WPC 0SQ;<@ʊNt Qש cs/:D$Zh?äv#so}Ti hD0]xJ@jAGV䠶 _hjHZK=@]K9\@?@X&7P@b!vojI޲Gzo6P|AS:7C˴E}THvV'N#N~tx(8qѰZgsAJ3!-Uz-7}˲9eҋ˹N3`<.Hzݖe\nKSAJ 2ttBGGe~f6/w8Eܞg٪/n"RI^]K-1s,bYuHe&pk6'+am=~S/[B1%hn,eF8[0GZ#BORb#\ % # 0+ UN ^  w z  4] q  m  _ %  NEb 0 B 0 D5i D- 0K ASi 0/ 0D AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60 (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular)  C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptjW):i+003|xULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2$ !.8]dd8         0  M d(|3$ !.8]dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8]dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8]dd8     _   ]8 iXXdd8@ttKD]INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#]KD #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefs @  @` September27,2000 L X iX] #]XX i$#BOBBYLEETATEv.STATEOFTENNESSEEX iX]  J  AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforKnoxCounty  J @@No.69733RayL.Jenkins,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200000796CCAR3CD   December6,_2000_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     Thepetitionerappealsthetrialcourtsdenialofhis MotiontoVacateJudgment.Eventhoughwe x  treatthemotionasapetitionforhabeascorpusreliefandcountenancetheappealviaTennesseeRule d ofAppellateProcedure3(b),therecordsupportsthetrialcourtsdeterminationthatthefactual P allegationsofimproperorinvalidjudgmentsareunfounded.Thus,thetrialcourtsdenialofthe < motionorpetitionisaffirmed. (x  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed.  P   #]X i#X iX.]James_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_and ( JerryL.Smith,JJ.,joined.  AlbertNewman,Knoxville,Tennessee,fortheAppellant,BobbyLeeTate.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter,ClintonJ.Morgan,CounselforState,RandallE. t _Nichols_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral,Zane_Scarlett_,AssistantDistrictAttorneyGeneral,forthe ` Appellee,StateofTennessee. L  `@@OO& OPINION #]XX i#X iX] $"t! #]XX i #  X iX]   ` Thepetitioner,BobbyLeeTate,appealstheKnoxCountyCriminalCourtsdismissal #L# ofhis MotiontoVacateJudgment.Itappearsfromthescantrecordonappealthatthepetitioner $8 $ pleadedguiltyinthetrialcourttonumerousfelonies,andthetrialcourtimposedsentenceson %$!% September2,1988.OnJanuary5,2000,thepetitionerfiledthemotionnowunderreview,inwhich &"& heclaimsthatthetrialjudgefailedtosignthejudgmentorjudgmentsofconvictionandthatthetrial '"' courtclerkfailedtoproperlyentertheconvictionjudgmentsintothetrialcourtminutes.Thelower (#( courtappointedcounseltorepresentthepetitionerandscheduledahearing.Atthehearing,the )$) petitionerscounselannouncedtothecourtthathehadinvestigatedthepetitionersclaimandfound p*%* thattheconvictionjudgmentsandcourtminuteswereinorder.Thetrialcourtthendeniedthe \+&+ motion,andthepetitionerappealed.Wehavereviewedtherecord,thebriefsoftheparties,andthe H,', applicablelaw,andweaffirmthetrialcourtsdismissalofthemotion. 4-(- _ԇ   ` Thestateinitsbriefassertsthatthemotionisapetitionforpostconvictionreliefand  arguesthatitisbarredbythepostconvictiononeyearstatuteoflimitations.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.  4030202(1997).Ifthemotionisviewedasapostconvictionpetition,thestatesargumentmay  bewellfounded,consideringthattheconvictionsresultedfromguiltypleasandwereimposedin t 1988;however,therecorddoesnotaffirmativelyreflectwhetherthepetitionerappealedthe ` convictionsand,ifso,thedateonwhichthehighestappellatecourttookfinalactionontheappeal. L  Seeid.Atanyrate,webelievetheargumentisirrelevantbecauseweconcludethatthemotion 8  shouldmoreproperlybetreatedasapetitionforhabeascorpusrelief.SeeJonathanStephensonv. $ t HowardCarlton,"S.W.3d",",No.E199800202SCR11CD,slipop.at23,(Tenn.Sept.  ` 21,2000).Asapetitionforhabeascorpusrelief,thedenialofsameisappealableasamatterof  L  right.SeeTenn.R.App.P.3(b).Wenotethatunlessthemotionistreatedasapetitionforhabeas  8  corpusrelief,itsdenialasafreestandingchallengetotheconvictionjudgmentscouldnotbe $  appealedasamatterofright.WilliamBoydv.State,No.E199902179CCAR3PC,slipop.at   3n.7(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Nov.6,2000);J.D.Hickmanv.State,No.E199902256CCA   R3PC,slipop.at45(Tenn.Crim.App.,Knoxville,Sept.27,2000)(orderdenyingpetitionto   rehear).      ` Habeascorpusreliefisavailablewhenthefaceoftherecordreflectsthatthe \ convictionorsentenceisvoidorwhenthesentencehasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157, H 164(Tenn.1993).Inthepresentcase,weneednotdeterminewhetherthepetitionerhasstateda 4 cognizablehabeascorpusclaim,becausethetrialcourtdeterminedthatthepetitionersclaimsare  p unfounded,andonappeal,thepetitionerhasfailedtoshowotherwise.Moreover,thejudgments  \ aboutwhichthepetitionercomplainsdonotappearintherecord.Accordingly,hehaswaived H appellatereview.SeeStatev.Banes,874S.W.2d73,82(Tenn.Crim.App.1993);Statev.Oody, 4 823S.W.2d554,559(Tenn.Crim.App.1991).      ` Fortheabovereasons,thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmed.     `     h     ___________________________________ l    `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE