenn.€R.Ð è+ˆ"" ÐApp.€P.€13(e).Ô#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼c#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔÐ ð-$$ ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€ý"#ÔÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼ÔThe€state€may€use€direct€evidence,€circumstantial€evidence,€or€aÐ è1ˆ(( Ðcombination€of€both€to€prove€the€requisite€elements€of€a€criminal€offense.€Ð ð3** ÐòòState€v.€Tharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€896,€899-900€(Tenn.€1987).€€The€weight€to€beÐ ø5˜,, Ðgiven€circumstantial€evidence,€and€any€inferences€to€be€drawn€therefrom€"areÐ 8 .. Ðquestions€primarily€for€the€jury."€€òòMarable€v.€Stateóó,€313€S.W.2d€451,€457Ð `  Ð(Tenn.€1958).€Ô#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼m##ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔÐ h  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€š%#ÔÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼Ô"A€person€commits€burglary€who,€without€the€effective€consent€ofÐ ` Ðthe€property€owner,"€enters€a€building€"with€intent€to€commit€a€felony€or€theft."€Ð h ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39-14-401,€„402.€€The€burglary€becomes€aggravatedÐ p  Ðwhen€the€building€entered€is€a€place€of€habitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„14„Ð x  Ð403.Ð €  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼ &#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼Ô"Value"€is€as€follows:Ð 0 ÐÓÓà8 Œ àà8ä Œ (#Œ (#à(i)€The€fair€market€value€of€the€property...€at€the€timeÐ €  Ðand€place€of€the€offense;€or€(ii)€If€the€fair€marketÐ x Ðvalue€of€the€property€cannot€be€ascertained,€the€costÐ p Ðof€replacing€the€property€within€a€reasonable€timeÐ h  Ðafter€the€offense...€€Ð`!ä Ð ä Ð  ÐÌÓH(ÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„106(35).Ô#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€þ'#ÔÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼Ô€€Ð P#ð ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼3*#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔThe€defendant€fit€the€description€provided€by€an€eyewitness€whoÐ h' Ðobserved€two€young€males€flee€the€scene€of€a€burglary.€€Later€that€day,€RoyÐ X)ø  ÐJohnson€saw€the€defendant€driving€a€vehicle€that€met€the€description€of€theÐ H+è!" Ðgetaway€car.€€When€police€officers€arrivedÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€¥*#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼Ô,€the€defendant€was€trying€to€sellÐ 8-Ø#$ ÐJohnson€firearms€similar€to€those€reported€missing€from€the€victim's€residence.€Ð (/È%& ÐThe€defendant€ran.€€Officers€itemized€the€stolen€jewelry.€The€victim€testified€asÐ 1¸'( Ðto€the€specific€guns€which€were€stolen.€€As€owner,€he€testified€that€the€fairÐ 3¨)* Ðmarket€value€of€all€the€items€was€approximately€$6,000.€€Owners€areÐ ø4˜+, Ðcompetent€by€fact€of€ownership€to€testify€to€the€value€of€the€property€stolen.€Ð è6ˆ-. ÐòòState€v.€Hammóó,€611€S.W.2d€826€(Tenn.€1981);Ô#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€%,#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼Ô€òòReaves€v.€Stateóó,€523€S.W.2dÐ Ø8x/0 Ð218,€220€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1975);€òòseeóó€N.€Cohen,€D.€Paine,€and€S.Ð `  ÐSheppeard,€òòTennessee€Law€of€Evidenceóó€ðð€701.2€(3òòrdóó€ed.€1995).€Ô#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€¸.#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼Ô€€From€theseÐ P ð Ðfacts,€it€was€entirely€reasonable€for€the€jury€to€conclude€that€the€defendant€wasÐ @ à Ðguilty€of€the€crime.€€It€was€up€to€the€jury€to€assess€credibility€of€the€victim'sÐ 0Ð Ðtestimony€regarding€the€value€of€the€jewelry.€€In€our€view,€the€circumstantialÐ  À Ðevidence€was€sufficient€to€support€the€verdict.Ð °  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€Ø/#ÔòòóóÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔThe€defendant's€second€argument€is€that€the€trial€court€erred€byÐ ð  Ðimposing€the€maximum€possible€sentence.€€He€specifically€contends€thatÐ à€ Ðbeing€the€driver€of€the€car€used€in€a€crime€does€not€necessarily€mean€that€heÐ Ðp Ðis€a€leader€in€the€commission€of€the€offense.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð À` Ð114(2).Ð °P ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€Í1#ÔÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼ÔWhen€there€is€a€challenge€to€the€length,€range,€or€manner€ofÐ "0 Ðservice€of€a€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€reviewÐ ˜$8 Ðwith€a€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€Ð  &@ ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€theÐ ¨(H  Ðaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ °*P!" Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Ð ¸,X#$ ÐS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991);€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597€(Tenn.Ð À.`%& Ð1994).€€"If€the€trial€court€applies€inappropriate€factors€or€otherwise€fails€toÐ È0h'( Ðfollow€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€the€presumption€of€correctness€falls."€€òòState€v.Ð Ð2p)* ÐSheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992).€€The€SentencingÐ Ø4x+, ÐCommission€Comments€provide€that€the€burden€is€on€the€defendant€to€showÐ à6€-. Ðthe€impropriety€of€the€sentence.€€Ð è8ˆ/0 Їà Œ àà ä àOur€review€requires€an€analysis€of€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,Ð `  Ðreceived€at€the€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(2)€the€presentence€report;€(3)€theÐ h  Ðprinciples€of€sentencing€and€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencingÐ p  Ðalternatives;€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense;€(5)€anyÐ x Ðmitigating€or€enhancing€factors;€(6)€any€statements€made€by€the€defendant€inÐ €  Ðhis€own€behalf;€and€(7)€the€defendant's€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€Ð ˆ(  ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€and€„210;€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€735€S.W.2dÐ 0  Ð859,€863€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987).€€The€record€in€this€case€demonstrates€thatÐ ˜8 Ðthe€trial€court€made€adequate€findings€of€fact.€Ô#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼¿3#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔÐ  @ ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€È;#ÔÔ‡ Š“¼ˆˆŠ“¼ÔIn€calculating€the€sentence€for€felony€convictions€committedÐ ˜8 Ðbefore€July€1,€1995,€the€presumptive€sentence€is€the€minimum€within€theÐ  @ Ðrange€if€there€are€no€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¨!H Ð40„35„210(c)€(1990)€(amended€July€1,€1995€to€provide€that€the€presumptiveÐ °#P Ðsentence€for€a€Class€A€felony€as€the€midpoint€in€the€range).€€If€there€areÐ ¸%X Ðenhancement€factors€but€no€mitigating€factors,€the€trial€court€may€set€theÐ À'` Ðsentence€above€the€minimum.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(d).€€A€sentenceÐ È)h  Ðinvolving€both€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€requires€an€assignment€ofÐ Ð+p"" Ðrelative€weight€for€the€enhancement€factors€as€a€means€of€increasing€theÐ Ø-x$$ Ðsentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210.€€The€sentence€may€then€be€reducedÐ à/€&& Ðwithin€the€range€by€any€weight€assigned€to€the€mitigating€factors€present.€€òòId.óó€Ô#†Š“¼ˆˆ Š“¼8<#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔÐ è1ˆ(( ÐÌà Œ àà ä àÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€z@#ÔÔ‡ ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼ÔThe€defendant€was€convicted€of€a€Class€D€and€a€Class€C€felony.€Ð à5€,, ÐThe€trial€court€imposed€a€Range€I€standard€offender€sentence,€with€a€30%Ð Ð7p.. Ðrelease€eligibility€status€for€both€convictions.€€The€sentence€for€the€Class€DÐ `  Ðfelony,€therefore,€could€be€as€little€as€two€years€or€as€much€as€four€years.€€TheÐ P ð Ðsentence€for€the€Class€C€felony€could€be€as€little€as€three€years€or€as€much€asÐ @ à Ðsix€years.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(3)€and€(4).€€The€trial€court€foundÐ 0Ð Ðthree€enhancement€factors:Ô#†Š“¼ˆ ˆ ŠÁ€ê@#ÔÔ‡ŠÁ€ ˆˆŠ“¼Ô€(1)€that€the€defendant€had€a€prior€criminal€history;Ð  À Ð(2)€that€the€defendant€was€a€leader€in€the€commission€of€the€offenses;€and€(3)Ð °  Ðthat€the€defendant€had€a€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€aÐ    Ðprevious€release.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1),(2),€and€(8).Ð ð  ÐÌà Œ àà ä àAs€the€only€mitigating€factor,€the€trial€court€found€that€theÐ Ðp Ðdefendant's€criminal€conduct€did€not€cause€or€threaten€serious€bodily€harm.€Ð À` ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€The€trial€court€assigned€little€weight€to€theÐ °P Ðmitigating€factor.€€Ð   @ ÐÌà Œ àà ä àIn€our€view,€the€evidence€supports€the€application€of€all€threeÐ €$  Ðenhancement€factors.€The€evidence€not€only€indicated€that€the€defendant€wasÐ p& Ðthe€driver€of€the€vehicle€that€was€used€in€these€offenses,€but€that€he€took€theÐ `(  Ðlead€in€hiding€the€guns€and€attempting€to€sell€them€to€Roy€Johnson.€€In€ourÐ P*ð " Ðopinion,€the€trial€court€correctly€applied€this€factor.€€Furthermore,€the€trial€courtÐ @,à"$ Ðhas€the€prerogative€to€weigh€the€enhancement€factors€against€any€mitigatingÐ 0.Ð$& Ðcircumstances.€€So€long€as€conscientious€consideration€is€given€to€all€relevantÐ  0À&( Ðfactors,€this€court€will€not€disturb€a€sentence€even€if€our€assessment€mightÐ 2°(* Ðhave€been€different€than€that€of€the€trial€judge.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2dÐ 4 *, Ð785€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€€€Ð ð5,. ÐÐ à7€.0 Ðà Œ àà ä àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð `  ÐÌÓÓà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D à________________________________Ð @ à Ðà Œ àà ä àà < àà ” àà ì àà D àGary€R.€Wade,€Presiding€JudgeÐ 8Ø ÐÌCONCUR:Ð (È ÐÌÌÌ____________________________Ð ¨  ÐDavid€H.€Welles,€JudgeÐ    ÐÌÌÌ____________________________Ð à€ ÐDavid€G.€Hayes,€JudgeÐ Øx Ѐ€€€€€Ð Ðp ÐÌà Œ àà ä à€Ð À` ÐÌà Œ à€€€€€€Ð °P ÐÌÌÌÌÌÔ#†Š“¼ˆ ˆŠÁ€‰C#Ô