ÿWPCð óXž1âeê #凼÷Ê“=gÒ¸8½%ôãæ±A ëW‚†á7تäijì’ªHÏǾre› í¢, ðÖ@I†ù2€ä]¼Ë ì:"9Žú$G¿ÿncX?h”ã¿ÀÿlíŸB…‰îâ’±ZHãQCDýcÂc! ãƒAW”Ç.žy´.bòVn¤§½‰¯\ã ”X~ežrY‡yG( DÙå Ø<÷±Ãâv”i:ï½Ñ1PÿI)tøÑ›Ö,îT®Kxæ®è í:a.4ž¤­B1ùš*+{_Ðçeºû$/ ËC ñS;$‘ñA†ÕÉÍ›˜o¶²Ì¥7ý¦ã¸p¸ª›†kòWùôÜh1Ê=8±î”Z´Qøü·d¥:Tö¸z±ãEö?VŽå’»ÄŸKJ6l[FÙsjõ”çhݶ£m§õ¤Šæ;!üû§*‘`vR]§ìâ ääJ1 ²íºLï¿–í°<Ã?¨š±ð$ÛhXòý}lIé ­+y ³•§>]q¿æUþQ¨mò‰© T@ß·;@DJțєq>|aÍ«ößÚ"˜¹LL ¶?Ì“ø°±þêЭ›vþíœYÊ úf¬Z¦º`äÚáAAF#  V+!Çqú™–»Zb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÁÐ UN‘ Æß Æ¥ Æk Æ1U@÷N799EA 0DCCCCCCCCCCCCCC D1‡‡ B¸¸¸¸¸¸¸bÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕ 0ùÝÝÝÝ BÖÖ 0¤ó D5— D-Ì 0Kùù ASDÆ— 0¤] 0D A«E »]{2)â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularûr')àL¡3|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 8000 Series PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÆúI Z‹6Times New Roman RegularLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman  (#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó'')÷ÿ! dxdxüÿP Pd- ù-(ŠG2Í$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÒ°Òà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€Xg|X»»Ô d(|3Eà$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3Eà$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»d d 8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ô»»d dÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€ ¼÷»» »ÔÑ8€zäXXdê»»d 8Ñà@HHìàIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@''%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ  ÐÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷ÔÌò òÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹i#ÔÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€Ô_ÔRETHAÔ_Ô€JEAN€SMITHÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ôó óÐ À ÐÓ¯ÓÌà@B B ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Henry€CountyˆÐ À  Ðà@Á Á ìàNo.€12853€€€€€€Julian€P.€Ô_ÔGuinnÔ_Ô,€Judge€ˆÐ ¬ ü Ðà€(#(#K(#àˆÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<o ` A߈Ð p À  ÐÌà@t t ìàNo.€W1999„00607„CCA„R3„CD€„€Decided€„€September€14,€2000ˆÐ k»  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<B` AßÐ C“  Ðó óÌThe€defendant€appeals€her€jury€conviction€and€sentence€for€possession€of€a€Schedule€II€controlledÐ >Ž  Ðsubstance€with€the€intent€to€manufacture,€sell€or€deliver.€€She€received€a€sentence€of€three€years€withÐ *z  Ðone€year€to€be€served€in€confinement€and€the€remainder€to€be€served€on€community€corrections.€€TheÐ f Ðdefendant€raises€the€following€issues€for€review:€€(1)€whether€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€sustainÐ R Ðher€convictionÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ô;€(2)€Ô#† ¼÷»X XD‹g#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ôwhether€the€prosecuting€attorney€made€improper€remarks€during€his€closingÐ î> ÐargumentÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹¯#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ô;€and€(3)€whether€her€sentence€is€excessive.€€Upon€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€theÐ Ú* Ðjudgment€of€the€trial€court€but€remand€for€the€assessment€of€the€fine.€€Ð Æ ÐÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed;€RemandedÐ žî Ðfor€Assessment€of€Fine.ó óÐ ŠÚ ÐÌòòRileyÔ#† ¼÷»à XD‹W#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X. ¼÷Ôóó,€J.€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòÔ_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€and€òòGlennóó,€JJ.€joined.Ð b² ÐÌSteven€L.€West,€McKenzie,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant.Ð :Š ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€J.€Ross€Dyer,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€G.Ð b ÐRobert€Ô_ÔRadfordÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Steven€L.€Ô_ÔGarrettÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ þN ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð ê :  ÐÌÓÓÓÓà@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹ #ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ôˆà p àà È àà  àà x àà Ð àÐ Â"" Ðà  àà ` àÌà  àOfficers€arrived€at€the€defendantððs€residence€to€execute€an€arrest€warrant€on€Gary€Osborne.Ð š$ê$ ÐOfficer€Archie€approached€the€back€porch,€detected€an€ammonia„type€smell,€observed€two€masonÐ †%Ö % Ðjars€with€a€white€powder€substance€on€the€bottom€and€chemicals€on€top,€and€saw€a€bottle€of€liquidÐ r&Â!& Ðfire€and€a€jar€of€ether.€€Thereafter,€the€defendant€appeared€on€the€porch.€€The€officers€advised€herÐ ^'®"' Ðthey€were€looking€for€Osborne,€and€she€stated€he€was€not€in€the€house.€€The€defendant€then€advisedÐ J(š#( Ðthe€officers€that€they€were€ð ðmore€than€welcome€to€lookðð€in€the€residence.€€Ð 6)†$) ÐÌà  àTwo€officers€testified€that€they€smelled€a€strong€chemical€odor€throughout€the€house.€€€StarterÐ +^&+ Ðfluid€and€lithium€batteries€were€observed€in€the€living€room,€and€there€was€a€razor€blade€and€whiteÐ ú+J', Ðresidue€on€the€corner€of€the€kitchen€table.€€In€addition,€Officer€Archie€searched€the€defendantððsÐ æ,6(- Ðbedroom€and€found€a€measuring€cup€with€some€burnt€chemical€residue,€several€boxes€ofÐ Ò-").ý ÐÔ_Ôpseudoephedrine€on€the€night€stand,€a€box€of€rolling€papers€on€the€bed,€and€a€plate€with€a€residueÐ ° ÐÔ_Ôof€methamphetamine.€€A€search€of€the€bathroom€revealed€a€plate€containing€small€bags€ofÐ œì Ðmethamphetamine,€lines€of€white€powder,€two€razor€blades,€and€a€pen€which€appeared€to€have€beenÐ ˆØ Ðused€as€a€straw.€€There€was€a€Pyrex€bowl€of€anhydrous€ammonia€in€the€bathtub.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àNarcotics€Officer€Wyrick€explained€that€the€items€found€were€used€in€running€a€ð ðNazi€styleððÐ L œ Ðmethamphetamine€lab.€€He€testified€that€this€type€of€lab€is€established€by€using€household€products.€Ð 8 ˆ ÐHe€stated€that€officers€observed€all€the€products€which€were€needed€for€this€kind€of€operation,€andÐ $ t Ðthe€smell€of€a€chemical€odor€indicated€the€operation€was€ongoing.€€He€explained€that€the€mason€jarsÐ  ` Ðfound€on€the€back€porch€and€in€the€bathroom€were€ð ðcooking.ðð€€This€refers€to€the€process€ofÐ ü L  Ðchemically€extracting€the€compound€ephedrine,€which€is€the€primary€ingredient€ofÐ è 8  Ðmethamphetamine.€€Wyrick€further€explained€that€this€process€would€take€approximately€four€toÐ Ô$  Ðeight€hours.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àCo„defendant€Jeremy€Freeland€testified€that€he€produced€the€methamphetamine€for€hisÐ ˜è  Ðpersonal€use,€and€the€defendant€had€no€knowledge€that€the€drug€was€being€manufactured.€€TheÐ „Ô  Ðdefendant€testified€the€residence€was€not€her€home.€€She€stated€she€was€there€only€the€one€night€and€Ð pÀ Ðhad€no€knowledge€of€the€drug€operation.€€However,€the€defendant€identified€the€property€as€her€homeÐ \¬ Ðto€the€officers;€a€utility€receipt€listed€the€defendant€as€the€owner€of€the€property;€and€a€receipt€fromÐ H˜ Ða€local€drug€store€showed€the€defendant€purchased€four€bottles€of€rubbing€alcohol€and€several€boxesÐ 4„ Ðof€pseudoephedrine€tablets€the€day€before€the€search.€€Ð  p ÐÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹Ù #ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷ÔÌà  àThe€jury€convicted€the€defendant€of€possession€of€methamphetamine€with€the€intent€toÐ øH Ðmanufacture,€sell€or€deliver€and€assessed€a€fine€of€$50,000.€€The€defendant€received€a€sentence€ofÐ ä4 Ðthree€years€with€one€year€to€be€served€in€confinement€and€the€remainder€on€community€corrections.€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àIn€this€appeal€as€of€right,€the€defendant€contends€the€evidence€is€insufficient€to€support€herÐ ¨ø Ðconviction;€the€prosecutor€made€improper€remarks€in€his€closing€argument;€and€her€sentence€isÐ ”ä Ðexcessive.€€We€reject€these€contentions€and€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court;€however,€weÐ €Ð Ðremand€for€the€assessment€of€the€appropriate€fine.€€Ô#† ¼÷»X XD‹p#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷ÔÐ l¼ ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àÌÓ  Óòòò òI.€€SUFFICIENCY€OF€THE€EVIDENCEÐ 0"€  ÐÌA.€€Standard€of€ReviewÐ $X" ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àÔ‡XD‹XX XD‹ÔIn€determining€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€Court€does€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€theÐ à%0!$ Ðevidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571€S.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€A€jury€verdict€approved€by€the€trialÐ Ì&"% Ðjudge€accredits€the€state's€witnesses€and€resolves€all€conflicts€in€favor€of€the€state.€€òòState€v.€Bigbeeóó,Ð ¸'#& Ð885€S.W.2d€797,€803€(Tenn.€1994).€€On€appeal,€the€state€is€entitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€viewÐ ¤(ô#' Ðof€the€evidence€and€all€legitimate€or€reasonable€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòId.óó€ThisÐ )à$( ÐCourt€will€not€disturb€a€verdict€of€guilt€due€to€the€sufficiency€of€the€evidence€unless€the€defendantÐ |*Ì%) Ðdemonstrates€that€the€facts€contained€in€the€record€and€the€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefromÐ h+¸&* Ðare€insufficient,€as€a€matter€of€law,€for€a€rational€trier€of€fact€to€find€the€accused€guilty€beyond€aÐ ° Ðreasonable€doubt.€€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€932€S.W.2d€1,€19€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Accordingly,€it€isÐ œì Ðthe€appellate€court's€duty€to€affirm€the€conviction€if€the€evidence,€viewed€under€these€standards,€wasÐ ˆØ Ðsufficient€for€any€rational€trier€of€fact€to€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€offense€beyond€aÐ tÄ Ðreasonable€doubt.€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e);€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€319,€99€S.Ct.€2781,Ð `° Ð2789,€61€L.Ed.2d€560€(1979);€€òòState€v.€Cazesóó,€875€S.W.2d€253,€259€(Tenn.€1994).Ð L œ ÐÓ›ÓÌò òòòB.€€AnalysisÐ $ t ÐÌÓ  Óóóó óà  àThe€defendant€contends€the€state€did€not€prove€she€was€aware€that€methamphetamine€wasÐ ü L  Ðbeing€produced€in€the€residence,€or€that€she€was€involved€in€the€manufacture€of€methamphetamine.€Ð è 8  ÐÔ#† XD‹XXXD‹³#ÔÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹°#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷ÔShe€further€argues€the€proof€does€not€reveal€that€methamphetamine€was€produced€other€than€forÐ Ô$  ÐFreelandððs€personal€use.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àViewing€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorable€to€the€state,€we€conclude€the€evidence€isÐ ˜è  Ðsufficient€to€support€the€defendantððs€conviction.€€Officer€Wyrick€described€the€lab€and€testified€that,Ð „Ô  Ðbased€on€his€experience€as€a€narcotics€officer,€the€lab€was€an€ongoing€operation.€€All€three€officersÐ pÀ Ðtestified€that€the€smell€of€chemical€odor€was€extremely€pungent.€€In€addition,€a€measuring€cup€withÐ \¬ Ða€burnt€chemical€residue,€a€plate€with€methamphetamine€residue,€and€several€boxes€ofÐ H˜ Ðpseudoephedrine€tablets€were€found€in€the€bedroom€where€the€defendant€was€sleeping.€€Furthermore,Ð 4„ Ðthe€defendant€had€recently€purchased€several€bottles€of€rubbing€alcohol€and€boxes€ofÐ  p Ðpseudoephedrine€tablets,€which€are€key€ingredients€in€methamphetamine.€€Although€the€defendantÐ  \ Ðtestified€this€was€not€her€residence,€the€officers€presented€contrary€evidence.€€Furthermore,€the€natureÐ øH Ðof€the€drug€operation€and€the€presence€of€small€bags€of€drugs€indicated€the€drugs€were€not€strictlyÐ ä4 Ðfor€personal€use.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àThe€weight€and€credibility€of€the€witnessesðð€testimony€are€matters€entrusted€exclusively€toÐ ¨ø Ðthe€jury€as€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòBreweróó,€932€S.W.2d€at€19.€€Thus,€the€jury€was€free€to€discount€theÐ ”ä Ðdefendantððs€explanation€if€they€found€her€testimony€was€not€credible.€€Likewise,€the€jury€couldÐ €Ð Ðassess€the€credibility€of€co„defendant,€Jeremy€Freeland.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àThere€was€sufficient€evidence€to€convict€the€defendant€of€possession€with€intent€toÐ D!” Ðmanufacture,€sell€or€deliver€methamphetamine.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ð 0"€  ÐÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹€%#ÔÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷Ôò òòòÌÌÓ  ÓII.€€CLOSING€ARGUMENTÐ ô$D # ÐÌA.€€Standard€of€ReviewÐ Ì&"% ÐÓì-ÓÌóóó óÔ‡XD‹XX XD‹Ôà  àð ðIt€is€unprofessional€conduct€for€a€prosecutor€intentionally€to€misstate€the€evidence€orÐ ¤(ô#' Ðmislead€the€jury€as€to€the€inferences€it€may€draw.ðð€€òòState€v.€Philpottóó,€882€S.W.2d€394,€408€(Tenn.Ð )à$( ÐCrim.€App.€1994);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Hicksóó,€618€S.W.2d€510,€518€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1981).€€It€is€asÐ |*Ì%) Ðmuch€his€or€her€duty€to€refrain€from€improper€methods€calculated€to€produce€a€wrongful€convictionÐ h+¸&* Ðas€it€is€to€use€every€legitimate€means€to€bring€about€a€just€one.€€òòBerger€v.€United€Statesóó,€295€U.S.€78,Ð ° Ð88,€55€S.Ct.€629,€633,€79€L.Ed.1314€(1935).Ð œì Ðà  àò òòòÔ#† XD‹XXXD‹e.#ÔÌÓ  ÓB.€€Analysisóóó óÐ tÄ ÐÓq1ÓÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€the€district€attorney€inappropriately€argued€the€jury€should€ð ðsend€aÐ L œ Ðmessageðð€to€the€community€since€juveniles€were€involved€in€the€drug€operation.€€The€defendantÐ 8 ˆ Ðalleges€that€the€only€juvenile€at€the€house€was€her€fourteen„year„old€son.€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àFirst,€we€note€that€there€is€no€indication€in€the€record€that€the€district€attorney€stated€orÐ ü L  Ðimplied€the€jury€should€ð ðsend€a€messageðð€to€the€community€regarding€juveniles€and€drug€activity.€Ð è 8  ÐFurthermore,€the€defendantððs€objection€to€the€stateððs€characterization€of€the€other€persons€in€theÐ Ô$  Ðhouse€as€juveniles€was€sustained€by€the€trial€court,€and€the€jury€was€instructed€to€ignore€counselððsÐ À  Ðstatement.€€Thus,€the€trial€court€gave€a€prompt€and€proper€instruction€which€was€sufficient€to€nullifyÐ ¬ü  Ðany€prejudicial€effect.€€òòSeeóó€òòPhilpottóó,€882€S.W.2d€at€408.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ô#† ¼÷»X XD‹Å-#Ôò òòòóóó óÐ ˜è  ÐÓ  ÓÌòòò òÔ‡ XD‹X» ¼÷ÔÌIII.€€SENTENCINGÐ ‚Ò ÐÌóóó óÓ  Óà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€her€sentence€is€ð ðexcessive€and€unduly€harsh.ðð€€Her€soleÐ Zª Ðargument€is€that€her€co„defendant,€Jeremy€€Freeland,€was€more€culpable,€yet€received€a€less€severeÐ F– Ðsentence.€€Ð 2‚ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€contends€that€Freeland€was€sentenced€to€three€years,€with€210€days€to€beÐ  Z Ðserved€in€confinement€and€the€balance€to€be€served€on€community€corrections.€€However,€hisÐ öF Ðsentence€does€not€appear€in€the€record€except€through€statements€of€counsel.€€Nevertheless,€we€seeÐ â2 Ðno€reason€to€disturb€the€defendantððs€sentence.Ð Î ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€is€not€required€to€give€co„defendants€the€same€sentence.€€òòState€v.€MichaelÐ ¦ö ÐLeon€Chambersóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9505„CC„00143,€Putnam€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filed€€JuneÐ ’â Ð20,€1996,€at€Nashville),€òòperm.€to€app.€denied€óó(Tenn.€1996).€€We€do€note€that€Freeland€pled€guilty,Ð ~ Î Ðand€the€record€does€not€indicate€whether€his€sentence€was€negotiated€pursuant€to€that€plea.€€Nor€doesÐ j!º Ðthe€record€contain€the€findings€of€the€trial€court€that€sentenced€Freeland,€or€the€proof€which€wasÐ V"¦  Ðpresented€at€his€sentencing€hearing.€€The€defendantððs€pre„sentence€report€does€not€contain€FreelandððsÐ B#’! Ðsentence€but€does€reveal€that€Freeland€was€only€twenty„two€years€of€age,€whereas€defendant€wasÐ .$~" Ðthirty„five.€€Each€case€rests€upon€its€own€merits,€and€we€need€not€look€to€other€cases€where€the€trialÐ %j # Ðcourt€has€properly€considered€the€sentencing€principles€applicable€to€the€defendant.€€òòSee€óóòòState€v.Ð &V!$ ÐJohnny€Wayne€Tilleryóó,€C.C.A.€No.€01C01„9506„CC„00182,€Giles€County€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€filedÐ ò&B"% ÐMarch€30,€1998,€at€Nashville),€€òòperm.€to€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1998).€€Thus,€the€defendant€has€notÐ Þ'.#& Ðestablished€any€unjustified€disparity€in€her€sentence.Ð Ê($' Ðà  àÌÌÓ€6Óòòò òIV.€FINEÐ Ž+Þ&* ÐÓ  Óóóó óÌà  àAlthough€not€raised€by€the€parties,€we€note€the€case€must€be€remanded€for€entry€of€theÐ œì Ðamount€of€the€fine.€€The€jury€set€the€defendantððs€fine€in€the€amount€of€$50,000.€€The€trial€courtÐ ˆØ Ðconfirmed€this€fine€at€sentencing;€however,€the€judgment€does€not€contain€the€amount€of€the€fine.€Ð tÄ ÐDefendant€filed€a€motion€to€reduce€the€fine€which€was€heard€at€the€motion€for€new€trial.€TheÐ `° Ðassessment€of€the€fine€was€ð ðstayed,€pending€further€action€of€the€[trial]€court.ðð€€The€trial€judgeÐ L œ Ðindicated€he€would€ð ðconsider€it€at€a€later€date.ðð€€Nothing€further€appears€in€the€record€concerning€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðfine.€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àWe,€therefore,€remand€to€the€trial€court€to€determine€the€amount€of€the€appropriate€fineÐ ü L  Ðpursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„301(b).€€Ð è 8  ÐÌÌòòò òÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONÐ ¬ü  ÐÓÓBÓÌóóó óà  àUpon€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€but€€remandÐ „Ô  Ðfor€entry€of€an€appropriate€fine.€€€Ð pÀ ÐÔ#† ¼÷»X XD‹46#ÔÓ… Ó