WPC; v}+dw҈:C3 o:B:Iʃ/uJG[%QIk(`?رKgx4%D1 AKaw v9>LYMJlB=d䭖.4A ú{\){a{{>4aFeY ZWJx >7S^xZjFhW$Ԡlܕ_nrF5nLy9AICb %\^ b 0nU,NwD4H\ zk m # U@   ] # 0N 0 0E 0 0 0 0x 0Z 09 0 0 0 0 0 0a 04 0 0 0 0| 0Z 05! 0 " 0" 0# 0$bO% 0W% 00 & 0<P& 0& 0>J' 0v' 0`' 0`^( 0`( 0`) 0`~) 08) 0* 02* 0+ 0:, 0YP, 0_, 0 - 0j. 0|/ B*1 D/*1 0Y1 D/2 0 3 063 04 0:5 0^R5 0<5U65U >"6U*`6UN6 06777 B77 07 D58 D-8 0K88 AS999 0R: 0D: A:;~ - (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*bk2@3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 40500(9 Z(Times New Roman Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 52J+M 0_level1  X 2( ` hp x 223  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2G+M 0_level2   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2D+M 0_level3   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2A+M 0_level4  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2>+M 0_level5   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2;+M 0_level6   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  28+M 0_level7  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  25+M 0_level8   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  22+M 0_level9    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2JM 0_levsl1  X 2( ` hp x 223  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2GM 0_levsl2   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2DM 0_levsl3   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2AM 0_levsl4  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2>M 0_levsl5   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2;M 0_levsl6   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  28M 0_levsl7  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  25M 0_levsl8   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  22M 0_levsl9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2JM 0_levnl1  X 2( ` hp x 223   5+ ` hp x 5  2GM 0_levnl2   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  2DM 0_levnl3   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  2AM 0_levnl4  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  2>M 0_levnl5   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  2;M 0_levnl6   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  28M 0_levnl7  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  25M 0_levnl8   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  - -22M 0_levnl9    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1   XXX   (&H2 XXX (&H3 XXX (&H4 XXX XXX(&H5 XXX (&H6 XXX 20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKN<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KN<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/KN<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7E(X7  ?P%2A`Arial?  XXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d dD)1dxd<:zTop of For7G(X7  ?P%2A`Arial?  XXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7D)2dxd0KS.SampleKN<6X9`(Courier NewKSO\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKN<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSO\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman%2A`Arial(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(|G2$ !.8dd8         0    d(|3?m$ !.8dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?m$ !.8dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _  8CXXdd8  @ttINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE# #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsJuly24,2002 L XCX #XXC#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.ANTHONYLEESMITHXCX  J  Direct @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforHamiltonCounty  J @@No.232692RebeccaJ.Stern,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200102333CCAR3CD   August9,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     AHamiltonCountyjuryconvictedthedefendantofburglaryandtheftunder$500.Hereceived x  consecutivesentencesof10yearsasaRangeIIIoffenderand11monthsand29days,respectively. d #XXCy#XCXThedefendantcontends(1)theevidencewasinsufficienttosupporthisconvictions;(2)thetrial P courterredinallowingthestatetopresentapropertyreceiptintoevidenceinlieuofcoinsfoundin < thedefendantspossession;(3)theprosecutormadeimproperremarksduringclosingargument;and (x (4)thetrialcourterredinorderingconsecutivesentences.Weaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. d Ѐ#XXC#XCX P  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed  <   #XC#XCX.JoeG.Riley,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.WellesandJerryL.Smith,  JJ.,joined.  JohnG._McDougal_Ԁ(attrial)andMelanieR.Snipes(onappeal),Chattanooga,Tennessee,forthe  appellant,AnthonyLeeSmith. t PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;KathyD._Aslinger_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; L  WilliamH.Cox,III,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andDeanC.Ferraro,AssistantDistrictAttorney 8!  General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. $"t!  OPINION $8 $     At9:30p.m.onFebruary2,2000,Officer_Damany_ԀNorwoodoftheChattanoogaPolice &"& DepartmentwenttoAndersonsFashionFabricstoinvestigateareportedburglary.OfficerNorwood '"' observedapersoninsidethestore scatteringaroundasiftryingtofindaplacetohideorexitthe (#( building.Theglassfrontdoorwasbroken,andabrickwasinfrontofthedoorway.Norwood )$) testifiedhesawthedefendantexitthroughthefrontdoor.Norwoodstatedhechasedthedefendant p*%* andwasabletokeepsightofhimuntilhearrestedhim.Norwoodtestifiedhefound$15.90in \+&+ quarters,dimes,andnickelsonthedefendant.Norwoodreturnedthedefendanttothestore. H,',  4-(- _  Thestoresowner,AltonAnderson,cametothestoreafterhewasnotifiedoftheburglary.  BothNorwoodandAndersontestifiedthecashregisterdrawerwasopen,andcoinswerescattered  onthefloorandcounter.Andersonstatedchangeappearedtobemissingfromthecashregister.  Accordingtobothmen,thedefendantapologizedtoAndersonforbreakingintothestore. t @1 1  I.SUFFICIENCYOFTHEEVIDENCE  8     `    Thedefendantcontendstheevidencewasinsufficienttosupporthisconvictions. XCXXXCWhere  ` sufficiencyoftheevidenceischallenged,therelevantquestionforanappellatecourtiswhether,after  L  viewingtheevidenceinthelightmostfavorabletotheprosecution,anyrationaltrieroffactcould  8  havefoundtheessentialelementsofthecrimeorcrimesbeyondareasonabledoubt.Tenn.R.App. $  P.13(e);Jacksonv.Virginia,443U.S.307,319,99S.Ct.2781,2789,61L.Ed.2d560(1979);   Statev.Abrams,935S.W.2d399,401(Tenn.1996).Theweightandcredibilityofthewitnesses'   testimonyaremattersentrustedexclusivelytothejuryasthetriersoffact.Statev.Sheffield,676   S.W.2d542,547(Tenn.1984);Statev.Brewer,932S.W.2d1,19(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).#XCXX XC"# XCXXXC# X XC# XCX    S\ S# X XC## #XCXOXCXXXC  Thedefendantwasconvictedofburglaryandtheftofproperty.Apersonisguiltyofburglary  ifheentersabuildingwithouttheownerseffectiveconsentwiththeintenttocommitatheft. S#XCXXOXC##XXCɬ#  XCX Tenn. w CodeAnn.3914402(a)(1). S# X XCy## Z#   &  XCXOXCXXXCӀApersoncommitstheftofpropertyif,withintenttodeprivethe c ownerofproperty,thepersonknowinglyobtainsorexercisescontroloverthepropertywithoutthe O owner'seffectiveconsent.'c@ԀTenn.CodeAnn.3914103. ;  S#XCXXOXCk##XXCL#XCX XCXXXC  OfficerNorwoodtestifiedhesawaholeinthestoresglassdoor,abrickrestingnearthe f doorway,andapersoninsidethestore scatteringaroundinanapparentefforttohideorflee. R AccordingtoOfficerNorwoodstestimony,thedefendantfledoutthefrontdoorofthestore,and > OfficerNorwoodkeptthedefendantinhissightuntilhewascaptured.Boththestoresownerand *z theofficertestifiedthestorescashregisterwasopenandcoinswerescattered.Theownertestified f itappearedcoinsweremissingfromtheregister.Alargenumberofcoinswerefoundinthe R defendantspossession.Further,thedefendantapologizedforenteringthestore.Inshort,the > defendantwascaught redhanded.Weconcludethisproofwasmorethansufficienttosupportthe  * defendantsconvictionsfortheburglaryandtheft.Thisissueiswithoutmerit. ! @ II.ADMISSIONOFPROPERTYRECEIPTINSTEADOFCOINS $"     `   Attrial,thestatedidnotpresenttheactualcoinsOfficerNorwoodfoundonthedefendant b&!$ atthetimeofhisarrest;instead,apropertyreceiptandaninventorywerepresentedasexhibitsto N'"% OfficerNorwoodstestimonythathefound$15.90incoinsonthedefendant.OfficerNorwood :(#& testifiedheturnedthecoinsovertothepolicedepartmentspropertydivision,whoputthemina &)v$' safe.Norwoodstatedthepolicedepartmentwouldwriteachecktotheownerofthecoinsrather *b%(  thanreturnthem.Thedefendantarguesthetrialcourterredinnotrequiringthestatetoproducethe *N&) coins.Healsoarguesthepropertyreceiptwasinadmissiblehearsay,andtheproperchainofcustody  wasnotestablished.     First,ourreviewoftherecordshowsthedefendantexpresslywaivedhishearsayobjection t inthetrialcourt.Bydoingso,hecannotnowchangehispositiononappeal. ` #XCXX XCV##XXC7#XCX XCXXXC  Thedefendantarguedattrial,andalsoarguesonappeal,thatthecoinsweredestroyed, 8  therebydenyingthedefendanttherighttoafairtrialduetothedestructionofthephysicalevidence. $ t However,beforethestatehasadutytopreserveevidence,theevidencemusthaveexculpatoryvalue.  ` SeeStatev.Ferguson,2S.W.3d912,917(Tenn.1999).Thedefendanthasmadenoshowingthat  L  thecoinsintheinstantcasehadexculpatoryvalue.  8    Thedefendantfurthercontendsonappealthestatedidnotestablishaproperchainofcustody   forthepropertyreceipt.Therewasnoobjectiononthisbasisattrial;theissueiswaived.SeeState   v.Dooley,29S.W.3d542,549(Tenn.Crim.App.2000).Evenifthetrialcourterredbyadmitting   thereceipt,suchanerrorclearlydidnotaffecttheresultofthetrialtothedefendantsprejudice.See   Tenn.R.App.P.36(b). p @  III.PROSECUTORSCLOSINGARGUMENT  4 ̀Thedefendantmaintainstheprosecutormadeimproperremarksduringhisclosingargument.  \ Theprosecutortoldthejury, Whenyougobacktothejuryroom,allofyoucheckyourpocketsand H seehowmuchchangeyouhaveinyourpocket.Illbetyounooneprobablyhasmorethantwo 4 dollarsinchangeintheirpocket.Therecordshowstherewasnoobjectiontothisstatement.   Therefore,thisissuehasbeenwaived.Statev.Farmer,927S.W.2d582,591(Tenn.Crim.App.   1996).    Further,thetestforreviewingprosecutorialmisconductiswhetherimproperconductaffected  theverdicttothedefendantsprejudice.Statev.Zirkle,910S.W.2d874,888(Tenn.Crim.App. l 1995).Thecourtsshouldconsiderthefollowingfactorsindeterminingwhethertheverdictwas X  affected:(1)theallegedimproperconductinlightofthefactsandcircumstancesofthecase;(2) D! curativemeasurestakenbythecourtandtheprosecutor;(3)theprosecutorsintentinmakingan 0"  improperstatement;(4)thecumulativeeffectofimproperconductandothererrorsintherecord;and #l! (5)therelativestrengthorweaknessofthecase.Id.Eveniftheprosecutorsremarksinthiscase $X" wereimproper,thestrengthoftheevidenceagainstthedefendantandlackofothererrorsmakesit $D # unlikelythattheremarksaffectedtheverdict.Thisissueiswithoutmerit. %0!$ @  IV.CONSECUTIVESENTENCING  (#'   Thedefendantcomplainsthetrialcourterredinorderingconsecutivesentencing.First,we |*%) notetherecorddoesnotcontainthetranscriptofthesentencinghearing.Itisthedutyoftheaccused h+&* toprovidearecordwhichconveysafair,accurateandcompleteaccountofwhattranspiredwith  regardtoanissuewhichformsthebasisoftheappeal.Tenn.R.App.P.24(b);seeStatev.Taylor,  992S.W.2d941,944(Tenn.1999).#XCXX XC%# XCXXXC# X XC$# XCX ԀForthisreason,theissuehasbeenwaived.    #XCXX XC3#QXCXXXCRegardlessofthiswaiver,wefindampleevidenceinthepresentencereporttorevealthetrial ` courtdidnotabuseitsdiscretioninorderingconsecutivesentencing.Generally,itiswithinthe L  discretionofthetrialcourttoimposeconsecutivesentencesifitfindsbyapreponderanceofthe 8  evidencethat#XCXXQXC3#OXCXXXC [t]hedefendantisanoffenderwhoserecordofcriminalactivityisextensive.... $ t Tenn.CodeAnn.4035115(b)(2).#XCXXOXCɧ5#QXCXXXC h #XCXXQXCɀ6##XXCa3#XCX XCXXXCԀThepresentencereport,whichiscontainedintherecord,  ` showsthedefendanthadatleastsevenpriorfelonyconvictionsandnumerouspriormisdemeanor  L  convictions.Weconcludethisevidencewassufficient#XCXX XC7#QXCXXXCtojustifyconsecutivesentencingduetothe  8  defendantsextensivecriminalhistory. $    Findingnoerrorinthejudgmentofthetrialcourt,weaffirm.   @*  #XCXXQXCK8##XXC6#XCX0 ` 0 ` (#` (#0 (# (# h     ___________________________________H(#(#    `     h     JOEG.RILEY,JUDGE