ÿWPC{ ^Z)îí#yŒ‚P“QÂÉa§Á2WO¸ö.N ›fòfð4Ú\T>Ít-ͧ} êÖú-=‹u\õcÙ…s ãýì ~´¬çâÕàpq8µÍËÇ#ÍŸqòÌ&Ùõ«?&om áQmæRä¨ñ†“±vU{åË6ãã9<Š‘«I݉ŽÝ ¯±härÁ^@Ê@§Lc 7W¸4ìæB 1 ǸŠ5 Sè¹(wÏTÊ›d4Óról[ËÇ!š¤6¿¬""’;éå42΃œ1ÄæñÕò³.ÔaUZScºN·‡DÉïôør`¡­ © Õ?Ãqp沈¶2ëÏ€íâD~öBþN¡ü‹¤£K>8m CL‰§ÐÑ$¤)À¦êÿ™Gˆ8”;ὟQW7®uñè0?‡yn»O*~êâAsÏ!ì]~fì´R@?ocø•Øz)wùñúÜ‘! Gûd…ë³;r¶Ñc÷hª‡]7 Q )^ÿòMf]6–Ʋй ã'1™j´¡Þ]`žOai©y™ˆÓÏIDŒ×ë“qÃâÚPލŠeQ-[ggwI·ü1 ÖÜAŠg4øk‘íQ† UËÞ:Rw–Nôb %\^ b 0ˆnU)NöwD4H\ zkÒå· m¹ U@Ð Ð Æ ÆÖ Æœ Æb #Á( Né 0Dëã/ERfffffffffffffffffffffbnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 0ëvvvv Baa 0¤~ D5" D-W 0K„„ ASÏÆ" 0¤è 0DŒ A«Ð»¬Š~+â (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularyG*ê:i¢Ø+003|x ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5˜HP LaserJet 4050ÈÈÈÈÈÈÈÈ0(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó ÙÝ ƒR¯‘$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¿ ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ_ÔThe€defendant€does€not€challenge€the€length€of€his€sentence,€as€it€was€an€agreed€five„year€sentence.€€Instead,Ð ° Ðthe€defendant€challenges€the€trial€courtððs€application€of€the€sentencing€enhancement€factors€in€relation€to€their€applicationÐ tÄ Ðto€the€denial€of€alternative€sentencing.€€We€address€the€defendant's€Ô_ÔissuesÔ_Ô€I€(whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€sentencingÐ 8ˆ Ðthe€defendant€to€the€Tennessee€Department€of€Correction€and€in€failing€to€grant€him€an€alternative€sentence),€III€(whetherÐ üL Ðthe€court€erred€by€failing€to€place€on€the€record€sufficient€findings€of€fact€and€reasons€for€enhancement€as€required€byÐ À ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„209(c)€and€„210(f)),€IV(whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€finding€that€the€crime€was€committedÐ „Ô Ðto€gratify€the€defendant's€desire€for€pleasure€or€excitement),€and€V€(whether€the€trial€court€erred€in€finding€a€prior€historyÐ H ˜ Ðof€criminal€convictions€as€an€enhancement€factor)€as€a€single€issue. HÝ ƒR¯‘$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¿ ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔDefendant€was€indicted€under€the€spelling€ð ðTulloch,ðð€but€other€pleadings€use€the€spelling€ð ðTullock.ðð€€PursuantÐ ° Ðto€our€policy,€we€utilize€the€spelling€in€the€indictment.€€ - ù-(|G2¯‘$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¿ ò»»Ô d(|3ÿq$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿq$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ¥»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ ¥»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼ ¥»»»ÔÑ8€T)XXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î4 ¥ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼ ¥»îî4 #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€September€25,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ ¥»XXT) #ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€TRACY€Ô_ÔTULLOCHÔ_Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔCockeÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€7450€€€€€€O.€Duane€Ô_ÔSloneÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2000„03046„CCA„R3„CDÐ ¥õ  ÐNovember€30,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ‘á  ÐßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant€entered€a€negotiated€plea€of€guilty€to€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€for€anÐ xÈ  Ðagreed€sentence€of€five€years€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender,€with€the€issue€of€alternative€sentencingÐ d´ Ðto€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€five€yearsÐ P  Ðincarceration.€€In€this€appeal,€the€defendant€contends€(1)€the€trial€court€erroneously€sentenced€theÐ <Œ Ðdefendant€without€a€sex€offender€evaluation€required€by€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„705;€Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)í#ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ôand€(2)€theÐ (x Ðtrial€court€improperly€applied€sentencing€enhancement€factors€and€should€have€sentenced€theÐ d Ðdefendant€to€alternative€sentencing.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)¸#ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ô€After€a€thorough€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgmentÐ P Ðof€the€trial€court.€€Ð ì< ÐÓYÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€AffirmedÔ#†¼ ¥»XXT) #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ôó óÐ Ä ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ ¥»àXT)" #ÔÔ‡XT)X.¼ ¥ÔJoe€G.€Riley,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJoseph€M.€Ô_ÔTiptonÔ_Ôóó€Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)Œ #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ôand€òòAlan€E.Ð œì ÐGlenn,óó€JJ.,€joined.Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)G #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥ÔÐ ˆØ ÐÌRonald€R.€Reagan€(at€hearing)€and€Dennis€C.€Campbell€(on€appeal),€Ô_ÔSeviervilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€theÐ `° Ðappellant,€Tracy€Ô_ÔTullochÔ_Ô.€€Ð L œ Ðâ âÐ 8!ˆ ý ÐÔ_ÔPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Mark€A.€Fulks,Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT) #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ô€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)q #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ô€AlÐ ° ÐC.€Schmutzer,€Jr.,€District€Attorney€General;€and€James€B.€Dunn,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ œì ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)Ï #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ô€Ô#†¼ ¥»XXT)È#ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥Ô€Ð ˆØ Ðâ âÌÓ] ÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ ¥»XXT) #ÔÔ‡XT)X»¼ ¥ÔÐ L œ ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ ¥»XXT)Œ#ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XT)X»¼ ¥Ôà  àThe€defendant€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€the€offense€of€attempted€aggravated€sexual€batteryÐ $ t Ðcommitted€in€October€1997€against€his€four„year„old€stepdaughter.€€Although€the€plea€agreementÐ  ` Ðspecified€a€sentence€of€five€years,€the€manner€of€service€of€the€sentence€was€to€be€determined€by€theÐ ü L  Ðtrial€court€at€a€sentencing€hearing.€€Ð è 8  ÐÌÌà  àà@@ @ ìàò òTESTIMONY€AT€SENTENCING€HEARINGó óˆÐ ¬ü  ÐÌà  àDetective€Maurice€Shults€of€the€Newport€Police€Department€testified€defendant€was€the€four„Ð „Ô  Ðyear„old€victim's€stepfather.€€The€victim€informed€Shults€of€the€defendantððs€sexual€activity€with€herÐ pÀ Ðafter€the€victim€and€defendant€watched€an€X„rated€movie.€€Officers€seized€the€victim's€underwear;Ð \¬ Ða€lab€test€detected€semen€on€them;€and€the€DNA€test€excluded€the€natural€father€but€not€theÐ H˜ Ðdefendant€as€a€possible€donor.€€The€defendant€first€denied€ever€being€alone€with€the€victim€butÐ 4„ Ðsubsequently€conceded€he€had€been€alone€with€the€victim.€€Ð  p ÐÌà  àOfficers€seized€an€X„rated€videotape€entitled€ð ðBang„a„Thonðð€at€the€residence.€€The€victimððsÐ øH Ðdescription€of€the€tape€she€watched€was€similar€to€the€tape€seized.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€did€not€testify€at€the€sentencing€hearing.€€In€the€pre„sentence€report,€he€deniedÐ ¼  Ðguilt€of€the€offense.€€He€contended€he€did€not€show€the€video€to€the€child,€but€rather€sheÐ ¨ø Ðindependently€watched€part€of€it€before€he€could€stop€her.€€He€blamed€the€charge€on€the€childððsÐ ”ä Ðnatural€fatherððs€ð ðtwist[ing]€and€bend[ing]€the€truthðð€in€order€to€ð ðhave€me€thrown€in€jail.ððÐ €Ð ÐÌà  àThe€pre„sentence€report€revealed€that€the€thirty„one„year„old€defendant€had€been€adjudicatedÐ X ¨ Ðdelinquent€for€the€offense€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€when€the€defendant€was€approximatelyÐ D!” Ðfourteen€years€old.€€Ð 0"€  ÐÌÌà@» » ìàò òI.€€SEX€OFFENDER€EVALUATIONó óˆÐ ô$D # ÐÌà  àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„13„705€(Supp.€1998)€provides:Ð Ì&"% ÐÌÒ°ÒÒ°Ò(a)€.€.€.€[E]ach€sex€offender€who€is€to€be€considered€for€probation€or€any€otherÐ ¤(ô#' Ðalternative€sentencing€shall€be€required€to€submit€to€an€evaluation€for€treatment,€riskÐ )à$( Ðâ âpotential,€procedures€required€for€monitoring€of€behavior€to€protect€victims€andÐ |*Ì%) Ðpotential€victims,€and€an€identification€under€the€procedures€developed€pursuant€toÐ ° Ððð€39-13-704(d)(1).Ð œì Ðâ âÌ(b)€Those€offenders€found€guilty€at€trial€or€who€pled€guilty€without€an€agreement€asÐ tÄ Ðto€length€of€sentence€and/or€probation€and/or€alternative€sentencing€that€are€to€haveÐ `° Ða€pre-sentence€report€prepared€for€submission€to€the€court€shall€be€required€to€submitÐ L œ Ðto€the€evaluation€referred€to€in€subsection€(a).€€Such€evaluation€shall€be€included€asÐ 8 ˆ Ðpart€of€the€pre-sentence€report€and€shall€be€considered€by€the€court€in€determining€theÐ $ t Ðsentencing€issues€herein€stated.€€If€the€court€grants€probation€or€alternativeÐ  ` Ðsentencing,€any€plan€of€treatment€recommended€by€such€evaluation€shall€be€aÐ ü L  Ðcondition€of€the€probation€or€alternative€sentencing.€€Those€offenders,€that,€as€partÐ è 8  Ðof€a€negotiated€settlement€of€their€case,€are€to€be€placed€on€probation€or€alternativeÐ Ô$  Ðsentencing€shall€be€required€to€submit€to€the€evaluation€referred€to€in€subsection€(a)Ð À  Ðas€a€condition€of€their€probation€or€alternative€sentencing€and€any€plan€of€treatmentÐ ¬ü  Ðrecommended€by€such€evaluation€shall€be€a€condition€of€probation€or€alternativeÐ ˜è  Ðsentencing.€€Ð „Ô  ÐÒ°EÒÒ°7ÒÌà  àDefendant€correctly€points€out€the€evaluation€is€not€a€part€of€the€record,€and€the€trial€courtÐ \¬ Ðmade€no€reference€to€it€in€sentencing€the€defendant.€€However,€the€pre„sentence€report€indicates€theÐ H˜ Ðdefendant€was€referred€to€an€agency€for€evaluation€and€treatment€well€over€a€month€prior€to€theÐ 4„ Ðsentencing€hearing,€and€defendant€informed€the€pre„sentence€report€officer€that€he€had€anÐ  p Ðappointment€on€August€1òòstóó,€€which€was€three€weeks€before€the€sentencing€hearing.€€Ð  \ ÐÌà  àNo€objection€or€reference€to€the€evaluation€was€made€by€defendant€at€the€hearing;€thus,€theÐ ä4 Ðissue€is€waived.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€36(a).€€Furthermore,€it€is€appellantððs€responsibility€to€provide€thisÐ Ð  Ðcourt€with€all€proper€records,€if€indeed€they€do€exist,€with€regard€to€an€appellate€issue.€€Tenn.€R.Ð ¼  ÐApp.€P.€24(b);€òòsee€òòóóState€v.€Tayloróó,€992€S.W.2d€941,€944€(Tenn.€1999).€€In€addition,€we€subsequentlyÐ ¨ø Ðconclude€in€this€opinion€that€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€alternative€sentencing.€€For€theseÐ ”ä Ðreasons,€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€relief€on€this€issue.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌÓ  ÓÌà@@44ìàò òII.€€DENIAL€OF€ALTERNATIVE€SENTENCINGó óÐ D!” Ðò òÓ  ÓÌA.€€Standard€of€Reviewó óÐ #l! ÐÌÔ‡ XT)XXXT)Ôà  àThis€courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€with€a€presumptionÐ ô$D # Ðof€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€conditioned€upon€anÐ à%0!$ Ðaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€judge€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€allÐ Ì&"% Ðrelevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543€(Tenn.€1999).€€If€the€trialÐ ¸'#& Ðcourt€fails€to€comply€with€the€statutory€directives,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€and€ourÐ ¤(ô#' Ðreview€is€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Pooleóó,€945€S.W.2d€93,€96€(Tenn.€1997).Ð )à$( Ðâ âÐ |*Ì%) Ðà  àUnder€the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989,€trial€judges€are€encouraged€to€useÐ ° Ðâ âalternatives€to€incarceration.€€An€especially€mitigated€or€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,Ð œì ÐD€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€options€in€theÐ ˆØ Ðabsence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6).Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àIn€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€may€consider€the€need€to€protectÐ L œ Ðsociety€by€restraining€a€defendant€having€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct,€the€need€to€avoidÐ 8 ˆ Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€whether€confinement€is€particularly€appropriate€toÐ $ t Ðeffectively€deter€others€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses,€and€whether€less€restrictive€measures€haveÐ  ` Ðoften€or€recently€been€unsuccessfully€applied€to€the€defendant.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1);Ð ü L  Ðòòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€Ð è 8  ÐÌà  àA€court€may€also€consider€the€mitigating€and€enhancing€factors€set€forth€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð À  Ððððð€40„35„113€and€114€as€they€are€relevant€to€the€ðð€40„35„103€considerations.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ ¬ü  Ð40„35„210(b)(5);€òòState€v.€Bostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€435,€438€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€€Additionally,€aÐ ˜è  Ðcourt€should€consider€the€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation€whenÐ „Ô  Ðdetermining€if€an€alternative€sentence€would€be€appropriate.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);Ð pÀ ÐòòBostonóó,€938€S.W.2d€at€438.€€Ð \¬ ÐÌÔ#†XT)XX XT) &#Ôò òB.€€AnalysisÐ 4„ ÐÌó óà  àTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„209(c)€requires€the€trial€court€to€make€ð ðspecific€findings€of€factÐ  \ Ðupon€which€application€of€the€sentencing€principles€was€based.ðð€€Such€findings€shall€be€a€part€of€theÐ øH Ðrecord.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(f).€€The€sole€issue€at€the€sentencing€hearing€was€the€mannerÐ ä4 Ðof€service€of€the€agreed€five„year€sentence.€€The€trial€court€specifically€noted€the€presence€of€threeÐ Ð  Ðenhancement€factors€and€the€absence€of€any€mitigating€factors.€€The€trial€court€did€not€make€anyÐ ¼  Ðspecific€findings€relating€to€alternative€sentencing€under€the€standards€announced€in€Tenn.€CodeÐ ¨ø ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„103(1).€€Thus,€we€review€the€denial€of€alternative€sentencing€òòde€novoóó€without€anyÐ ”ä Ðpresumption€of€correctness.€€Ð €Ð ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€applied€sentencing€enhancement€factors€(1)€(previous€history€of€criminalÐ X ¨ Ðconvictions€or€criminal€behavior€in€addition€to€those€necessary€to€establish€the€appropriate€range),Ð D!” Ð(7)€(the€offense€was€committed€to€gratify€the€defendant's€desire€for€pleasure€or€excitement),€and€(15)Ð 0"€  Ð(abuse€of€a€position€of€private€trust).€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114.€€The€trial€court€placed€greatÐ #l! Ðweight€upon€the€last€enhancement€factor.€€Ð $X" ÐÌà  àOn€appeal,€the€state€concedes€that€the€trial€court's€reliance€upon€factor€(1)€was€misplaced.€Ð à%0!$ ÐThe€juvenile€adjudication€of€aggravated€sexual€battery€does€not€qualify€under€factor€(1);€however,Ð Ì&"% Ðthe€defendant's€juvenile€adjudication€renders€enhancement€factor€(20)€applicable€(defendant€wasÐ ¸'#& Ðadjudicated€to€have€committed€a€delinquent€act€as€a€juvenile€that€would€constitute€a€felony€ifÐ ¤(ô#' Ðcommitted€by€an€adult).€€òòState€v.€Adamsóó,€45€S.W.3d€46,€58€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2000);€Tenn.€CodeÐ )à$( ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„114(20).€€Accordingly,€we€apply€enhancement€factor€(20).€€We€do€not€give€it€greatÐ |*Ì%) Ðweight€as€the€juvenile€adjudication€was€approximately€seventeen€years€ago.€€Ð h+¸&* Їà  àThe€trial€court€erred€in€applying€enhancement€factor€(7).€€Although€this€enhancement€factorÐ ° Ðmay€at€times€be€applied€to€the€offense€of€rape,€òòseeóó€òòState€v.€Arnettóó,€49€S.W.3d€250,€262€(Tenn.€2001),Ð œì Ðit€may€not€be€applied€to€attempted€aggravated€sexual€battery€because€sexual€gratification€is€anÐ ˆØ Ðelement€of€this€offense.€òò€Seeóó€òòóóòòState€v.€Waltonóó,€958€S.W.2d€724,€730€n.6€(Tenn.€1997).€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€properly€applied€enhancement€factor€(15)€as€the€defendant€clearly€abused€aÐ L œ Ðposition€of€private€trust.€€We€agree€with€the€trial€court€that€this€is€entitled€to€great€weight.€€Ð 8 ˆ ÐÌà  àWe€further€conclude€that€confinement€is€necessary€in€order€to€avoid€depreciating€theÐ  ` Ðseriousness€of€the€offense.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B).€€The€victim€in€this€case€was€fourÐ ü L  Ðyears€old,€far€below€the€age€of€thirteen€which€is€the€age€limitation€for€attempted€aggravated€sexualÐ è 8  Ðbattery.€€The€facts€are€appalling.€€Ð Ô$  ÐÌà  àBased€upon€our€òòde€novoóó€review,€we€conclude€the€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€alternativeÐ ¬ü  Ðsentencing.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.€€à p àà È àà  àà x àà Ð àÐ ˜è  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð \¬ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGE