WPC+ @+pȅa\ڐ`! Ij4IlzO9d Q&z5]!J`!ٰnǻ5Yc^ ħH*;^&ACGt5:X_4:OL̉{[C˪1j5s >Yg(l)iY5){f5cVfk5XH+Mb %\^ b 0nU&NwD4H\ zk m # 0Y   v <U3>N@0B 0rE` 0b 0M 05 0 0 0 0 0 0f 0B 0 0 0 0 0a 0+ 0 0 0 0i 0>! 0" 0"b# 0# 0|$ 0B% 0P& 0PU& 0P&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 0&&&& B'' 0' D3( D-( 0K)) ASL)) 0e* 0D + AM++ (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*T#3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4050064Hyperlink    ԁLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5\  `&Times New Roman StrobelRiddall2G+J 0_level1  X /%4 4 <DL/23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2D+J 0_level2   ," <DL,23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2A+J 0_level3   ) <DL)23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2>+J 0_level4  ` &<<DL&23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2;+J 0_level5   #DL#23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  28+J 0_level6    DL 23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  25+J 0_level7  h DDL23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  22+J 0_level8   L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2/+J 0_level9    L23  ..  2( 4 <DL2  2GJ 0_levsl1  X /%4 4 <DL/23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levsl2   ," <DL,23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2AJ 0_levsl3   ) <DL)23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levsl4  ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levsl5   #DL#23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levsl6    DL 23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  25J 0_levsl7  h DDL23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levsl8   L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levsl9    L23  Ԁ  2( 4 <DL2  2GJ 0_levnl1  X /%4 4 <DL/23   2( 4 <DL2  2DJ 0_levnl2   ," <DL,23   2( 4 <DL2  2AJ 0_levnl3   ) <DL)23   2( 4 <DL2  2>J 0_levnl4  ` &<<DL&23   2( 4 <DL2  2;J 0_levnl5   #DL#23   2( 4 <DL2  28J 0_levnl6    DL 23   2( 4 <DL2  - -25J 0_levnl7  h DDL23   2( 4 <DL2  22J 0_levnl8   L23   2( 4 <DL2  2/J 0_levnl9    L23   2( 4 <DL2  6 4heading 1   6 4heading 2   6 4heading 3   (|G2$ !.8%dd8         0    d(|3e$ !.8%dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3e$ !.8%dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8%dd8     _   %8OXXdd8@ttT%INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#%T #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsAugust21,2001 L XOX% #%XXO #TOMMYWAYNESIMPSONv.STATEOFTENNESSEE,etal.XOX%  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtforMorganCounty  J @@No.8568E.Eugene_Eblen_,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200002993CCAR3CD   December4,_2001_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Defendantappealsfromthedismissalofhispetitionforwritofhabeascorpus.Weconcludethat x  theStateofTennesseeneversurrenderedjurisdictionoverdefendantandthatdefendantssentence d didnotexpire.Weaccordinglyaffirmthejudgmentfromthetrialcourt. P  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed  (x   #%XO#XOX.%JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_Ԁand P James_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,JJ.,joined. < JoeH.Walker,DistrictPublicDefender,andWalterB.Johnson,II,AssistantPublicDefender,for  thedefendant,TommyWayneSimpson.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;MarkA._Fulks_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;J.Scott  _McCluen_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andDarylRoger_Delp_,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,for t theappellee,StateofTennessee. ` #%XXO#  &  XOX%XOXXXOOPINION $"t!   '$"    Thedefendant,TommyWayneSimpson,appealsfromthedenialofawritofhabeascorpus. #L# Inhisappeal,defendantinsiststhatawritofhabeascorpusisjustifiedbecausetheStateof $8 $ Tennesseeiswithoutjurisdictionoverhim.Wedisagree.  %$!%   Facts '"'     DefendantTommyWayneSimpsonisaninmateconfinedatBrushyMountainCorrectional )$) Complexin_Wartburg_,Tennessee.OnMay27,1970,defendantwasconvictedofpetitlarcenyin p*%* LauderdaleCountyandreceivedasentenceofoneyear.Whileservingthatsentence,defendant \+&+ escapedandfledtoKentuckywherehecommittedanarmedrobberyandmaliciousshooting.He H,', wasconvictedofthosecrimesandbeganservingatwelveyearsentenceinKentuckystateprison. 4-(- _DefendantescapedaftertwomonthsandreturnedtoTennesseewherehecommittedandwas  convictedforarmedrobberyandfirstdegreemurder.Hereceivedsentencesof15yearsand20years  andoneday,respectively.DefendantwasorderedtoserveallofhisTennesseesentences  consecutivelyforaneffectivesentenceof36years. t     XIn1975,defendantagainescapedfromTennesseeandfledtoKentucky.WhileinKentucky, L  defendantcommittedtwobankrobberies.Afterthesecond,hewasshotandapprehendedby 8  Kentuckyauthorities.HewaseventuallytransportedtoahospitalinKnoxville,Tennessee.In $ t Tennessee,theKentuckyauthoritiesturnedthedefendantovertofederalauthorities,although  ` KnoxvilleCityPoliceandKnoxCountySheriffsDeputiesguardedhim.Uponhisreleasefromthe  L  hospital,defendantwasreturnedtoKentucky,tried,andconvictedoftwobankrobberiesinfederal  8  court,andreceivedaneffectivefiftyyearsentence. $   X XWhileservinghisfederalsentenceinTerreHaute,Indiana,defendantfiledforafastand   speedytrialrelativetothedetainerforcriminalchargesinDavidsonCounty,Tennessee,regarding   his1975escapeinTennessee.TheStatefailedtorespondtotherequestwithintherequired180   days,andthechargeswereultimatelydismissed.In1989,defendantwasparoledfromthefederal p prisoninNorthDakota,wherehewasbeingheldasafederalboarder,andreturnedtoKentuckyto \ servethebalanceofhistwelveyearsentenceontheKentuckystatecharges.WhileinKentucky,the H TennesseeDistrictAttorneyGeneralforthe20thJudicialDistrictinDavidsonCountysentaletter 4 totheKentuckyStateReformatoryreleasinganyholdplacedondefendantregardingchargesin  p DavidsonCounty.DefendanttestifiedthattheonlychargependingagainsthiminDavidsonCounty  \ wasforanescapefromincarceration,andtheletterwasnotinreferencetoanyotherchargesagainst H himfromothercountiesinTennessee.In1993,thedefendantwasparoledinKentuckyand 4 extraditedbacktoTennesseetocompletehisthirtysixyearsentenceforarmedrobberyandfirst   degreemurder.OnJune22,1993,theextraditiontotheStateofTennesseewasdismissedbythe   LyonCountyDistrictCourt.DefendantwasreturnedtotheKentuckyDepartmentofCorrections  andservedhissentence,whichexpiredonMay14,1997.Finally,onJuly15,1997,defendantwas  returnedtotheStateofTennesseeonafugitivewarrant.   X XIn1999,defendantfiledapetitionforwritofhabeascorpusintheCriminalCourtforMorgan X  CountyallegingthattheStateofTennesseewaivedjurisdictionoverhimwhentheyreleasedhim D! tofederalauthoritiesin1975withoutrequiringhimtofinishhisthirtysixyearsentence.Atthe 0"  habeascorpushearing,defendantarguedthatalthoughhissentencehadnotexpired calendarwise, #l! thetrialcourtcouldfindthatdefendantssentencehadexpiredbecauseTennesseehadreleasedhim $X" tofederalauthoritieswithoutadetainer. $D #    %0!$ TheStatearguedthatthedefendantreceivedaneffectivesentenceofthirtysixyears &"% beginningonMay27,1970;thus,hissentencewouldnotexpireuntiltheyear2006.TheStatealso '#& arguedthatdefendantwasneverreturnedtostatecustodyafterhisescapein1975;rather,thathewas (#' apprehendedbyKentuckyauthoritiesandtakentoahospitalinKnoxville,Tennesseewherehewas )$( turnedovertofederalauthoritiesbytheKentuckyauthorities. |*%)   X h+&*  XThetrialcourtconcludedthattherewasnobasistoissueawritofhabeascorpusbecausethe  sentencesdidnotexpireandthejudgmentswerenotvoid.ThetrialcourtfoundthattheStatedid  notwaiveitsjurisdictionoverdefendant.Thetrialcourtalsofoundthatdefendantfailedtoprove  thathewasreturnedtothecustodyoftheTennesseeDepartmentofCorrection.Hispetitionwas t dismissed. `  X&  3      3"  Analysis3""  "Ԍ 8  Ќ  Rb  `    DefendantassertsinhisappealthattheStateofTennesseeeffectivelywaivedjurisdiction b  overhimbyreleasinghimtofederalauthoritieswithoutadetainer,thusrequiringhimtofinishhis N   statesentence.'8 "HearguesthatbecausetheStateofTennesseeiswithoutjurisdictionoverhim, :  habeascorpusreliefiswarranted.Wedisagree. &v    Rd b   Ahabeascorpuspetitionmaybeusedonly(1)tocontestvoidjudgmentswhicharefacially P  invalidbecausetheconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendant <  or(2)toprovethatadefendantssentencehasexpired.Statev.Ritchie,20S.W.2d624,630(Tenn. (x 2000);Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).Theappellanthastheburdenof d establishingeitheravoidjudgmentoranillegalconfinementbyapreponderanceoftheevidence. P Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619,627(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).Ifhesuccessfullycarriesthe < burden,theappellantisentitledtoimmediaterelease.Id.Defendantdoesnotcontestthefactthat ( hissentencehasnotexpired.Therefore,weaddressonlythecontentionthattheStateiswithout  jurisdictionoverhim.  ЀR*  Insupportofhisoriginalpetition,defendantcitedStatev.Grosch,152S.W.2d239(Tenn. * 1941),forthepropositionthatastatewaivesjurisdictionoveraprisonerbyreleasingtheprisoner  toanotherstatesjurisdictionforprosecutionorserviceofasentence.InJohnsv.Bowlen,No.  03C019503CR00106,1996WL310023(Tenn.Crim.App.,filedJune11,1996,atKnoxville),  apanelofthisCourtstatedthefollowing:  InGrosch,theTennesseeSupremeCourtheldthatwhenafugitivefromjusticefaces v criminalchargesintheasylumstate,theasylumstatemaydisposeofthosecharges b  beforehonoringtheextraditionrequestofthedemandingstate.Id.at243.Thecourt N! furtherheldthattheasylumstatemayneverthelesschoosetoimmediatelyhonorthe :" requisitionandsurrenderthefugitivetothedemandingstate.Id.at244.This &#v  decisionrestswiththegovernoroftheasylumstate.Id.SeeYatesv.Gilless,841 $b! S.W.2d332,335(Tenn.Crim.App.1992)(ifcriminalchargesarependingin $N " Tennessee,itissolelywithinthegovernor'sdiscretiontoopttodeliverafugitiveto %:!# ademandingstateimmediatelyortodelaydeliveryuntilaftertheTennesseecharges &&"$ areresolved).Finally,thecourtinGroschobserved,"suchsurrenderwilloperateas '#% awaiverofjurisdictionoftheasylumstate."152S.W.2dat244[quotingPeoplev. (#& Klinger,319Ill.275,149N.E.799,42A.L.R.581];Statev.Bomar,366S.W.2d )$' 750,751(Tenn.1963). *%( *,XX $%XX*R+'r+&Johns#XOXXXO #XOXXXO#%XXO #XOX%,#%XXO1#XOX%#XOXXXOv1#XOXXXOԀ1996WL310023,#XOXXXO=2#XOXXXO#%XXO1#XOX%Ԁat*2. +') Ї  WeconcludethattheaforementionedstatementinGroschisnotcontrollingandthat  defendantsrelianceonGroschismisplaced.SeealsoJohns,#XOXXXO2#XOXXXO#%XXO2#XOX%1996WL310023,at*2.#%XXOK4#XOX%#XOXXXO 4#XOXXXOThe  ExtraditionClauseoftheUnitedStatesConstitutionsetsforththedutyofstatestoextraditefugitives  fromjustice: t   R`B" <DL,XX $%XB  X  XApersonchargedinanystatewithtreason,felony,orothercrime,whoshallflee  fromjustice,andbefoundinanotherstate,shallondemandoftheexecutive   authorityofthestatefromwhichhefled,bedeliveredup,toberemovedtothestate   havingjurisdictionofthecrime. v   XN6 X26  R b   R V   <( 4 <DL  X<U.S.Const.art.IV,2,cl.2.TheExtraditionClausehasbeenimplementedbyafederalstatute,18  V U.S.C.3182,andbytheUniformCriminalExtraditionAct.Coungerisv.Sheahan,11F.3d726,  B  728(7thCir.1993)(citingMichiganv.Doran,439U.S.282,28789,99S.Ct.530,53436(1978)). .  TheUniformCriminalExtraditionAct,whereadopted,governsstateextraditionproceedings,in   conjunctionwithoverridingfederallaw.Id.;seealsoMartinv.Sams,600F.Supp.71,72(E.D.   Tenn.1984).Tennesseehasadoptedtheuniformact,TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection409101   to130,whichspecificallyprovides:   Rz6" <DLX6  X  XNothinginthischaptershallbedeemedtoconstituteawaiverbythisstateofits  right,powerorprivilegetotrysuchdemandedpersonforcrimecommittedwithin  thisstate,orofitsright,powerorprivilegetoregaincustodyofsuchpersonby  extraditionproceedingsorotherwiseforthepurposeoftrial,sentenceorpunishment  foranycrimecommittedwithinthisstate,norshallanyproceedingshadunderthis | chapterwhichresultin,orfailtoresultin,extraditionbedeemedawaiverbythis h stateofanyofitsrights,privilegesorjurisdictioninanywaywhatsoever. T  X!< X<  R@  R4  <( 4 <DL  X<Tenn.CodeAnn.409130(a)(emphasisadded).Moreover,TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection 4 409130(b)providesthat,evenwhentherearecriminalproceedingspendingagainstafugitivein   Tennessee,thegovernormayextraditethefugitive"beforetheconclusionofsuchproceedingsor   histermofsentenceinthisstate"withoutwaivingthejurisdictionofTennesseeinanyway.See  Carterv.State,600S.W.2d750,75253(Tenn.Crim.App.1980),perm.toappealdenied(Tenn.  1980);seealsoInreExtraditionofDixon,487So.2d1195,1197(Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986)(under  theUniformCriminalExtraditionAct,surrenderofthefugitivetothedemandingstatedoesnot l  amounttoawaiverofFlorida'srighttoexercisejurisdictionoverhiminthefuture).Inotherwords, X! undertheExtraditionAct,thegovernorofthisstateneverwaivesjurisdictionovertheaccusedby D" enteringintoanyextraditionproceeding. 0#   Rn$$l  Lastly,wenotealineofcasesholdingthatthemeresurrenderofaprisonertoanother Z% ! jurisdictiondoesnotimplyapardon,waiver,orcommutationofsentence.See#XOXXXO4#XOXXXO#%XXO4#XOX%Strobelv.Egeler,547 F&!" F.2d339(6thCir.1977);Gachesv.ThirdJudicialDistrict,416F.Supp.767(W.D.Okla.1976)#XOXXXOxE#XOXXXO#%XXOE#XOX%;#XOXXXOF#XOXXXO#%XXOF#XOX%In 2'"# rePatterson,411P.2d897(Cal.#%XXO`G#XOX%#XOXXXOG#XOXXXO1966);Armpriesterv.Grimes,111S.E.2d34(Ga.#XOXXXO!H#XOXXXO#%XXOG#XOX%Ԁ1959);Bartlett (n#$ v.Lowry,182S.E.850(Ga.#%XXOH#XOX%#XOXXXOH#XOXXXOԀ1935);#%XXOcI#XOX%#XOXXXOI#XOXXXORiddallv.Cupp,508P.2d457(Or.Ct.App.#%XXOI#XOX%#XOXXXO1J#XOXXXOԀ1973);Bishopv.  )Z$% Cupp,490P.2d524(Or.Ct.App.#XOXXXOJ#XOXXXO#%XXOJ#XOX%Ԁ1971);Carter,600S.W.2dat753#%XXOK##%%tK#XOX%XOXXXO.Thesecasesrevealthata )F%&  waiverorpardonwillnotbeimpliedunlessthereisaffirmativeevidenceintherecorddemonstrating *2&' such.NothingintherecordbeforethisCourtreflectsanintentionalwaiverorabandonmentof  interestindefendantbytheStateofTennessee.     DefendantpointstoalineofcasesfromourSixthCircuitCourtofAppealsandassertsthat t theystandforthepropositionthatwhenastatevoluntarilyrelinquishescustodyofapersonwhile ` thatpersonisservingasentence,thestatecannotreacquirethepersontocompletethesentence.See L  Helmv.Jago,588F.2d1180(6thCir.1979);Himesv.OhioAdultParoleAuth.,448F.2d410(6th 8  Cir.1971)#XOXXXOgL#XOXXXO#%XXOHL#XOX%.Wedonotreadthecasesthisway.Infact,thecourtinHelmspecificallyconcludedthat $ t Ohiostatelawwasdispositiveoftheissueinthatcaseasitstatedthat thereleaseofanaccusedby  ` onesovereigntytoanother,sothatthereceivingsovereigntymayenforceitscriminallawsagainst  L  him,doesnotconstituteawaiverofjurisdictionovertheaccused.Id.at1181.Relyingonthe  8  Tennesseecasescitedabove,weconcludethatthelawinTennesseeisnotfavorabletodefendant $  andthattherewasnowaiverofjurisdictionoverdefendantwhenfederalauthoritiestookcustody   ofhimin1975.Furthermore,weconcludethattheletterfromtheDavidsonCountyDistrict   AttorneyGeneralin1989wasonlyinregardtodefendantsescapefromDavidsonCountyanddid   noteffectanaffirmativewaiverofthestatesjurisdictionoverdefendantregardingtheothercharges   forwhichdefendantisincarcerated. p &    CONCLUSION H *U 'HU  WeconcludetheStateofTennesseewasneitherwithoutjurisdictionoverdefendant,northat  p iteversurrenderedjurisdiction.#XOXXXO>P#XOXXXO#%XXOP#XOX%Accordingly,weaffirmthetrialcourtsdenialofthewritofhabeas  \ corpus. H    `     h      p     _________________________________ l JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE X  #XOXXXO@V##%XXOV#