ÿWPCß …XäD„ûï߇fOiuÒ¼Ñj™-2‚<ñO®JäÙ¨áÆª½[ÚÖWZÝÀqœœÜü昅ÓÛü /q(³í°˜®Už#Q¼V¸Éè´Q€Ü’x¼º˜€ÉÙP@Ç­(zFÔÿÉÉ€LÕˆt»1¡Šê àœ]DؤNâyÄ1erR¨ÞYŠÀˆ[Ã-Ò¯íØ¼@Õ¢ë¦ÅQNÈáÈ|Â9õS.ìA¤'ã" ËùVªìåHˆ«¦>ûåʶ>Ì*Þm"m‘– ðÛÍ陨O.ƈ^aPð"ãt!"¢°Œ®JP Nã=+0|Q"ñj¢µ“ ˜iãž« {Z.³67íþ ¦dÌAÝØ~ EHYt4¬žb %\^ b 0ˆnUNöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ #ÉÐ 0D™ ÆÝ Æ£ ÆiÆ/UNõNC†EEEË•ÍrbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔ 0ëÜÜÜÜ BÇÇ 0¤ä D3ˆ D-» 0Kèè AS3Ɔ 0¤L 0Dð A«4»=žS1Þ (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regularóbï.TWin103|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular MRDELIUSthat thatSevierdispositive CrimCurwood WittBurnetteSeviervilleSchmutzerd]ischarge I]t TBILeatht]hereHargroveHumphreysSoller TDOC ‹Ý ƒRÂy$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô·]ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€record€at€the€guilty€plea€hearing€clearly€establishes€that€the€trial€court€imposed€two€concurrent€six„yearÐ ° Ðsentences€to€community€corrections.€€However,€the€judgment€forms€reflect€that€the€Appellant€was€sentenced€to€theÐ tÄ Ðð ðTDOC.ðð€€Because€a€sentence€to€community€corrections€and€a€sentence€to€the€Department€of€Correction€are€two€distinctÐ 8ˆ Ðsentences€with€different€program€requirements,€different€conditions,€and€distinctly€different€consequences€followingÐ üL Ðrevocation,€it€is€important€that€the€correct€sentence€be€noted€on€the€judgment€form.€€Any€conditions,€such€as€a€period€ofÐ À Ðincarceration,€should€be€noted€in€the€ð ðspecial€conditionsðð€section€of€the€judgment€form.€ hÝ ƒRÂy$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô·]ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€statute€is€clear€that€when€the€trial€court€is€considering€a€defendant€for€diversion,€following€a€guilty€plea,Ð ° Ðthe€judgment€of€conviction€should€not€be€entered.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(a)(1)(A)€(2003).€€- ù-(|G2Ây$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô·]ò»»Ô d(|3?x$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?x$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€µ»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼µ»»»ÔÑ8€UÁXXdì»»d8ÑÓÓÓÓà@ttìàÔ‡îµÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼µ»îî0#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€August€17,€2004Ð üL ÐÔ‡XUÁX»¼µÔÌò òÔ#†¼µ»XXUÁD#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€WILLIAM€GEORGE€SOLLERòòóóÔ‡XUÁX»¼µÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌÓ ÓÓÓà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Sevier€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€8040€&€8659€€€€€€Richard€R.€Vance,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2003„02970„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€October€19,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÓÓÌÓ  ÓÔ‡XUÁXXXUÁÔÓÓThe€Appellant,€William€G.€Soller,€appeals€the€denial€of€his€petition€for€judicial€diversion.€€Under€theÐ d´ Ðterms€of€a€plea€agreement,€Soller€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€burglary,€aggravated€assault,€and€resistingÐ P  Ðarrest€and€received€an€effective€sentence€of€six€years,€with€service€of€thirty€days€in€the€county€jail.€Ð <Œ ÐFollowing€imposition€of€the€agreed€sentence,€Soller€moved€for€judicial€diversion.€€At€the€scheduledÐ (x Ðhearing,€the€trial€court€ruled€that€Soller€was€statutorily€ineligible,€as€he€had€previously€been€grantedÐ d Ðdiversion€in€the€state€of€Florida.€€This€ruling€is€in€conflict€with€our€supreme€courtððs€holding€in€òòStateÐ P Ðv.€Schindleróó,€986€S.W.2d€209,€211€(Tenn.€1999).€€Irrespective€of€the€error,€we€conclude€that€the€trialÐ ì< Ðcourt€was€without€authority€to€alter€the€terms€of€a€negotiated€plea€agreement€which€was€dispositiveÐ Ø( Ðof€all€sentencing€issues.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€11(e)(1)Ô_Ô(CÔ_Ô).€€Nonetheless,€because€the€sentencesÐ Ä Ðimposed€embody€the€plea€agreement€of€the€parties,€Ô_ÔSollerÔ_Ôððs€sentences€are€affirmed.€Ð ° ÐÌÔ#†XUÁXXXUÁ/#ÔÔ#†¼µ»XXUÁÁ#ÔÔ‡XUÁX»¼µÔÓ#Óò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Affirmedó óÐ ˆØ ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼µ»àXUÁ± #ÔÔ‡XUÁX.¼µÔDavid€G.€Hayes,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJames€Curwood€Witt,€Jr.óó€andÐ `° ÐòòAlan€E.€Glennóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð L œ ÐÌRichard€L.€Burnette,€Knoxville,€Tennessee;€and€Bryan€E.€Delius,€Sevierville,€Tennessee,€for€theÐ $"t! ÐAppellant,€William€George€Soller.Ð #`" ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Moore,€Solicitor€General;€Brent€C.Ð è$8 $ ÐCherry,€Assistant€Attorney€General;€Al€Schmutzer,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Joseph€A.Ð Ô%$!% ÐBaker,€Jr.,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð À&"& ÐÔ#†¼µ»XXUÁb #ÔÔ‡XUÁX»¼µÔÌÓ3 Óà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼µ»XXUÁN#ÔÔ‡XUÁX»¼µÔÐ ˜(è#( ÐÌò òFactual€Backgroundó óÐ p*À%* ÐòòóóÔ#†¼µ»XXUÁÀ#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XUÁX»¼µÔò òÔ‡XUÁXXXUÁÔÌà@··ìàó ó€€€€€€On€April€2,€2003,€the€Appellant,€in€accordance€with€the€terms€of€a€negotiated€plea€agreement,ˆÐ H,˜', Ðpled€guilty€to€aggravated€burglary,€aggravated€assault,€and€resisting€arrest.€€A€second€aggravatedÐ 4-„(-ýÿ ÐÔ_Ôassault€charge€was€dismissed.€€As€provided€by€the€plea€agreement,€the€Appellant€received€concurrentÐ ° Ðsix„year€sentences€for€his€aggravated€burglary€and€aggravated€assault€convictions,€both€being€classÐ œì ÐC€felonies.€€For€his€conviction€for€resisting€arrest,€the€Appellant€received€a€concurrent€sentence€ofÐ ˆØ Ðsix€months.€€The€agreement€further€provided€that€the€Appellant€would€be€required€to€serve€thirtyÐ tÄ Ðdays€confinement,€followed€by€ð ðCommunity€Corrections€Probationðð€for€the€balance€of€theÐ `° Ðsentences.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð L œ ÐÌà  àFollowing€entry€of€the€guilty€pleas,€the€Appellantððs€counsel€advised€the€trial€court€that€theÐ $ t ÐAppellant€would€be€seeking€judicial€diversion.€€The€court€agreed€to€consider€the€AppellantððsÐ  ` Ðentitlement€to€diversion€but€reserved€its€ruling€on€the€request€pending€a€written€petition.€€TheÐ ü L  ÐAppellant€subsequently€filed€a€petition€for€diversion€on€April€8,€2003.€€A€ruling€was€never€reachedÐ è 8  Ðon€the€petition,€and€the€judgments€of€conviction€were€entered€on€April€30,€2003.€€The€Appellant€thenÐ Ô$  Ðfiled€a€Motion€for€Correction€of€Judgments,€asserting€that€his€petition€for€diversion€had€not€beenÐ À  Ðadjudicated.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àA€hearing€was€held€on€October€14,€2003,€during€which€the€Appellant€introduced€numerousÐ „Ô  Ðletters€supporting€his€request€for€diversion,€as€well€as€several€certificates€evidencing€the€AppellantððsÐ pÀ Ðprior€military€service€and€training.€A€certificate€of€eligibility€for€diversion€from€the€TennesseeÐ \¬ ÐBureau€of€Investigation€was€also€introduced.€€After€reviewing€the€evidence,€the€trial€court€denied€theÐ H˜ ÐAppellantððs€request€for€diversion,€finding€that€he€was€statutorily€ineligible€because€of€a€priorÐ 4„ Ðdiversion€in€another€state.€€The€Appellant€appeals.€€Ð  p ÐÌà@‚‚&ìàò òAnalysisˆÐ øH ÐÌà  àó óThe€Appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€ruling€that€he€was€statutorily€ineligible€forÐ Ð  Ðjudicial€diversion€due€to€a€prior€adjudication€of€diversion€in€the€state€of€Florida€in€1992.€€It€is€trueÐ ¼  Ðthat€our€diversion€statute,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„313€(2003),€provides€thatÐ ¨ø Ðð ð[d]ischarge€and€dismissal€under€this€section€.€.€.€may€occur€only€once€with€respect€to€any€person.ðð€Ð ”ä ÐIn€denying€diversion,€the€trial€court€observed:Ð €Ð ÐÌà8  à[I]t€is€important€that€the€law€states€clearly€that€it€can€only€be€used€once.€€And€itÐ X ¨ Ðappears€to€this€Court,€and€I€so€find€that€it€has€been€already€used€up€in€that€judgmentÐ D!” Ðfrom€the€State€of€Florida.€€So€heððs€simply€not€eligible€under€this€provision.€Ð 0"€  ÐNotwithstanding€the€good€record€and€all€those€other€things€which€are€very€important.Ð#l!Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ $X" ÐThe€State€concedes€that€this€ruling€was€erroneous.€€In€òòSchindleróó,€986€S.W.2d€209,€in€a€virtuallyÐ ° Ðidentical€issue,€our€supreme€court€concluded€that€a€defendant€who€had€twice€been€granted€diversionÐ œì Ðin€two€different€states€was€not€statutorily€ineligible€for€diversion€in€Tennessee.€€€The€court€reasoned:Ð ˆØ Ðâ âÌà8  àOur€legislature€has€explicitly€stated€that€a€defendant€may€be€placed€on€judicialÐ `° Ðdiversion€only€once€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313.€€The€defendantððs€priorÐ L œ Ðgrants€of€diversion€in€Kansas€and€Texas,€however,€were€not€pursuant€to€Tenn.€CodeÐ 8 ˆ ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„313.€€Accordingly,€the€defendant€is€not€statutorily€precluded€fromÐ $ t Ðbeing€placed€on€diversion€by€ðð€40„35„313(a)(2)€merely€by€reason€of€the€prior€grants.€Ð `Ð Ð  ÐÌòòIdóó.€at€212.Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àAccordingly,€we€find€that€the€trial€courtððs€ruling€was€in€error.€€Notwithstanding€error,€we€areÐ À  Ðcompelled€to€address€the€overriding€issue€of€whether€the€trial€court€had€the€authority€to€alter€theÐ ¬ü  Ðterms€of€the€plea€agreement€and€grant€the€Appellant€diversion.Ð ˜è  ÐÌà  àThe€assistant€district€attorney€opposed€any€consideration€of€diversion€both€at€the€guilty€pleaÐ pÀ Ðhearing€and€again€at€the€diversion€hearing.€€Following€the€Appellantððs€admissions€of€guilt€to€theÐ \¬ Ðoffenses€at€the€guilty€plea€hearing,€and€before€the€courtððs€imposition€of€sentences,€AppellantððsÐ H˜ Ðcounsel€advised€the€trial€court€that€it€would€be€requesting€judicial€diversion.€€The€trial€courtÐ 4„ Ðresponded:€ð ðI€will€allow€you€to€file€a€written€petition€and€have€the€TBI€run€their€background€check,Ð  p Ðand€in€the€event,€Iððve€got€jurisdiction€over€the€case€for€the€next€six€years.ðð€€The€following€colloquyÐ  \ Ðthen€occurred:Ð øH ÐÌà8  àGEN.€BAKER:€Our€agreement,€certainly€Mr.€Delius€has€been€here€many€times€beforeÐ Ð  Ðand€if€he€ever€wants€a€deferral€he€certainly€talks€to€me€about€that€prior€to€anÐ ¼  Ðagreement,€that€is€not€part€of€the€agreement.€€Ð¨øÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àTHE€COURT:€I€understand.€And€.€.€.ЀÐÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àMR.€DELIUS:€I€thought€I€stated€that,€Your€Honor.€€It€was€not€part€of€the€agreement.ÐX ¨Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àTHE€COURT:€You€did.€€Itððs€not€part€of€the€agreement.Ð0"€ Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àMR.€DELIUS:€This€is€within€the€purview€of€the€Court€to€decide€though,€not€withinÐ $X" Ðthe€purview€of€the€District€Attorneyððs€office.Ðô$D #Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àTHE€COURT:€Anything€further€I€need€to€know?ÐÌ&"%Ð Ð  ÐÌà8  àMR.€DELIUS:€No,€Your€Honor.Ф(ô#'Ð Ð  Ðâ âÐ )à$( ÐAt€this€point,€the€trial€court€accepted€the€Appellantððs€pleas€of€guilty€and€entered€judgments€ofÐ ° Ðconvictions€and€sentences€in€each€case€in€accordance€with€the€plea€agreement.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àAgain,€at€the€diversion€hearing,€the€assistant€district€attorney€advised€the€court:Ð tÄ ÐÌà8  àGENERAL€BAKER:€Your€Honor,€back€in€April€we€entered€into€a€full€agreement.€Ð L œ ÐThe€agreement€was€that€[the€Appellant]€would€plead€guilty€to€these€offenses,€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðaggravated€assault€and€aggravated€burglary.€€And€at€that€time€he€got€a€relatively€smallÐ $ t Ðamount€of€jail€time€for€the€nature€of€these€offenses.€€That€was€the€full€agreement€ofÐ  ` Ðthe€State€and€the€defense€and€there€was€no€mention€of€any€kind€of€deferral€or€theÐ ü L  Ðeligibility€of€diversion.€€Had€there€been,€Your€Honor,€we€wouldnððt€have€entered€intoÐ è 8  Ðthat€agreement.€€We€would€have€pushed€forward€and€avoided€this,€altogether.€.€.€.€TheÐ Ô$  ÐState€would€be€opposed€to€a€deferral.€ÐÀ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àDefense€counsel€responded:Ð ˜è  ÐÌà8  àMR.€DELIUS:€I€did€not€have€an€agreement,€Your€Honor,€and€we€announced€that€atÐ pÀ Ðthe€time€when€we€entered€the€plea,€that€we€did€not€have€an€agreement€as€to€the€issueÐ \¬ Ðof€judicial€diversion.€€And€the€Court€made€the€State€aware€that€that€was€yourÐ H˜ Ðdecision,€not€the€Stateððs€decision,€as€to€whether€or€not€to€grant€that€at€that€time.€€ItÐ 4„ Ðwas€not€an€agreed„upon€thing,€and€I€made€the€Court€aware€of€that€at€the€time.€€AndÐ  p Ðthe€Court€indicated€at€that€time€that€it€was€going€to€reserve€the€issue€of€judicialÐ  \ Ðdiversion€and€ask€us€to€present€things€on€his€behalf,€which€we€came€to€court€to€do.ÐøHÐ Ð  ÐÌà8  àà ` àAnd€I€was€quite€surprised,€Your€Honor,€that€the€judgments€went€downÐ Ð  Ðwithout€any€reference€to€the€Courtððs€ruling€that€it€was€holding€that€issue€in€reserve.€Ð¼ Ð Ð  ÐÌà  à€It€is€abundantly€clear€from€the€record€in€this€case€that€the€Appellant€entered€his€guilty€pleasÐ ”ä Ðpursuant€to€Tennessee€Rules€of€Criminal€Procedure€11(e)(1)(C),€as€the€State€and€the€AppellantÐ €Ð Ðagreed€to€the€specific€sentences€to€be€imposed€in€each€case.€€Nothing€was€reserved€in€the€pleaÐ l¼ Ðagreement€for€the€court€to€decide,€as€the€agreement€was€dispositive€of€all€sentencing€issues.€€TheÐ X ¨ Ðnegotiated€plea€agreement€in€this€case€secured€dismissal€of€a€felony€offense€and€significantly€reducedÐ D!” Ðthe€Appellantððs€exposure€to€extended€incarceration.€€The€plea€agreement€procedures€of€Rule€11(e)Ð 0"€  Ðdo€not€contemplate€that€the€Appellant€may€bind€the€State€to€its€agreement€while€at€the€same€timeÐ #l! Ðpermit€the€Appellant€to€seek€additional€sentencing€benefits€from€the€trial€judge.€€In€òòState€v.€Leathóó,Ð $X" Ð977€S.W.2d€132,€135€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998),€this€court€observed€that:Ð ô$D # ÐÌà8  àOur€supreme€court€has€held€that€ð ð[t]here€is€no€provision€in€Rule€11(e)€[Tenn.€R.Ð Ì&"% Ðâ âCrim.€P.]€that€permits€the€trial€court€to€alter€the€agreement€if€the€plea€is€being€enteredÐ ¸'#& Ðunder€subsection€(1)(C).ðð€€òòState€v.€Grady€Hargroveóó,€No.€01S01„9203„CC„00035,Ð ° Ð1993€WL€300759,€slip€op.€at€3,€Humphreys€County€(Tenn.,€Nashville,€Aug.€9,€1993).€ÐœìÐ Ð  Ðâ âÌAccordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€was€without€authority€to€alter€the€terms€of€the€pleaÐ tÄ Ðagreement.€€However,€because€the€trial€court€did€not€grant€the€Appellantðð€request€for€diversion€in€thisÐ `° Ðcase,€the€terms€of€the€plea€agreement€were€not€altered.€€Thus,€the€Appellantððs€assigned€error€isÐ L œ Ðirrelevant€as€the€sentences€were€entered€in€conformity€with€the€plea€agreement.€€Accordingly,€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðsentences€are€affirmed.€€Ð $ t ÐÌà  àà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONˆÐ ü L  ÐÌó óà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing€and€the€record€as€a€whole,€we€affirm€the€sentences€imposed€by€theÐ Ô$  Ðtrial€court,€but€we€remand€the€case€for€entry€of€corrected€judgments€consistent€with€footnote€1€of€thisÐ À  Ðopinion.€Ô#†XUÁXXXUÁy#ÔÐ ¬ü  ÐÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð \¬ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JUDGE