’WPC‘ j°A‚õü2Øā÷Õfēa|ÅMŪ×҆·}ŠaƒDŸ«š  iž„걣=.Ÿ3Ų©ć4 ģł .a֋·²ä“9 Aī^m-«˜·FKėŚ?¢³’Šn;š(“·#œšFC:äÕCŒsØ’.ĻŁĪ²¾‚^]~+ƾO$ŃwpŪĆ®b^zœT(š†˜ĄŻ`LętņŻ©µĖt s ]•ā3[9įˆ²+eW„/ ‰y8łh &Moų,”ąčŻD§ių^DįµmčWG3 Æ 2¹ tćĄCŻžs)ōÓWhŠęMUµņy'ošąˆŚ™ū ½¦ ®¶…å–»«3’_6ƒčōŒ1½’}ģįGQČŹ×féR¤¶åT40وy^é9’z'Ģ»k1”~2æbz ™¦…¾OēŲĻŅIysč8ćč;K,Uņb#Į\ % U@# 0ˆc UNė 1u9 72® zą ŅZ ^ , w8 4< 1‡P Ę× ʝ ĘcĘ)ļNž mE 0c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~b†††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††† 0ėŽŽŽŽ Byy 0¤– D3: D-m 0Kšš ASåĘ8 0¤ž 0D¢ A«ę˜HP LaserJet 4,ü,,,,,ü0»(ČhH  Z‹(Times New Roman (`£Ŗ$””Ń€.ŃŃ8€½­»»d»»d8ŃŃ ż ŃÓ  Ó(ķ€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i) ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptt£B)ā q\;'¼„  \ś£(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|x ’U‹’ĄĄĄ(;3£$““Ō2#ŌŚ  Ś0Ś  Ś.Ō3  Ōą0  ą - ł-(|G2ö $¤¤Ż ƒ£Ŗ!ŻŃ€.ŃŃ8€Ɣ»»dd8ŃŃ ż ŃÓ  ÓŻ  Żą  ąņņŚ  Ś0Ś  ŚóóŌ€ōݤņ»»Ō d(|3$££Ż ƒ£Ŗ!ŻŃ€.ŃŃ8€Ɣ»»dd8ŃŃ ż ŃÓ  ÓŻ  ŻVVVV'’’dxd)!ČČČČdxdx( ±ž$’’ņ ņFigure€Ś  Ś1Ś  Śó ó^_X`YEž’<<C’’ƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$¢¢Ż ƒ£Ŗ!ŻŃ€.ŃŃ8€Ɣ»»dd8ŃŃ ż ŃÓ  ÓŻ  Ż($$””ņ ņŚ  Ś1Ś  Śó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8’’’’’’’’’’C’’ HKKKKŻ ƒ£Ŗ!ŻŃ€.ŃŃ8€Ɣ»»ddČ8ŃŃ ż ŃÓ  ÓŻ  ŻŌ_ŌŃ  ŃŃ  ŃŌ€¼Ɣ»»»ŌŃ8€؋XXdš»»d8Ńą@ttģąŌ‡īāī»¼ƔŌIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆŠ ° Šą@WW$ģąAT€KNOXVILLEŌ#†¼Ɣ»īīā #ԈŠ Ü, ŠÓ  Óą @ ąą @` ąMay€2000€SessionŠ X ŠŌ‡X؋X»¼ƔŌĢņ ņŌ#†¼Ɣ»XX؋#ŌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEņņóó€v.€AMANDA€LEE€SUTTONŌ‡X؋X»¼ƔŌó óŠ  ` ŠĢą@@½½ģąņ ņDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Hamilton€CountyŠ  h Šą@@ųųģąNo.€214146€€€€€€Stephen€M.€Ō_ŌBevilŌ_Ō,€JudgeŠ  X ŠĢĢą@@ģģ*ģąßA€V) °°` d€÷E<×` Aߊ Ų(  ŠĢą@@TTģąNo.€E1999„00920„CCA„R3„CDŠ ×'  ŠOctober€2,€Ō_Ō2000Ō_ŌŠ Ē  ŠßA€V) °°` dE<¶` Aߊ ·  Šó óĢÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€a€former€day€care€worker,€pled€guilty€to€Class€D€felony€child€abuse€for€breaking€theŠ ¶ Šjaw€of€a€two„year„old€child€in€her€care.€€She€was€given€a€three„year€sentence,€to€be€served€in€splitŠ ¦ö Šconfinement,€with€six€months€in€the€county€workhouse€and€four€years€of€supervised€probation.€€OnŠ –ę Šappeal,€the€defendant€raises€the€issues€of€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€considering€the€age,Š †Ö Švulnerability,€and€risk€to€the€victimššs€life€as€a€sentencing€enhancement€factor€when€the€offense€wasŠ vĘ Šalready€classified€according€to€the€age€of€the€victim,€and€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€failing€toŠ f¶ Šutilize€alternative€sentencing.€€Based€upon€our€review,€we€affirm€the€decision€of€the€trial€court.Ō#†¼Ɣ»XX؋#ŌŌ‡X؋X»¼ƔŌŠ V¦ ŠÓÓÓĢņ ņTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmedó óŠ 6† ŠĢņņÓ  ÓŌ#†¼Ɣ»ąX؋6#ŌŌ‡X؋X.¼ƔŌAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€ņņThomas€T.€Ō_ŌWoodallŌ_Ōóó€and€ņņJohnŠ f ŠEverett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Š V ŠĢJerry€H.€Summers€and€Jimmy€F.€Rodgers,€Jr.,€Chattanooga,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€AmandaŠ ę6 ŠLee€Sutton.Š Ö& ŠĢPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Elizabeth€B.€Ō_ŌMarneyŌ_Ō,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Š ¶!  ŠWilliam€H.€Cox,€III,€District€Attorney€General;€Ō_ŌKelliŌ_Ō€Ō_ŌLavonŌ_Ō€Ō_ŌCrandellŌ_Ō€Black,€Assistant€DistrictŠ ¦"ö! ŠAttorney€General;€and€Claire€Hayes€Brant,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,Š –#ę" ŠState€of€Tennessee.Š †$Ö# ŠÓčÓĢą@@OO&ģąņ ņOPINIONó óŌ#†¼Ɣ»XX؋ #ŌŌ‡X؋X»¼ƔŌŠ f&¶!% ŠĢņņóóŌ#†¼Ɣ»XX؋ó #ŌÓ  ÓŌ€X؋X»¼ƔŌą  ąThe€defendant€€is€a€former€day€care€worker€who€broke€the€jaw€of€a€two„year„old€child€in€herŠ F(–#' Šcare€by€using€excessive€force€to€get€the€child€to€lie€down€for€a€nap.€€Based€upon€her€guilty€plea,€theŠ 6)†$( Šdefendant€was€convicted€of€one€count€of€child€abuse€of€a€child€aged€six€and€under,€a€Class€D€felony.€Š &*v%) ŠThe€trial€court€sentenced€her€to€three€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction,€to€be€served€in€splitŠ +f&* Šconfinement,€with€six€months€in€the€county€workhouse€at€75€percent,€followed€by€four€years€ofŠ ,V'+ Šsupervised€probation.€€The€defendant€was€additionally€ordered,€as€a€condition€of€probation,€to€attendŠ ö,F(, Šanger€management€classes.€€€The€trial€court€denied€the€defendantššs€request€for€alternative€sentencing.€Š ę-6)-żĀ ŠŌ_ŌThe€defendant€filed€a€timely€appeal,€presenting€two€issues€for€review,€which€she€states€in€her€briefŠ ° Šas€follows:Š  š ŠĢӁ€ (5h83ÓŻ"‚3£"ŻŻ  Żą8  ąŻ‚3£’ŻŌ25hŌŚ  ŚIŚ  Ś.Ō3  Ōą0` Š Š ąŻ  ŻWhether€it€is€proper€to€consider€the€age,€vulnerability,€and€risk€to€human€lifeŠ €Š Šof€the€victim€as€enhancement€factors€against€a€defendant€who€pleads€guiltyŠ pĄ Što€an€offense€for€which€the€penalty€is€classified€depending€on€the€victimššsŠ ` ° Šage.Żƒ3£’8݌ŠP  ` Š ` Š  ŠŒŻ  ŻĢŻ"‚3£"ŻŻ  Żą8  ąŻ‚3£ŻŌ25hŌŚ  ŚIIŚ  Ś.Ō3  Ōą0` Š Š ąŻ  ŻWhether€the€trial€court€erred€in€refusing€to€place€the€defendant€immediatelyŠ 0 € Šon€some€form€of€alternative€sentencing.Żƒ3£@݌Š p ` Š ` Š  ŠŒŻ  Żą8  ąŠ Š Š  Šą  ąBased€upon€our€review,€we€affirm€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court.Š P  ŠĢą@¤¤(ģąņņņ ņFACTSóóó óˆŠ ą0  ŠĢą  ąIn€1996,€the€defendant,€Amanda€€Lee€€Sutton,€was€a€twenty„one„year„old€day€care€workerŠ Ą Šat€the€Care€and€Play€Day€Care€Center€in€Hamilton€County,€Tennessee.€€On€November€20,€1996,€oneŠ ° Šof€the€defendantššs€charges,€two„year„old€Jasmine€Copeland,€bit€another€child.€€The€defendant€reactedŠ  š Šby€picking€Jasmine€up€by€the€arms,€placing€her€on€the€diaper€changing€table,€and€squirting€liquidŠ ą Šsoap€into€her€mouth.€€Six€days€later,€on€November€26,€1996,€Jasmine€refused€to€lie€down€for€a€nap.€Š €Š ŠIn€response,€the€defendant€physically€forced€the€child€onto€a€thin€sleeping€mat€on€the€floor€of€the€dayŠ pĄ Šcare€center,€and€held€her€down.€€€In€the€process,€Jasmineššs€jaw€was€fractured.€€Š `° ŠĢą  ąTwo€different€versions€were€given€of€the€November€26,€1996,€incident.€€According€to€theŠ @ Šdefendant,€she€š šfirmly€placedšš€€the€child€on€her€side€on€the€š šsleeping€mat,šš€and€completely€coveredŠ 0€ Šher€with€a€blanket.€€She€said€that€she€sat€behind€the€child€and€rubbed€the€childššs€back,€but€did€notŠ  p Šhold€her€down.€€According€to€day€care€employees€Lisa€R.€Walker€and€Patty€Sue€Hamby,€however,Š ` Šthe€defendant€š šthrew,šš€rather€than€š šplaced,šš€the€child€onto€the€mat.€€In€an€interview€withŠ P ŠChattanooga€Police€Sergeant€Francine€Fleming,€Hamby€stated€that€the€defendant€€š šjerkedšš€JasmineŠ š@ Šup€by€the€arms,€š šthrew€her€on€the€matšš€in€a€š šbody€slam,šš€and€then€lay€partially€on€top€of€the€childŠ ą0 Što€keep€her€down.€€In€a€separate€interview,€Walker€said€that€the€defendant€threw€Jasmine€š šface€firstššŠ Š  Šon€the€mat€and€š šthen€she€covered€her€up€with€a€blanket€and€laid€[sic]€half€across€the€child€until€theŠ Ą! Šchild€cried€herself€to€sleep.šš€€Š °"  ŠĢą  ąOn€January€29,€1997,€the€Hamilton€County€Grand€Jury€returned€two€indictments€against€theŠ $ą" Šdefendant.€€The€defendant€was€charged€with€child€abuse,€in€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€AnnotatedŠ €%Š # ŠSection€39„15„401,€for€the€soap€incident.€€She€was€charged€€with€aggravated€child€abuse,€in€violationŠ p&Ą!$ Šof€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€39„15„402,€for€the€incident€which€resulted€in€the€childššsŠ `'°"% Šbroken€jaw.€€The€State€subsequently€dismissed€the€charge€based€on€the€soap€incident,€and€acceptedŠ P( #& Ša€guilty€plea€to€a€reduced€charge€of€child€abuse€of€a€child€age€six€and€under,€in€violation€ofŠ @)$' ŠTennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€39„15„401(a),€a€Class€D€felony,€for€the€broken€jaw€incident.€€TheŠ 0*€%( Šparties€agreed€that€the€defendant,€as€a€Range€I,€standard€offender,€would€receive€a€sentence€withinŠ  +p&) Šthe€range€of€two€to€four€years.Š ,`'* Їą  ąOver€a€dozen€people,€all€prepared€to€vouch€for€the€defendantššs€good€character€and€reputationŠ ° Šin€the€community€for€truth€and€veracity,€appeared€at€her€sentencing€hearing,€held€€February€1,€1999,Š  š Šand€March€1,€1999.€€The€defendantššs€minister,€John€Randall€Bell,€pastor€of€the€Lupton€Drive€BaptistŠ ą ŠChurch€in€Chattanooga,€testified€that€he€had€known€the€defendant€for€three€years,€that€she€regularlyŠ €Š Šattended€church,€and€that€she€had€a€good€reputation€for€truth€and€veracity€in€the€community.€€HeŠ pĄ Šstated€that€he€had€never€known€the€defendant€to€be€a€violent€person,€and€that€he€would€not€hesitateŠ ` ° Što€have€her€assist€in€the€church€nursery€or€day€care.€€Bell€further€testified€€that€the€defendant€hadŠ P   Šexpressed€remorse€for€the€victimššs€injury.€€Bell€also€stated,€however,€that€the€defendant€had€beenŠ @  Šsurprised€that€the€victim€was€hurt,€and€indicated€that€she€did€not€know€how€the€injury€had€occurred.€Š 0 € Šą  ąĢą  ąFour€other€witnesses,€friends€and€neighbors€of€the€defendant,€testified€that€they€had€knownŠ `  Šthe€defendant€for€a€number€of€years,€that€her€reputation€in€the€community€for€truth€and€veracity€wasŠ P  Šgood,€and€that€she€was€not€a€violent€person.€€Two€of€these€witnesses€had€children.€€They€testified€thatŠ š@  Šthe€defendant€had€babysat€their€children€in€the€past,€that€she€was€good€with€children,€and€that€theyŠ ą0  Šwould€not€hesitate€to€have€her€care€for€their€children€in€the€future.Š Š  ŠĢą  ąThe€defendant€testified€that€she€was€single,€and€lived€at€home€with€her€mother.€€She€wasŠ ° Šcurrently€employed€as€a€cashier€at€a€grocery€store,€where€she€had€worked€for€the€past€year€and€a€half.€Š  š ŠThe€defendant€stated€that€on€November€26,€1996,€one€of€her€day€care€co„workers,€Lisa€Walker,Š ą Šasked€her€to€help€get€the€victim,€who€was€fussing,€settled€for€a€nap.€€The€defendant€explained€thatŠ €Š Šshe€€picked€the€victim€up€under€her€arms€and€š šfirmlyšš€laid€her€down€on€the€sleeping€mat€on€the€floor.€Š pĄ ŠThe€defendant€maintained€that€she€had€not€thrown€the€child.€€She€described€the€incident€for€the€court:Š `° ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąOkay.€€I€was€over€there€on€the€preschool€side€and€then€Lisa€called€meŠ @ Šover€there€to€help€her€and€she€was€fidgeting€and€then€theyš!šI€askedš!šIŠ 0€ Špicked€her€up€to€lay€her€down€and€I€laid€her€down€on€her€side€and€IŠ  p Šcovered€her€up€and€I€was€rubbing€her€back,€telling€her€to€go€to€sleep.€Š ` ŠŠ ` x` x ŠThe€defendant€said€that€she€had€not€intended€to€hurt€the€victim,€and€that€she€had€been€unaware,€atŠ š@ Šthe€time€of€the€incident,€that€the€victim€had€been€injured.€Š ą0 ŠĢą  ąOn€cross„examination,€the€defendant€admitted€that€she€originally€told€Sergeant€Fleming€thatŠ Ą! Šshe€had€used€more€force€than€she€should€have€with€the€victim.€€She€said,€however,€that€she€had€notŠ °"  Šmeant€it€the€way€it€sounded,€stating,€š šI€told€her€at€first€that€I€used€more€force€than€maybe€what€IŠ  #š! Šshould€have,€but€she€was€moving€in€the€process€and€I€didnššt€mean€like€force.šš€Š $ą" ŠĢą  ąThe€victimššs€father€testified€that€Jasmineššs€jaw€was€swollen€and€bruised€when€he€picked€herŠ p&Ą!$ Šup€from€the€day€care€on€November€26,€1996.€€€He€said€that€his€daughter€was€visibly€upset,€but€unableŠ `'°"% Što€tell€him€what€had€happened€or€why€she€was€crying.€€He€and€his€wife€took€the€child€to€the€hospital,Š P( #& Šwhere€X„rays€revealed€a€broken€jaw.€€On€cross„examination,€the€father€acknowledged€that€the€breakŠ @)$' Šin€his€daughterššs€jaw€was€a€hairline€fracture,€and€that€he€and€his€wife€had€incurred€$804€in€medicalŠ 0*€%( Šbills€for€Jasmineššs€treatment.€Š  +p&) ŠŠ ,`'* Šą  ąThe€trial€court€found€three€enhancement€factors€under€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€SectionŠ ° Š40„35„114€to€be€applicable€in€sentencing:€(4),€the€victim€was€particularly€vulnerable€because€of€ageŠ  š Šor€physical€or€mental€disability;€(10),€the€defendant€had€no€hesitation€about€committing€a€crimeŠ ą Šwhen€the€risk€to€human€life€was€high;€and€(15),€the€defendant€abused€a€position€of€public€or€privateŠ €Š Štrust.€€€The€court€€found€€factor€(10)€applicable€in€this€case€partly€because€of€the€extreme€youth€ofŠ pĄ Šthe€victim,€stating:€Š ` ° ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ą[A]nytime€youššre€dealing€with€a€child€of€tender€years€of€two€years€oldŠ @  Šor€younger€and€you€treat€that€child€in€such€a€manner€that€that€childŠ 0 € Šcould€be€subject€to€being€injured,€the€risk€to€human€life€is€high€in€thatŠ  p  Šparticular€regard€and€I€do€find€factor€No.€10€applies.€€Š` ` x` x ŠĢThe€trial€court€gave€š šgreat€weightšš€to€factor€(15),€the€defendantššs€abuse€of€her€position€of€public€trustŠ š@  Šas€a€day€care€worker€in€whose€care€parents€had€entrusted€their€young€children.€Š ą0  ŠĢą  ąThe€trial€court€found€relevant€mitigating€factors€to€be€the€defendantššs€youth,€her€lack€ofŠ Ą Šjudgment€due€to€her€youth,€and€her€lack€of€a€sustained€intent€to€commit€a€crime.€The€trial€court€alsoŠ ° Šfound€the€defendantššs€lack€of€a€prior€record€and€the€number€of€responsible€citizens€who€appearedŠ  š Šin€court€on€the€defendantššs€behalf€to€be€mitigating€factors.€€The€trial€court€noted,€however,€that€theseŠ ą Šlatter€two€factors€carried€little€weight.€€Š €Š ŠĢą  ą€The€trial€court€found,€on€balance,€that€š šthe€seriousness€of€the€enhancement€factorsŠ `° Šoutweigh[ed]šš€the€mitigating€factors.€€Consequently,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€a€termŠ P  Šof€three€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€Concluding€that€the€seriousness€of€the€crime€wouldŠ @ Šbe€depreciated€if€the€defendant€did€not€serve€any€jail€time,€the€trial€court€ordered€that€the€defendantššs€Š 0€ Šsentence€be€served€in€€split€confinement,€with€six€months€in€the€Hamilton€County€Workhouse€at€75Š  p Špercent,€followed€by€four€years€of€supervised€probation.€€€The€trial€court€found€the€defendant€to€beŠ ` Šunsuitable€for€placement€in€the€Hamilton€County€Community€Corrections€Program€because€of€theŠ P Šviolent€nature€of€her€offense,€because€she€had€violated€a€position€of€public€and€private€trust€inŠ š@ Šperpetrating€the€crime,€and€because€she€had€failed€to€show€true€remorse€for€her€actions.€€TheŠ ą0 Šdefendant€filed€a€timely€appeal€to€this€court.Š Š  ŠĢą@ņņ&ģąņ ņņņANALYSISˆŠ °"  ŠĢą@5 5 ģąóóI.€€Applicability€of€Sentencing€Enhancement€FactorsˆŠ $ą" Šó óĢą  ąThe€first€issue€the€defendant€raises€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€enhancementŠ p&Ą!$ Šfactors€(4)€and€(10)€to€enhance€her€sentence€from€the€two„year€minimum€to€three€years.€€TheŠ `'°"% Šdefendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€applying€these€enhancement€factors€because€both€factors€Š P( #& Šwere€based€on€an€essential€element€of€her€crime,€namely,€the€age€of€the€victim.€€The€defendantŠ @)$' Šasserts€that€the€crime€to€which€she€pled€guilty,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€39„15„401(a),Š 0*€%( Šchild€abuse€of€a€child€age€six€and€under,€š šexplicitly€accounts€for€the€victimššs€age,€and€implicitlyŠ  +p&) Šaccounts€for€the€accompanying€increased€risk€of€injury€to€an€abused€child€under€the€age€of€six,€byŠ ,`'* Šincreasing€the€classification€of€the€offense€from€a€Class€A€misdemeanor€to€a€Class€D€felony€when,Š ° Šas€here,€the€child€abuse€is€inflicted€upon€a€victim€less€than€six€years€old.šš€Š  š ŠĢą  ąThe€State€argues€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€applying€enhancement€factors€(4)€and€(10).€Š €Š ŠThe€State€asserts€that€factor€(4)€is€applicable€because€the€victim,€a€two„year„old€child,€was€bothŠ pĄ Šcompletely€powerless€to€resist€the€defendantššs€abuse€at€the€time€it€occurred,€and€unable€later€toŠ ` ° Šcommunicate€what€the€defendant€had€done.€€The€State€asserts€that€factor€(10)€is€applicable€becauseŠ P   Šthe€defendantššs€action,€in€throwing€a€two„year„old€child€onto€the€floor€with€enough€force€to€fractureŠ @  Šthe€childššs€jaw,€was€one€which€necessarily€placed€the€childššs€life€at€great€risk.€€Š 0 € ŠĢą  ąŌ‡X| XXX؋ŌWhen€a€defendant€challenges€the€length€and€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€it€is€the€dutyŠ `  Šof€this€court€to€conduct€a€ņņóóņņde€novoóó€review€on€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€"the€determinationsŠ üL  Šmade€by€the€court€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken€are€correct."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„35„401(d).€Š č8  ŠThis€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€courtŠ Ō$  Šconsidered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€ņņState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823Š Ą  ŠS.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€Ō#†X؋X XX|¢E#ŌThe€weight€to€be€afforded€an€enhancement€or€a€mitigating€factor€isŠ ¬ü  Šleft€to€the€trial€courtššs€discretion€as€long€as€the€trial€court€complies€with€the€purposes€and€principlesŠ ¬ü Šof€the€1989€Sentencing€Act,€and€its€findings€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record.€€Tenn.€€CodeŠ œģ ŠAnn.€šš€40„35„210€(1997),€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;€ņņState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€236Š ŒÜ Š(Tenn.€1986).€€Ō‡X| XXX؋Ō€Ō#†X؋X XX|7J#ŌŌ‡X| XXX؋Ō€€Ō#†X؋X XX|zJ#ŌIn€this€case,€the€record€reveals€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutory€sentencingŠ |Ģ Šguidelines,€and€that€it€properly€considered€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances€in€the€case.€€€Š |Ģ ŠAccordingly,€we€review€this€issue€ņņde€novo,óó€giving€the€€presumption€of€correctness€to€the€trial€courtššsŠ l¼ Šfindings.Š \¬ ŠĢņ ņą  ąó ó€The€applicability€of€a€particular€enhancement€factor€must€be€determined€on€a€case„by„caseŠ <Œ Šbasis.€€ņņState€v.€Lavenderóó,€967€S.W.2d€803,€807€(Tenn.€1998).€€If€the€same€facts€which€establish€theŠ ,| Šelement€of€the€offense€charged€are€also€used€to€establish€the€enhancement€factor,€then€theŠ l Šenhancement€factor€may€not€be€used€to€increase€punishment.€€ņņId.óó€(citing€ņņState€v.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2dŠ  \ Š597,€601€(Tenn.€1994)).€€Š üL ŠĢą  ą€€The€defendant€pled€guilty€to€a€violation€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€39„15„Š Ü , Š401(a),€which€provides:Š Ģ! ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąņ ņó óAny€person€who€knowingly,€other€than€by€accidental€means,€treats€aŠ ¬#ü! Šchild€under€eighteen€(18)€years€of€age€in€such€a€manner€€as€to€inflictŠ œ$ģ" Šinjury€or€neglects€such€a€child€so€as€to€adversely€affect€the€childššsŠ Œ%Ü # Šhealth€and€welfare€commits€a€Class€A€misdemeanor;€provided,€thatŠ |&Ģ!$ Šif€the€abused€or€neglected€child€is€six€(6)€years€of€age€or€less,€theŠ l'¼"% Špenalty€is€a€Class€D€felony.Š\(¬#&` x` x ŠĢTenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€39„15„401(a)€(1997).€€Since€the€victim€was€six€years€of€age€or€less,€theŠ <*Œ%( Šdefendantššs€crime€was€a€Class€D€felony,€rather€than€a€Class€A€misdemeanor.€€The€elementsŠ ,+|&) Šnecessary€to€establish€the€defendantššs€crime,€therefore,€were€that€the€child€was€six€years€of€age€orŠ ,l'* Šless,€and€that€the€defendant€treated€the€child€knowingly,€other€than€by€accidental€means,€in€such€aŠ ° Šmanner€as€to€inflict€injury€on€the€child.€€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€same€fact€necessary€toŠ  š Šestablish€an€essential€element€of€her€crime,€the€victimššs€age,€was€used€to€establish€the€applicabilityŠ ą Šof€both€enhancement€factor€(4)€and€enhancement€factor€(10).€€We€disagree.€€Š €Š ŠĢņ ņÓ  ÓA.€€Enhancement€Factor€(4)Š ` ° ŠĢó óÓTTÓą  ąEnhancement€factor€(4)€may€be€applied€when€the€facts€show€that€the€š švictim€of€the€offenseŠ @  Šwas€particularly€vulnerable€because€of€age€or€physical€or€mental€disability,€.€.€.šš€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Š 0 € Ššš€40„35„114(4)€(1997).€€Our€supreme€court,€in€ņņState€v.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31,€35€(Tenn.€1993),Š  p  Šconcluded€that€enhancement€factor€(4)€€š šrelates€more€to€the€natural€physical€and€mental€limitationsŠ `  Šof€the€victim€than€merely€to€the€victimššs€age.šš€ņņóóņņóó€ņņIdóó.€€€Thus,€theņ ņó ó€ņņAdamsóó€court€found€that€factor€(4)Š P  Šcould€be€used€in€an€aggravated€rape€case€of€a€child€under€the€age€of€thirteen,€even€though€the€ageŠ š@  Šof€the€child€is€an€essential€element€of€the€crime,€š šif€the€circumstances€show€that€the€victim,€becauseŠ ą0  Šof€his€age€or€physical€or€mental€condition,€was€in€fact€ššparticularly€vulnerable,šš€i.e.,€incapable€ofŠ Š  Šresisting,€summoning€help,€or€testifying€against€the€perpetrator.šš€€ņņId.óó€at€35.€ņ ņ€ó óŠ Ą ŠĢą  ąThe€record€in€the€case€at€bar€clearly€supports€the€trial€courtššs€application€of€enhancementŠ  š Šfactor€(4),€in€that€the€victim€š šwas€particularly€vulnerable€because€of€age€or€physical€or€mentalŠ ą Šdisability.€.€.€.šš€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„35„114(4)€(1997).€€The€victim€in€this€case,€a€two„year„oldŠ €Š Šchild,€was€completely€powerless€to€prevent€the€abuse€inflicted€on€her€by€the€adult€defendant.€Š pĄ ŠMoreover,€the€record€reflects€that€the€child€was€incapable€of€communicating,€even€to€her€own€father,Š `° Šwhat€the€defendant€had€done€to€her.€€Based€upon€these€facts,€we€€conclude€that€the€trial€court€did€notŠ P  Šerr€in€applying€enhancement€factor€(4).Š @ ŠĢņ ņÓ  ÓB.€€Enhancement€Factor€(10)Š  p ŠĢó óÓ3\Óą  ąEnhancement€factor€(10)€may€be€applied€when€the€facts€show€that€š š[t]he€defendant€had€noŠ P Šhesitation€about€committing€a€crime€when€the€risk€to€human€life€was€high.šš€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„Š š@ Š35„114(10)€(1997).€€The€key€inquiry€for€a€court€in€determining€if€factor€(10)€applies€is€whether,Š ą0 Šunder€the€circumstances€of€the€case,€the€defendantššs€actions€caused€a€high€risk€to€human€life.€€ņņStateŠ Š  Šv.€Jonesóó,€883€S.W.2d€597,€602„03€(Tenn.€1994);€ņņState€v.€Binghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€452€(Tenn.Š Ą! ŠCrim.€App.),€ņņpermóó.€ņņappóó.€ņņdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995)ņņóó.€€€Š °"  ŠĢą  ąIn€this€case,€the€defendantššs€co„workers,€Hamby€and€Walker,€both€testified€that€the€defendantŠ $ą" Šviolently€threw€the€victim€onto€the€one„€to€two„inch€thick,€narrow€sleeping€mat€located€on€the€floorŠ €%Š # Šof€the€day€care€center.€€The€childššs€jaw€was€fractured€as€a€result€of€the€defendantššs€actions.€€The€trialŠ p&Ą!$ Šcourt€found€that,€under€these€circumstances,€€the€risk€to€the€childššs€life€was€high.€€Although€the€trialŠ `'°"% Šcourt€based€its€finding,€in€part,€on€the€fact€that€the€victim€was€only€two€years€old,€and€therefore€moreŠ P( #& Šsusceptible€than€an€older€child€to€serious€injury€by€the€defendantššs€action,€it€is€clear€that€factor€(10)Š @)$' Šwas€shown€to€be€applicable€by€evidence€other€than€that€which€was€required€to€establish€the€offense.€Š 0*€%( ŠWe€conclude,€therefore,€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€applying€enhancement€factor€(10).Š  +p&) Šą  ąą ` ąŠ ,`'* Šņ ņą@llģąII.€€€Alternative€SentencingˆŠ ° ŠĢó óą  ąThe€second€issue€the€defendant€raises€is€whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€that€sheŠ ą Šserve€her€sentence€in€split€confinement,€with€six€months€in€the€county€workhouse,€followed€by€fourŠ €Š Šyears€of€supervised€probation.€€The€defendant€€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€not€placing€her€onŠ pĄ Šprobation€for€the€full€term€of€her€sentence.€€The€defendant€contends€that€the€facts€in€her€case€supportŠ ` ° Šfull€probation,€rather€than€imprisonment.€€€In€support,€the€defendant€cites€her€lack€of€a€prior€record,Š P   Šher€lack€of€intent€to€harm€the€victim,€her€expressed€remorse,€the€large€number€of€character€witnessesŠ @  Šwho€appeared€on€her€behalf,€and€the€fact€that€the€victim€did€not€require€hospitalization€for€her€injury.€Š 0 € ŠĢą  ąIn€the€alternative,€the€defendant€argues€that€she€should€have€received€judicial€diversion,€orŠ `  Šbeen€placed€in€the€Hamilton€County€Community€Corrections€Program€for€the€full€term€of€herŠ P  Šsentence.€€The€defendant€contends€that€her€crime€was€a€nonviolent€felony,€and€that,€as€such,€sheŠ š@  Šmeets€the€statutory€requirements€for€eligibility€for€admission€to€the€community€corrections€program.€Š ą0  ŠThe€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€courtššs€denial€of€her€request€for€community€corrections€wasŠ Š  Šarbitrary€and€capricious.€€Š Ą ŠĢą  ąThe€State€argues€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€the€form€of€sentence€it€imposed€upon€theŠ  š Šdefendant.€€The€State€points€out€that€the€trial€court€specifically€found€that€the€defendant€should€serveŠ ą Šsome€jail€time€in€order€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense.€€The€State€asserts€thatŠ €Š Šthe€defendant,€convicted€of€a€violent€felony,€does€not€meet€the€eligibility€requirements€for€theŠ pĄ Šcommunity€corrections€program.€€The€State€notes,€moreover,€€that€the€community€corrections€staffŠ `° Šfound€the€defendant€unsuitable€for€the€program.€Š P  ŠĢņ ņÓ  ÓA.€€ProbationŠ 0€ ŠĢÓ.lÓą  ąó óThe€defendant€first€argues€that€she€should€have€beenņ ņ€ó óimmediately€placed€on€full€probation.Š ` ŠAs€a€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€D€felony,€the€defendant€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorableŠ P Šcandidate€for€alternative€sentencing,€absent€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€ņņSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„35„Š š@ Š102(6).€€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„303(a)€states€that€a€defendant€shall€be€ņņeligibleóóŠ ą0 Šfor€probation,€subject€to€certain€exceptions€that€do€not€apply€in€this€case,€if€the€sentence€imposedŠ Š  Šupon€the€defendant€is€eight€years€or€less.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„35„303(a)€(1997).€€Even€if€eligible,Š Ą! Šhowever,€the€defendant€is€not€automatically€entitled€to€probation€as€a€matter€of€law.€€ņņSeeóó€€Tenn.€CodeŠ °"  ŠAnn.€šš€40„35„303(b)€(1997).€€The€burden€is€upon€the€defendant€to€show€that€she€is€a€suitableŠ  #š! Šcandidate€for€total€probation.€€ņņState€v.€Goodeóó,€956€S.W.2d€521,€527€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997);€ņņStateŠ $ą" Šv.€Boggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€467,€477€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€ņņseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„35„303(b)Š €%Š # Š(1997).€€€In€order€to€meet€this€burden,€the€defendant€š šmust€demonstrate€that€probation€will€ššsubserveŠ p&Ą!$ Šthe€ends€of€justice€and€the€best€interest€of€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.šššš€ņņState€v.€Binghamóó,€910Š `'°"% ŠS.W.2d€448,€456€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€ņņpermóó.€ņņappóó.€ņņdeniedóó€(Tenn.€1995)€(quoting€ņņState€v.€Dykesóó,€803Š P( #& ŠS.W.2d€250,€259€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990)).€Š @)$' ŠĢą  ąIn€determining€whether€or€not€to€grant€probation,€the€trial€court€should€consider,€among€otherŠ  +p&) Šfactors,€the€circumstances€surrounding€the€offense,€the€defendantššs€criminal€record,€the€defendantššsŠ ,`'* Špresent€condition,€the€defendantššs€credibility€or€lack€thereof,€and€whether€a€sentence€of€full€probationŠ ° Šwould€unduly€depreciate€the€seriousness€of€the€offenseņņóó.€€ņņSeeóó€ņņState€v.€Davisóó,€940€S.W.2d€558,€559Š  š Š(Tenn.€1997);€ņņGoodeóó,€956€S.W.2d€at€527;€ņņBinghamóó;€910€S.W.2d€at€456ņņóó€.Š ą ŠņņóóĢą  ąThe€defendant,€in€arguing€for€full€probation,€points,€ņņinter€aliaóó,€to€her€lack€of€a€criminalŠ pĄ Šrecord,€the€large€number€of€character€witnesses€who€appeared€in€her€behalf,€and€the€fact€that€theŠ ` ° Švictim€did€not€require€hospitalization€for€her€injury.€€€The€trial€court€considered€all€these€factors,Š P   Šhowever,€and€found€them€to€be€outweighed€by€the€circumstances€surrounding€the€defendantššsŠ @  Šoffense,€and€the€need€for€some€term€of€imprisonment€to€avoid€depreciating€the€serious€nature€of€theŠ 0 € Šcrime.€€The€trial€court€also€found€that€the€defendant€was€not€truly€remorseful,€and€that,€despite€herŠ  p  Šguilty€plea,€she€had€not€fully€accepted€responsibility€for€her€role€in€causing€the€childššs€injury.€Š `  ŠConsequently,€the€trial€court,€in€its€discretion,€denied€the€defendant€full€probation.€€The€courtŠ P  Šexplained€its€decision:Š š@  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąIn€order€to€preserve€the€sanctity€and€the€trust€in€people€in€child€careŠ Š  Šcenters€to€not€sentence€Ms.€Sutton€I€think€to€some€type€ofŠ Ą Šconfinement€would€definitely€be€to€depreciate€the€seriousness€of€thisŠ ° Šoffense.€€It€would€be€sending€a€message€that,€well,€things€happen€outŠ  š Šthere€and€if€you€donššt€mean€to€do€it€or€itššs€the€first€time,€itššs€okay,€andŠ ą Šthis€Court€cannot€allow€that,€although€I€donššt€think€Ms.€Sutton€shouldŠ €Š Šbe€sent€to€the€penitentiary€for€what€she€did,€but€I€do€think€she€needsŠ pĄ Što€be€incarcerated€for€a€period€of€time€to€think€about€what€she€did€andŠ `° Što€think€about€her€actions€on€that€particular€occasion€and€hopefully€atŠ P  Šsome€point€in€time€she€will€admit€to€herself€finally€and€quit€denyingŠ @ Šthis,€admit€to€herself€that€she€did€act€improperly,€that€she€did€actŠ 0€ Šrecklessly€and€irresponsibly€and€as€a€result€of€that€she€caused€thisŠ  p Šbroken€jaw.€€Š`` x` x ŠĢą  ąThe€trial€courtššs€findings€in€this€matter€are€supported€by€the€record.€€The€defendantššs€pastor,Š š@ ŠJohn€Randall€Bell,€testified€that€in€conversations€with€the€defendant,€she€€š šsimply€.€.€.€had€remorseŠ ą0 Šthat€the€child€was€hurt,€but€had€no€idea€how€the€child€got€hurt.šš€€Throughout€her€testimony,€theŠ Š  Šdefendant€denied€that€she€had€been€angry€or€impatient,€or€that€she€had€treated€the€child€in€a€roughŠ Ą! Šor€violent€manner.€€Both€witnesses€to€the€incident,€however,€described€what€can€only€be€interpretedŠ °"  Šas€violent€treatment€of€a€small€child,€with€the€defendant€throwing€the€child€š šface€firstšš€to€the€floorŠ  #š! Šin€a€š šbody€slam,šš€and€then€partially€laying€on€top€of€the€child€to€prevent€her€from€rising.€€That€theŠ $ą" Šchild€did€not€require€hospitalization€for€the€resulting€injury€does€not€lessen€the€severity€of€theŠ €%Š # Šdefendantššs€actions.€€€We€conclude€that€the€trial€court€acted€within€its€discretion€in€denying€fullŠ p&Ą!$ Šprobation€to€the€defendant.€ņ ņŠ `'°"% ŠĢÓ  ÓB.€Judicial€DiversionŠ @)$' ŠĢó óÓ®‚Óą  ąThe€defendant€also€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€not€granting€her€judicial€diversion.€€Š  +p&) ŠWhether€the€defendant€should€be€granted€judicial€diversion€is€within€the€sound€discretion€of€the€trialŠ ,`'* Šcourt.€€ņņBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456€(citing€ņņState€v.€Bonestelóó,€871€S.W.2d€163,€168€(Tenn.€Crim.Š ° ŠApp.€1993)).€€€We€find€no€abuse€of€discretion€by€the€trial€court€in€its€failure€to€grant€the€defendantŠ  š Šjudicial€diversion.Š ą ŠĢņ ņÓ  ÓC.€€Community€Corrections€Š pĄ ŠĢó óÓ…Óą  ąLastly,€the€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€her€request€for€placementŠ P   Šin€the€Hamilton€County€Community€Corrections€Program.€€The€defendant€asserts€that€she€meets€theŠ @  Šapplicable€statutory€prerequisites€for€eligibility€to€the€community€corrections€program,€and€that€theŠ 0 € Štrial€courtššs€denial€of€her€request€for€placement€in€the€program€was€arbitrary€and€capricious.€€€WeŠ  p  Šdisagree.Š `  ŠĢą  ąTo€be€eligible€for€participation€in€a€community€corrections€program,€a€defendant€must€meetŠ š@  Šthe€minimum€eligibility€requirements€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„36„106(a),€whichŠ ą0  Šstates:Š Š  ŠĢņ ņą8  ąą8` Š Š ąó óAn€offender€who€meets€all€of€the€following€minimum€criteria€shall€beŠ ° Šconsidered€eligible€for€punishment€in€the€community€under€theŠ  š Šprovisions€of€this€chapter:Аą` x` x ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(1)€Persons€who,€without€this€option,€would€beŠ pĄ Šincarcerated€in€a€correctional€institution;Š`°ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(2)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€property„related,€orŠ @ Šdrug/alcohol„related€felony€offenses€or€other€felonyŠ 0€ Šoffenses€not€involving€crimes€against€the€person€asŠ  p Šprovided€in€title€39,€chapter€13,€parts€1„5;Š`ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(3)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€nonviolent€felonyŠ š@ Šoffenses;Šą0ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(4)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€felony€offenses€inŠ Ą! Šwhich€the€use€or€possession€of€a€weapon€was€notŠ °"  Šinvolved;Š #š!ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(5)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€present€or€pastŠ €%Š # Špattern€of€behavior€indicating€violence;Šp&Ą!$ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąą8ø ` x` xą(6)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€pattern€ofŠ P( #& Šcommitting€violent€offenses;€and€Š@)$'ø ø  ŠĢą8  ąą8` Š Š ąPersons€who€are€sentenced€to€incarceration€or€on€escape€at€the€timeŠ  +p&) Šof€consideration€will€not€be€eligible.Š,`'*` x` x ЇTenn.€Code€Ann.€šš€40„36„106(a)€(Supp.€1998).€A€defendant€who€meets€the€minimum€eligibilityŠ ° Šrequirements€of€this€statute,€however,€is€not€automatically€entitled€to€be€sentenced€under€the€Act.€Š  š ŠņņState€v.€Ballóó,€973€S.W.2d€288,€294€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998)€(citing€ņņState€v.€Tayloróó,€744€S.W.2d€919Š ą Š(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1987)).€Š €Š ŠĢą  ąOn€€June€23,€1999,€a€hearing€was€held€on€the€defendantššs€motion€for€placement€in€theŠ ` ° Šcommunity€corrections€program.€The€trial€court€heard€testimony€from€the€program€manager€of€theŠ P   Šcounty€community€corrections€program,€and€from€the€defendant.€€€The€Hamilton€County€CommunityŠ @  ŠCorrections€Program€manager€testified€that,€after€review,€the€program€had€determined€that€theŠ 0 € Šdefendant€did€not€meet€the€minimum€eligibility€requirements€for€community€corrections,€based€onŠ  p  Šthe€violent€nature€of€her€offense.€€The€defendant€testified€that€she€was€genuinely€remorseful€for€herŠ `  Šcrime,€and€that€she€was€willing€to€comply€with€the€conditions€of€house€arrest.€Š P  ŠĢą  ąAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€defendantššs€request€for€placementŠ ą0  Šin€the€county€community€corrections€program,€citing€the€violent€nature€of€her€offense,€her€lack€of€Š Š  Štruthfulness€regarding€the€incident,€her€failure€to€show€true€remorse,€and€her€violation€of€a€positionŠ Ą Šof€public€trust€in€perpetrating€the€crime.€€€€The€record€supports€the€trial€courtššs€findings,€and€showsŠ ° Šthat€its€decision€was€neither€arbitrary€nor€capricious.€€€We€find,€therefore,€that€the€trial€court€did€notŠ  š Šabuse€its€discretion€in€denying€the€defendantššs€request€to€be€placed€in€the€community€correctionsŠ ą Šprogram.Š €Š ŠĢą@FF%ģąņ ņņņCONCLUSIONˆŠ `° ŠĢóóó óą  ąWe€conclude€that€the€evidence€supports€the€trial€courtššs€application€of€enhancement€factorsŠ @ Š(4)€and€(10),€and€that€the€trial€court€did€not€abuse€its€discretion€in€denying€the€defendantššs€requestŠ 0€ Šfor€full€probation€or€judicial€diversion.€€We€further€conclude€that€the€evidence€supports€the€trialŠ  p Šcourtššs€€finding€that€the€defendant€was€unsuitable€for€placement€in€the€Hamilton€County€CommunityŠ ` ŠCorrections€Program.€€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€Š P ŠĢĢĢ€€ņ ņŠ Ą! Šó óą  ąą ` ąą ø ąą  ąą h ąą Ą ąą  ą___________________________________€Š °"  Šą  ąą ` ąą ø ąą  ąą h ąą Ą ąą  ąALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE