WPC hJiv~pYoPEM )WQFbLz:.Y1FH=?=;i4_J1.RT+RtgᭌvNmO/u?=LHz(ox.YLA{2)fx!IǑpSh024^D5=d$2|ٽs~Gү@HҎZýmպj'7$ %e F!U>  0 0 0< 0< 0D 0H D+< Ag @  o @ o B-6 Bc  0 #*UN %9M?(CNk^ mwy4} mb-\  `&Times New Roman'  LA satisfied Microsoft Office UserL0A satisfied Microsoft Office User .   6S C4Heading 1  XXX           6_ O4Heading 2  X XXX            X <:Default Para<:Footnote Ref6== 4Body Text  XXX      8 6Block Text   XXX     2( ` hp x2      8.` hp x (#8  'dxd &Draw Object <<=8C HKKKK  WPC i K513%)+-51d~ - WPC i K513%)+-51d~ -)Hairline d  d#|x(r$..      XXHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularXq-s Yo):i+00U- - ##CXd#  !..      XX  __         0p x (#X0T8dd8  'Qhh8TINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  Q%ATJACKSONT8Ԉ    H.` hp x (#X(#HAssignedonBriefsJuly9,2002 > XXTTXX STATEOFTENNESSEEv.MICHAELL.TAYLORXXT  0  DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtfor_Hardin_ԀCounty  " No.8049,8050C.Creed_McGinley_,Judge   -  XX  k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KEj K Kj2 -  XX No.W200102744CCAR3CDFiledAugust23,_2002_ _  -  XX  k[W$~ Kp@0 dd`  KE+ K K+2 -  XX    Pursuanttoanegotiatedpleaagreement,thedefendantpledguiltytopossessionofcrackcocaine  p  withtheintenttoresell,distributeormanufacture,possessionofmarijuana,possessionofdrug V paraphernalia,andfourcountsofthesaleofover.5gramsofcrackcocaine.Thedefendantwas < sentencedasagreedtonine(9)yearsforeachfelonycountandelevenmonthsandtwentynine " daysforeachmisdemeanorcount.Theagreementalsoprovidedthatallofthesentenceswould  beservedconcurrentlyforaneffectivenineyearsentence.Followingasentencinghearing,the  trialcourtdeniedalternativesentencing.Inthisappeal,thedefendantchallengesthedenialof  alternativesentencing.Weaffirm. j   Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed  6   JohnEverettWilliams,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichNormaMcGeeOgle R andAlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined. 8 GuyT.Wilkinson,DistrictPublicDefender;andRichardW._DeBerry_,AssistantPublic  Defender,fortheappellant,MichaelL.Taylor.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter,MarkA._Fulks_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; f!! G.Robert_Radford_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andJohnW._Overton_,Jr.,AssistantDistrict L"" AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. 2##   OPINION  %4!&   XXXX    N    Thedefendant,MichaelL.Taylor,pledguilty,incasenumber8049,toonecountof '#( possessionofacontrolledsubstancewiththeintenttoresell,distributeormanufacture,aClassB (#) felony;onecountofpossessionofmarijuana,aClassAmisdemeanor;andonecountof |)$* possessionofdrugparaphernalia,aClassAmisdemeanor.Thedefendantalsopledguilty,in b*%+ casenumber8050,tofourcountsofthesaleofacontrolledsubstance,allClassBfelonies. H+&, Pursuanttoapleaagreement,thedefendantwassentencedasfollows:nine(9)yearsforeachof .,~'- thefelonyoffenses,andelevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysforeachofthemisdemeanors,with -d(. allcountstobeservedconcurrently,foraneffectivenineyearsentence.Afterahearingon -J)/a ' 8XXdd8   _alternativesentencing,thetrialcourtdeniedthedefendantsrequestforasentenceinthe  communitycorrectionsprogramandorderedhimtoservehissentenceintheDepartmentof  Correction.Thedefendantfiledthistimelyappealchallengingthetrialcourtsdenialofan | alternativesentence.Casenumbers8049and8050havebeenconsolidatedforthepurposeof b thisappeal.N݌ H Ќ    XXXX    XXXX         &  S  StandardofReviewS  Ԍ  d Ќ    XXXX   X  Whenanaccusedchallengesthemannerofserviceofasentence,suchasthedenialofan  0 alternativesentence,thisCourtsreviewofthesentenceisdenovowithapresumptionof    correctness.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thispresumptionisconditioneduponan    affirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialjudgeconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandall   relevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Pettus,986S.W.2d540,543(Tenn.1999).Ifthetrial x  courtfailstocomplywiththestatutorydirectives,thereisnopresumptionofcorrectnessandour ^  reviewisdenovo.Statev.Poole,945S.W.2d93,96(Tenn.1997).'  D   *z  Whenconductingadenovoreviewofasentence,thisCourtmustconsider:(a)the ` evidence,ifany,receivedatthetrialandthesentencinghearing;(b)thepresentencereport;(c) F theprinciplesofsentencingandargumentsastosentencingalternatives;(d)thenatureand , characteristicsofthecriminalconductinvolved;(e)anystatutorymitigatingandenhancement  factors;(f)anystatementmadebythedefendantregardingsentencing;and(g)thepotentialor  lackofpotentialforrehabilitationortreatment.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102,103,210;State  v.Thomas,755S.W.2d838,844(Tenn.Crim.App.1988). t  Z UndertheCriminalSentencingReformActof1989,trialjudgesareencouragedtouse @ alternativestoincarceration.AnespeciallymitigatedorstandardoffenderconvictedofaClass &v C,DorEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsinthe  \ absenceofevidencetothecontrary.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102(6).Duetotheinstant B defendantsClassBfelonyconvictions,heisnotpresumedtobeafavorablecandidatefor ( alternativesentencing.Moreover,thedefendantisineligibleforprobationsincehissentence  exceedseightyears.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035303(a).Nevertheless,thedefendantmaybe  eligibleforparticipationinacommunitycorrectionsprogram,anotherformofalternative   sentence,ifhesatisfiestheminimumeligibilitycriteriasetforthatTennesseeCodeAnnotated p!  section4036106(a).Anoffenderdesiringacommunitycorrectionssentencemustdemonstrate V"! thatheorshe: <#"  X X X! ,X(#!(1)...withoutthisoption,wouldbeincarceratedinacorrectionalinstitution; "$r# 0 4  (2)...[was]convictedofpropertyrelatedordrug/alcoholrelatedfelonyoffenses %X $ orotherfelonyoffensesnotinvolvingcrimesagainsttheperson...;%>!%4 4  (3)...[was]convictedofnonviolentfelonyoffenses; &$"& Ѐ0 4  (4)...[was]convictedoffelonyoffensesinwhichtheuseorpossessionofa ' #' weaponwasnotinvolved;(#(4 4  0 4  (5)...[does]notdemonstrateapresentorpastpatternofbehaviorindicating )$) violence;l*%*4 4   X! X! X!(6)...[does]notdemonstrateapatternofcommittingviolentoffenses;and R+&+  X X X 8,', 0 4  (7)...[wasnot]sentencedtoincarcerationoronescapeatthetimeof  consideration....4 4   X% X% X%% X(#,!%E.` hp x (#X(#E XTenn.CodeAnn.4036106(a). |  XB'AlloffenderswhomeettherequirementsoftheCommunityCorrectionsActarenot H entitledtobesentencedpursuanttothatactasamatteroflaw.Statev.Grandberry,803S.W.2d . ~ 706,707(Tenn.Crim.App.1990).Afterdeterminingthatanoffenderiseligiblefora  d communitycorrectionssentence,thetrialcourt,applyingthesentencingconsiderationssetforth  J inTennesseeCodeAnnotatedsection4035103andgeneralsentencingguidelines,determines  0 whethertheoffenderisentitledtoasentenceundertheCommunityCorrectionsAct.In    determiningifincarcerationisappropriate,atrialcourtmayconsidertheneedtoprotectsociety    byrestrainingadefendanthavingalonghistoryofcriminalconduct,theneedtoavoid   depreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffense,whetherconfinementisparticularlyappropriateto x  effectivelydeterotherslikelytocommitsimilaroffenses,andwhetherlessrestrictivemeasures ^  haveoftenorrecentlybeenunsuccessfullyappliedtothedefendant.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035 D  103(1);Statev.Ashby,823S.W.2d169(Tenn.1991). *z   `  X  XXXXX        X,  Analysis,-  \-Ԍ F Ќ    XXXX    X, , Atthehearingonalternativesentencing,bothpartiesreliedonapresentencereport  preparedbythecommunitycorrectionsprogram.Inadditiontotheseveninstantoffenses,the  defendanthasthreepriorfelonyconvictionsfordeliveryofacontrolledsubstance,oneprior  felonyconvictionforaggravatedassault,onepriormisdemeanorconvictionforpossessionofa t controlledsubstance,threepriormisdemeanorconvictionsforevadingarrest,oneprior Z misdemeanorconvictionforresistingarrest,andonepriormisdemeanorconvictionforassault, @ foratotaloffourpriorfelonyandsixpriormisdemeanorconvictions.Inaddition,the &v presentencereportindicatesthatthedefendanthaspreviouslyviolatedtheconditionsof  \ probationandparole.Finally,hehasapriorarrest/chargeforaggravateddomesticassault, B whichwasdismissedbecausethevictimdidnotappearincourt. (   Thetrialcourtfirstnotedthatthedefendantisnotpresumedtobeafavorablecandidate  foralternativesentencingbecauseofthefiveClassBfelonyconvictions.Afterreviewingthe   presentencereport,thetrialcourtfoundthatthedefendantwasnotanappropriatecandidatefor p!  alternativesentencingduetohisextensivecriminalhistory,aswellasthenumberofoffenses V"! involvedintheinstantcases.   h  <#"  "$r# Upondenovoreview,wefirstnotethatitisarguablewhetherthedefendantevenmeets %X $ theeligibilitycriteriaforplacementinthecommunitycorrectionsprogramduetohisprior %>!% convictionsforassaultandaggravatedassault.However,evenifheweredeemedeligibleunder &$"& theCommunityCorrectionsAct,weconcludethatthetrialcourtdidnoterrindenying ' #' communitycorrectionsduetothedefendantsextensivecriminalrecordandthepastfailureof (#( measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementtocurbhiscriminalactivity. )$)  l*%*  R+&+  8,',   XCONCLUSION   7 X7Accordingly,weseenoreasontodisturbthesentenceofthetrialcourt. |  X h___________________________________  0 JOHNEVERETTWILLIAMS,JUDGE    ; hXX