ÿWPC1 IDJæa³X±y`Y±yÀÜ ™»ÊI°b+cò®¯ˆq„N=‚ßßLÖU/¬tŸ¶×så½éïÇèòÃ+ÖL:ƒÃQ÷Lºóv¡¨ /h)-Éç^L°ÆÑÌà÷‡°¥N¼û®x–\’Ÿw)«YÞ6%'õqf):@fg̈f„Ç&;•xyêÄv\|e‰_´óþÁø´–×cª_>Eg+“8uÇýÄ|°·®<û$Íým%ž"ž€®…½AQß'ûÃÂÌít“6¬³? N{ÒÚúü%jͪ é“µob…"#q5+ ¸(Â÷*ô Yœ^ïaÚÉá»&ñtxx–œÂ™©Ǿ*¾É&îÊÀ–, ¯oEìnwè—;W‰ÇbÆZ•?Ù&F +äo¾H2r¿ÖFM³lë;æÙYïùŘO5C¯S]ˆ^,ºH¾{½Íaˆ¶Ô0ÿG«B«qvˆèÖUdN„ïõ62Ë7 Sî G\y÷Õ}…ž]¿"â  HÉÁ¼>L +o‰G'õìm}쫵n-§Yjs½fkì0q[ >ï[r¾íëç ^­>si¸JÐNó%(ÝÝçBÆèßé¨'$¦êÀ†¾ÿX|€Äb#É\ %% #+ 0ˆN UNÖ 0D$ ^ h zt Òî wÀ NÄ 4Æ Ú Æé ƯÆuÆ;N mEb&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 0ë.... B 0¤6 D3Ú D-  0K:: AS…ÆØ 0¤ž 0DB A«†˜\\IB01S08\KNOXCLERK3ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0» Ý ƒRCÞ$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôõåò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€officer€testified€that€he€sent€the€test€sample€to€the€ð ðlabðð€and€learned€of€the€results€later€when€he€receivedÐ ° Ðthe€lab€report.(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóóµ©}1Þ  ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptóbï.ê:i¢×+003|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ - ù-(|G2CÞ$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€AM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ôõåò»»Ô d(|3z$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€AM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3z$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€AM»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€AM»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼AM»»»ÔÑ8€ UXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  Ñà@ttìàÔ‡îWàAMÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@WW$ìàAT€KNOXVILLEÔ#†¼AM»îîWà #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAssigned€on€Briefs€August€18,€2004Ð üL ÐÔ‡X UX»¼AMÔÌò òÔ#†¼AM»XX U#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€JODY€LEE€TURNERòòóóÔ‡X UX»¼AMÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òAppeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Cumberland€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNoà0 @ às.€7280€and€7454€€€€€€Leon€Burns,€Jr.,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€E2004„00060„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€November€29,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓFollowing€his€guilty€plea€to€two€counts€of€theft,€the€defendant,€Jody€Lee€Turner,€was€sentenced€inÐ xÈ  Ðthe€Cumberland€County€Criminal€Court€to€an€effective€four„year€term€to€be€served€on€probation,Ð d´ Ðsupervised€by€a€community€corrections€program€agency.€€A€few€weeks€later,€the€court€revoked€theÐ P  Ðcommunity€placement€and€ordered€the€defendant€to€serve€his€four„year€sentence€in€the€DepartmentÐ <Œ Ðof€Correction.€€From€that€order,€the€defendant€appeals.€€Upon€review,€we€affirm€the€judgmentsÐ (x Ðbelow.Ô#†¼AM»XX U#ÔÔ‡X UX»¼AMÔÐ d ÐÓ´ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3;€Judgments€of€the€Criminal€Court€are€Affirmed.ó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼AM»àX U-#ÔÔ‡X UX.¼AMÔJames€Curwood€Witt,€Jr.,€óóJ.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayesóó€andÐ Ä ÐòòAlan€E.€Glenn,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌDavid€Brady,€District€Public€Defender;€and€John€B.€Nisbet,€III,€and€Joe€L.€Finley,€Jr.,€AssistantÐ ˆØ ÐDistrict€Public€Defenders,€Ô_ÔCookevilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€Appellant,€Jody€Lee€Turner.Ð tÄ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€&€Reporter;€Kathy€D.€Aslinger,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð L œ ÐWilliam€E.€Gibson,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Kevin€Poore,€Assistant€District€Attorney€General,Ð 8!ˆ  Ðfor€the€Appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð $"t! ÐÓÒÓÌò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼AM»XX U#ÔÔ‡X UX»¼AMÔÐ ü#L# ÐòòóóÔ#†¼AM»XX U6 #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€X UX»¼AMÔà0  àà0` (#(#àÐ ` (#` (# Ðà  àà ` àOn€October€1,€2003,€the€defendant€pleaded€guilty€to€theft€of€property€valued€in€excessÐ Ô%$!% Ðof€$500,€a€Class€E€felony,€and€to€theft€of€property€valued€in€excess€of€$1,000,€a€Class€D€felony.€€òòSeeÐ À&"& Ðgenerallyóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€39„14„103,€„105€(2003).€€As€a€Range€I€offender,€he€received€a€two„Ð ¬'ü"' Ðyear€sentence€for€the€Class€E€felony€and€a€four„year€sentence€for€the€Class€D€felony.€€The€trial€courtÐ ˜(è#( Ðimposed€the€sentences€to€run€concurrently,€yielding€an€effective€sentence€of€four€years.€€The€trialÐ „)Ô$) Ðcourt€ordered€that€the€sentences€be€ð ðsuspended€to€[Department€of€Correction]€probation€supervisedÐ p*À%* Ðby€[community€corrections].ðð€€Consequently,€the€court€ordered€the€defendant€to€comply€with€theÐ \+¬&+ Ðrequirements€and€conditions€of€the€community€corrections€program,€including€requirements€that€heÐ H,˜', Ðobey€all€applicable€laws,€refrain€from€the€use€of€drugs,€and€submit€to€drug€screens.Ð 4-„(-ý Їà  àà ` àOn€November€7,€2003,€the€state€filed€a€community€corrections€violation€report€andÐ ° Ðalleged€that€the€defendant€had€tested€positively€for€the€use€of€methamphetamine€on€October€30€andÐ œì Ðthat€on€November€4,€2003,€he€admitted€to€using€methamphetamine€and€refused€to€submit€to€a€drugÐ ˆØ Ðscreen.€€Ð tÄ ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€December€1,€2003,€the€trial€court€conducted€a€revocation€hearing.€€TheÐ L œ Ðdefendantððs€probation€officer€testified€that€the€defendant€entered€the€community€corrections€programÐ 8 ˆ Ðon€October€1,€2003,€and€was€given€a€drug€field€test€on€October€30,€which€revealed€the€consumptionÐ $ t Ðof€methamphetamine.ò òó ó׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€officer€attempted€to€administer€another€test€on€November€4,€but€theÐ  ` Ðdefendant€ð ðelected€not€to€take€the€test€[because]€he€would€fail€it€for€meth[amphetamine].ðð€€TheÐ ü L  Ðdefendant€signed€a€statement€acknowledging€that€he€had€been€using€the€drug,€and€the€officer€placedÐ è 8  Ðthe€written€statement€into€evidence.€€The€officer€testified€that,€he€believed,€the€defendant€told€himÐ Ô$  Ðthat€he€had€used€methamphetamine€on€November€3,€2003.€€Ð À  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€defendant€testified€at€the€revocation€hearing€that€he€had€maintained€employmentÐ ˜è  Ðand€had€enrolled€in€ð ðalcohol€and€drug€assessment,ðð€as€required€by€the€community€correctionsÐ „Ô  Ðprogram.€€He€attended€outpatient€classes€once€a€week€for€three€weeks€in€October€2003.€€He€admittedÐ pÀ Ðthat€he€was€addicted€to€methamphetamine€and€had€used€it€in€October€and€as€recently€as€two€weeksÐ \¬ Ðprior€to€the€hearing.€€He€testified€that€he€needed€a€program€more€intensive€than€weekly€classes.€€HeÐ H˜ Ðrequested€a€more€intensive€program€to€treat€his€addiction;€however,€he€admitted€that,€in€JanuaryÐ 4„ Ð2003,€he€declined€to€attend€a€rehabilitation€program€called€ð ðNew€Leaf.ðð€€He€admitted€on€cross„Ð  p Ðexamination€that,€when€first€questioned€by€his€probation€officer,€he€untruthfully€denied€usingÐ  \ Ðmethamphetamine.€€€Ð øH ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€judge€expressed€concern€that€the€defendant€had€rebuffed€attempts€to€treatÐ Ð  Ðhis€substance€abuse€problems€in€January€2003,€following€an€arrest€for€driving€under€the€influence.€Ð ¼  ÐThe€judge€observed€that€the€defendant€had€refused€to€ð ðget€seriousðð€about€his€drug€problem€until€afterÐ ¨ø Ðhe€had€been€placed€on€probation€and€had€been€caught€in€violation€of€the€rules.€€Based€upon€the€useÐ ”ä Ðof€methamphetamine€demonstrated€by€the€drug€screen€and€the€defendantððs€admission,€the€court€onÐ €Ð ÐDecember€1,€2003,€ordered€the€revocation€of€the€defendantððs€community€corrections€placement€andÐ l¼ Ðordered€his€confinement€in€the€Department€of€Correction€to€serve€the€balance€of€his€originalÐ X ¨ Ðsentence.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€January€6,€2004,€the€defendant€filed€a€notice€of€appeal.€€On€appeal,€the€defendantÐ #l! Ðargues€that€the€order€of€incarceration€was€too€harsh€and€that,€instead€of€confining€the€defendant,€€theÐ $X" Ðtrial€court€should€have€extended€his€probation€for€two€additional€years.€€The€state€responds€that€theÐ ô$D # Ðtrial€court€acted€within€its€discretion€in€ordering€confinement€as€a€means€of€serving€the€originalÐ à%0!$ Ðsentence.€€We€agree€with€the€state.Ð Ì&"% Ðâ âÐ ¸'#& Ðà  àà ` àBefore€we€explain€our€reasoning,€we€must€address€the€defendantððs€untimely€noticeÐ ° Ðâ âof€appeal.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(b),€4(a).€€We€note€that,€in€criminal€cases,€the€notice€of€appeal€isÐ œì Ðnot€jurisdictional,€and€this€court€may€waive€the€untimely€filing€of€a€notice€of€appeal€in€the€interestsÐ ˆØ Ðof€justice.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€4(a).€€Although€the€defendant€has€not€asked€this€court€to€take€this€action,Ð tÄ Ðthe€state€has€not€moved€for€a€dismissal€of€the€appeal.€€At€any€rate,€we€conclude€that€justice€is€bestÐ `° Ðserved€by€excusing€the€filing€of€a€timely€notice.€€We,€therefore,€proceed€to€the€merits€of€the€appeal.€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€standard€of€review€upon€appeal€of€an€order€revoking€probation€is€the€abuse€ofÐ $ t Ðdiscretion€standard.€€òòState€v.€Harkinsóó,€811€S.W.2d€79,€82€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€order€for€an€abuse€ofÐ  ` Ðdiscretion€to€occur,€the€reviewing€court€must€find€that€the€record€contains€no€substantial€evidenceÐ ü L  Ðto€support€the€conclusion€of€the€trial€judge€that€a€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation€has€occurred.€Ð è 8  ÐòòId.óó;€òòState€v.€Delpóó,€614€S.W.2d€395,€398€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1980);€òòsee€State€v.€Michael€Emleróó,€No.Ð Ô$  Ð01C01-9512-CC-00424,€slip€op.€at€4€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Nov.€27,€1996)€(where€theÐ À  Ðdefendant€admits€violation€of€the€terms€of€probation,€revocation€by€the€trial€court€is€not€arbitrary€orÐ ¬ü  Ðcapricious);€òòsee€also€State€v.€Mitzi€Ann€Boydóó,€No.€03C01-9508-CC-00246,€slip€op.€at€3€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð ˜è  ÐApp.,€Knoxville,€Nov.€1,€1996).€€The€trial€court€is€required€only€to€find€that€the€violation€ofÐ „Ô  Ðprobation€occurred€by€a€preponderance€of€the€evidence.€€Tenn.€Code€€Ann.€ðð€40-35-311(e)€(2003).€Ð pÀ ÐUpon€finding€a€violation,€the€trial€court€is€vested€with€the€statutory€authority€to€ð ðrevoke€the€probationÐ \¬ Ðand€suspension€of€sentence€and€cause€the€defendant€to€commence€the€execution€of€the€judgment€asÐ H˜ Ðoriginally€entered.ðð€€òòId.€€óóFurthermore,€when€probation€is€revoked,€ð ðthe€original€judgment€so€renderedÐ 4„ Ðby€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€and€effect€from€the€date€of€the€revocation€of€such€suspension.ðð€Ð  p ÐòòIdóó.€ðð€40-35-310€(2003).€€The€trial€judge€retains€the€discretionary€authority€to€order€the€defendant€toÐ  \ Ðserve€the€original€sentenceòò.€€See€State€v.€Dukeóó,€902€S.W.2d€424,€427€(Tenn.€Ô_ÔCrimÔ_Ô.€App.€1995).Ð øH ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€the€present€case,€the€defendant€was€placed€on€probation€with€his€sentenceÐ Ð  Ðsuspended€pending€his€compliance€with€community€corrections€supervision.€€He€admitted€hisÐ ¼  Ðviolation€of€the€terms€of€his€probation€and€makes€no€claim€on€appeal€that€the€trial€court€erred€inÐ ¨ø Ðrevoking€probation.€€Although€he€urges€us€to€conclude€that€serving€the€four„year€sentence€inÐ ”ä Ðconfinement€is€too€harsh,€we€find€no€basis€for€concluding€that€the€trial€court€abused€its€discretion€inÐ €Ð Ðordering€confinement.€€The€defendant€was€apparently€addicted€to€methamphetamine€and€may€haveÐ l¼ Ðbenefitted€from€an€intensive€rehabilitation€program;€however,€the€trial€court€was€troubled€by€theÐ X ¨ Ðdefendantððs€rebuffing€attempts€in€January€2003€to€get€him€into€a€substance€abuse€program.€€The€trialÐ D!” Ðcourt€found€that€the€theft€offenses€which€are€the€bases€for€the€current€sentences€were€related€to€theÐ 0"€  Ðdefendantððs€involvement€with€methamphetamine,€and€the€court€expressed€concerns€for€the€safety€ofÐ #l! Ðthe€public€should€the€defendant€remain€in€the€community.€€€The€record€supports€the€trial€judgeððsÐ $X" Ðreasoning,€and€we€cannot€help€but€observe€that€the€defendant€continued€his€use€of€meth„Ð ô$D # Ðamphetamine,€not€only€after€submitting€his€guilty€plea€and€accepting€the€terms€of€probation,€but€evenÐ à%0!$ Ðafter€the€violation€warrant€had€been€filed.€€Given€the€record€before€us€and€the€trial€courtððs€findingsÐ Ì&"% Ðof€fact,€we€discern€no€abuse€of€discretion€in€ordering€the€four„year€sentence€served€in€the€DepartmentÐ ¸'#& Ðof€Correction.€€Ð ¤(ô#' ÐÌà  àà ` àAccordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€affirmed.à  à€Ð |*Ì%) Ðà  à€Ð h+¸&* ЇÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð tÄ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJAMES€CURWOOD€WITT,€JR.,€JUDGE