ÿWPC˜ st1ö¶ï–<Ѹ—<]Ê.¯Â`¨ŠH}Q¾ù&´›O¡û]ðó}‘Æ>’‡e‘¬vMcsŸŸhÔÜë &#fÛ:ÁY]M_VPY=›SÍrm†]$Iº—n°å‘õ/Z¬ø,5ԿŲ‚£O±†-\î7ásª¥îî)¹ØÀ!þE-Îåj7B–¦Ã$Òö¥Kffi´}¤¼ß‚P eÿLä(A"Ãê:œp<ÎàDs[€„'›5xîF¼ù1t x‹õôùjž*4‰ð~Õ3á†*S}qdŽf Û±‰D:Ýܽ·e¬Qr[j©Ü–æ:-;g¼Õ€¯?3x‹Õe ç¥çÅ_3ÄjãfØÉ^Ï µ&É¡ñÇHqb’)ŠÒiƳÚq1 Š·sͨâã#±+ñÏ«TmôÑ^ldPÑà‚nmþ¥`¼$Åü[:äeê1N›Ã}BSI+Ø ,fA÷µ~È›W{ãç™ è^³o"jb %\U @b 0ˆ¢U N*^ xw„4ˆ zœÒ è ÷ mù #Á ÆÑ Æ— Æ] Æ#éNñó 0DEHJJJJJ(eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeb 0ë•••• B€€ 0¤ D3A D-t 0K¡¡ ASìÆ? 0¤ 0D© A«í»(ÆúI Z‹(Times New Roman (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman RegularÑ­*-s üPH,ê:i¢Ø+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5  Ý ƒRw¢$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¾•ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report€reflects€the€defendant€"pled€guilty€to€violation€of€the€implied€consent€law,"€was€placedÐ ° Ðon€probation€for€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days,€and€had€his€license€revoked.€€This€was€not€contested€at€theÐ tÄ Ðsentencing€hearing.€€Ordinarily,€a€violation€of€the€implied€consent€law€is€not€a€criminal€offense,€and€the€sanction€isÐ 8ˆ Ðrevocation€of€the€driver's€license.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€55„10„406(a)(3).€€Only€under€limited€circumstances€does€aÐ üL Ðmisdemeanor€conviction€result.€€òòSeeóó€òòÔ_ÔidÔ_Ôóó.€€Regardless€of€whether€this€violation€should€be€considered€under€Ô_ÔenhancementÐ À ÐfactorÔ_Ô€(1)€as€a€criminal€conviction€or€criminal€behavior,€it€would€not€affect€our€sentencing€determinations.€€(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒRw¢$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¾•ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔWe€note€the€Ô_ÔpresentenceÔ_Ô€report€reflects€defendant€was€on€probation€for€violation€of€the€implied€consent€lawÐ ° Ðwhen€he€unlawfully€possessed€alcohol,€for€which€he€was€subsequently€convicted.€€òòSeeóó€òòsupraóó€note€1€as€to€potentialÐ tÄ Ðinvalidity€of€the€probationary€penalty€for€violation€of€the€implied€consent€law.€€However,€as€we€have€stated,€underageÐ 8ˆ Ðpossession€of€alcohol€by€one€over€18€but€under€21€years€of€age€is€not€to€be€used€against€the€violator€in€any€criminalÐ üL Ðproceeding.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€57„3„412(a)(3)(C)€(Supp.€2001).€€ Ý ƒRw¢$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¾•ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€period€of€probation€may€be€for€a€period€up€to€"the€statutory€maximum€time€for€the€class€of€the€convictionÐ ° Ðoffense."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(c).€€The€total€range€of€punishment€for€burglary,€a€Class€D€felony,€is€from€twoÐ tÄ Ðto€twelve€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(b)(4).€€Thus,€the€twelve€years€of€probation€was€within€the€allowedÐ 8ˆ Ðrange.€€Although€we€question€the€wisdom€of€such€a€lengthy€period€of€probation,€we€do€not€believe€that€we€have€anÐ üL Ðappropriate€basis€to€disturb€this€sentencing€determination€by€the€trial€court.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789Ð À Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)€(Ô_ÔnotingÔ_Ô€the€appellate€court€may€not€disturb€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€simplyÐ „Ô Ðbecause€"we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result").€€- ù-(|G2w¢$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¾•ò»»Ô d(|3ÿa$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿa$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€=»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÔ€¼=»»»ÔÑ8€ZñXXdì»»d8ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼=»»¼=Ôà@ttìàÔ‡îÓ=ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼=»îîÓ+#ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  ÓAugust€14,€2002€SessionÐ üL ÐÔ‡XZñX»¼=ÔÌò òÔ#†¼=»XXZñ#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€HARLEY€B.€Ô_ÔUPCHURCHÔ_ÔÔ‡XZñX»¼=Ôó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Ô_ÔOvertonÔ_Ô€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€4934€€€€€€Ô_ÔLillieÔ_Ô€Ann€Sells,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2001„03170„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€September€9,€Ô_Ô2002Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓDefendant€pled€guilty€to€burglary,€theft€under€$500,€and€vandalism€under€$500€and€was€sentencedÐ xÈ  Ðby€the€trial€court€to€an€effective€sentence€of€four€years€with€the€requirement€that€he€serve€one€yearÐ d´ Ð"day€for€day"€in€the€county€jail€followed€by€twelve€years€of€supervised€probation.€€On€appeal,Ð P  Ðdefendant€contends€(1)€the€length€of€his€sentence€is€excessive;€(2)€he€should€have€been€granted€fullÐ <Œ Ðprobation;€and€(3)€the€trial€court€erred€in€requiring€him€to€serve€his€time€of€confinement€"day€forÐ (x Ðday."€€We€remand€for€deletion€of€the€"day€for€day"€requirement€because€it€deprives€the€defendant€ofÐ d Ðthe€opportunity€to€earn€statutory€sentencing€credits;€however,€we€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trialÐ P Ðcourt€in€all€other€respects.€€Ð ì< ÐÓÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgments€of€the€Criminal€Court€Affirmed€asÐ Ä ÐModified;€Remandedó óÐ ° ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼=»àXZñ°#ÔÔ‡XZñX.¼=ÔJoe€G.€Riley,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòDavid€G.€Hayesóó€and€òòNorma€McGeeÐ ˆØ ÐOgleóó,€JJ.,€joined.Ð tÄ ÐÌDavid€N.€Brady,€District€Public€Defender;€and€John€B.€Nisbet,€III,€Assistant€District€PublicÐ L œ ÐDefender,€for€the€appellant,€Harley€B.€Ô_ÔUpchurchÔ_Ô.€€Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Elizabeth€T.€Ryan,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð #`" ÐWilliam€Edward€Gibson,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Owen€G.€Burnett,€Assistant€DistrictÐ ü#L# ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.€€Ð è$8 $ ÐÌÌÓ@ Óò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼=»XXZño #ÔÔ‡XZñX»¼=ÔÐ ¬'ü"' ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼=»XXZñ #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XZñX»¼=Ôà  àDefendant€pled€guilty€to€burglary,€theft€under€$500,€and€vandalism€under€$500€with€theÐ „)Ô$) Ðsentence€to€be€determined€by€the€trial€court.€€For€burglary,€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€toÐ p*À%* Ðfour€years€to€serve€one€year€in€confinement€followed€by€twelve€years€supervised€probation.€€For€theÐ \+¬&+ Ðâ âmisdemeanor€offenses€of€theft€under€$500€and€vandalism€under€$500,€the€trial€court€sentenced€theÐ H,˜',ý ÐÔ_Ôdefendant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€for€each€offense€to€run€concurrently€with€eachÐ ° Ðother€and€also€concurrently€with€the€burglary€sentence.€€Ð œì Ðâ âÌà  àTestimony€at€the€sentencing€hearing€indicated€that€on€December€7,€2000,€the€defendant,Ð tÄ Ðwhile€"drunk,"€broke€through€a€door€and€burglarized€a€store€in€Monroe,€Tennessee.€€He€was€arrestedÐ `° Ðby€officers€inside€the€store;€various€items€had€been€scattered€about€in€the€store.€€Ð L œ ÐÌà  àThe€nineteen„year„old€defendant€had€a€tenth€grade€education€but€had€secured€his€GED.€€HeÐ $ t Ðhad€a€sparse€work€history,€had€misdemeanor€convictions€as€an€adult,€and€had€numerous€juvenileÐ  ` Ðadjudications.€€Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àTestimony€at€the€sentencing€hearing€further€revealed€the€victim€told€the€defendant€to€stayÐ Ô$  Ðaway€from€the€store€after€this€burglary.€€Nevertheless,€the€victim€had€to€instruct€the€defendant€onÐ À  Ðthree€separate€occasions€to€leave€the€property.€€Ð ¬ü  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€applied€enhancement€factors€(1),€prior€history€of€criminal€convictions€orÐ „Ô  Ðcriminal€behavior,€and€(8),€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€a€sentenceÐ pÀ Ðinvolving€release.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1),€(8).€€The€trial€court€applied€mitigatingÐ \¬ Ðfactor€(1),€conduct€did€not€cause€or€threaten€serious€bodily€injury,€and€gave€this€mitigating€factorÐ H˜ Ðlittle€weight.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€The€trial€court€found€no€other€applicableÐ 4„ Ðmitigating€factors.€€The€trial€court€further€found€the€defendant€was€untruthful€in€his€testimony€andÐ  p Ðexhibited€a€"òòlaissez€faireóó"€attitude€concerning€his€sentencing.€€The€trial€court€further€noted€theÐ  \ Ðdefendant's€extensive€criminal€history€and€that€no€prior€punishments€had€been€effective€to€deterÐ øH Ðdefendant's€criminal€activities.€€Although€the€trial€court€denied€total€probation,€the€trial€court€orderedÐ ä4 Ðthat€the€defendant€effectively€serve€one€year€in€confinement€followed€by€twelve€years€of€probation.€Ð Ð  ÐÌÌà@dd!ìàò òSTANDARD€OF€REVIEWó óˆÐ ”ä ÐÌà  àIn€defendant's€first€two€issues,€he€contends€the€trial€court€erred€by€imposing€the€maximumÐ l¼ Ðlength€of€sentences€and€further€erred€by€denying€total€probation.€€We€respectfully€disagree.€€Ð X ¨ ÐÌà  àThis€courtððs€review€of€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€is€òòde€novoóó€with€a€presumptionÐ 0"€  Ðof€correctness.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d).€€This€presumption€is€conditioned€upon€anÐ #l! Ðaffirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€judge€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€allÐ $X" Ðrelevant€facts€and€circumstances.€€òòState€v.€Pettusóó,€986€S.W.2d€540,€543€(Tenn.€1999).€€If€the€trialÐ ô$D # Ðcourt€fails€to€comply€with€the€statutory€directives,€there€is€no€presumption€of€correctness€and€ourÐ à%0!$ Ðreview€is€òòde€novoóó.€€òòState€v.€Pooleóó,€945€S.W.2d€93,€96€(Tenn.€1997).Ð Ì&"% ÐÌà  àThe€burden€is€upon€the€appealing€party€to€show€that€the€sentence€is€improper.€€Tenn.€CodeÐ ¤(ô#' ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€€If€no€mitigating€or€enhancement€factorsÐ )à$( Ðfor€sentencing€are€present,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„35„210(c)€provides€that€theÐ |*Ì%) Ðpresumptive€sentence€for€the€felony€offense€shall€be€the€minimum€sentence€within€the€applicableÐ h+¸&* Ðrange.€€òòóóòòState€v.€Lavenderóó,€967€S.W.2d€803,€806€(Tenn.€1998);€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€788Ð ° Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€However,€if€such€factors€do€exist,€a€trial€court€should€enhance€theÐ œì Ðminimum€sentence€within€the€range€for€enhancement€factors€and€then€reduce€the€sentence€within€theÐ ˆØ Ðrange€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(e);€òòState€v.€Arnettóó,€49€S.W.3d€250,Ð tÄ Ð257€(Tenn.€2001).€€No€particular€weight€for€each€factor€is€prescribed€by€the€statute,€as€the€weightÐ `° Ðgiven€to€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€court€as€long€as€the€trial€court€complies€withÐ L œ Ðthe€purposes€and€principles€of€the€sentencing€act€and€its€findings€are€supported€by€the€record.€€òòStateÐ 8 ˆ Ðv.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,€238€(Tenn.€1986);€òòState€v.€Kelleyóó,€34€S.W.3d€471,€479€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð $ t Ð2000);€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210€Sentencing€Commission€Comments.€€Ð  ` ÐÌò òA.€€Length€of€Sentencesó óÐ è 8  ÐÌà  àThe€range€of€punishment€for€burglary,€a€Class€D€felony,€for€a€standard€offender€is€from€twoÐ À  Ðto€four€years.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„112(a)(4).€€The€trial€court€set€punishment€at€four€years,Ð ¬ü  Ðthe€maximum.€€The€range€of€punishment€for€the€two€Class€A€misdemeanor€offenses€is€any€time€notÐ ˜è  Ðgreater€than€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„111(e)(1).€€The€trialÐ „Ô  Ðcourt€set€punishment€for€each€misdemeanor€offense€at€the€maximum.€€Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àDefendant€contests€the€trial€court's€application€of€enhancement€factor€(1),€prior€history€ofÐ H˜ Ðcriminal€convictions€or€criminal€behavior.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1).€€The€defendant€hadÐ 4„ Ðprior€juvenile€adjudications€for€truancy,€unruly€behavior,€domestic€assault,€delinquency,Ð  p Ðmisdemeanor€theft€and€escape€from€confinement€on€a€misdemeanor€adjudication.€€The€trial€courtÐ  \ Ðerroneously€relied€upon€the€defendant's€prior€juvenile€adjudications€in€applying€this€factor.€€òòSeeóó€òòStateÐ øH Ðv.€Adamsóó,€45€S.W.3d€46,€58€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2000)€(holding€juvenile€adjudications€can€now€beÐ ä4 Ðused€for€enhancement€purposes€only€under€factor€(20)€and€not€factor€(1)).€€The€defendant's€priorÐ Ð  Ðjuvenile€adjudications€would€not€have€qualified€as€felonies€as€an€adult;€therefore,€they€could€not€beÐ ¼  Ðconsidered€under€either€factor€(1)€or€factor€(20).€€The€record€also€shows€the€defendant€was€convictedÐ ¨ø Ðof€underage€possession€of€alcohol€when€he€was€over€18€years€of€age€but€under€21€years€of€age.€Ð ”ä ÐHowever,€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€57„3„412(a)(3)(C)€(Supp.€2001)€expressly€providesÐ €Ð Ðthat€"[n]o€violation€of€[this€provision].€.€.€may€at€any€time€be€used€against€the€violator€in€any€criminalÐ l¼ Ðproceeding."€€Accordingly,€underage€possession€of€alcohol€could€not€be€considered€under€factor€(1).€Ð X ¨ ÐNevertheless,€the€defendant€did€have€misdemeanor€convictions€as€an€adult€for€contributing€to€theÐ D!” Ðdelinquency€of€a€minor€and€violation€of€the€implied€consent€law.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Furthermore,€defendant€admittedÐ 0"€  Ðto€using€marijuana€two€months€prior€to€sentencing€and€illegally€using€hydrocodone€six€months€priorÐ #l! Ðto€sentencing.€€This€criminal€behavior,€though€not€resulting€in€convictions,€may€also€be€consideredÐ $X" Ðunder€enhancement€factor€(1).€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Caricoóó,€968€S.W.2d€280,€288€(Tenn.€1998).€€Accordingly,Ð ô$D # Ðenhancement€factor€(1)€applies.€€Ð à%0!$ Їà  àThe€trial€court€erroneously€applied€enhancement€factor€(8),€prior€history€of€unwillingness€toÐ ° Ðcomply€with€conditions€of€release€into€the€community,€based€upon€its€finding€that€the€currentÐ œì Ðoffenses€were€committed€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation€and,€further,€based€upon€theÐ ˆØ Ðdefendant's€prior€juvenile€adjudication€of€escape€from€a€juvenile€detention€center.€€Factor€(8)€onlyÐ tÄ Ðapplies€to€a€òòpreviousóó€history€of€unwillingness€and€does€not€apply€where€the€present€offenses€wereÐ `° Ðcommitted€while€the€defendant€was€on€probation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Hayesóó,€899€S.W.2d€175,€186€(Tenn.Ð L œ ÐCrim.€App.€1995)€(emphasis€in€original).€€Furthermore,€we€conclude€the€escape€from€juvenileÐ 8 ˆ Ðdetention€does€not€trigger€the€application€of€enhancement€factor€(8)€because€òòjuvenile€detentionóó€doesÐ $ t Ðnot€involve€release€into€the€community.€€Nevertheless,€we€conclude€that€factor€(8)€is€applicable€forÐ  ` Ðreasons€not€relied€upon€by€the€trial€court.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€defendant€was€placed€upon€juvenile€probation€onÐ ü L  ÐNovember€5,€1997,€placed€on€house€arrest,€and€was€subsequently€adjudicated€for€domestic€assaultÐ è 8  Ðcommitted€while€he€was€on€house€arrest.€€Violation€of€a€condition€of€probation€as€a€juvenile€qualifiesÐ Ô$  Ðas€a€previous€history€of€unwillingness€to€comply€with€conditions€of€release€into€the€community.€Ð À  ÐòòState€v.€Jacksonóó,€60€S.W.3d€738,€743€(Tenn.€2001)€(holding€enhancement€factor€(20)€does€notÐ ¬ü  Ðprevent€juvenile€probation€violations€from€being€considered€under€enhancement€factor€(8)).€Ð ˜è  ÐAccordingly,€enhancement€factor€(8)€applies.€€Ð „Ô  ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€applied€mitigating€factor€(1),€conduct€did€not€cause€nor€threaten€serious€bodilyÐ \¬ Ðinjury,€but€gave€it€little€weight.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(1).€€The€trial€court€did€not€err€inÐ H˜ Ðgiving€this€mitigating€factor€little€weight.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Timothy€Alan€Hopperóó,€No.€02C01„9709„CC„Ð 4„ Ð00371,€1999€Tenn.€Crim.€App.€LEXIS€293,€at€*12€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Mar.€29,€1999,€at€Jackson),Ð  p Ðòòperm.€to€app.€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1999).€€Likewise,€we€find€the€trial€court€properly€rejected€mitigatingÐ  \ Ðfactor€(6),€defendant€lacked€substantial€judgment€because€of€his€youth.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„Ð øH Ð35„113(6).€€A€defendant's€youth€does€not€automatically€require€application€of€this€factor€but,€rather,Ð ä4 Ðwe€must€consider€"youth€in€context"€of€the€circumstances€tending€to€demonstrate€the€ability€toÐ Ð  Ðappreciate€the€nature€of€the€conduct.€€òòState€v.€Adamsóó,€864€S.W.2d€31,€33€(Tenn.€1993).€€Defendant'sÐ ¼  Ðextensive€involvement€with€the€criminal€and€juvenile€justice€systems€negates€this€mitigating€factor.€Ð ¨ø ÐÌÌà  àFinally,€defendant€contends€the€trial€court€erred€in€weighing€the€enhancement€and€mitigatingÐ l¼ Ðfactors.€€However,€the€weight€to€be€given€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€is€left€to€the€discretionÐ X ¨ Ðof€the€trial€court.€€òòKelleyóó,€34€S.W.3d€at€479.€€Ð D!” ÐÌà  àBased€upon€our€òòde€novoóó€review,€and€in€light€of€the€application€of€enhancement€and€mitigatingÐ #l! Ðâ âfactors,€we€conclude€the€four„year€sentence€for€burglary€and€the€sentences€of€eleven€months€andÐ $X" Ðtwenty„nine€days€for€the€misdemeanors€are€appropriate.€€Further,€we€will€not€disturb€the€length€ofÐ ° Ðprobation€set€by€the€trial€court.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ð œì Ðâ âÌò òB.€€Denial€of€Total€Probationó óÐ tÄ ÐÌà  àDefendant€contends€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€total€probation.€€An€especially€mitigatedÐ L œ Ðor€standard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidateÐ 8 ˆ Ðfor€alternative€sentencing€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð $ t Ð102(6).€€A€trial€court€must€presume€that€a€defendant€sentenced€to€eight€years€or€less€and€for€whomÐ  ` Ðincarceration€is€not€a€priority€is€subject€to€alternative€sentencing.€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,Ð ü L  Ð379„80€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€It€is€further€presumed€that€€a€sentence€other€than€incarcerationÐ è 8  Ðwould€result€in€successful€rehabilitation€unless€rebutted€by€sufficient€evidence€in€the€record.€€òòId.óó€atÐ Ô$  Ð380.€€However,€although€a€defendant€may€be€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternativeÐ À  Ðsentencing,€the€defendant€has€the€burden€of€establishing€suitability€for€total€probation.€€òòState€v.Ð ¬ü  ÐBoggsóó,€932€S.W.2d€467,€477€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996);€òòóóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b).€€EvenÐ ˜è  Ðthough€probation€must€be€automatically€considered,€ð ðthe€defendant€is€not€automatically€entitled€toÐ „Ô  Ðprobation€as€a€matter€of€law.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b)€Sentencing€Commission€Comments;Ð pÀ ÐòòState€v.€Hartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€373€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€A€defendant€seeking€full€probationÐ \¬ Ðbears€the€burden€on€appeal€of€showing€the€sentence€imposed€is€improper,€and€that€full€probation€willÐ H˜ Ðbe€in€the€best€interest€of€the€defendant€and€the€public.€€òòState€v.€Bakeróó,€966€S.W.2d€429,€434€(Tenn.Ð 4„ ÐCrim.€App.€1997).Ð  p ÐÌà  àIn€determining€if€incarceration€is€appropriate,€a€trial€court€may€consider€the€need€to€protectÐ øH Ðsociety€by€restraining€a€defendant€having€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct,€the€need€to€avoidÐ ä4 Ðdepreciating€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€whether€confinement€is€particularly€appropriate€toÐ Ð  Ðeffectively€deter€others€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses,€and€whether€less€restrictive€measures€haveÐ ¼  Ðoften€or€recently€been€unsuccessfully€applied€to€the€defendant.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1).€Ð ¨ø ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€did€not€err€in€denying€total€probation.€€We€first€note€that€defendant€did€receiveÐ €Ð Ðalternative€sentencing€in€the€form€of€split€confinement.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„104(c)(5).€Ð l¼ ÐWe€further€note€that€the€defendant,€even€at€his€young€age,€has€amassed€a€considerable€history€ofÐ X ¨ Ðcriminal€conduct,€albeit€mostly€in€the€form€of€juvenile€adjudications.€€Measures€less€restrictive€thanÐ D!” Ðconfinement€have€been€unsuccessfully€applied.€€The€trial€court€also€properly€considered€theÐ 0"€  Ðdefendant's€untruthfulness,€which€relates€to€his€potential€for€rehabilitation.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Nunleyóó,€22Ð #l! ÐS.W.3d€282,€289€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1999).€€Defendant€has€not€met€his€burden€of€establishing€thatÐ $X" Ðfull€probation€should€have€been€granted.€€This€issue€is€without€merit.€€Ð ô$D # ЇÌà@· · ìàò ò"DAY€FOR€DAY"€CONFINEMENTó óˆÐ œì ÐÌà  àFinally,€defendant€contends€the€trial€court€erred€in€ordering€his€one„year€confinement€in€theÐ tÄ Ðcounty€jail€to€be€served€"day€for€day."€€We€must€agree€with€his€contention.€€Ð `° ÐÌà  àThe€order€to€confine€the€defendant€in€the€burglary€case€for€one€year€"day€for€day"€deprivesÐ 8 ˆ Ðthe€defendant€of€the€opportunity€to€earn€proper€sentencing€credits€as€provided€by€statute.€€òòSeeóóÐ $ t Ðòògenerally€óóòòState€v.€James€Kevin€Underwoodóó,€No.€E2000„01945„CCA„R3„CD,€2001€Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð  ` ÐLEXIS€585,€at€*8€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€Aug.€2,€2001,€at€Knoxville);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Clarkóó,€67€S.W.3dÐ ü L  Ð73,€78€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001).€€An€order€of€confinement€for€one€year€in€the€county€jail€is€governedÐ è 8  Ðby€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€41„21„236(d)€relating€to€sentence€reduction€credits€establishedÐ Ô$  Ðby€the€Department€of€Correction€for€felony€offenders€serving€sentences€of€one€or€more€years€in€theÐ À  Ðcounty€jail.€€Accordingly,€we€modify€the€time€of€confinement€to€the€extent€of€deleting€the€"day€forÐ ¬ü  Ðday"€language€set€forth€in€the€judgment€for€the€felony€offense;€thus,€defendant€will€be€entitled€to€earnÐ ˜è  Ðappropriate€sentence€credits.€€The€judgments€for€the€two€misdemeanor€offenses€do€not€have€the€"dayÐ „Ô  Ðfor€day"€language;€thus,€the€defendant€will€be€entitled€to€earn€good€conduct€credit€toward€theseÐ pÀ Ðsentences.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€41„2„111(b).€€In€summary,€defendant€will€be€entitled€to€earnÐ \¬ Ðproper€sentence€reduction€credits€which€will€apply€toward€his€one€year€of€confinement€in€the€countyÐ H˜ Ðjail.€€Ð 4„ ÐÌÌà@FF%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ øH ÐÌà  àWe€remand€to€the€trial€court€for€entry€of€an€amended€judgment€in€the€burglary€case€deletingÐ Ð  Ðthe€"day€for€day"€language.€€We€affirm€the€judgments€of€the€trial€court€in€all€other€respects.€€Ð ¼  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð €Ð Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àJOE€G.€RILEY,€JUDGE