ÿWPC< ç¢qäù³á¢4äࢸÙ­;„c£bÙ$1.¹Ùjà;bÓ³þ,çÃÝÙÙçð¼@ü½Ì¨Ù£q· 3úq‹ˆ¿cŸéÝVÁ>‰ççêç·gQŽ6J"Ô_ÌþÓl;N4›oáS’x‰8òuÓÅò¼“,C§v w_eÅl2ø‡5)15H8zi’B±–ž'õ•¦²ªæf “w=¦ÕDÇ5c![?âA:íÇZ‚Éðï GÌ‚ä¤çŸ$Sö¥w|þDe[èâzó!Ò2­ j‘Òˆ!ÌnT¡Â!dºgGóÜåáì€ê´*DW6Ørœ»úùí’d‹î—õ-Ì‹.à°îy]ƒW€Ä÷O>•b(æÿùïCº{MÚnXrø¨ Ù•!XnJ¿#¬‡p&ÈÙâôd<´È¯3ïí%Y.§ÉY`U•b(¯Œß¶²¸Ýþ˜Â]Ž¤bïA$"gåþ}_0Ü*+³^üÒâ¹Ç6M6Ôh¼^ηû.B¼HÚG»|ϱT„ý«Þ囑ô³G$?P-Š 0ALI¨„|4¤IÙ4¾ôdæb\“™õ’Rk ·P^2-Þ¥ª„ØÔf7âJ&3 lÆþÆÂaD‡ÓÒ–(2þðÅ¡ewNÌ”gܘ\çb %\^ b 0ˆnU NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 1‡‘ Æ ÆÞ Ƥ Æj 720Nb 1ud 72ÙE  0c p 1‡x 72ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿb111111111111111111111111111111111111 0ë9999 B$$ 0¤A D3å D- 0KEE ASÆã 0¤© 0DM A«‘»j Y-s (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularüPH,ry.opnì3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(Š½CEKQW]cioAutoList1A.A.A.A.A.A.A.A.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 A.3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  à (EhCEKQW]cioAutoList2I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.- ù-(|G2†ž$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô²ò»»Ô d(|3ÿ$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿ$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€õ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼õ»»»ÔÑ8€ZYXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îtõÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼õ»îît#ԈРÖ& Ðà@Î Î ìàAssigned€on€Briefs€July€17,€2002ˆÐ üL ÐÌà@ääìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€AARON€Ô_ÔLEMBARÔ_Ô€SMITHó óˆÐ  p ÐÌÔ€XZYX»¼õÔà@L L ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔDicksonÔ_Ô€CountyˆÐ F – Ðà@¡ ¡ ìàNo.€CR5191B€€€€€Allen€Wallace,€JudgeˆÐ 2 ‚ ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<õ` A߈Ð öF  Ðà  àÌà@¢ ¢ ìàNo.€M2001„02532„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€25,€2002ˆÐ ñA  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<È` Aßó óÐ É  ÐÌFollowing€a€jury€trial,€Defendant,€Aaron€Ô_ÔLembarÔ_Ô€Smith,€was€found€guilty€of€two€counts€of€Class€DÐ Ä Ðfelony€burglary€(a€building€other€than€a€habitation),€one€count€of€Class€E€felony€vandalism,€twoÐ ° Ðcounts€of€Class€D€felony€theft,€and€one€count€of€Class€D€felony€vandalism.€€One€of€the€burglaries,Ð œì Ðthe€Class€D€felony€vandalism,€and€one€of€the€Class€D€felony€thefts,€involved€an€incident€whichÐ ˆØ Ðoccurred€at€Centennial€Elementary€School€in€Ô_ÔDicksonÔ_Ô.€€The€other€charges€involved€an€incident€atÐ tÄ ÐÔ_ÔBucknerÔ_Ô€City€Park,€which€is€located€on€property€adjoining€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€In€thisÐ `° Ðappeal,€Defendant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€to€sustain€his€convictions€for€theÐ Lœ Ðburglary,€vandalism,€and€theft€convictions€arising€from€the€incident€at€Centennial€ElementaryÐ 8ˆ ÐSchool.€€He€does€not€challenge€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€or€raise€any€other€issues,€regardingÐ $t Ðthe€remaining€charges.€€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€convictions€for€burglary,Ð ` Ðvandalism,€and€theft€regarding€the€incident€at€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€However,€our€reviewÐ üL Ðof€the€record€indicates€errors€in€the€judgments;€as€the€sentencing€hearing€is€not€a€part€of€the€record,Ð è8 Ðbut€the€judgments€on€their€face€are€erroneous,€we€remand€these€cases€to€the€Circuit€Court€of€Ô_ÔDicksonÔ_ÔÐ Ô$ ÐCounty€for€amended€judgments€to€be€entered€or€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing,€if€necessary.Ð À ÐÌò òà@;;ìàTenn€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Circuit€Court€as€to€Convictions€à@@÷÷ìàˆÐ ˜ è ÐAffirmed;€Judgments€of€the€Circuit€Court€as€to€Sentences€Reversed€and€Remanded.ó óÐ „!Ô  ÐÌòòThomas€T.€Ô_ÔWoodallÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJ.€Ô_ÔCurwoodÔ_Ô€Ô_ÔWittÔ_Ô€óóand€òòAlanÐ \#¬" ÐE.€Glenn,óó€JJ.,€joined.Ð H$˜# ÐÌDidi€Christie,€Brownsville,€Tennessee€(on€appeal);€and€William€B.€(Jake)€Ô_ÔLockertÔ_Ô,€III,€District€PublicÐ  &p!% ÐDefender,€Ashland€City,€Tennessee€(at€trial€and€of€counsel€on€appeal)€for€the€appellant,€AaronÐ  '\"& ÐÔ_ÔLembarÔ_Ô€Smith.Ð ø'H#' ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Thomas€E.€Williams,€III,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ Ð) %) ÐGeneral;€Dan€M.€Ô_ÔAlsobrooksÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Kim€G.€Ô_ÔMenkeÔ_Ô,€Assistant€DistrictÐ ¼* &* ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ¨+ø&+ ÐÌÐ €-Ð(-ýG ÐÔ_Ô‡à@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ° ÐÌà@%ìàò òBACKGROUNDó óˆÐ ˆØ ÐÌà  àIn€his€appeal,€Defendant€does€not€challenge€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€as€to€the€fact€thatÐ `° Ða€burglary,€a€theft,€and€vandalism€occurred€at€Centennial€Elementary€School€in€Dickson,€as€allegedÐ L œ Ðin€the€indictment.€€Defendant€does,€however,€strongly€assert€that€the€State€failed€to€prove,€beyondÐ 8 ˆ Ða€reasonable€doubt,€that€he€was€one€of€the€participants€in€the€burglary,€vandalism,€and€theft.€€OurÐ $ t Ðreview€of€the€facts,€therefore,€will€be€confined€to€the€testimony€and€other€evidence€concerning€proofÐ  ` Ðof€the€three€participants€in€the€incident€at€Centennial€Elementary€School.Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àAt€approximately€5:50€a.m.€on€July€7,€2000,€Charlotte€Wisdom,€who€worked€for€theÐ Ô$  Ðð ðextended€daycareðð€at€Centennial€Elementary€School€in€Dickson,€arrived€on€the€premises€of€theÐ À  Ðschool€to€open€up€the€building€for€daycare.€€When€she€arrived,€she€observed€a€car€parked€under€theÐ ¬ü  Ðcanopy€at€the€front€door.€€She€did€not€recognize€it€as€belonging€to€a€parent€of€any€of€the€children.€Ð ˜è  ÐThe€car€doors€were€open,€the€trunk€was€open,€and€a€big€screen€television€was€inside€the€trunk.€€SheÐ „Ô  Ðtestified€that€it€was€a€maroon€vehicle€and€that€she€saw€two€white€males€standing€by€the€vehicle.€Ð pÀ ÐWhen€they€observed€her,€they€ð ðtook€off€running.ðð€€One€of€the€men€had€on€a€yellow€shirt€with€theÐ \¬ Ðword€ð ðPacoðð€printed€on€it.€€The€men€ran€around€the€building€to€Ms.€Wisdomððs€left€and€went€downÐ H˜ Ða€grass€embankment.€€Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àWithout€a€cellular€telephone,€Ms.€Wisdom€could€not€immediately€call€for€assistance€or€reportÐ  \ Ðthe€suspicious€behavior.€€She€saw€someone€driving€a€truck€in€the€adjoining€city€park,€and€went€toÐ øH Ðthe€driver€and€asked€to€use€his€cellular€phone€to€call€9„1„1.€€She€reported€the€burglary€in€progress€andÐ ä4 Ðwas€instructed€to€go€back€and€get€the€license€number€of€the€vehicle€parked€by€the€front€door€to€theÐ Ð  Ðschool.€€She€did€so.€€She€looked€down€to€get€something€to€write€on,€and€when€she€again€looked€atÐ ¼  Ðthe€vehicle,€she€observed€a€black€male€come€out€of€the€school€with€something€in€his€hand€andÐ ¨ø Ðapparently€place€it€in€the€passenger€side€of€the€vehicle€in€front€of€the€door.€€Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àThe€black€male€walked€around€the€vehicle€and€looked€inside€the€driverððs€window,€and€thenÐ l¼ Ðapparently€observed€Ms.€Wisdom.€€At€the€same€time€that€Ms.€Wisdom€observed€a€police€car€comingÐ X ¨ Ðfrom€her€left,€toward€the€school,€the€black€male€ran€back€inside€the€school€building.€€He€appearedÐ D!” Ðto€have€white€surgical„type€gloves€on,€and€was€wearing€something€ð ðsleevelessðð€like€a€tank€top€or€aÐ 0"€  Ðpair€of€overalls.€€She€stated€that€Defendantððs€shirt€was€dark.€€Ms.€Wisdom€did€not€again€observeÐ #l! Ðeither€the€two€white€males€or€the€black€man€who€ran€back€inside€the€school€building.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àSeveral€police€officers€arrived€at€the€scene€within€moments.€€Corporal€Robert€Odom€testifiedÐ à%0!$ Ðthat€he€was€dispatched€at€5:56€a.m.€to€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€He€observed€a€maroon€vehicleÐ Ì&"% Ðunder€the€canopy€at€the€front€entrance€of€the€school.€€He€also€saw€Ms.€Wisdom€beside€her€vehicle.€Ð ¸'#& ÐMs.€Wisdom€told€Officer€Odom€the€direction€that€the€two€white€males€had€run.€€Odom€walked€overÐ ¤(ô#' Ðto€the€location€where€the€men€had€run€down€the€hill,€and€noticed€that€the€two€white€males€had€run€Ð )à$( Ðtoward€a€nearby€apartment€complex€known€as€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments,€which€could€beÐ |*Ì%) Ðseen€from€the€school€property.€€Ð h+¸&* Їà  àBrian€Johnson,€who,€at€the€time,€was€the€K„9€officer€for€the€Dickson€Police€Department,Ð ° Ðbrought€his€ð ðcertifiedðð€search€dog€to€the€scene€of€the€crime.€€A€perimeter€was€set€up€and€Johnson,Ð œì Ðalong€with€Officer€Odom€and€Sergeant€Mosley,€entered€the€school€to€see€if€anyone€could€be€found.€Ð ˆØ ÐNo€one€was€found€inside€of€the€building.€€However,€the€dog€picked€up€the€scent€of€two€tracks€outsideÐ tÄ Ðthe€building.€€One€track€was€picked€up€at€the€corner€of€the€school€building€where€Ms.€Wisdom€hadÐ `° Ðstated€that€the€two€white€males€had€run.€€This€trail€led€directly€to€apartment€16„B€of€Crosby€TerraceÐ L œ ÐWest€Apartments.€€Officer€Johnson€also€testified€that€there€was€a€split€of€the€tracks€of€a€person€orÐ 8 ˆ Ðpersons€at€a€culvert€between€the€school€and€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments.€€The€second€track€wasÐ $ t Ðheading€back€toward€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments€after€it€had€branched€away€from€the€firstÐ  ` Ðtrack,€but€the€K„9€search€dog€became€hot€and€tired€and€the€tracking€had€to€cease.€€Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àBooty€Reed,€director€of€the€Dickson€Housing€Authority,€testified€that€he€was€responsible€forÐ Ô$  Ðmanagement€of€the€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments.€€He€testified€that€apartment€16„B€was€leasedÐ À  Ðto€Crystal€Merrill,€and€that€apartment€7„B€was€leased€to€Jamie€Simco.€€Richard€Darden€testified€thatÐ ¬ü  Ðhe€worked€for€an€agency€that€ð ðhad€connectionsðð€with€Dale€Merrill€and€Defendant.€€Dale€Merrill€hadÐ ˜è  Ðgiven€his€address€as€16„B€Crosby€Terrace€West,€and€Defendant€had€given€his€address€as€7„B€CrosbyÐ „Ô  ÐTerrace€West.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àGary€Brunett,€the€principal€at€Centennial€Elementary€School,€testified€that€he€examined€theÐ H˜ Ðextensive€damage€done€during€the€July€7,€2000€incident.€€He€further€testified€as€to€the€value€ofÐ 4„ Ðproperty€taken€and€damages€done€to€the€property.€€Pamela€Brock,€a€teacher€at€Centennial€ElementaryÐ  p ÐSchool,€also€worked€in€the€extended€daycare€at€Centennial€Elementary€during€the€summer€of€2000.€Ð  \ ÐShe€had€closed€down€the€school€at€the€end€of€the€day€on€July€6,€2000.€€After€the€burglary,€it€wasÐ øH Ðdiscovered€that€her€name€tag€was€missing.€€Ms.€Brock€testified€that€she€had€never€been€to€CrosbyÐ ä4 ÐTerrace€West€Apartments€in€her€life.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àOrville€ð ðBubbaðð€Sesler,€an€officer€with€the€Dickson€Police€Department,€testified€that€he€wasÐ ¨ø Ðdispatched€to€Centennial€Elementary€School€shortly€after€the€incident€was€reported.€€While€en€route,Ð ”ä Ðhe€was€redirected€by€the€dispatcher€to€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments.€€He€arrived€at€6:04€a.m.€Ð €Ð ÐHe€stopped€near€apartment€16„B.€€Sesler€observed€the€Defendant€running€toward€apartment€16„B,Ð l¼ Ðstop€at€the€door€of€16„B,€and€begin€beating€on€the€door€in€an€effort€to€have€someone€let€him€in.€Ð X ¨ ÐDefendant€had€come€running€from€behind€some€of€the€other€nearby€apartments.€€Sesler€approachedÐ D!” Ðthe€Defendant€and€brought€him€back€to€the€police€vehicle€for€investigation.€€Sesler€went€to€apartmentÐ 0"€  Ð16„B,€along€with€an€officer€from€the€Dickson€County€Sheriffððs€Department,€and€knocked€on€theÐ #l! Ðdoor.€€A€female€let€the€officers€inside,€and€he€immediately€observed€the€yellow€ð ðPacoðð€shirt€that€wasÐ $X" Ðseen€by€Ms.€Wisdom€and€reported€to€the€police.€€The€shirt€was€near€the€door.Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àWhen€Sesler€observed€the€Defendant,€his€legs€were€bleeding,€and€he€was€wearing€short€pantsÐ Ì&"% Ðand€a€dark€shirt.€€Sesler€did€not€remember€the€type€of€shirt.€€Also,€Sesler€observed€that€theÐ ¸'#& ÐDefendantððs€body€was€ð ðwet€with€sweatðð€like€Defendant€had€been€running.€€The€proof€at€trial€was€thatÐ ¤(ô#' ÐDefendant€is€a€black€male.€€Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àJennifer€Ann€Smith€testified€that€she€had€known€Defendant€for€a€few€months,€through€herÐ ° Ðâ âacquaintanceship€with€Crystal€Merrill.€€She€stated€that€Defendant€resided€in€apartment€7„B€withÐ œì ÐJamie€Simco.€€On€the€night€of€July€6,€2000,€Ms.€Smith€was€spending€the€night€at€apartment€16„B.€Ð ˆØ ÐShe€said€that€the€Defendant,€along€with€various€other€people,€was€also€staying€in€apartment€16„B.Ð tÄ ÐMs.€Smith€had€left€her€car€keys€on€the€coffee€table€when€she€went€to€bed.€€Ms.€Smithððs€maroonÐ `° Ðvehicle€was€the€one€used€in€the€burglary€which€was€found€at€the€front€entrance€of€CentennialÐ L œ ÐElementary€School.€€A€stipulation€of€the€parties€provided€that€no€latent€fingerprints€belonging€to€theÐ 8 ˆ ÐDefendant€were€found€at€Centennial€Elementary€School,€but€one€latent€fingerprint€belonging€to€DaleÐ $ t ÐMerrill€was€taken€from€a€filing€cabinet€in€the€office€area€of€the€school.€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àDetective€Mike€Fleaner€of€the€Dickson€Police€Department€was€the€lead€detective€in€theÐ è 8  Ðinvestigation€of€the€burglary,€vandalism,€and€theft€incident€at€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€PamÐ Ô$  ÐBrockððs€name€tag€was€found€on€a€sidewalk€directly€in€front€of€apartment€16„B.€€Detective€FleanerÐ À  Ðtestified€regarding€a€taped€and€transcribed€statement€given€by€Defendant€on€the€morning€of€July€7,Ð ¬ü  Ð2000€at€the€Dickson€Police€Department.€€In€this€statement,€Defendant€did€not€admit€to€participatingÐ ˜è  Ðin€the€crimes€at€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€However,€Detective€Fleaner€testified€that,€duringÐ „Ô  Ðhis€conversation€with€Defendant€prior€to€the€tape€recording€being€made,€Defendant€stated€theÐ pÀ Ðfollowing:€Defendant€told€Fleaner€that€he€(Defendant)€was€not€going€to€admit€to€being€a€lookout€ð ðonÐ \¬ Ðtapeðð€because€ð ðany€half„ass€lawyerððcould€get€him€out€of€ð ðthis€sh„„.ðð€€Defendant€admitted€to€FleanerÐ H˜ Ðthat€he€(Defendant)€was€at€the€school€and€ran€away€from€it.€€Defendant€stated€that€two€of€the€peopleÐ 4„ Ðinvolved€were€ð ðBenjiðð€and€ð ðJoker,ðð€but€did€not€give€the€identity€of€a€third€person.€€Ð  p ÐÌà  àIn€his€transcribed€statement,€Defendant€denied€any€involvement€in€the€burglary.€€However,Ð øH Ðhe€stated€that€ð ðBenjiðð€and€ð ðJokerðð€burglarized€the€building€and€committed€the€vandalism€and€theft.€Ð ä4 ÐDefendant€told€Detective€Fleaner€that€he€knew€they€were€going€to€burglarize€the€school,€but€he€justÐ Ð  Ðwatched€and€did€not€participate.€€He€admitted€to€Fleaner€that€he€was€ð ðat€the€schoolðð€and€ran€when€Ð ¼  Ðhe€saw€the€state€trooper€drive€up.€€Defendant€admitted€to€having€previously€made€the€statement€toÐ ¨ø ÐDetective€Fleaner,€when€advised€near€the€scene€that€a€search€dog€was€going€to€go€into€the€school,Ð ”ä Ðthat€ð ðman,€thereððs€nobody€else€in€the€school.€€I€guarantee€there€ainððt€nobody€else€in€school.ðð€Ð €Ð ÐHowever,€Defendant€explained€that€he€meant€that€he€assumed€the€two€men€inside€the€school€wouldÐ l¼ Ðalso€see€the€police€drive€up,€as€he€did,€and€would€run€out.Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àTrooper€Chip€Miller,€of€the€Tennessee€Highway€Patrol,€testified€that€he€was€dispatched€toÐ 0"€  Ðthe€school€after€the€report€of€a€burglary€in€progress.€€He€gave€a€detailed€description€and€identified,Ð #l! Ðthrough€photographs,€the€route€taken€by€him€to€arrive€at€the€school€grounds.€€Trooper€MillerððsÐ $X" Ðtestimony€was€that€a€person€sitting€in€the€area€where€Defendant€claimed€to€be€sitting,€would€haveÐ ô$D # Ðbeen€unable€to€see€the€highway€patrol€car€arrive,€due€to€the€contour€and€shape€of€the€premises.Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àDale€Merrill€was€called€by€defense€counsel€to€testify€at€the€trial.€€Merrill€had€already€pledÐ ¸'#& Ðguilty€because€of€his€participation€in€the€burglary,€vandalism,€and€theft€at€Centennial€ElementaryÐ ¤(ô#' ÐSchool.€€Merrill€testified€that€he,€Rodney€Nichols,€and€Tim€Justice€broke€into€Centennial€ElementaryÐ )à$( ÐSchool€in€the€early€morning€hours€of€July€7,€2000.€€òòóóMerrill€stated€that€Defendant€was€not€present.€Ð |*Ì%) ÐProof€showed€that€Dale€Merrill€and€Tim€Justice€are€white€males.€€When€questioned€as€to€RodneyÐ h+¸&* ÐNicholsðð€race,€Merrill€testified€that€ð ðI€believe€heððs€mixed.€€I€donððt€know€what€heððs€mixed€with,€butÐ ° Ðheððs€light„skinned.ðð€€Merrill€testified€that€the€three€first€began€shooting€Merrillððs€.22€caliber€rifleÐ œì Ðaround€the€school,€and€shot€out€a€couple€of€the€windows.€€They€began€looking€inside€the€school€andÐ ˆØ Ðsaw€televisions€and€computers.€€He€said€it€was€a€spur„of„the„moment€decision€to€break€in€and€getÐ tÄ Ðitems€to€make€some€money.€€Merrill€testified€that€he€sent€Rodney€Nichols€to€go€back€to€apartmentÐ `° Ð16„B€to€get€Timððs€Blazer€automobile.€€However,€Nichols€came€back€with€Jennifer€Smithððs€vehicle.€Ð L œ ÐMerrill€stated€that€he€and€Tim€Justice€were€loading€a€television€and€a€computer€in€the€vehicle€andÐ 8 ˆ ÐRodney€Nichols€was€inside€the€school.€€He€observed€a€car€come€around€the€corner€and€he€and€JusticeÐ $ t Ðbegan€running.€€Merrill€ran€to€apartment€16„B€at€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments.€€He€took€off€hisÐ  ` Ðyellow€shirt,€laid€it€by€the€door,€and€climbed€into€the€closet€attic.€€He€testified€that€Rodney€NicholsÐ ü L  Ðwas€wearing€a€shirt€like€a€tank€top€during€the€burglary.€€During€cross„examination,€Merrill€admittedÐ è 8  Ðto€having€been€previously€convicted€of€prior€felonies,€including€theft,€burglary,€and€vandalism.€€HeÐ Ô$  Ðhad€known€Defendant€for€about€five€years.€€Merrill€could€not€explain€why€Defendant€would€haveÐ À  Ðgiven€a€statement€to€police€that€ð ðBenjiðð€and€ð ðJokerðð€had€committed€the€burglary€at€the€school.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àMerrillððs€testimony€was€impeached€with€testimony€from€his€own€guilty€plea€submission.€€AtÐ „Ô  Ðthat€hearing,€he€stated€that€it€was€he,€rather€than€Nichols,€who€had€taken€Jennifer€Smithððs€vehicle€toÐ pÀ Ðthe€school.€€Merrill€had€also€testified€at€his€guilty€plea€submission€that€Tim€Justice€was€inside€theÐ \¬ Ðschool€when€the€first€car€drove€up€(Ms.€Wisdomððs€vehicle)€and€that€he€and€Rodney€Nichols€ran€offÐ H˜ Ðtogether€away€from€the€school.€€He€claimed€that€he€had€the€names€mixed€up€at€the€guilty€pleaÐ 4„ Ðsubmission€hearing.Ð  p ÐÌà  àDetective€Fleaner€was€again€called€as€a€witness€during€the€Defendantððs€proof.€€He€identifiedÐ øH Ða€shirt€and€a€pair€of€pants€that€Defendant€was€wearing€at€the€time€he€was€taken€into€custody€on€theÐ ä4 Ðmorning€of€July€7,€2000.€€He€also€testified€that€mud€on€the€clothing€could€be€attributed€to€crawlingÐ Ð  Ðunder€a€fence€which€was€between€Centennial€Elementary€School€and€Crosby€Terrace€WestÐ ¼  ÐApartments.€€The€shirt€was€not€a€sleeveless€or€tank€top€shirt.€€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà@òò&ìàò òANALYSISó óˆÐ €Ð ÐÌà  àò òI.€€Sufficiency€of€the€EvidenceÐ X ¨ Ðó óÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€court€must€review€theÐ 0"€  Ðrecord€to€determine€if€the€evidence€adduced€during€the€trial€was€sufficient€"to€support€the€findingÐ #l! Ðby€the€trier€of€fact€of€guilt€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt."€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€This€rule€isÐ $X" Ðapplicable€to€findings€of€guilt€predicated€upon€direct€evidence,€circumstantial€evidence,€or€aÐ ô$D # Ðcombination€of€direct€and€circumstantial€evidence.€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€932€S.W.2d€1,€18€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð à%0!$ ÐApp.€1996).Ð Ì&"% ÐÌ€à  àIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€court€does€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðevidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€Nor€may€this€court€substitute€itsÐ )à$( Ðinferences€for€those€drawn€by€the€trier€of€fact€from€circumstantial€evidence.€€òòLiakas€v.€Stateóó,€199Ð |*Ì%) ÐTenn.€298,€305,€286€S.W.2d€856,€859€(1956).€€To€the€contrary,€this€court€is€required€to€afford€theÐ h+¸&* ÐState€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€contained€in€the€record€as€well€as€all€reasonableÐ ° Ðand€legitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€from€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Tuttleóó,€914€S.W.2d€926,Ð œì Ð932€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àThe€trier€of€fact,€not€this€court,€resolves€questions€concerning€the€credibility€of€the€witnesses,Ð `° Ðthe€weight€and€value€to€be€given€the€evidence€as€well€as€all€factual€issues€raised€by€the€evidence.€Ð L œ ÐòòId.óó€€In€òòState€v.€Graceóó,€the€Tennessee€Supreme€Court€stated,€"[a]€guilty€verdict€by€the€jury,€approvedÐ 8 ˆ Ðby€the€trial€judge,€accredits€the€testimony€of€the€witnesses€for€the€State€and€resolves€all€conflicts€inÐ $ t Ðfavor€of€the€theory€of€the€State."€€493€S.W.2d€474,€476€(Tenn.€1973).€€€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àBecause€a€verdict€of€guilt€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€and€replaces€it€with€aÐ è 8  Ðpresumption€of€guilt,€the€accused€has€the€burden€in€this€court€of€illustrating€why€the€evidence€isÐ Ô$  Ðinsufficient€to€support€the€verdict€returned€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914Ð À  Ð(Tenn.€1982);€òòGraceóó,€493€S.W.2d€at€476.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àAlthough€the€evidence€of€the€defendantððs€guilt€is€circumstantial€in€nature,€circumstantialÐ „Ô  Ðevidence€alone€may€be€sufficient€to€support€a€conviction.€€òòState€v.€Tharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€896,€899„900Ð pÀ Ð(Tenn.€1987);€€òòState€v.€Gregoryóó,€862€S.W.2d€574,€577€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€However,€in€orderÐ \¬ Ðfor€this€to€occur,€the€circumstantial€evidence€must€be€not€only€consistent€with€the€guilt€of€the€accusedÐ H˜ Ðbut€it€must€also€be€inconsistent€with€innocence€and€must€exclude€every€other€reasonable€theory€orÐ 4„ Ðhypothesis€except€that€of€guilt.€€òòTharpeóó,€726€S.W.2d€at€900.€€€In€addition,€ð ðit€must€establish€such€aÐ  p Ðcertainty€of€guilt€of€the€accused€as€to€convince€the€mind€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€[theÐ  \ Ðdefendant]€is€the€one€who€committed€the€crime.ðð€€òòId.óó€(quoting€òòPruitt€v.€Stateóó,€460€S.W.2d€385,€390Ð øH Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1970)).Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àWhile€following€the€above€guidelines,€this€court€must€remember€that€the€jury€decides€theÐ ¼  Ðweight€to€be€given€to€circumstantial€evidence€and€ð ð[t]he€inferences€to€be€drawn€from€such€evidence,Ð ¨ø Ðand€the€extent€to€which€the€circumstances€are€consistent€with€guilt€and€inconsistent€with€innocenceÐ ”ä Ðare€questions€primarily€for€the€jury.ðð€€òòMarable€v.€Stateóó,€313€S.W.2d€451,€457€(Tenn.€1958);€òòsee€alsoóó€Ð €Ð ÐòòGregoryóó,€862€S.W.2d€at€577;€òòState€v.€Couryóó,€697€S.W.2d€373,€377€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1985);€òòPruittóó,Ð l¼ Ð460€S.W.2d€at€391.Ð X ¨ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌà  àWhile€the€evidence€was€circumstantial,€it€was€sufficient€to€support€the€convictions€forÐ 0"€  Ðburglary,€vandalism,€and€theft€at€Centennial€Elementary€School.€€Defendant€admitted€his€presenceÐ #l! Ðat€the€scene.€€He€was€observed€running€to€apartment€16„B€by€Officer€Sesler€within€minutes€of€theÐ $X" Ðburglary€being€reported.€€His€legs€were€scratched€and€he€seemed€to€be€in€a€panic€to€get€inside€theÐ ô$D # Ðapartment.€€A€reasonable€jury€could€conclude€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€that€Defendant€was€theÐ à%0!$ Ðblack€male€who€was€observed€by€Ms.€Wisdom€coming€out€of€the€school€and€placing€something€intoÐ Ì&"% Ðthe€vehicle€parked€under€the€canopy,€who€then€ran€back€into€the€school€at€about€the€time€the€firstÐ ¸'#& Ðpolice€car€arrived.€€Even€though€Ms.€Wisdom€thought€that€the€black€male€had€on€a€sleeveless€shirtÐ ¤(ô#' Ðor€overalls,€she€did€say€it€was€a€dark€shirt.€€Defendant€was€wearing€a€dark€shirt€when€observedÐ )à$( Ðbanging€on€the€door€of€apartment€16„B€by€Officer€Sesler.€€There€was€also€sufficient€proof€presentedÐ |*Ì%) Ðby€the€State€to€show€the€proximity€of€the€school€to€Crosby€Terrace€West€Apartments,€with€the€clearÐ h+¸&* Ðinference€that€a€person€could€run€from€the€school€to€the€apartments€in€the€time€between€Ms.€WisdomÐ ° Ðobserving€the€perpetrator€at€the€school€and€when€Officer€Sesler€saw€Defendant€running€to€apartmentÐ œì Ð16„B€and€banging€on€the€door€to€get€inside.€€There€was€also€proof€of€doors€into€the€school€that€couldÐ ˆØ Ðnot€be€observed€at€the€time€the€officers€first€began€arriving.Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àEven€though€not€specifically€raised€by€Defendant€in€this€appeal,€we€have€reviewed€theÐ L œ Ðevidence€pertaining€to€the€burglary,€vandalism,€and€theft€at€Buckner€City€Park.€€There€was€testimonyÐ 8 ˆ Ðthat€a€building€used€at€the€city€park€was€burglarized.€€There€was€also€sufficient€testimony€of€theft€ofÐ $ t Ðproperty€and€vandalism.€€Furthermore,€witnesses€testified€that€Defendant€admitted€his€involvementÐ  ` Ðin€the€burglary€at€the€Buckner€City€Park€building,€and€that€he€was€seen€in€possession€of€some€of€theÐ ü L  Ðstolen€property€shortly€after€the€occurrence€of€the€crime.€€Ð è 8  Ðà  àÌà  àAccordingly,€we€affirm€all€of€Defendantððs€convictions€for€burglary,€theft,€and€vandalism.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àò òII.€€Sentencingó óÐ ˜è  ÐÌà  àEven€though€not€raised€by€the€State€or€the€Defendant€in€this€appeal,€we€have€reviewed€theÐ pÀ Ðjudgments,€and€based€upon€our€review,€we€are€compelled€to€reverse€the€judgments€insofar€as€theyÐ \¬ Ðpertain€to€sentencing,€and€remand€for€entry€of€appropriate€amended€judgments€or€for€a€newÐ H˜ Ðsentencing€hearing,€whichever€is€deemed€appropriate,€even€though€we€affirm€the€convictions.Ð 4„ ÐÌà  àThe€transcript€of€the€sentencing€hearing€is€not€a€part€of€the€record.€€However,€the€pre„Ð  \ Ðsentence€report€and€the€judgments€are€included€in€the€record.€€The€jury€found€Defendant€guilty€ofÐ øH Ðfive€Class€D€felonies,€and€one€Class€E€felony.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àAccording€to€the€pre„sentence€report,€Defendant€had€three€prior€convictions€for€Class€DÐ ¼  Ðfelony€theft,€and€two€prior€convictions€for€burglary€of€a€vehicle,€a€Class€E€felony.€€The€pre„sentenceÐ ¨ø Ðreport€indicates€that€the€ð ðdate€of€events/arrestðð€was€October€3,€1999,€and€the€date€of€conviction€wasÐ ”ä ÐMay€12,€2000€for€each€of€the€offenses.€€They€were€all€included€in€Dickson€County€Circuit€CourtÐ €Ð ÐCase€No.€4916.€€It€is€not€clear€from€the€record€whether€all€of€the€offenses€occurred€on€the€same€dateÐ l¼ Ðor€on€different€dates.€€In€any€event,€each€judgment€for€the€convictions€presently€on€appeal€indicatesÐ X ¨ Ðthat€Defendant€was€being€sentenced€as€a€multiple€offender.€€In€addition,€the€judgment€for€Count€5Ð D!” Ðof€the€indictment,€in€which€Defendant€was€charged€with€Class€C€felony€vandalism,€and€which€theÐ 0"€  Ðjury€returned€a€verdict€for€Class€D€felony€vandalism,€reflects€that€Defendant€was€convicted€for€aÐ #l! ÐClass€C€felony€vandalism,€contrary€to€the€juryððs€verdict.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„106(a)(1)€defines€a€ð ðmultiple€offenderðð€as€aÐ à%0!$ Ðdefendant€who€has€received€a€minimum€of€two,€but€not€more€than€four,€prior€felony€convictionsÐ Ì&"% Ðwithin€the€conviction€class,€a€higher€class,€or€within€the€next€two€lower€felony€classes,€whereÐ ¸'#& Ðapplicable.€€€Since€Defendant,€in€the€present€case,€was€sentenced€for€five€Class€D€felonies€and€oneÐ ¤(ô#' ÐClass€E€felony,€his€prior€criminal€record€of€three€Class€D€felonies€and€two€Class€E€felonies,€wouldÐ )à$( Ðnormally€justify€sentencing€as€at€least€a€multiple€offender.€€However,€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedÐ |*Ì%) Ðsection€40„35„106(b)(4)€provides€that€convictions€for€multiple€felonies€committed€as€part€of€a€singleÐ h+¸&* Ðcourse€of€conduct€within€twenty„four€hours€constitutes€one€conviction€for€the€purposes€ofÐ ° Ðdetermining€the€number€of€prior€convictions,€unless€the€criminal€acts€result€in€bodily€injury€orÐ œì Ðthreatened€bodily€injury€to€the€victim€or€victims.€€Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„106(c)€states€that€ð ð[a]€defendant€who€is€found€byÐ `° Ðthe€court€beyond€a€reasonable€doubt€to€be€a€multiple€offender€òòshallóó€receive€a€sentence€òòwithin€RangeÐ L œ ÐIIóó.ðð€€(emphasis€added).Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àTennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„112(b)(4)€provides€that€a€ð ðRange€IIðð€sentence€forÐ  ` Ða€Class€D€felony€is€not€less€than€four€years€nor€more€than€eight€years.€€Also,€Tennessee€CodeÐ ü L  ÐAnnotated€section€40„35„112(b)(5)€provides€that€a€Range€II€sentence€for€a€Class€E€felony€is€not€lessÐ è 8  Ðthan€two€nor€more€than€four€years.Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€for€count€1€of€the€indictment,€wherein€Defendant€was€convicted€of€burglary,Ð ¬ü  Ðreflects€a€sentence€of€three€years€as€a€multiple€offender€for€a€Class€D€felony.€€However,€the€minimumÐ ˜è  Ðsentence,€as€stated€above,€for€a€Range€II€multiple€offender€of€a€Class€D€felony€is€four€years.€€TheÐ „Ô  Ðjudgment€reflecting€the€conviction€in€count€2€for€the€Class€E€felony€conviction€for€vandalism,Ð pÀ Ðreflects€a€one„year€sentence€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender.€€However,€the€minimum€sentence,€byÐ \¬ Ðstatute,€is€two€years.€€Likewise,€the€judgment€for€count€3,€reflecting€Defendant€being€sentenced€as€Ð H˜ Ða€multiple€offender€for€the€Class€D€felony€theft,€reflects€a€sentence€of€two€years,€and€the€minimum,Ð 4„ Ðby€statute,€for€a€Range€II€multiple€offender,€is€four€years.€€The€judgment€for€the€conviction€of€countÐ  p Ð4,€for€a€Class€D€burglary€as€a€multiple€offender€is€for€a€sentence€of€two€years,€with€the€minimumÐ  \ Ðsentence€for€that€offense€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender€being€four€years.Ð øH ÐÌà  àAs€stated€above,€the€judgment€for€count€5€reflects€conviction€of€a€Class€C€felony,€but€the€juryÐ Ð  Ðverdict€reflects€a€finding€of€guilty€of€Class€D€felony€vandalism.€€Defendant€was€sentenced€to€fiveÐ ¼  Ðyears€for€the€conviction€in€count€5.€€The€sentence€of€five€years€is€within€the€permissible€range€forÐ ¨ø Ðsentencing€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender€for€a€D€felony,€but€not€for€a€C€felony,€which€has€aÐ ”ä Ðminimum€sentence,€by€statute,€of€six€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(b)(3).€€Finally,€theÐ €Ð Ðjudgment€for€count€7€reflects€a€conviction€for€Class€D€felony€theft€and€sentencing€as€a€multipleÐ l¼ Ðoffender€to€two€years€incarceration.€€Again,€the€minimum€sentence€for€a€Range€II€multiple€offenderÐ X ¨ Ðfor€a€Class€D€felony€is€four€years.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àAll€of€the€sentences€on€appeal€in€this€case€were€ordered€to€be€served€consecutively€to€theÐ #l! Ðsentence€Defendant€received€in€Dickson€County€Circuit€Court€No.€4916,€which€constituted€his€priorÐ $X" Ðconvictions€referenced€above.€€In€addition,€counts€1,€2,€and€3€were€ordered€to€be€served€concurrentlyÐ ô$D # Ðwith€each€other,€but€consecutive€to€concurrent€sentences€in€counts€4,€5,€and€7.€€Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àIn€summary,€the€judgments€reflect€that€if€Defendant€was€appropriately€sentenced€as€a€RangeÐ ¸'#& ÐII€multiple€offender,€the€sentences€are€not€within€the€statutorily„prescribed€range€of€punishment€inÐ ¤(ô#' Ðcounts€1,€2,€3,€4,€and€7.€€The€judgment€in€count€6€reflects€conviction€for€a€Class€C€felony,€but€theÐ )à$( Ðjuryððs€verdict€reflects€a€finding€of€guilt€of€a€Class€D€felony.Ð |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àWe€are€therefore€compelled€to€reverse€the€judgments€insofar€as€sentencing€is€concerned,€andÐ ° Ðremand€this€case€for€the€trial€court€to€enter€an€amended€judgment€reflecting€that€Defendant€beÐ œì Ðsentenced€as€a€standard€Range€I€offender,€if€appropriate,€and€a€correct€reflection€of€his€sentencingÐ ˆØ Ðstatus.€€In€the€alternative,€if€Defendant€is€appropriately€classified€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender,€theÐ tÄ Ðtrial€court€is€to€conduct€a€new€sentencing€hearing€to€determine€the€length€of€the€sentence€in€each€case€Ð `° Ðand€whether€consecutive€or€concurrent€sentencing€is€proper€once€Defendant€is€sentenced€within€theÐ L œ Ðrange€of€punishment€as€a€Range€II€multiple€offender.Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ  ` ÐÌà  àFor€the€foregoing€reasons,€we€affirm€the€convictions€of€Defendant€for€burglary,€vandalism,Ð è 8  Ðand€theft€as€reflected€by€the€juryððs€verdict.€€The€judgment€in€count€5€should€be€amended€to€reflectÐ Ô$  Ða€conviction€for€Class€D€felony€vandalism€rather€than€Class€C€felony€vandalism.€€In€addition,€weÐ À  Ðreverse€the€sentences€and€remand€this€case€for€the€trial€court€to€amend€the€judgments€to€showÐ ¬ü  ÐDefendantððs€sentencing€as€a€standard€Range€I€offender€if€he€was€inappropriately€designated€as€aÐ ˜è  ÐRange€II€multiple€offender.€€If€Defendant€was€appropriately€designated€as€a€Range€II€multipleÐ „Ô  Ðoffender,€the€trial€court€shall€conduct€a€new€sentencing€hearing€and€impose€sentences€within€RangeÐ pÀ ÐII.€€The€trial€court€shall€then€determine€consecutive€or€concurrent€sentencing€based€upon€theÐ \¬ Ðsentences€received€following€the€new€sentencing€hearing.Ð H˜ ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  \ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE