WPC /h,(:Z Az}&*Ɵn+;umWQ)>iJzPMAկ,"H_DAg IM\IYEZ?By[#fQ^WnIv51eG GP:s?3/C|޾{ 1|jPuS۠aՃ=E5BJ# aL%sy}H*[O"]v_9o\v036.6E6g .픪;F8 6{ɏq)8|@p$6\mkRkS^ӟς}*H"ay|pꖄآY{R_X(}Y@!zR2M={buUЌZR-Qӽ)|Cɬ 3 g߷ևud/)|"c7"цL<@ゐZt{sjr8i%OSnZK1+b>w^b %\^ b 0nUNwD4H\ zk m #  _ %NEb 0 B 0 D3i D- 0K ASg 0- 0D AS1 (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regularh_B0:i+003|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(|G2^$ !.8 dd8         0  < d(|3w $ !.8 dd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3w $ !.8 dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8 dd8     _    8XXdd8@hh  INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @gg$ATNASHVILLE#   #Ԉ #    @  @` XX  # XX#WILLIAMTHOMAS_UMFLEET_Ԁv.STATEOFTENNESSEEXX   / @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty  ) @@No.99C1780J.RandallWyatt,Jr.,Judge   @@*AV) ` dE< ` A    @@TTNo.M200300815CCAR3PCFiledOctober19,_2004_ z  AV) ` dE<M` A N     TheDefendant,WilliamThomas_Umfleet_,appealsfromtheorderofthetrialcourtdismissinghis F  petitionforpostconvictionreliefastimebarred.TheStatehasfiledamotionrequestingthatthis /  CourtaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule20oftheRulesoftheCourtofCriminal h Appeals.WegranttheStatesmotionandaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourt. Q  Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmedPursuant # toRule20,RulesoftheTennesseeCourtofCriminalAppeals      # X{#XX. DavidH.Welles,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJerryL.SmithandRobertW.  _Wedemeyer_,JJ.,joined. y MikeJ._Urquhart_,Nashville,Tennessee,fortheappellant,William_Umfleet_. K PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;JenniferL._Bledsoe_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; m VictorS.Johnson,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andMichael_Rohling_,AssistantDistrictAttorney V General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. ? |@@OO& MEMORANDUMOPINION # XX#XX       # XX #XX    `     h       TherecordreflectsthatonMay11,2000,theDefendantpleadedguiltytoandwasconvicted }## ofburglaryandwassentencedtosixyearsandonedayasaRangeIstandardoffender.Hewas f$$ orderedtoserveninetydaysinconfinement,withthebalancetobeservedonprobation. O% % Subsequently,aprobationviolationhearingwasconductedonJuly26,2001,afterwhichthetrial 8&!& courtrevokedtheDefendantsprobationandorderedthebalanceofhissentenceservedin !'q"' confinement.OnAugust5,2002,theDefendantfiledapetitionseekingpostconvictionrelief.The  (Z#( trialcourtconductedahearingonthepostconvictionpetitionandsubsequentlyenteredanorder (C$) dismissingthepetitionastimebarred.ItisfromthisorderthattheDefendantappeals. ),%*   Itapparentthattheoneyearstatuteoflimitationsforseekingpostconvictionrelieffromthe +&, DefendantsMay11,2000convictionforburglaryexpiredlongbeforethepostconvictionpetition ,'- wasfiledonAugust5,2002.TheDefendantsoconcedes.Nevertheless,theDefendantarguesthat -(. _theoneyearstatuteoflimitationsshouldnotstartrunninguntilJuly26,2001,thedatethatthe  Defendantsprobationwasrevokedandhewasorderedtoservethebalanceofhissentencein  confinement.TheDefendantarguesthatwiththistriggeringdateforthecommencementofthe  statuteoflimitations,hispetitionwastimelyfiled. k   AspointedoutbytheState,thiscourthasheldthatourpostconvictionprocedureactdoes =  notpermitthefilingofapetitiontoattackcollaterallythevalidityofaproceedingtorevoke & v probation.Youngv.State,101S.W.3d430,433(Tenn.Crim.App.2002).Aproceedingtorevoke  _ suspensionofasentenceandprobationisindependentoftheinitialconvictionandsentencing.Id.  H at432.WebelieveitisclearthatYoungstandsforthepropositionthatthestatuteoflimitationsfor  1  filingapostconvictionproceedingbeginstorunfromthedateofentryofthejudgmentofthe    convictionandsentencing,andthestatuteoflimitationsisnotrevivedbyasubsequentrevocation   ofprobation.Accordingly,thetrialcourtproperlyconcludedthattheDefendantspetitionforpost   convictionreliefwastimebarred.Thepetitioneralsoseekstoargueonappealthatthedismissal   ofhispostconvictionpetitionviolatestheequalprotectionclauseofboththeUnitedStatesandthe n  TennesseeConstitutions.Thisissuewasnotraisedinthetrialcourtandwethereforedeclineto W  consideritbecauseithasbeenraisedforthefirsttimeonappeal. @   Accordingly,theStatesmotionisgranted.Thejudgmentofthetrialcourtisaffirmedin b accordancewithRule20oftheRulesoftheCourtofCriminalAppeals. K    `     h     ___________________________________     `     h     DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE