WPC / Tm~OHHIa.1qO$G E{#O7[ެZ{κiZ!b&Iz"O[^/=[n|vHqa{!f.O._ZIfmG!VG߲Bnރ.J(^_APq_~hGoNƒS=fi{۽F:5OiSLYlEIiR!B3a-3%l/uHL$ W5]P<g 1u 72 ^ L wX 4\ p  m N E 0 0a 02 0 0 09 0 0uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu 1e    ooooooooooo B\\IB01S02\CLERKJAC,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular\  `&Times New Roman3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)n41 ~/:i+003|xU*AA (_17  5+ ` hp x 523  Ԁ5+ ` hp x 5  *GG (_16   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ/%` ` hp x /   *88 (_15  ," hp x ,23  Ԁ," hp x ,  *55 (_14 ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ) hp x ) ` *22 (_13  &hhp x &23  Ԁ&hhp x &  *// (_12  #p x #23  Ԁ#p x #  *,, (_11 h  p x 23  Ԁ p x h *)) (_10  pp x 23  Ԁpp x    35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.SearchTerm d !USUS.,  __XXXX   XX8XXdd8@hh#XX#h^XXINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#XXh^#XXԈ #    @  @` #XX# XXJAMESTHOMASv.DAVIDMILLS,Warden#XX2#  ? @@ AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforLauderdaleCounty  9 @@No.5839JoeH.Walker,III,Judge  # @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200401037CCAR3_HC_ԀFiledSeptember17,_2004_   AV) ` dE<]` A ^     ThismatterisbeforetheCourtupontheStatesmotiontoaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtby V  orderpursuanttoRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.ThePetitionerappealsthetrial ? courtsdenialofhabeascorpusrelief.#X`XXXM#XXXX`ThePetitionerfailstoassertacognizablegroundforhabeas (x corpusrelief.Accordingly,theState'smotionisgrantedandthejudgmentofthetrialcourtis a affirmed. J  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheTrialCourtAffirmed     DavidG.Hayes,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJohnEverettWilliamsand  AlanE.Glenn,JJ.,joined.  JamesThomas,prose. Z PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;RachelE.Willis,AssistantAttorneyGeneral,for ,| theappellee,StateofTennessee. e @@OO& MEMORANDUMOPINION  ! !       OnJuly9,1999,Petitionerenteredguiltypleastosevencountsofaggravatedassaultandten $$ countsofaggravatedrobberyforwhichhereceivedaneffectivesentenceoffifteenyears.OnMarch u% % 9,2004,Petitionersoughthabeascorpusrelief,statingthattheindictmentsarevoidbasedupon ^&!& discriminationintheselectionofthegrandjuryforeperson.Thetrialcourtdismissedthe G'"' application,findingthattheapplicationfailedtostateagrounduponwhichthewritofhabeascorpus 0(#( couldissue.Thetrialcourtfurtherfoundthattheapplicationcouldnotbetreatedasoneforpost )i$) convictionrelief. *R%*   #X`XXX#XXXX` +$', _  ArticleI,15oftheTennesseeConstitutionguaranteestherighttoseekhabeascorpusrelief  andTenn.CodeAnn.2921101etseq.codifiestheapplicableproceduresforseekingawrit.  However,thegroundsuponwhichourlawprovidesreliefareverynarrow.Taylorv.State,995  S.W.2d78,83(Tenn.1999).#X`XXX #HabeascorpusreliefisavailableinTennesseeonlywhenitappears k uponthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordoftheproceedingsuponwhichthejudgmentisrendered T thatXXXX`(1)theconvictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthoritytosentenceadefendant;or(2) =  defendantssentencehasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993).#X`XXX#ԀThus,the & v groundsuponwhichhabeascorpusreliefwillbegrantedareverynarrow.XXXX`Statev.Ritchie,20  _ S.W.3d624,630(Tenn.2000).Itispermissibleforatrialcourttosummarilydismissapetitionfor  H habeascorpusrelief,withouttheappointmentofcounselandwithoutanevidentiaryhearing,ifthere  1  isnothingonthefaceofthejudgmenttoindicatethattheconvictionsaddressedthereinarevoid.    Passarellav.State,891S.W.2d619(Tenn.Crim.App.1994).     Uponourreviewoftherecordinthiscase,weconcludethatthetrialcourtproperly   determinedthatthePetitioner'sclaimsarenotcognizableinahabeascorpusproceeding.#X`XXX#Thereis n  nothingintherecordtoindicatethatthetrialcourtwaswithoutjurisdictiontosentencePetitioner; W  noristhereanythingtoindicatethatthePetitioner'ssentenceshaveexpired.Thus,nogroundsexist @ entitlingPetitionertohabeascorpusrelief.Petitionerschallengetotheselectionprocessforthe )y forepersonofthegrandjurycanonlybeaddressedinapetitionforpostconvictionrelief.SeeState b v.RoyLaverneMorris,Jr.,No.W199901628CCAR3CO,1999WL1531760,*2(Tenn.Crim. K App.atJackson,Dec.16,1999),perm.toappealdenied,(Tenn.Jul.17,2000). 4   Sӹ   H(03?+ ` hp x X?X`XXX`  Section4030105(c)(2003Repl.),TennesseeCodeAnnotated,instructstrialcourtsto  Y % K #X`XXX`#%KX`XXX`treathabeas#X`XXX`#X`XXX`petitionsas#X`XXX`$#X`XXX`postconvictionpetitions"whenthereliefandprocedureauthorizedby B [thePostConvictionProcedureAct]appearadequateandappropriate."Consideringthe + applicationasoneforpostconvictionrelief,weconcludethatsuchpetitionisbarredasa  petitionforpostconvictionreliefasitwasfiledoutsidetheapplicable#X`XXX`s#X`XXX`statuteoflimitations.  #X`XXX`6#XXXX`  #X`XXX#XXXX`  Accordingly,itisORDEREDthattheStatesmotionisgranted.Thejudgmentofthe %u trialcourtisaffirmedinaccordancewithRule20,RulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals.  ^ '(#XX ____________________________________ :&!" ((#DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE #XX##X`XXX#