ÿWPCª ‘Pv¬_ÙÔ[^^Œ‹°ƒZ0Ðæy Ž.o!Ú{õ#—E6\X޼8–Fx£!çlçÌÚá{QMýLR±°qžéé(fñº_Úžo5Y$8x}#<¹Ö÷ÜSý§h"£mˆ»¹Õxñ&›.b½p±Síò'Ñæ&_®çºc6Øãùªšg!¢Ds)޾¬Ýfz ê;F–ÑI“ÿ=åûµL”â¨k™(ø1ÅJ¬)˜lBÜèŽDckz=Ã>=@7 …Mf4¶I·#ŸöYïÜ!W‡T­dð›aV1ßÃ> 6ê÷ot@ضZì\·»b %\U@b 0ˆ¢UN*UNx Æ^ æ zò Òl w> 4B V e Æg Æ- Æó ƹ mN–#Á˜˜EYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY 0D[[[bŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸŸ 0ë§§§§ B’’ 0¤¯ D3S D-† 0K³³ ASþÆQ 0¤ 0D» A«ÿ»(ƒð Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular Ý ƒR¶ê$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¿åò»»ÔÝ  ÝThe€Defendant€was€arrested€for€joyriding€and€criminal€trespass€while€on€bond€for€the€instant€offenses,€but€bothÐ ° Ðcharges€were€subsequently€dismissed.¹š-s  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3j1,s›¡  3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó- ù-(|G2¶ê$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¿åò»»Ô d(|3`$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3`$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ »»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ »»»ÔÑ8€\¡XXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î¼î»¼ ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼ »îî¼ #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€July€24,€2002Ð üL ÐÔ‡X\¡X»¼ ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ »XX\¡#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€WILLIAM€C.€SMITHÔ‡X\¡X»¼ Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔSevierÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€7972€€€€€€Rex€Henry€Ogle,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2001„02339„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐAugust€28,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€Defendant,€William€C.€Smith,€pled€guilty€to€burglary,€a€class€D€felony,€and€theft€under€$500,Ð xÈ  Ða€class€A€misdemeanor.€€Pursuant€to€the€Defendantððs€plea€agreement,€he€was€sentenced€as€a€RangeÐ d´ ÐI€standard€offender€with€the€sentences€to€run€concurrently.€€The€parties€left€the€length,€method,€andÐ P  Ðmanner€of€service€to€the€trial€judgeððs€discretion.€€After€a€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€sentencedÐ <Œ Ðthe€Defendant€to€four€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction€for€the€burglary€and€a€concurrentÐ (x Ðsentence€of€11€months€and€29€days€at€75%€for€the€misdemeanor€theft.€€The€Defendant€now€appealsÐ d Ðas€of€right.€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð P ÐÓÏÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Affirmedó óÐ Ø( ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ »àX\¡Š#ÔÔ‡X\¡X.¼ ÔDavid€H.€Welles,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJerry€L.€Smithóó€and€òòJoe€G.€Riley,Ð ° ÐJJ.óó,€joined.Ð œì ÐÌJames€Ô_ÔGreenleeÔ_Ô,€Ô_ÔSeviervilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€William€C.€Smith.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Thomas€E.€Williams,€III,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ L œ ÐGeneral;€Al€Ô_ÔSchmutzerÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Charles€E.€Ô_ÔAtchleyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€DistrictÐ 8!ˆ  ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $"t! ÐÓpÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ »XX\¡Ÿ#ÔòòóóÔ‡X\¡X»¼ ÔÐ ü#L# ÐÓ  ÓÓÓÔ#†¼ »XX\¡Ó #ÔÔ€X\¡X»¼ ÔòòÔ‡X\¡XXX\¡Ôóóà  àÌÓÓà  àThe€trial€court€ordered€that€the€Defendant€serve€an€effective€sentence€of€four€years€inÐ À&"& Ðconfinement€following€his€pleas€of€guilty€to€burglary€and€misdemeanor€theft.€€The€sole€issue€raisedÐ ¬'ü"' Ðby€the€Defendant€in€this€appeal€as€of€right€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€him€some€formÐ ˜(è#( Ðof€an€alternative€sentence.€€We€conclude€that€it€did€not.Ð „)Ô$) ÐÌà  àÔ#†X\¡XXX\¡j #ÔWe€note€at€the€outset€that€ð ð[Ô_Ôf]orÔ_Ô€those€defendants€who€plead€guilty,€the€guilty€plea€hearingÐ \+¬&+ Ðis€the€equivalent€of€trial,€in€that€it€allows€the€State€the€opportunity€to€present€the€facts€underlying€theÐ H,˜', Ðoffense.ðð€€òòState€v.€Keenóó,€996€S.W.2d€842,€843€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1999)€(quoting€òòState€v.€RobertÐ 4-„(-ý7 ÐÔ_ÔBryant€Rhodesóó,€No.€03C01„9405„CR„00174,€1995€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€607,€at€*4€(Knoxville,Ð ° ÐJuly€20,€1995)).€€ð ðFor€this€reason,€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€is€often€(if€not€always)Ð œì Ðneeded€in€order€to€conduct€a€proper€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€as€contemplated€by€TennesseeÐ ˆØ ÐCode€Annotated€section€40„35„210.ðð€€òòKeenóó,€996€S.W.2d€at€844.€€It€is€the€responsibility€of€theÐ tÄ ÐAppellant€to€provide€this€Court€with€an€adequate€record€which€conveys€a€fair,€accurate,€and€completeÐ `° Ðaccount€of€what€transpired€in€the€trial€court€with€respect€to€the€issues€that€form€the€basis€of€theÐ L œ Ðappeal.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€24(b);€òòState€v.€Bunchóó,€646€S.W.2d€158,€160€(Tenn.€1983).€€The€failureÐ 8 ˆ Ðto€do€so€results€in€a€waiver€of€such€issues€and€a€presumption€that€the€decision€of€the€trial€court€wasÐ $ t Ðcorrect.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Oodyóó,€823€S.W.2d€554,€559€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€In€this€case,€theÐ  ` ÐDefendant€failed€to€provide€this€Court€with€a€transcript€of€the€guilty€plea€hearing€or€a€recitation€ofÐ ü L  Ðany€of€the€facts€underlying€the€offenses€to€which€he€pled€guilty.€€Ô‡X\¡XXX\¡ÔOnly€the€most€basic€facts€underlyingÐ è 8  Ðthe€two€convictions€may€be€gleaned€from€the€indictment.€€Therefore,€we€will€proceed€to€review€theÐ Ô$  ÐDefendantððs€challenge€of€his€sentence,€though€our€efforts€at€a€meaningful€review€have€beenÐ À  Ðfrustrated€by€his€failure€to€supply€us€with€an€adequate€record.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€Sevier€County€Grand€Jury€returned€a€two„count€indictment€charging€the€Defendant€withÐ „Ô  Ðtheft€of€property€under€$500,€a€class€A€misdemeanor,€and€burglary,€a€class€D€felony.€€In€count€oneÐ pÀ Ðof€the€indictment,€the€Defendant€was€charged€with€stealing€property€valued€under€$500€fromÐ \¬ ÐOutback€Leather€store€between€the€months€of€July€and€September€of€1999.€€In€count€two€of€theÐ H˜ Ðindictment,€the€Defendant€was€charged€with€the€unauthorized€entry€of€the€Mountain€Meadows€ResortÐ 4„ Ðoffice€with€the€intent€to€commit€theft€in€February€of€1999.Ð  p ÐÌà  àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€this€CourtÐ øH Ðhas€a€duty€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€that€the€determinationsÐ ä4 Ðmade€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€isÐ Ð  Ðð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€the€sentencingÐ ¼  Ðprinciples€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.Ð ¨ø Ð1991).Ð ”ä ÐÌà  àWhen€conducting€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€Court€must€consider:€(a)€the€evidence,Ð l¼ Ðif€any,€received€at€the€trial€and€sentencing€hearing;€(b)€the€presentence€report;€(c)€the€principles€ofÐ X ¨ Ðsentencing€and€arguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives;€(d)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€theÐ D!” Ðcriminal€conduct€involved;€(e)€any€statutory€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors;€(f)€any€statementÐ 0"€  Ðmade€by€the€defendant€regarding€sentencing;€and€(g)€the€potential€or€lack€of€potential€forÐ #l! Ðrehabilitation€or€treatment.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„102,€„103,€„210Ô#†X\¡XXX\¡b#ÔÔ‡X\¡XXX\¡Ô;€òòState€v.€Breweróó,€875Ð $X" ÐS.W.2d€298,€302€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993);€òòState€v.€Thomasóó,€755€S.W.2d€838,€844€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ô$D # ÐApp.€1988).Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àIf€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencing€procedure,€that€theÐ ¸'#& Ðcourt€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€consideration€and€proper€weight€to€theÐ ¤(ô#' Ðfactors€and€principles€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€that€the€trial€courtððs€findings€of€fact€areÐ )à$( Ðâ âadequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentence€even€if€we€would€haveÐ |*Ì%) Ðpreferred€a€different€result.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Pikeóó,€978€S.W.2d€904,€926„27€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.Ð ° ÐFletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).Ô#†X\¡XXX\¡ù#ÔÔ‡X\¡XXX\¡ÔÐ œì Ðâ âÌà  àÔ#†X\¡XXX\¡®"#ÔÔ‡X\¡XXX\¡ÔA€defendant€who€ð ðis€an€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D,Ð tÄ Ðor€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absenceÐ `° Ðof€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6);€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€3€S.W.3d€456,€462Ð L œ Ð(Tenn.€1999).€€Where€a€defendant€is€entitled€to€the€statutory€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing,Ð 8 ˆ Ðthe€State€has€the€burden€of€overcoming€the€presumption€with€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.Ð $ t ÐBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€455€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995),€òòoverruled€on€other€groundsóó,€òòState€v.Ð  ` ÐHooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€1,€9€(Tenn.€2000).€€Guidance€regarding€what€constitutes€ð ðevidence€to€theÐ ü L  Ðcontraryðð€which€would€rebut€the€presumption€of€alternative€sentencing€can€be€found€in€TennesseeÐ è 8  ÐCode€Annotated€section€40„35„103(1),€which€sets€forth€the€following€considerations:Ð Ô$  Ðà8  à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€a€defendant€who€hasÐ À  Ða€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;Ьü Ð Ð  Ðà8  à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense€orÐ ˜è  Ðconfinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likelyÐ „Ô  Ðto€commit€similar€offenses;€or€ÐpÀÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€beenÐ \¬ Ðapplied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant[.]ÐH˜Ð Ð  ÐÌòòSeeóó€òòHooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€at€5;€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€170€(Tenn.€1991).òòóó€€Ð  p ÐÌà  àAdditionally,€the€principles€of€sentencing€reflect€that€the€sentence€should€be€no€greater€thanÐ øH Ðthat€deserved€for€the€offense€committed€and€should€be€the€least€severe€measure€necessary€to€achieveÐ ä4 Ðthe€purposes€for€which€the€sentence€is€imposed.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(2),€(4).€€TheÐ Ð  Ðcourt€should€also€consider€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment€of€the€defendant€inÐ ¼  Ðdetermining€the€appropriate€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòid.óó€ðð€40„35„103(5).Ô#†X\¡XXX\¡##ÔÔ‡X\¡XXX\¡ÔÐ ¨ø ÐÔ#†X\¡XXX\¡Ï,#Ôà  àÌà  àThe€presentence€report€reflects€that,€at€the€time€of€sentencing,€the€Defendant€was€thirty„fourÐ €Ð Ðyears€old,€married,€and€the€step„father€of€two€children.€€He€stated€that€he€graduated€from€high€schoolÐ l¼ Ðin€1985€and€received€a€bachelors€degree€from€Auburn€University€in€1990.€€Although€at€the€time€ofÐ X ¨ Ðsentencing€he€was€employed€as€an€installer€for€a€heat€and€air€company,€the€presentence€report€showsÐ D!” Ðthat€the€Defendant€misrepresented€the€length€of€his€terms€of€employment€for€his€two€prior€jobs€asÐ 0"€  Ða€server€in€restaurants.€€The€Defendant€has€a€lengthy€history€of€drug€and€alcohol€use.€€According€toÐ #l! Ðthe€report,€he€first€began€using€alcohol€and€marijuana€at€the€age€of€seventeen.€€Furthermore,€heÐ $X" Ðadmitted€to€using€marijuana€and€ecstasy€while€the€present€charges€were€pending.€€At€the€time€of€hisÐ ô$D # Ðinterview€for€the€presentence€report,€the€Defendant€was€attending€therapy€for€emotional€problemsÐ à%0!$ Ðas€well€as€Narcotics€Anonymous€meetings.€€The€Defendantððs€criminal€history€includes€convictionsÐ Ì&"% Ðfor€forgery€and€rape.€€Ð ¸'#& ÐÌà  àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€the€Defendant€serveÐ )à$( Ðhis€sentence€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€judge€based€his€decision€on€the€DefendantððsÐ |*Ì%) Ðð ðprior€record€for€Rape€and€another€theft€type€offense.ðð€€Furthermore,€the€Defendant€failed€to€appearÐ h+¸&* Ðat€the€original€sentencing€hearing,€but€the€court€did€not€place€as€much€weight€on€that€factor€becauseÐ ° Ðit€occurred€shortly€after€his€wife€suffered€a€miscarriage.€€Nevertheless,€by€not€appearing€at€theÐ œì Ðhearing,€the€Defendant€ð ðviolated€a€term€of€[his]€release€into€[the]€community.ðð€€Finally,€the€trialÐ ˆØ Ðcourt€gave€consideration€to€ð ðthe€fact€that€[he]€did€use€drugs€while€[he€was]€out€on€release€in€[the]Ð tÄ Ðcommunity€and€involved€[him]self€in€other€illegal€activity.ðð׃×Ý ƒ+#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð `° ÐÌà  àA€criminal€defendant€challenging€a€trial€courtððs€sentencing€decision€has€the€burden€ofÐ 8 ˆ Ðestablishing€that€his€or€her€sentence€is€improper.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code.€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401,€SentencingÐ $ t ÐCommission€Comments;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.€€The€Defendant€has€not€met€his€burdenÐ  ` Ðin€this€case.€€The€proof€adduced€at€the€sentencing€hearing€established€that€the€Defendant€has€priorÐ ü L  Ðconvictions€for€rape€and€forgery,€he€failed€to€appear€at€the€original€sentencing€hearing,€and€he€hasÐ è 8  Ðengaged€in€additional€criminal€conduct,€the€use€of€illegal€drugs,€while€the€instant€charges€wereÐ Ô$  Ðpending.€€Taken€in€the€aggregate,€these€circumstances€are€sufficient€to€justify€the€trial€courtððs€denialÐ À  Ðof€alternative€sentencing.Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.Ð „Ô  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 4„ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€H.€WELLES,€JUDGE