WPC; cuoTWnZ{+ZGtJЄss1YhT`Yw"憺GiOoc=Ƒ5΋tBeM y0=KBJt"&Wu4kV#ܑ0Lр =\BGb%x]sf%Iw#@(N΄T]¯S9E3~>`̧uOtTI ̎mDWZ$9  ّg셄/a+H%m[M2FctrmkN\rYob#\ %% UN+ 0y UIN U0>O 0D z K U* ^ G wS 4W k 1N mEb 06666 B!! 0> D5 D- 0KDD AS 0 0DL A\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman(#$  0   C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt%2A`ArialwmW/ y.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 53|xU- - u R}$      1    _ ` Thepetitionerincorrectlyallegesthatthisrequirementonlybecameeffectivein1995.Infact  TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection3913523mandatedthisrequirementasearly_as_Ԁ1993.(|G2}$ !.8dXXd8         0   d(|3$ !.8dXXd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8dXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8dd8     _   8XXdd8@hh`>INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#`> #Ԉ #    @  @` AssignedonBriefsFebruary4,2003 F XX #XX#MITCHELL_TARVER_v.STATEOFTENNESSEEXX  ? @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Obion_ԀCounty  9 @@No.2223WilliamB._Acree_,Jr.,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200201662CCAR3COFiledOctober21,_2003_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     X#XXXTheprosepetitioner,Mitchell_Tarver_,appealsfromthedenialofhispetitionforawritofhabeas V  corpus.#XXXX#+#XXXXԀWeconcludethatthecircuitcourterredinsummarilydismissingthehabeaspetitionunder ? thepeculiarcircumstancespresentedintheinstantcase.#XXXX #XXXXԀWethereforereversethejudgmentofthe (x circuitcourtandremandforproceedingsconsistentwiththisopinion.#XXXX##XX#XX a  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtisReversedand 3 Remanded.     #X#XX.JerrySmith,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.WellesandNormaMcGee  Ogle,JJ.,joined.  Mitchell_Tarver_,prose,Clifton,Tennessee. [ PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;R.RobinDixon,Jr.,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; -} andThomasA.Thomas,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. f @@OO& OPINION #XX#XX  8  #XX_ #XX  XXXX@!FactualBackground  " "   OnNovember19,1993,thepetitionerpledguiltytotheoffenseofrapeofachild.The $$ petitionerallegesthatheenteredintoapleaagreementwiththestateagreeingtopleadguiltytothis x% % offenseinreturnforaguaranteedsentenceoffifteenyearsofincarcerationtobeservedata30% a&!& releaseeligibilitydate.ThepleaagreementwasacceptedbythetrialcourtonFebruary25,1994. J'"'   OnJune25,2002,inthe_Obion_ԀCountyCircuitCourt,thepetitionerfiledaprosepetition )l$) seekinghabeascorpusrelief.Asnoted,thepetitionerallegedthathehadagreed,peraplea *U%* agreementwiththestate,toserveafifteenyearsentenceforhiscrimeofchildrapewitha30% *>&+ releaseeligibilitydate.However,pursuanttothepassageofastatuteamendingreleaseeligibility +'', forchildrapistsin1995,thelawrequiredallindividualsconvictedofchildrapetoserve100%of ,(- theirsentence.Thepetitionerallegedthatalthoughhissentencehasexpiredunderthetermsofhis -(. _pleaagreement,heisbeingforcedtoservealongertermofimprisonmentbasedonthenewstatutory  sentencingguidelinesthatrequirechildrapiststoserve100%oftheirsentence./ #  1      ׀Accordingly,he  allegesthatthehabeascourterredbydenyinghiswritbecauseheisbeingforcedtoserveanexpired  sentence.Initsorderdenyingthepetition,thehabeascourtstatedthatthepetitionerhadfailedto k presentanygroundsforhabeasreliefbecausethetrialcourtsjudgmentformreflectsthathewas T orderedtoserveafifteenyearsentenceasachildrapist,andTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection39 =  13523mandatesthatallchildrapistsservetheentiretyoftheirsentence.Thehabeascourtnoted & v thattherearetwojudgmentsforthesingleoffense.Onejudgmentnotesa30%releaseeligibility  _ dateasastandardoffender.Theotherreflectsasentenceonlyasachildrapist.Itisthislatter  H judgmentthatthehabeascourtconcludedwastheactualjudgmentofthecourt.  1  #XXXX #  ?+ ` hp x X?XXXXHabeasCorpusRelief       #XXXX#XXXXTheTennesseeSupremeCourthasexplainedtheverylimitedscopeofhabeascorpusrelief   inTennessee,asfollows: n    <(` ` hp u X<HabeascorpusreliefisavailableinTennesseeonlywhen itappears @ uponthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordoftheproceedingsupon )y whichthejudgmentisrenderedthataconvictingcourtwaswithout b jurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendant,orthatadefendants K sentenceofimprisonmentorotherrestrainthasexpired. 4   E+ ` hp x ` Xu[E#XXXX#XXXXArcherv.State#XXXX#XXXX,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).ThisCourthasstatedthat [i]fthecourt  renderingajudgmenthasjurisdictionoftheperson,thesubject-matter,andhastheauthoritytomake  thechallengedjudgment,thejudgmentisvoidable,notvoid;andthejudgmentmaynotbe q collaterallyattackedinasuitforhabeascorpusrelief.#XXXX<#XXXXPassarellav.State#XXXX#XXXX,891S.W.2d619,627 Z (Tenn.Crim.App.1994). C   Ahabeascourtisnotrequired,asamatteroflaw,tograntthewritandconductaninquiry e intotheallegationscontainedinthepetition.#XXXXs#XXXXSee#XXXX#XXXXԀTenn.CodeAnn.29-21-109;#XXXX #XXXXPassarella#XXXXt#XXXX,891 N S.W.2dat627.Ifthepetitionfailstostateacognizableclaim,thepetitionmaybedismissedbythe  7 habeascourtsummarily.#XXXX#XXXXSee#XXXX #XXXXԀ#XXXX!#XXXXStateexrel.Byrdv.Bomar#XXXXK!#XXXX,214Tenn.476,381S.W.2d280(1964); !   Tenn.CodeAnn.29-21-109.Therelevantstatuteprovidesinpart: Iffromtheshowingofthe " ! petitioner,theplaintiffwouldnotbeentitledtoanyrelief,thewritmayberefused....Tenn.Code #" Ann.29-21-109. $#    `     h     Thestate#XXXX!#XXXXarguesthatthehabeascourtactedproperlybysummarilydismissingthe ]&!% petitionersrequestforhabeasreliefbecausethepetitionerallegedbutfailedtodemonstratethathe F'"& wasservinganexpiredterm.Specifically,thestatereliesononeofthejudgmentformssubmitted /(#' tothehabeascourtthatreflectsthatthepetitionerwassentencedtoservehisfifteenyearagreed )h$( uponsentenceundertheclassificationof childrapist.PerTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection39  13523,childrapistsarerequiredtoservetheentiretyoftheirsentenceandarenoteligibleforan  earlyrelease.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913523(Supp.2002).    However,whenarguingthatthehabeascourtactedproperlybysummarilydismissingthe T petitionersrequestforhabeasrelief,thestatehasnotconsideredtheprecedentsetforthinthe =  TennesseeSupremeCourtopinionofMcLaneyv.Bell,59S.W.3d90(Tenn.2001)#XXXX##XXXX.#XXXXn(#XXXXԀIn#XXXX(#XXXXMcLaney#XXXX(#XXXX & v thehabeaspetitionerfiledapetitionintheDavidsonCountyCriminalCourtallegingthathehad  _ beenonbailonarapechargeoutofJeffersonCountywhenhecommittedtwoadditionalfelonies  H inthatcounty.ThepetitionersubmittedapleaagreementforallthesechargestotheJefferson  1  CountyCircuitCourt.Thepleaagreementcontainedaprovisionthatallthreeofthepetitioners    sentencesweretobeservedconcurrently.Thepetitionerfurtheralleged,correctly,thatbecausehe   wasonbailforonefelonywhenhecommittedtwoothers,hissentenceswereillegalbecause   TennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection40-20-111(b)andTennesseeRuleofCriminalProcedure   32(c)(3)(C)mandatedconsecutivesentencingundersuchcircumstances.Becausehisagreementto n  serveconcurrentsentenceswasillegal,thepetitionermaintainedhispleasofguiltywerenot W  knowinglyorvoluntarilyenteredandshouldbesetaside.#XXXXG)#XXXXSee#XXXX-#XXXXԀ#XXXX@.#XXXXMcLaney#XXXX.#XXXX,59S.W.3dat92. @   TheTennesseeSupremeCourtheldthatifMcLaneysallegationsaboutbeingonbailwhen b hecommittedtwoadditionaloffensesweretrue,thenconcurrentsentenceswouldbeindirect K contraventionofthelaw,illegal,void,andsubjecttoreviewbywayofawritofhabeascorpus.The 4 supremecourtthereforeremandedthecasetotheDavidsonCountyCircuitCourtanddirectedthat  thecourtappointcounselandconductahearingwithrespecttowhetherMcLaneywasindeedfree  onbailatthetimehealleged.TheCourtnotedthatiftheDavidsonCountyCircuitCourt  determinedthattheallegationsweretrue,theDavidsonCountycourtshoulddeclaretheconcurrent  sentencesvoidandthentransferthecasetotheJeffersonCountytrialcourtforimpositionofalegal q sentenceshouldthepetitioneragree,orifnolegalpleaagreementcouldbereached,thewithdrawal Z oftheoriginalpleaandtrial.#XXXX.#XXXXSee#XXXX3#XXXXid#XXXX3#XXXX.59S.W.3dat94-95. C   Inthecase#XXXX4#XXXXsub#XXXX4#XXXXԀ#XXXX4#XXXXjudice#XXXX/5#XXXX,thepetitionerallegesthathispleaagreement,acceptedbythecircuit e courtinObionCountyandreflectedinhisjudgmentform,includedaprovisionthathewouldbe N eligibleforreleaseafterserviceof30%ofhissentencesforhischildrapeconviction.Thepetition  7 submittedtothehabeascourtandajudgmentformattachedthereto,indicatethatthetrialcourt !   acceptingthepetitionerspleabothdenotedthatthepetitionerwasachildrapist,butlikewise " ! indicatedthatthepetitionerwastoserve30%ofhissentenceasaRangeIstandardoffender.Such #" asentenceisindirectcontraventionofTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection39-13-523,which $# mandatesserviceofsuchsentencesat100%undiminishedbysentencingcreditstowardrelease.#XXXXz5#XXXXThe t% $ petitionerallegedinhishabeaspetitionthathecommittedthecrimeatissuein1993,andthis ]&!% allegationisnotdisputedbytherecord.Accordingly,section3913523,whoseeffectivedateis F'"& July1,2002,required#XXXXE9#XXXXthedefendanttoservehissentenceforchildrapeinitsentirety.ThisCourt /(#' haspreviouslyheldthatpleaagreementsallowingthedefendanttoserveanillegalsentencearevoid. )h$( #XXXX:#XXXXSee#XXXX;#XXXXԀ#XXXX<#XXXXLloydPaulHillv.State#XXXX[<#XXXX,No.M2000-01428-CCA-R3-PC,2001WL1006050,at*5(Tenn. *Q%) Crim.App.atNashville,Aug.30,2001).#XXXX<#XXXX *:&*  +#'+   Thepeculiarprobleminthiscaseisthattherearetwoconflictingjudgmentforms.Sincethe  habeascourtandthecourtofconvictionareoneinthesame,itappearsthatthejudgebelowsimply  examinedthetrialcourtrecordsandmadeafindingthatthejudgmentreflectingalegalsentencewas  thesentenceactuallyimposedwhenthepetitionerwasoriginallysentenced.Asaresultthehabeas k courtsummarilydismissedwithoutanyfurtherevidentiaryproceedings. T   Atfirstblushthisappearssensible,howeversummarydismissalofahabeascorpuspetition & v isonlyappropriatewhentheallegationsinthehabeaspetitionshowthatthepetitionerisnotentitled  _ torelief.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921109;McLaney,59S.W.3dat93.Intheinstantcasethe  H allegationsinthepetitionandthedocumentssupportingthemwoulddemonstrateavoidsentence  1  forachildrapist.Thehabeascourtwasabletoreachitsdecisiontodismissonlythroughresortto    areviewoftheunderlyingrecordsoftheconviction.Whileconsiderationoftheunderlyingrecord   ofconvictionsisappropriate,see,id.fn.2,webelieveitmustbedoneinthecontextofan   evidentiaryhearingwhereinthehabeaspetitionerhastheopportunitytoexplainanydiscrepancyin   theunderlyingrecordsandtheallegationsinthehabeaspetitionwhichiftruewouldrenderthe n  sentencevoid.Thus,intheinstantcasethehabeasjudgeshouldhavedirectedananswerorissuance W  ofwritpursuanttoTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection2921110,andproceededtoahearingto @ resolvetheapparentconflictinthejudgmentformsandgrantordenyreliefasappropriate. )y #XXXXq=#XXXX  Therefore,#XXXXE#XXXXԀweremandthiscasetotheObionCountyCircuitCourtforanorderdirectingthe K custodianofthepetitionertorespondtotheallegationsinthehabeaspetition,anevidentiaryhearing 4 whereinthepetitionershallbegivenanopportunitytoprovehisallegationsandsuchotherrelief  asmaybeappropriate.#XXXXBF#XXXX    #XXXXG#XXXX#XXXX_H#  ?+ ` hp x X?XXXXConclusion q     #XXXXH#XXXXInlightoftheforegoingwereversethejudgmentoftheObionCountyCircuitCourtand Z remandthiscaseforfurtherproceedingsconsistentwiththisopinion.#XX ##lI#   C   #  J##`J#XX     `     h     ___________________________________ !      `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE