ÿWPCÄ -b~º#C; .¹ªt:S  J-½dwl~8+aD©Í…Ÿ49¨9þ &"°›8»ßŒ)ã—jêÍ\ë‘Ê'c TRnuPÔE6ÖcV‘Ý–tÑX‰ŽÔr˜àlêY›Û‡!)kC8o¤.ס¡(I öük§c‹Ð+ØÓÅ@Qvy›Ž 6Øœ-égæ  F™xo2à5{íTLèW)¸×Äiæé ü‡šÇ¥¨e\"<Š>KÁðMvªåÈL1þ!ÔW0 ímÞ¨rðÌž&)2^4H–)e °ü5¶t¥tÒ[ÿêãÿÝ0-¨iÀ{‘©U©õä– 82½ëÜaÎmžÄt³MVÏïuÊÞÜjµYFrL4ÀÆñ™ýôh 𲱯G3$¶8æÖÕ;,1`°8¹æe“^•*”L{+²†j •-. ¸fYÊhåðdõŠ}̱I¦}EWP-=+.qSÊMŸu„ôÒögÒ Ç«]€´Û“ÏÎ(3Òñ3 Ê0ñþOâf. n\÷=íP¦?-ŠÄb›1/ïRËòaT­¨”,]€ˆ=BÄ"’¾K¶rÒuŸÉÓæF,Ý,švþãŒ5p{³»'½*Jt4Ee?ƸbUN\ %ª 0ˆ°^ 8wD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ 0D‘ ÆÕ Æ› Æa Æ'íNõU@÷t7E« ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­b¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹¹ 0ëÁÁÁÁ B¬¬ 0¤É D3m D-  0KÍÍ ASÆk 0¤1 0DÕ A«(ÈhH  Z6Times New Roman Regular»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó裆)â •jW)ܨ€­3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 (ÀÊO Z‹(Times New Roman  jÝ ƒRŸß$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‹Äò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ‡ô‹Äòòô‹ÄÔThere€is€reference€in€the€record€to€the€fact€that€the€Ô_ÔAppellantÔ_Ô€was€charged€in€a€separate€indictment€with€felonyÐ ° Ðpossession€of€cocaine€and€was€sentenced€on€the€same€day€for€this€offense€and€the€offense€of€facilitating€aggravatedÐ tÄ Ðrobbery.€€The€record€also€suggests€that€the€two€convictions€were€ordered€to€be€served€consecutively€and€that€bothÐ 8ˆ ÐÔ_ÔsentencesÔ_Ô€were€revoked€at€the€revocation€hearing.€€Neither€the€indictment€nor€the€judgment€form€for€the€felony€drugÐ üL Ðconviction€are€included€in€the€record;€nor€does€the€Appellant€appeal€from€the€revocation€of€this€Ô_ÔsentenceÔ_Ô€which€equallyÐ À Ðaffects€her€liberty.€€Additionally,€we€note€that€the€transcript€of€the€sentencing€hearing€of€the€instant€case€is€not€includedÐ „Ô  Ðin€the€record€before€this€court. Ý ƒRŸß$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‹Äò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔÔ‡ô‹Äòòô‹ÄÔThe€warrant€was€amended€by€order€of€the€court€on€March€2,€1999,€and€on€June€29,€1999.- ù-(|G2Ÿß$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€7¼»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô‹Äò»»Ô d(|3Gs$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€7¼»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Gs$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€7¼»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€7¼»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼7¼»»»ÔÑ8€c XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î!-7¼ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼7¼»îî!- #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€12,€2000€at€JacksonÐ üL ÐÔ‡Xc X»¼7¼ÔÌò òÔ#†¼7¼»XXc .#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€MYRA€L.€SMITHòòóóÔ‡Xc X»¼7¼Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Knox€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€62386Bà0 @ à€à0 @ à€€€€€€€€Mary€Beth€Ô_ÔLeibowitzÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E1999„02196„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐDecember€6,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓMyra€L.€Smith€appeals€the€sentencing€decision€of€the€Knox€County€Criminal€Court€revoking€herÐ xÈ  Ðnon„Ô_ÔincarcerativeÔ_Ô€sentence€and€ordering€service€of€the€sentence€in€the€Ô_ÔTDOCÔ_Ô.€€In€September€1998,Ð d´ ÐSmith€pled€guilty€to€the€class€C€felony€of€facilitating€aggravated€robbery€and€was€placed€under€theÐ P  Ðsupervision€of€the€Knox€County€Community€Alternative€to€Prison€Program€(Ô_ÔCAPPÔ_Ô).€€Four€monthsÐ <Œ Ðlater,€a€violation€warrant€issued.€€On€appeal,€Smith€argues€that€the€trial€court€acted€arbitrarily€inÐ (x Ðrevoking€her€suspended€sentence€by€failing€to€consider€her€extreme€drug€addiction,€her€history€ofÐ d Ðmental€illness,€and€her€lack€of€intent€to€violate€the€conditions€of€probation.€€Finding€that€the€trialÐ P Ðcourt€did€not€abuse€its€discretion,€we€affirm.Ð ì< ÐÔ#†¼7¼»XXc £#ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼7¼ÔÓ ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed.ó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼7¼»àXc  #ÔÔ‡Xc X.¼7¼ÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,óó€andÐ œì ÐòòTHOMAS€€T.€Ô_ÔWOODALLÔ_Ô,€J.óó,€joined.Ð ˆØ ÐÌMark€E.€Stephens,€District€Public€Defender,€Julia€Ô_ÔAuerÔ_Ô,€at€trial,€and€Paula€R.€Voss,€on€appeal,Ð `° ÐAssistant€Public€Defenders,€Knoxville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Myra€L.€Smith.Ð L œ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter,€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General,€Peter€M.Ð $"t! ÐÔ_ÔCoughlanÔ_Ô,€Assistant€Attorney€General,€Randall€E.€Ô_ÔNicholsÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General,€and€RobertÐ #`" ÐL.€Ô_ÔJolleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ü#L# ÐÔ#†¼7¼»XXc Ñ #ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼7¼ÔÌÓ¢ ÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼7¼»XXc ® #ÔÔ‡Xc X»¼7¼ÔÐ À&"& ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼7¼»XXc !#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€Xc X»¼7¼ÔÌà  àThe€Appellant,€Myra€L.€Smith,€appeals€the€July€16,€1999,€sentencing€decision€of€the€KnoxÐ „)Ô$) ÐCounty€Criminal€Court€ordering€that€ð ðthe€defendantððs€Community€Alternatives€to€Prison€ProgramÐ p*À%* Ðbe€and€the€same€is€hereby€revoked€and€the€judgment€of€this€court€on€September€24,€1998€.€.€.€is€putÐ \+¬&+ Ðinto€full€force€and€effect.ðð€€Before€examination€of€the€issues€presented€on€appeal,€we€find€itÐ H,˜', Ðnecessary€to€first€examine€the€specific€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.€Ð 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ô‡à  àò òó óOn€September€24,€1998,€the€Appellant,€under€the€terms€of€a€negotiated€plea€agreement,€pledÐ ° Ðguilty€to€the€offense€of€facilitating€aggravated€robbery,€a€class€C€felony.€The€judgment€form€enteredÐ œì Ðby€the€trial€court€shows€that,€for€this€one€conviction,€the€appellant€received€two€sentences:€(1)€a€five„Ð ˆØ Ðyear€TDOC€sentence€and€(2)€a€community€based€alternative€sentence€of€nine€years€and€two€hundredÐ tÄ Ðnine€days.€€The€special€conditions€section€of€the€uniform€judgment€form€contains€the€notation:Ð `° ÐÌà8  àòòBy€agreement,€it€is€hereby€ordered€that€the€Defendant€is€placed€under€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðsupervision€of€the€community€alternative€to€prison€program€for€a€periodÐ $ t Ðof€9€years,€209€days,€which€shall€expire€April€21,€2008.Ð `Ð Ð  ÐÌóóThus,€from€the€judgment€form€it€is€impossible€to€determine€whether€the€sentence€imposed€was€aÐ è 8  ÐTDOC€sentence€or€a€community€corrections€sentence.€€In€this€regard,€we€would€note€that,€if€the€trialÐ Ô$  Ðcourt€intended€the€sentence€to€be€a€community€corrections€sentence,€the€sentence€would€be€illegalÐ À  Ðbecause€the€maximum€sentence€which€can€be€imposed€for€a€range€one€offender€convicted€of€a€classÐ ¬ü  ÐC€felony€is€six€years.€€Ô‡Xc XXXc Ô€òòSeeóó€€òòTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€40„36„106(e)(2)€(ð ðthe€court€shall€possess€the€powerÐ ˜è  Ðto€set€the€duration€of€the€sentence€for€the€offense€committed€at€any€period€of€time€up€to€theÐ „Ô  Ðmaximum€sentence€within€the€appropriate€sentence€rangeðð).€€òòSee€alsoóó€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„Ð pÀ Ð112(a)(3)€(sentence€range€is€3€to€6€years).Ô#†Xc XXXc s#Ô€€On€the€other€hand,€if€the€trial€court€intended€the€sentenceÐ \¬ Ðto€be€a€TDOC€sentence,€with€the€five€years€being€suspended€and€the€Appellant€being€placed€onÐ H˜ Ðprobation€under€CAPPððs€supervision€for€a€period€of€nine€years€and€two€hundred€nine€days€as€aÐ 4„ Ðcondition€of€probation,€that€sentence€would€be€valid.€€òòSeeóó€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(óóf).€€òòSeeÐ  p Ðalsoóó€€òòÔ‡Xc XàXc ÔTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„303(c)€(ð ðthe€court€shall€sentence€the€defendant€to€a€specific€sentenceÐ  \ Ðbut€shall€suspend€€.€.€.€all€or€part€thereof€and€place€the€defendant€on€.€.€.€probation€.€.€.€for€a€periodÐ øH Ðof€time€not€less€than€the€minimum€sentence€allowed€under€the€classification€and€up€to€and€includingÐ ä4 Ðthe€statutory€maximum€time€for€the€class€of€the€conviction€offenseðð);€€òòóóòòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðð€40„35„Ð Ð  Ð111(b)(3)€(3€to€15€years).Ô#†Xc XXXc #ÔÐ ¼  ÐÌà  àThe€Appellant,€in€her€brief,€takes€the€position€that€the€sentence€imposed€was€a€five„yearÐ ”ä ÐTDOC€sentence€which€was€suspended€with€supervision€being€placed€with€the€CAPP€program.€Ð €Ð ÐCertain€portions€of€the€record,€however,€do€not€support€this€position.€€For€example,€no€probationÐ l¼ Ðwarrant€was€ever€filed€nor€is€the€term€ð ðprobationðð€ever€used€in€these€proceedings.€€Instead,€aÐ X ¨ Ðð ðViolation€of€CAPP€Programðð€warrant€was€issued€which€recites€that,€on€September€24,€1998,€theÐ D!” Ðtrial€court:Ð 0"€  Ðà8  àplace[d]€the€[Appellant]€on€the€community€alternative€to€prison€program€(CAPP)€forÐ #l! Ða€term€of€eleven€years€in€accordance€with€the€provision€of€Title€40,€Chapter€36€of€theÐ $X" ÐTennessee€Code€Annotated€(Community€Corrections€Act).€[׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×]Ðô$D #Ð Ð  Їà  àFollowing€the€revocation€hearing,€the€trial€court€entered€an€order€entitled€ð ðRevocation€ofÐ ° ÐCommunity€Alternatives€to€Prison€Program,ðð€which€contained€the€following€language:Ð œì ÐÌà8  àIT€IS€THEREFORE,€ORDERED€by€the€Court€that€the€defendantððs€CommunityÐ tÄ ÐAlternatives€to€Prison€Program€be€and€the€same€is€hereby€revoked€and€the€judgmentÐ `° Ðof€this€court€on€September€24,€1998,€[five€(5)€years€in€the€Tennessee€StateÐ L œ ÐPenitentiary€for€Women€as€a€Standard€Offender,€Range€I],€is€put€into€full€force€andÐ 8 ˆ Ðeffect.Ð$ tÐ Ð  ÐÌFinally,€it€is€noted€that,€at€the€revocation€hearing,€the€trial€court€credited€the€Appellant€withÐ ü L  Ðð ðsuccessful€CAPP€timeðð€during€her€participation€in€the€program€which€contradicts€a€sentence€ofÐ è 8  Ðprobation.€€òòSee,€e.g.óó,€€òòState€v.€Bruce€Coleóó,€No.€02C01„9708„CC„00324€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,Ð Ô$  ÐJune€11,€1998)€(probationer€placed€in€community€corrections€program€as€condition€of€probation€notÐ À  Ðentitled€to€sentence€credit€for€time€spent€under€community€corrections€supervision).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àDespite€the€contradictions€contained€in€the€record€regarding€the€precise€nature€of€the€sentenceÐ „Ô  Ðimposed,€we€conclude€that€whether€the€Appellant€was€on€probation€or€serving€a€€communityÐ pÀ Ðcorrections€sentence€is€immaterial€to€the€disposition€of€this€appeal.€€The€same€principles€applicableÐ \¬ Ðto€a€probation€revocation€are€relevant€to€the€revocation€of€community€corrections.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,Ð H˜ Ð811€S.W.2d€79,€83€(Tenn.€1991).€€Nonetheless,€we€remind€the€sentencing€court€of€the€importanceÐ 4„ Ðof€clearly€articulating€the€precise€nature€and€manner€of€service€of€sentence€in€its€imposition€ofÐ  p Ðpunishment.Ð  \ ÐÌÌà@ÛÛ%ìàò òBackgroundó óˆÐ Ð  ÐÌà  àOn€January€27,€1999,€a€violation€warrant€was€filed€alleging€that€the€Appellant€had€violatedÐ ¨ø Ðthe€conditions€of€the€CAPP€program€by:Ð ”ä ÐÌà8  àRule€#1€€Failing€to€obey€the€laws€of€the€U.S.€and€the€State€.€.€.€as€well€as€anyÐ l¼ Ðmunicipal€ordinance.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àRule€#2€€The€offender€shall€not€frequent€bars€or€taverns€nor€possess€or€use€alcoholÐ 0"€  Ðor€controlled€substances.Ð#l!Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àRule€#4€€By€fraternizing€with€persons€who€use,€deal€or€traffic€illegal€substances€orÐ ô$D # Ðwho€has€a€criminal€reputation.Ðà%0!$Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àRule€#8€€By€failing€to€pay€court€costs.и'#&Ð Ð  ÐÐ ¤(ô#' Ðà8  àRule€#10€€By€failing€to€pay€community€corrections€monthly€fees.€[׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×]аРР ÐÌA€hearing€was€held€on€July€16,€1999.€€At€the€hearing,€Nancy€Mlekodaj,€the€A€&€D€coordinator€withÐ ˆØ Ðthe€CAPP€program,€testified€that,€on€January€14,€1999,€the€Appellant€submitted€to€a€drug€screenÐ tÄ Ðwhich€revealed€a€positive€result€for€cocaine.€€The€Appellant€admitted€to€Ms.€Mlekodaj€that€she€hadÐ `° Ðused€cocaine€and€that€the€use€of€the€substance€was€a€violation€of€her€non„incarcerative€status.€€OnÐ L œ ÐFebruary€25,€1999,€the€Appellant€again€tested€positive€for€the€presence€of€cocaine.€€After€this€secondÐ 8 ˆ Ðpositive€drug€screen,€the€Appellant€"absconded€from€the€program."€€On€cross„examination,€Ms.Ð $ t ÐMlekodaj€stated€that,€prior€to€her€absconding€from€the€program,€the€Appellant€had€been€participatingÐ  ` Ðin€"groups"€and€otherwise€performing€well€in€the€CAPP€program.€€She€also€testified€that€theÐ ü L  ÐAppellant€was€not€paying€the€required€costs€and€fees€associated€with€the€program,€but€that€theseÐ è 8  Ðmonies€were€not€the€focus€of€the€Appellant's€rehabilitative€program€at€that€point.€€It€was€concededÐ Ô$  Ðthat€the€Appellant's€main€problem€was€her€continued€use€of€cocaine.€€No€further€evidence€wasÐ À  Ðpresented.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àIn€a€discussion€of€relevant€considerations,€the€trial€court€articulated€the€following€findings:Ð „Ô  ÐÌà8  à€.€.€.€We€have€to€look€really€at€Miss€Smith's€history€and€what€she€was€doing€on€CAPPÐ \¬ Ðas€well€as€the€two€.€.€.€uses€of€the€drug.ÐH˜Ð Ð  Ðà8  àÐ Ð Ð  Ðà8  àMiss€Smith€has€had€a€long€history€of€mental€health€and€particularly€of€illegal€drugÐ  p Ðuse.€€Miss€Smith€stated€in€her€presentence€report€that€she€drank€beer€at€seventeen€andÐ  \ Ðdrank€gallons€in€a€day.€€She€first€used€cocaine€at€twenty.€€And€if€I'm€correct€here€MissÐ øH ÐSmith€is€a€lady€of€thirty„seven€years€of€age€approximately.€€And€Miss€Smith€hasÐ ä4 Ðcontinued€the€use€of€cocaine€and€has€in€this€court€been€convicted€of€possession€ofÐ Ð  Ðcocaine,€a€class€C€felony,€with€the€intent€to€.€.€.€sell€it€.€.€.€.€€And€in€addition€she€hasÐ ¼  Ðalso€been€convicted€of€facilitation€to€commit€an€aggravated€robbery€in€a€situationÐ ¨ø Ðwhere€an€individual€died,€and€that€was€a€violent€situation.ДäÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àMiss€Smith€has€had€treatment€in€her€past€from€Another€Chance,€Sisters€of€theÐ l¼ ÐRainbow,€Lakeshore€Mental€Health€Institute,€and€I€am€sure€that€on€each€occasion€sheÐ X ¨ Ðwas€afforded€opportunities€which€„€„€and€on€CAPP€and€even€twice€on€CAPP€becauseÐ D!” Ðthe€Court€was€willing€to€ROR€her€to€let€her€go€into€some€more€intensive€treatmentÐ 0"€  Ðwith€CAPP.Ð#l!Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àOn€each€of€those€occasions€I€do€not€doubt€Miss€Smith's€sincerity€as€she€has€beenÐ ô$D # Ðsincere€in€this€report€that€she€wanted€to€turn€her€life€around€and€that€she€was€tryingÐ à%0!$ Ðto€do€so.€€Unfortunately€the€situation€is€that€I€am€a€Criminal€Court€judge€and€I€am€notÐ Ì&"% Ða€social€institute.и'#&Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ ¤(ô#' Ðà8  àTo€allow€Miss€Smith,€who€tested€positive€for€cocaine€and€was€given€a€chance€to€turnÐ ° Ðâ âit€around€following€these€convictions€of€such€a€severe€nature,€yet€another€chanceÐ œì Ðbecause€she€tested€positive€again€and€then€absconded€both€sends€the€wrong€messageÐ ˆØ Ðto€Miss€Smith€and€would€be,€in€this€Court's€opinion,€irresponsible.€€I€wish€I€had€anÐ tÄ Ðinpatient€in„house€treatment€program.€€I€no€longer€do.Ð`°Ð Ð  ÐÌÌà@‚‚&ìàò òAnalysisó óˆÐ $ t ÐÌà  à€The€law€concerning€revocation€of€a€suspended€sentence€is€clear.€€Upon€finding,€by€aÐ ü L  Ðpreponderance€of€the€evidence,€that€a€defendant€has€violated€the€conditions€of€probation,€a€trial€courtÐ è 8  Ðretains€the€discretion€to€revoke€the€defendant€from€a€suspended€sentence€and€cause€execution€of€theÐ Ô$  Ðoriginal€judgment€as€it€was€entered.€€òòTenn.€Code€Ann.óó€ðððð€40-35-310,€-311(d)€(1997€&€Supp.€1998);Ð À  ÐòòTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(óóe)(4)€(Supp.€1998).Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThis€court€reviews€a€revocation€under€an€abuse€of€discretion€standard.€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.Ð „Ô  ÐStubblefieldóó,€953€S.W.2d€223,€226€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997)€(citing€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82;€òòStateÐ pÀ Ðv.€Delpóó,€614€S.W.2d€395€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980)).€€This€means€that€the€evidence€need€only€showÐ \¬ Ðthat€the€trial€judge€has€exercised€"conscientious€and€intelligent€judgment€in€making€the€decisionÐ H˜ Ðrather€than€acting€arbitrarily."€€òòSeeóó€€òòState€v.€Leachóó,€914€S.W.2d€104,€107€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)Ð 4„ Ð(citing€òòStamps€v.€Stateóó,€614€S.W.2d€71,€73€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.Ð  p Ð1981)).€€Thus,€in€reviewing€the€trial€court's€action,€it€is€our€obligation€to€examine€the€record€andÐ  \ Ðdetermine€whether€the€trial€court€has€exercised€a€conscientious€judgment.€€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810Ð øH ÐS.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àIn€the€present€case,€the€Appellant's€flagrant€abuse€of€her€judicially€granted€liberty€isÐ ¼  Ðindefensible.€€The€primary€goal€of€non„institutional€punishment€is€to€provide€a€period€of€grace€inÐ ¨ø Ðorder€to€assist€the€rehabilitation€of€a€penitent€offender.€€òòSeeóó€€òòBurns€v.€United€Statesóó,€287€U.S.€216,Ð ”ä Ð220,€53€S.€Ct.€154,€155€(1932).€€The€record€is€undisputed€that€the€Appellant€continued€to€use€cocaineÐ €Ð Ðand€then€absconded€from€the€program.€€Her€conduct€demonstrates€that€she€is€unrepentant.€€EffortsÐ l¼ Ðto€rehabilitate€the€Appellant€have€been€rejected.€€In€the€case€before€us,€the€trial€court€was€statutorilyÐ X ¨ Ðauthorized€to€reinstate€the€Appellant's€original€five„year€Department€of€Correction€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€Ð D!” ÐòòTenn.€Code€€Annóó.€ðð€40-35-310;€òòTenn.€Code€Annóó.€ðð€40„36„106(e)(4).€€Based€on€the€record€beforeÐ 0"€  Ðus,€we€cannot€conclude€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€in€revoking€the€Appellant€from€herÐ #l! Ðnon„incarcerative€status€and€by€ordering€the€Appellant€to€serve€the€terms€of€her€original€sentence.€Ð $X" ÐThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€Ð ô$D # ÐÌÌÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð |*Ì%) Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE