ÿWPC,  db„ŠÝ±b‘r!%|^ÿ¼èn†ÚSbimONñÀ9²Q‹à·!ôä T;ÕQ w›Õ×J=KÙØð6}‘ñ=,4 rpgóHT,W°@ÙÄ1ƒ&ÂéAýŒäL,`qü=Ó§ÜÐ'$½NK«ˆqqÅT¦pøŠ³ß_Ë‘¿ÞF¿UÖ@*QW= éôà²*ãú¬÷ìW;0/†ø Ôƒ‹q%+c³¬f°á¾ú¢<ù­kB#LO%†HÍr¨˜ ¼ès–ñžêò¦PÁRS©m !Ó}X’J±-NRÛ_¼Ìj¯å௽þ äMÍ¢IÓ—À²Üo~7]tŸJ4:SeÉêã9N’6Ÿb÷ FÏ]J\L÷Ù‚0U¿}äªS'o4ô:ÛCuDÑþ…&’›”Ç“€ÞÂLÒ‘Ï6Ýy¢¡ßÈ1_@EI$l< ¹Üü–ŠÂ§Xàû’Fv(Ë~0éÁ(I»›âcò€ÒAú ý F¤"0ð³]™´ÒGÌe-j6ƒ#b‹ì¸ÇÔ¯ðñðI}Æ.®K=Y˜°Ÿ÷MÎ*JP0yצp”¾^sGø ~þs’ˆn>¯‰•ÐÉ)ƒîIö«l®Tó,TOÍÛv­¯,Gœ©$0îÛ2•cXa#!NUNo %½ 0(ÃU:ëb% w- 41 E "T Nv ^ x „ m†  T¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ AQù ÆJ 0D 0DT 0D˜ ˜ D3Ü B ˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0(ÈhH  Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡,Ù¹6 AZ‹"Arial Regular- ù-tpO'3|xkidnapping÷‚#(L ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ  JÝ ƒ[¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X†ÕXXXÔÔ€èmçXX†ÕÔÓ  ÓÔ_Ôò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€õùçèmÔÐ  ÐÌJanuary€3,€2000ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€Ô_ÔClerkÔdAxÔó óÔ_ÔZ[\]_Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó````'ÿÿdxd dÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ` °ÑÒ°ÒÒX°ÒÔ€Šaæ‹XXÔÔ€Š Ö‹‹ŠaæÔÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ€ÑÑ8€UXXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÓ  Óò òÔ_Ôßv€Y_@0,j: `€€@ÿEðf Žtt¨¦(` \vßÔ_ÔÔ_ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÐ `  ÐÌAT€KNOXVILLEÌÌNOVEMBER€SESSION,€1999ÌÌÌÌÓ  ÓSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€à À àà  à)à0 p àC.C.A.€NO.€03C01„9903„CR„00122ó óÐpp€%p€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àò ò)ó óà p àÐ r  Ðà ` àà ¸ àAppellee,ò òà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€€€à p àÐ t  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àKNOX€COUNTYÐv p€%p€% ÐV.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)€€€€€€€Ð x  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à)à0 p àHON.€RICHARD€BAUMGARTNERÐ|p€%p€% ÐRAMAAN€JAMEL€THOMAS,à0 À àà0À€%À€%à)€€€€€€€à p àÐ~€%€% Ѐà ` àà0 ¸ àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà À àà  à)à0ph€%h€%àó óЀ p€%p€% Ѐà ` àà ¸ àAppellant.à h àà À àò òà  à)à0 p à(THEFT€OF€PROPERTY)€Ð‚"p€%p€% Ðó óÌÌÌòòFOR€THE€APPELLANTóó:à À àà  àòòà p àà È àFOR€THE€APPELLEEóó:Ð x ÐÌò òWILLIAM€L.€BROWNà0 h àòòóóà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%àà p àPAUL€G.€SUMMERS€Ðp €%€% Ðó óAttorney€at€Law€à0  àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà0À€%À€%àà0p€%€%àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐr!p€%p€% Ð706€Walnut€Street,€Suite€902ÌKnoxville,€TN€37902à0 h àà0Àh€%h€%àò òà  àà p àMARVIN€S.€BLAIR,€JR.Ðj# À€%À€% Ðó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àò òó óà À àà  àà p àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÐl$ h€%h€% Ðò òó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà  àà p à2nd€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÐh%À€%À€% Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà0 À àà  àà0pÀ€%À€%à425€Fifth€Avenue€North€Ð p€%p€% Ѐà ` àà0 ¸ àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àà  àà p àNashville,€TN€€37243Ð`'À€%À€% Ðò òó óÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àò òó óà À àà  àà p àò òRANDALL€EUGENE€NICHOLSÐ X)ø  Ðó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` €%` €%àà0¸ €%¸ €%àà0h€%€%àà0Àh€%h€%àò òà  àà p àó óDistrict€Attorney€General€ÐZ*ú !À€%À€% Ðà ` àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò òMARSHA€SELECMANÐ R,ò"# Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àó óAssistant€District€Attorney€GeneralÐ T-ô#$ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p à400€MainÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àP.O.€Box€1468€Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àKnoxville,€TN€37901„1468€ÌÌÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED€________________________ÌÌAFFIRMED€IN€PART;€REVERSED€IN€PART;€ÌREMANDED€FOR€RESENTENCINGÌÐ ;¼12 ÐTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGEò òó óÐ  `  ÐÔ_ÔÓ  ÓÔ€°°ˆŠHSÔò òòòOPINIONóóó óÔ€ŠHSˆ°°ÔÐ `  ÐÓ  ÓÌÓÓÌà ` àDefendant€Ramaan€Jamel€Thomas€pled€guilty€in€the€Knox€County€CriminalÐ ¾ ÐCourt€to€one€count€of€theft€of€property€worth€between€$10,000.00€and€$60,000.00Ð ® Ðand€the€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€three€years€to€be€served€in€the€CommunityÐ þž ÐAlternative€to€Prison€Program€(ð ðCAPPðð).€€The€trial€court€subsequently€revokedÐ îŽ  ÐDefendantððs€participation€in€CAPP€and€imposed€a€sentence€of€six€years€in€theÐ Þ~  ÐTennessee€Department€of€Correction,€with€credit€for€time€served€in€jail€and€in€CAPP.€Ð În ÐDefendant€challenges€his€sentence,€raising€the€following€issues:Ð ¾^ Ðà0 ` à1)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€revoked€his€placement€in€CAPP;€andЮN` €%` €% Ðà0 ` à2)€whether€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€increased€his€sentence€to€six€years.О>` €%` €% ÐAfter€a€review€of€the€record€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€in€part,€reverseÐ Ž. Ðthe€judgment€in€part,€and€remand€this€case€for€resentencing.Ð ~! ÐÌà@··(Dàò òI.€€BACKGROUNDó óˆÐ ^%þ ÐÌà ` àDefendant€was€placed€in€CAPP€on€October€17,€1996.€€On€November€22,Ð N)î  Ð1996,€a€CAPP€violation€warrant€was€filed€which€alleged€that€Defendant€had€violatedÐ >+Þ!" Ðthe€CAPP€requirements€by€failing€to€obey€the€laws€of€the€United€States€and€the€StateÐ .-Î#$ Ðof€Tennessee.€€Following€a€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€Stateððs€petition€forÐ /¾%& Ðrevocation€of€Defendantððs€participation€in€CAPP.€€On€May€23,€1997,€a€second€CAPPÐ 1®'( Ðviolation€warrant€was€filed€which€alleged€that€Defendant€had€violated€the€CAPPÐ þ2ž)* Ðrequirements€by€failing€to€remain€employed,€failing€to€pay€fees,€failing€to€report,€andÐ î4Ž+, Ðfailing€to€perform€community€service.€€Following€another€hearing,€the€trial€courtÐ Þ6~-. Ðdenied€the€Stateððs€petition€for€revocation€of€Defendantððs€participation€in€CAPP.€€OnÐ Î8n/0 ÐMay€27,€1998,€a€third€CAPP€violation€warrant€was€filed€which€alleged€that€DefendantÐ `  Ðhad€violated€the€CAPP€requirements€by€failing€to€pay€fees,€failing€to€report,€failingÐ P ð Ðto€keep€his€curfew,€failing€to€perform€community€service,€and€possessing/owning€aÐ @ à Ðfirearm.Ð 0Ð ÐÌà ` àAt€the€revocation€hearing€on€the€third€violation€warrant€held€June€8,€1998,Ð °  ÐHerman€Dickerson€testified€that€Defendant€had€failed€to€keep€his€curfew€on€threeÐ    Ðseparate€occasions€in€April€and€May€of€1998.€€In€addition,€Defendant€had€repeatedlyÐ ð  Ðfailed€to€report€for€classes€and€meetings,€had€failed€to€perform€community€serviceÐ à€ Ðaccording€to€schedule,€and€had€failed€to€pay€fees€on€schedule€despite€having€theÐ Ðp Ðfinancial€means€to€do€so.€€Dickerson€testified€that€in€essence,€Defendant€hadÐ À` Ðdemonstrated€an€unwillingness€to€comply€with€the€requirements€of€CAPP.Ð °P ÐÌà ` àIna€Akinola€testified€that€she€was€Defendantððs€former€girlfriend.€€On€May€27,Ð "0 Ð1998,€at€approximately€1:00€a.m.,€Defendant€left€Akinolaððs€residence€after€the€twoÐ €$  Ðhad€a€brief€argument.€€Defendant€subsequently€returned€and€pounded€on€the€door,Ð p& Ðbut€Akinola€refused€to€let€him€in.€€Defendant€then€threatened€to€damage€AkinolaððsÐ `(  Ðcar€if€she€would€not€let€him€in€the€residence.€€After€some€words€were€exchanged,Ð P*ð " ÐDefendant€and€another€girlfriend€got€into€a€vehicle€and€Akinola€went€outside.€€At€thisÐ @,à"$ Ðpoint,€Defendant€pointed€a€gun€at€Akinola€and€when€the€vehicle€he€was€in€started€toÐ 0.Ð$& Ðdrive€away,€Defendant€fired€a€shot€out€the€window.Ð  0À&( ÐÌà ` àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€stated€that€it€had€previouslyÐ 4 *, Ðfound€that€Defendant€had€violated€the€CAPP€requirements,€but€it€had€givenÐ ð5,. ÐDefendant€another€chance€with€a€warning€that€future€violations€would€have€seriousÐ à7€.0 Ðconsequences.€€The€trial€court€then€revoked€Defendantððs€participation€in€CAPPÐ Ð9p02 Ðbased€on€his€failure€to€comply€with€the€programððs€requirements.€€The€trial€court€thenÐ `  Ðincreased€the€sentence€from€three€years€to€six€years€without€any€explanation€orÐ P ð Ðfurther€elaboration.Ð @ à ÐÌà ` àOn€October€2,€1998,€Defendant€filed€a€ð ðMotion€to€Reconsiderðð€his€sentence.€Ð  À ÐThe€trial€court€conducted€a€hearing€on€the€motion€on€October€14,€1998.€€At€theÐ °  Ðbeginning€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€took€judicial€notice€of€the€fact€that€the€criminalÐ    Ðcharges€against€Defendant€for€the€incident€with€Akinola€had€been€dismissedÐ ð  Ðbecause€Akinola€had€failed€to€appear€for€trial.Ð à€ ÐÌà ` àDuring€the€hearing€on€the€motion€to€reconsider,€Kelly€Irick€testified€that€sheÐ À` Ðwas€present€during€the€altercation€between€Akinola€and€Defendant€on€May€27,€1998,Ð °P Ðand€she€never€saw€Defendant€with€a€gun€and€she€never€heard€any€shots€fired.€€Ð   @ ÐÌà ` àDefendant€testified€that€although€he€was€at€Akinolaððs€residence€on€May€27,Ð €$  Ð1998,€he€did€not€have€a€gun.€€Defendant€claimed€that€he€had€failed€to€report€andÐ p& Ðattend€CAPP€classes€because€he€had€been€working.€€Defendant€admitted€that€heÐ `(  Ðhad€not€paid€fees€according€to€schedule,€but€he€claimed€that€he€could€not€pay€theÐ P*ð " Ðfees€because€he€had€to€quit€his€job€when€he€was€arrested€for€the€incident€involvingÐ @,à"$ ÐAkinola.€€Defendant€also€admitted€that€he€had€violated€curfew,€but€he€claimed€thatÐ 0.Ð$& Ðit€only€occurred€once.Ð  0À&( ÐÌà ` àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€denied€the€motion€toÐ 4 *, Ðreconsider.€€The€court€stated€that€the€major€reason€for€its€decision€to€revokeÐ ð5,. ÐDefendantððs€placement€in€CAPP€and€to€increase€the€sentence€was€the€incidentÐ à7€.0 Ðinvolving€Akinola.Ð Ð9p02 ЇÌà@*Dàò òII.€€WAIVERó óˆÐ P ð ÐÌà ` àInitially,€the€State€contends€that€Defendant€waived€his€right€to€appeal€theÐ @à Ðrevocation€of€his€placement€in€CAPP€and€the€increase€of€his€sentence€by€failing€toÐ 0Ð Ðfile€notice€of€appeal€within€thirty€days€of€the€entry€of€the€judgment€appealed€from€asÐ  À  Ðrequired€by€Rule€4(a)€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€Appellate€Procedure.€€Although€theÐ °  Ðrecord€indicates€that€Defendant€did€not€file€notice€of€appeal€within€the€thirty€dayÐ    Ðperiod,€Rule€4(a)€expressly€provides€that€in€criminal€cases,€ð ðthe€ððnotice€of€appealððÐ ð Ðdocument€is€not€jurisdictional€and€the€filing€of€such€document€may€be€waived€in€theÐ à€ Ðinterest€of€justice.ðð€€We€have€decided€to€exercise€our€discretion€and€waive€the€timelyÐ Ðp Ðfiling€of€the€notice€of€appeal€in€order€to€consider€the€issues€raised€by€Defendant.Ð À` ÐÌà@ÃÃ'Dàò òIII.€€REVOCATIONó óˆÐ  "@ ÐÌà ` àDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€revoked€his€placementÐ &0 Ðin€CAPP.€€Ð €(   ÐÌà ` àThe€decision€to€revoke€a€Community€Corrections€sentence€rests€within€theÐ `,#$ Ðsound€discretion€of€the€trial€court€and€that€decision€will€not€be€disturbed€on€appealÐ P.ð$& Ðunless€there€is€no€substantial€evidence€to€support€the€trial€court's€conclusion€that€aÐ @0à&( Ðviolation€had€occurred.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€InÐ 02Ð(* Ðreviewing€the€trial€court's€finding,€it€is€our€obligation€to€examine€the€record€andÐ  4À*, Ðdetermine€whether€the€trial€court€has€exercised€a€conscientious€judgment€rather€thanÐ 6°,. Ðan€arbitrary€one.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Mitchellóó,€810€S.W.2d€733,€735€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð 8 .0 Ð1991).Ð ð902 Їà ` àDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€improperly€relied€on€the€incidentÐ `  Ðinvolving€Akinola€as€a€basis€for€revoking€his€placement€in€CAPP.€€Specifically,Ð P ð ÐDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€could€not€rely€on€his€alleged€possession€andÐ @ à Ðfiring€of€a€gun€because€Defendant€and€Irick€denied€that€Defendant€had€a€gun€and€theÐ 0Ð Ðcharges€involving€the€incident€were€dropped€because€Akinola€failed€to€appear€forÐ  À Ðtrial.€€However,€after€observing€the€testimony€and€demeanor€of€Akinola,€Irick,€andÐ °  ÐDefendant,€the€trial€court€accredited€the€testimony€of€Akinola€and€found€that€Irick€andÐ    ÐDefendant€had€been€untruthful.€€Contrary€to€Defendantððs€assertions,€nothing€in€theÐ ð  ÐCommunity€Corrections€Act€provides€that€a€violation€of€a€Community€CorrectionsÐ à€ Ðsentence€must€result€in€a€criminal€conviction€in€order€to€be€considered€by€a€trial€courtÐ Ðp Ðas€a€basis€for€revocation.€€Moreover,€the€proof€of€a€violation€need€not€be€establishedÐ À` Ðbeyond€a€reasonable€doubt,€but€it€is€sufficient€if€it€allows€the€trial€judge€to€make€aÐ °P Ðconscientious€and€intelligent€decision.€€òòHarkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€at€82.Ð   @ ÐÌà ` àMoreover,€even€without€the€incident€involving€Akinola,€there€was€substantialÐ €$  Ðother€evidence€that€Defendant€violated€the€requirements€of€CAPP.€€Indeed,Ð p& ÐDickerson€testified€that€Defendant€had€failed€to€keep€his€curfew€on€three€separateÐ `(  Ðoccasions,€had€repeatedly€failed€to€report€for€classes€and€meetings,€had€failed€toÐ P*ð " Ðperform€community€service€according€to€schedule,€and€had€failed€to€pay€fees€onÐ @,à"$ Ðschedule€despite€having€the€financial€means€to€do€so.€€Under€these€circumstances,Ð 0.Ð$& Ðthe€trial€court€was€clearly€justified€in€revoking€Defendantððs€placement€in€CAPP.€Ð  0À&( ÐDefendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.Ð 2°(* ÐÌÌÌÐ Ð9p02 Ðà@ee#Dàò òIV.€€INCREASE€IN€SENTENCEó óˆÐ `  ÐÌà ` àDefendant€contends€that€the€trial€court€erred€when€it€increased€his€sentenceÐ P ð Ðfrom€three€to€six€years.Ð @à ÐÌà ` àThe€Community€Corrections€Act€provides€that€once€a€defendant€violates€theÐ  À  Ðterms€of€his€or€her€Community€Corrections€sentence,€the€trial€court€may€revoke€theÐ °  Ðsentence€and€impose€a€new€sentence:Ð    Ðà0 ` àÓÓThe€court€shall€also€possess€the€power€to€revoke€the€sentence€imposed€atÐ ð Ðany€time€due€to€the€conduct€of€the€defendant€or€the€termination€or€modificationÐ èˆ Ðof€the€program€to€which€the€defendant€has€been€sentenced,€and€the€courtÐ à€ Ðmay€resentence€the€defendant€to€any€appropriate€sentencing€alternative,Ð Øx Ðincluding€incarceration,€for€any€period€of€time€up€to€the€maximum€sentenceÐ Ðp Ðprovided€for€the€offense€committed,€less€any€time€actually€served€in€anyÐ Èh Ðcommunity-based€alternative€to€incarceration.€€ÐÀ`` €%` €% ÐÌÓÓTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-36-106(e)(4)€(Supp.€1999).€€Ð ° P ÐÌà ` àAlthough€the€above€statute€makes€it€clear€that€a€trial€court€has€the€authorityÐ $0 Ðto€increase€the€length€of€sentence€upon€the€revocation€of€a€Community€CorrectionsÐ €&  Ðsentence,€there€are€certain€requirements€that€must€be€satisfied€before€the€trial€courtÐ p(  Ðmay€do€so.€€First,€the€trial€court€must€state€its€reasons€for€imposing€a€new€sentenceÐ `*!" Ðon€the€record.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-209(c),€€-210(f)ð!ð(g)€(1997€&€Supp.€1999)òòóó.€Ð P,ð"$ ÐIn€addition,€the€record€of€the€sentencing€hearing€"shall€include€specific€findings€ofÐ @.à$& Ðfact€upon€which€application€of€the€sentencing€principles€was€based."€Tenn.€CodeÐ 00Ð&( ÐAnn.€ðð€40-35-209(c)€(1997).€€Further,€Ð  2À(* ÐÓÓà0 ` àà ¸ à(f)€Whenever€the€court€imposes€a€sentence,€it€shall€place€on€the€recordÐ 4°*, Ðeither€orally€or€in€writing€what€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors€it€found,€ifÐ 5¨+- Ðany,€as€well€as€findings€of€fact€as€required€by€ðð€40-35-209.€€Ð6 ,.` €%` €% Ðà0 ` àà ¸ à(g)€A€sentence€must€be€based€on€evidence€in€the€record€of€the€trial,€theÐ ø6˜-/ Ðsentencing€hearing,€the€presentence€report,€and,€the€record€of€prior€felonyÐ ð7.0 Ðconvictions€filed€by€the€district€attorney€general€with€the€court€as€required€byÐ è8ˆ/1 Ððð€40-35-202(a).€€Ðà9€02` €%` €% ЇÓÓTenn€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-210€(Supp.€1999).€€These€statutory€provisions€areÐ `  Ðmandatory€and€the€fact€that€this€Court€reviews€sentences€de€novo€does€not€relieveÐ P ð Ðthe€trial€court€from€complying€with€these€statutory€mandates.€€òòState€v.€Ervinóó,€939Ð @ à ÐS.W.2d€581,€584€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.1996);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòBaker€v.€Stateóó,€989€S.W.2d€739,Ð 0Ð Ð741€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998).€€Ð  À ÐÌà ` àIn€the€revocation€hearing€of€this€case,€the€trial€court€made€certain€findings€ofÐ    Ðfact€in€regard€to€the€basis€for€revocation,€but€the€trial€court€did€not€make€any€findingsÐ ð  Ðof€fact€in€regard€to€the€basis€for€the€increase€in€the€length€of€sentence.€€In€fact,€theÐ à€ Ðtrial€court€did€not€identify€any€reason€whatsoever€for€increasing€the€length€ofÐ Ðp Ðsentence.€€It€is€true€that€during€the€hearing€on€the€motion€to€reconsider,€the€trial€courtÐ À` Ðindicated€that€it€had€increased€the€length€of€sentence€based€on€Defendantððs€conductÐ °P Ðduring€the€incident€with€Akinola.€€However,€the€trial€court€failed€to€identify€theÐ   @ Ðenhancement€and€mitigating€factors€that€applied€to€Defendantððs€sentence€and€theÐ "0 Ðcourt€failed€to€identify€the€findings€of€fact€that€would€have€supported€the€applicationÐ €$  Ðof€any€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors.Ð p& ÐÌà ` àQuite€simply,€the€trial€court€did€not€follow€the€sentencing€procedures€set€forthÐ P*ð " Ðin€the€1989€Sentencing€Act€when€it€increased€the€length€of€Defendantððs€sentence.€Ð @,à"$ ÐThe€court€did€not€address€the€purposes€or€sentencing€considerations€of€the€Act.€€NorÐ 0.Ð$& Ðdid€the€court€set€forth€its€findings€with€respect€to€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors.€Ð  0À&( ÐThus,€we€cannot€conduct€the€statutorily€mandated€de€novo€review€of€the€increasedÐ 2°(* Ðsentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€upon€revocation€of€the€CAPP€sentence.€€òòSeeóóÐ 4 *, ÐòòState€v.€Cooperóó,€977€S.W.2d€130,€132€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998);€òòErvinóó,€939€S.W.2dÐ ð5,. Ðat€584.€€We€therefore€reverse€Defendantððs€increased€sentence€and€we€remand€thisÐ à7€.0 Ðcase€for€a€new€sentencing€hearing€consistent€with€the€principles€outlined€in€thisÐ Ð9p02 Ðopinion.€€òòSeeóó€òòCooperóó,€977€S.W.2d€at€132;€òòErvinóó,€939€S.W.2d€at€584.€We€wish€toÐ `  Ðemphasize€that€although€there€may€be€valid€grounds€for€an€increased€sentence,€theÐ P ð Ðtrial€court€may€not€increase€the€sentence€for€the€sole€purpose€of€punishingÐ @ à ÐDefendant€for€violating€the€requirements€of€his€CAPP€sentence.€òòSeeóó€òòErvinóó,€939Ð 0Ð ÐS.W.2d€at€583.Ð  À ÐÌà@ÌÌ(Dàò òV.€€CONCLUSIONó óˆÐ    ÐÌà ` àFor€the€reasons€stated€above,€we€affirm€the€trial€courtððs€revocation€ofÐ ð ÐDefendantððs€placement€in€CAPP.€€However,€we€reverse€the€increased€sentenceÐ à€ Ðimposed€by€the€trial€court€and€we€remand€this€case€for€a€new€sentencing€hearingÐ Ðp Ðconsistent€with€the€principles€outlined€in€this€opinion.Ð À` Ðà ` à€€€€€Ð ° P ÐÓÓÌ€€à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ð ˜#8 Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JudgeÐ $0 ÐÌÌÌCONCUR:Ð p(  ÐÌÌÌ___________________________________Ð P,ð"$ ÐJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€JudgeÐ H-è#% ÐÌÌ___________________________________Ð 00Ð&( ÐJERRY€L.€SMITH,€JudgeÐ (1È') ÐÌÌ