ÿWPCã Xo‰Ü|`ao¸Þ] ¶QŸËw`zo3œ‘·9ô9gµ®ÎïJ„Ÿ¬ùÖ˜Í+‚æ¶Œ¹3ùŽq$xÈÌ9ÆÉ;¤-ÃÃŽí”ÍýÿÛY× öþÆc!û[ý£_ŠP8· ¼„K óÖÇ·°óQNÓ Ì$ º'b­×[VZ‹—å‚1D5ÊЪGÇp£ðªŠ)“Z­)$p®b RX—*_JAÿph«»Ð.ÜzÍTM¬éË\"QèAŒ†Ž­ÍŪa;Ef®¡IœÞØûŠW…À-3Ky[ø0Û¶gûÉÌ;Ñ,ºè¿úe9vCò Ð¥måìÐŽ=‡:Dþmçͳj°ÌÑÁ±ÃÄ4Ø!í±»+I_5 > Õ/ÕŸ;eËCè Q½±Åj(kº5© –6{æÖ ø£‘™L×mKŽxòèmã5°{ÑX×_ìN0ü]‘„P4©=×€q(„¯_´×ÇÙ‰z½´jT Á΂Ìz¿mÑéÙÜɼ:<ÑÓTSuÀ®KÀÉÓ¿û¢(^ðôaÎë 3Ér#MÜ«&†ï[YÀ).B3jÎn2÷ŠüCZÏñÌÕövOº®‘w“ÁùL#óévÝx•fÕæ÷$š>b#É\ %% ^ + 0ˆ7 UN¿ w 4 z% ÒŸ q € m‚ ì™ Æ… ÆKÆÆ× 0DNáUNãº1EëçíííííNÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔÔbÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖ 0ëÞÞÞÞ BÉÉ 0¤æ D5Š D-¿ 0Kìì AS7ÆŠ 0¤P 0Dô A«8˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0»:wH1Ï (`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular ~‰/˜Cê:i¢×+00 ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ âÝ ƒRï±$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¹ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔThe€defendant€was€convicted€of€child€neglect€in€the€Obion€County€Juvenile€Court€on€November€4,€2003.Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular  CHETWALLEY P.J.McIntireSherrillCrissyMenees DUIMcDanielAshby CmtsmisdemeanantsSeatonTroutmanmisdemeanant i[s t]heVernita i]nNeeleya]lthoughBlakelyApprendi ÝÝ ƒRï±$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¹ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔBy€the€time€of€the€defendantððs€sentencing€hearing,€Ms.€Little€and€the€defendant€had€married.- ù-(|G2ï±$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ƒ‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¹ò»»Ô d(|3ÿ$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ƒ‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV)ÿÿ!dxdx)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3ÿ$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ƒ‰»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ƒ‰»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ƒ‰»»»ÔÑ8€ÍWXXdé»»d8Ñà@hhìàÔ‡îf>ƒ‰ÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONÔ#†¼ƒ‰»îîf> #ԈРÓ# ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` àAssigned€on€Briefs€September€14,€2004Ð öF ÐÔ‡XÍWX»¼ƒ‰ÔÌò òÔ#†¼ƒ‰»XXÍW!#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€ROBBIE€CHET€WALLEYÔ‡XÍWX»¼ƒ‰Ôó óÐ ï? ÐÌà@@½½ìàò òDirect€Appeal€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Ô_ÔObionÔ_Ô€CountyÐ é 9 Ðà@@øøìàNo.€3„434€€€€€€William€B.€Ô_ÔAcreeÔ_Ô,€JudgeÐ Ó # ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<` AßÐ ‘á  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€W2003„02987„CCA„R3„CD€€„€Filed€October€7,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ԀРŠÚ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<]` AßÐ ^®  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€defendant,€Robbie€Chet€Walley,€was€convicted€of€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia€and€wasÐ V¦  Ðsentenced€to€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days,€all€suspended€except€for€sixty€days.€€On€appeal,€heÐ ? Ðargues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€alternative€sentencing.€€Based€upon€our€review,€we€affirmÐ (x Ðthe€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð a ÐÓùÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€Affirmedó óÐ ã3 ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ƒ‰»àXÍW•#ÔÔ‡XÍWX.¼ƒ‰ÔAlan€E.€Glenn,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€P.J.,óó€and€òòNormaÐ ¶ ÐMcGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€joined.Ð Ÿï ÐÌJames€T.€Powell,€Union€City,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Robbie€Chet€Walley.Ð qÁ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michelle€Chapman€McIntire,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ C“ ÐGeneral;€Thomas€A.€Thomas,€District€Attorney€General;€and€James€T.€Cannon,€Assistant€DistrictÐ ,| ÐAttorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ô#†¼ƒ‰»XXÍWH#ÔÔ‡XÍWX»¼ƒ‰Ô€Ð e ÐÓÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ƒ‰»XXÍW· #ÔÔ‡XÍWX»¼ƒ‰ÔÐ ç 7  ÐòòóóÔ#†¼ƒ‰»XXÍW? #ÔÓ  ÓÔ€XÍWX»¼ƒ‰ÔÌò òòòÓ  ÓFACTSÐ º" " ÐÌÓÎ Óà  àó óóóThe€defendant€pled€guilty€to€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia€in€the€Ô_ÔObionÔ_Ô€County€GeneralÐ Ž$Þ$ ÐSessions€Court€and€was€sentenced€to€eleven€months,€twenty„nine€days,€with€all€but€thirty€daysÐ w%Ç % Ðsuspended.€€He€then€appealed€this€sentence€to€the€Ô_ÔObionÔ_Ô€County€Circuit€Court,€and€a€sentencingÐ `&°!& Ðhearing€was€held€on€December€12,€2003.òòò òÐ I'™"' ÐÌóóó óà  àAt€the€hearing,€Deputy€Brian€Osborne€of€the€Ô_ÔObionÔ_Ô€County€Sheriffððs€Department€testifiedÐ )l$) Ðthat€he€responded€to€a€call€at€the€defendantððs€residence€on€August€26,€2003.€€The€defendant€hadÐ *U%* Ðcalled€the€sheriffððs€office€and€reported€that€an€intruder€was€trying€to€break€in€and€had€taken€hisÐ î*>&+ Ðgirlfriendððs€three„year„old€child.€€When€Deputy€Osborne€arrived€at€the€residence,€the€defendant,€whoÐ ×+'', Ðappeared€to€be€in€a€ð ðhallucinogenic€state,ðð€was€outside€talking€to€two€other€officers.€€The€defendantÐ À,(- Ðtold€Osborne€that€ð ðJerry€Sherrill€was€trying€to€climb€through€the€windows€of€the€house€and€upÐ ©-ù(.ý ÐÔ_Ôthrough€the€air€conditioner€ducts€of€the€house.ðð€€Osborne€went€inside€the€house€where€he€found€aÐ ° Ðnaked€three„year„old€boy€lying€in€the€hallway€near€a€bathroom.€€He€later€determined€that€the€boyÐ ™é Ðwas€the€child€of€the€defendantððs€girlfriend,€Crissy€Little.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Osborne€also€found€a€hypodermic€needleÐ ‚Ò Ðon€top€of€the€shower€stall€in€the€bathroom.€€The€defendant€told€the€officers€that€he€had€ð ðinjectedÐ k» Ðcocaine.ðð€After€the€defendantððs€grandmother€arrived€at€the€house,€she€told€Osborne€she€had€noÐ T¤ Ðknowledge€of€the€needle€and€ð ðit€didnððt€belong€to€her€house.ðð€€Osborne€said€that€the€defendant€wasÐ =  Ðcharged€with€possession€of€drug€paraphernalia€and€child€neglect.׃ Q×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Ð & v ÐÌà  àCrissy€Walley,€the€defendantððs€wife,€testified€that€she€and€the€defendant€had€been€marriedÐ ø H Ðone€month€and€that€she€was€pregnant€with€the€defendantððs€baby.€€She€said€the€three„year„old€boy,Ð á 1  Ðwho€was€found€on€the€floor€the€day€of€the€defendantððs€arrest,€was€her€son€and€that€the€defendant€wasÐ Ê   Ðbabysitting€him€while€she€worked.€€She€said€her€son€was€not€harmed€in€any€way€that€day.€€She€saidÐ ³  Ðthat€Jeremy€Menees€had€vandalized€their€house€in€the€past.Ð œì  ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€testified€that€he€called€the€police€the€day€of€his€arrest€because€someone€shotÐ n¾  Ðthrough€the€back€window€of€the€house.€€He€told€the€police€that€Jeremy€Menees€might€have€done€theÐ W§  Ðshooting,€but€he€never€said€anything€about€Jerry€Sherrill.€€He€also€told€the€police€that€someone€wasÐ @ Ðtrying€to€break€in€the€house,€but€denied€saying€the€intruder€was€in€the€duct€work.€€The€defendant€saidÐ )y Ðthat€when€the€officers€arrived€ð ðthey€started€focusing€on€me,€you€know,€like,€ððSomethingððs€wrongÐ b Ðwith€you.ðððð€€He€tried€to€show€the€window€to€the€officers,€but€they€would€not€look€at€it.€€He€informedÐ ûK Ðthe€officers€that€a€three„year„old€child€was€in€the€house.€€The€defendant€said€the€child€was€asleep€inÐ ä4 Ðthe€floor€without€his€pants€on€because€he€had€spilled€milk€on€them,€and€the€defendant€had€put€theÐ Í Ðpants€in€the€dryer.€€The€defendant€denied€telling€the€officers€that€he€had€injected€cocaine.€€AskedÐ ¶ Ðabout€the€hypodermic€needle€found€in€the€house,€the€defendant€explained€that€a€nurse€who€came€toÐ Ÿï Ðthe€house€to€give€his€grandfather€B12€shots€must€have€left€it€there.Ð ˆØ ÐÌà  àThe€defendant€said€he€pled€guilty€to€the€child€neglect€charge€because€his€attorney€told€himÐ Zª Ðit€was€in€his€best€interest€to€do€so.€€He€further€said€he€pled€guilty€to€the€instant€offense€because€hisÐ C“ Ðattorney€told€him€he€would€receive€probation€if€he€did€so.€€He€said€he€was€ð ðshockedðð€at€the€sentenceÐ ,| Ðhe€received.€The€defendant€said€he€and€his€wife€planned€to€move€to€Nashville€in€order€for€him€toÐ e Ðstart€electronics€and€underwater€welding€school€in€January€2004.€€He€said€if€he€were€incarceratedÐ þN Ðhe€would€have€to€wait€until€March€or€April€to€start€school.€€The€defendant€acknowledged€that€he€hadÐ ç 7 Ðprior€convictions€for€DUI€and€vandalism€but€said€the€convictions€occurred€eight€years€ago€when€heÐ Ð!   Ðwas€eighteen€years€old.Ð ¹" ! ÐÌà  àRuby€McDaniel,€the€defendantððs€grandmother,€testified€that€her€husband€did€receive€monthlyÐ ‹$Û# ÐB12€shots€at€the€house.€€She€said€she€was€in€the€bathroom€with€Deputy€Osborne€when€he€found€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðneedle€on€top€of€the€shower.€€To€her€knowledge,€the€defendant€had€never€used€a€needle€to€inject€anyÐ ]&­!% Ðtype€of€drug.€€On€cross„examination,€Mrs.€McDaniel€said€that€her€husband€had€been€in€a€nursingÐ F'–"& Ðhome€for€about€six€months.€€Asked€if€that€meant€her€husband€had€been€admitted€to€the€nursing€homeÐ /(#' Ðin€June€2003,€before€the€instant€offense€occurred€in€August,€Mrs.€McDaniel€said,€ð ðI€donððt€ð!ð€IÐ ° Ðcouldnððt€tell€you.ðð€Ð ™é Ðà  àÌà  àAt€the€conclusion€of€the€hearing,€the€trial€court€found€that€the€defendant€had€shown€noÐ k» Ðremorse€and€had€been€untruthful€in€his€testimony.€€Applying€enhancement€factor€(1),€Tenn.€CodeÐ T¤ ÐAnn.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€(1997),€the€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€eleven€months,€twenty„nineÐ =  Ðdays€in€the€county€jail,€all€suspended€except€for€sixty€days.€Ð & v ÐÌò òòòÓ  ÓANALYSISóóó óÐ ø H ÐÓs#ÓÌà  àThe€defendant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€alternative€sentencing€and€ð ðbyÐ Ë   Ðusing€an€enhancement€factor€solely€for€the€purpose€of€punishing€the€defendant€for€statements€madeÐ ´  Ðby€the€defendant€during€the€sentencing€hearing.ððÐ í  ÐÌò òÔ‡Xîk XXXÍWÔà  àó óWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length€and€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,€it€is€the€dutyÐ o¿  Ðof€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòde€novoóó€review€on€the€record€with€a€presumption€that€"the€determinationsÐ X¨  Ðmade€by€the€court€from€which€the€appeal€is€taken€are€correct."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401(d)Ð A‘ Ð(2003).€€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trialÐ *z Ðcourt€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances."€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,Ð c Ð823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€presumption€does€not€apply€to€the€legal€conclusionsÐ üL Ðreached€by€the€trial€court€in€sentencing€the€accused€or€to€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€courtÐ å5 Ðwhich€are€predicated€upon€uncontroverted€facts.€€òòState€v.€Butleróó,€900€S.W.2d€305,€311€(Tenn.€Crim.Ð Î ÐApp.€1994);€òòState€v.€Smithóó,€891€S.W.2d€922,€929€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1994);€òòState€v.€Bonestelóó,€871Ð · ÐS.W.2d€163,€166€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€However,€this€court€is€required€to€give€great€weight€toÐ  ð Ðthe€trial€court's€determination€of€controverted€facts€as€the€trial€court's€determination€of€these€factsÐ ‰Ù Ðis€predicated€upon€the€witnesses'€demeanor€and€appearance€when€testifying.Ð r Ðò òÌà  àó óIn€conducting€a€òòde€novoóó€review€of€a€sentence,€this€court€must€consider€(a)€any€evidenceÐ E• Ðreceived€at€the€trial€and/or€sentencing€hearing,€(b)€the€presentence€report,€(c)€the€principles€ofÐ .~ Ðsentencing,€(d)€the€arguments€of€counsel€relative€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(e)€the€nature€andÐ g Ðcharacteristics€of€the€offense,€(f)€any€mitigating€or€enhancement€factors,€(g)€any€statements€madeÐ  P Ðby€the€accused€in€his€own€behalf,€and€(h)€the€accused's€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitationÐ é 9 Ðor€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40-35-103,€-210;€òòState€v.€Scottóó,€735€S.W.2d€825,€829€(Tenn.Ð Ò!"  ÐCrim.€App.€1987).Ð »" ! Ðò òÌà  àó óThe€party€challenging€the€sentence€imposed€by€the€trial€court€has€the€burden€of€establishingÐ Ž$Þ# Ðthat€the€sentence€is€erroneous.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-401,€Sentencing€Commission€Cmts.;Ð w%Ç $ ÐòòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.Ð `&°!% ÐÌÔ#†XÍWX XXîkò$#Ôà  àMisdemeanor€sentencing€is€controlled€by€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40-35-302,Ð 2(‚#' Ðwhich€provides,€in€part,€that€the€trial€court€shall€impose€a€specific€sentence€that€is€consistent€withÐ )k$( Ðthe€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Sentencing€Reform€Act.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÐ *T%) Ð40-35-302(b).€€Although€the€Sentencing€Reform€Act€typically€treats€misdemeanants€and€felons€theÐ í*=&* Ðsame,€misdemeanants€are€not€given€the€presumption€of€a€minimum€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Seatonóó,Ð Ö+&'+ Ð914€S.W.2d€129,€133€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).€€A€separate€sentencing€hearing€is€not€required€inÐ ° Ðmisdemeanor€sentencing,€but€the€trial€court€must€"allow€the€parties€a€reasonable€opportunity€to€beÐ ™é Ðheard€on€the€question€of€the€length€of€any€sentence€and€the€manner€in€which€the€sentence€is€to€beÐ ‚Ò Ðserved."€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-302(a).€€A€misdemeanor€sentence,€unlike€a€felony€sentence,€hasÐ k» Ðno€sentence€range.€€òòState€v.€Bakeróó,€966€S.W.2d€429,€434€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).Ð T¤ ÐÌà  àThe€trial€court€has€great€flexibility€and€discretion€in€fashioning€a€misdemeanor€sentence.€€TheÐ & v Ðsentence€must€be€specific€and€in€accordance€with€the€principles,€purposes,€and€goals€of€the€1989Ð  _ ÐSentencing€Act.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-302(b);€òòState€v.€Palmeróó,€902€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.Ð ø H Ð1995).€€The€trial€court€should€consider€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€in€making€its€sentencingÐ á 1  Ðdeterminations;€however,€unlike€the€felony€sentencing€statute,€which€requires€the€trial€court€to€placeÐ Ê   Ðits€findings€on€the€record,€the€misdemeanor€sentencing€statute€"merely€requires€a€trial€judge€toÐ ³  Ðconsider€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors€when€calculating€the€percentage€of€a€misdemeanorÐ œì  Ðsentence€to€be€served€in€confinement."€€òòState€v.€Troutmanóó,€979€S.W.2d€271,€274€(Tenn.€1998).€€TheÐ …Õ  Ðtrial€court€is€authorized€to€place€the€misdemeanant€on€probation€either€immediately€or€after€a€termÐ n¾  Ðof€confinement.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-302(e).€€When€a€defendant€challenges€a€misdemeanorÐ W§  Ðsentence,€this€court€conducts€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€a€presumption€that€the€trial€court'sÐ @ Ðdeterminations€are€correct.Ð )y ÐÔ‡Xîk XXXÍWÔà  àÌà  àÔ#†XÍWX XXîkõ8#ÔIn€sentencing€the€defendant,€the€trial€court€stated:Ð ûK ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àWhatððs€bothering€me,€though,€.€.€.€[the€defendant]€has€come€into€courtÐ Í Ðand€shown€no€remorse€whatsoever€for€not€only€the€incident€for€whichÐ ¶ Ðhe€was€on€trial€[sic]€today,€but€also€for€the€companion€case€whichÐ Ÿï Ðwas€decided€in€Juvenile€Court.€€He€shows€no€candor€whatsoever,€orÐ ˆØ Ða€complete€lack€of€candor.€€Somebody€is€not€telling€the€truth.ÐqÁ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àMr.€Osborne€came€in€and€testified€that€[the€defendant]€wasÐ C“ Ðintoxicated,€he€was€claiming€somebody€was€in€his€air€conditioningÐ ,| Ðsystem.€.€.€.€€He€testified€that€the€defendant€admitted€to€him€that€thisÐ e Ðneedle€was€his.€€On€the€other€hand,€[the€defendant]€comes€in€andÐ þN Ðsays,€ð ðThatððs€not€true.€€I€was€not€intoxicated.€€I€didnððt€say€anythingÐ ç 7 Ðabout€the€duct€work.€€That€wasnððt€my€needle.€€I€told€them€that.ðð€Ð Ð!   ÐSomebodyððs€not€telling€the€truth.й" !` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à[The€defendant],€you€would€have€helped€yourself€ð!ð€and€theÐ ‹$Û# ÐCourt€finds€that€the€testimony€of€the€officer,€Mr.€Osborne,€is€credibleÐ t%Ä $ Ðand€yours€i[s]€not.€€It€would€have€been€much€more€helpful€had€youÐ ]&­!% Ðcome€into€court€and€said,€ð ðThatððs€true.€€I€made€a€mistake.€€I€need€toÐ F'–"& Ðget€on€to€Nashville.ðð€€But€you€come€into€court€and€everything€isÐ /(#' Ðsomebody€elseððs€fault.€€Itððs€your€lawyerððs€fault€that€you€pled€guiltyÐ )h$( Ðin€two€different€courts,€yet€youððre€innocent,€completely€innocent,€didÐ *Q%) Ðnothing€wrong,€but€you€pled€guilty€anyway.€€I€just€donððt€buy€all€ofÐ ê*:&* Ðthat.ÐÓ+#'+` x` x Їà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àTaking€your€lack€of€remorse€and€your€lack€of€candor,€youððveÐ ° Ðbeen€untruthful,€enhancement€factor€number€1€applies.€€The€CourtÐ ™é Ðthinks€that€some€jail€time€is€indicated€in€this€case.ЂÒ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ àIððm€going€to€sentence€you€to€11€months€and€29€days€in€theÐ T¤ Ðcounty€jail,€to€serve€60€days.Ð= ` x` x ÐÌà  àA€trial€court€may€deny€alternative€sentencing€and€sentence€a€defendant€to€confinement€basedÐ  _ Ðon€any€one€of€the€following€considerations:Ð ø H ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(A)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restrainingÐ Ê   Ða€defendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;г ` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(B)€Confinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€theÐ …Õ  Ðseriousness€of€the€offense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€toÐ n¾  Ðprovide€an€effective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similarÐ W§  Ðoffenses;€orÐ@` x` x ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àà ¸ à(C)€Measures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€haveÐ b Ðfrequently€or€recently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant[.]Ð ûK Ðà ¸ àÐ ` x` x ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-103(1)€(2003).Ð ¶ ÐÌà  àIn€determining€that€the€defendant€should€serve€sixty€days€of€his€sentence€in€confinement,€theÐ ˆØ Ðtrial€court€applied€enhancement€factor€(1),€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(1)€(1997),€ð ð€[t]heÐ qÁ Ðdefendant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€or€criminal€behavior€in€addition€to€thoseÐ Zª Ðnecessary€to€establish€the€appropriate€range,ðð€and€found€that€the€defendant€had€been€untruthful€andÐ C“ Ðhad€shown€no€remorse.€€Ð ,| ÐÌÔ‡Xîk XXXÍWÔà  àIn€òòState€v.€Robert€Duff€and€Vernita€Coxóó,€No.€02C01„9307„CR„00152,€1995€WL€390951,€atÐ þN Ð*3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€June€28,€1995),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€Nov.€6,€1995),€this€court€notedÐ ç 7 Ðthat€ð ð[i]n€accordance€with€this€general€principle,€Tennessee€courts€have€repeatedly€held€thatÐ Ð!   Ðuntruthfulness€is€a€factor€which€may€be€considered€in€determining€the€appropriateness€of€probation.ððÐ ¹" ! Ðòòóó(citing€òòState€v.€Neeleyóó,€678€S.W.2d€48,€49€(Tenn.€1984);€òòState€v.€Bunchóó,€646€S.W.2d€158,€160Ð ¢#ò" Ð(Tenn.€1983)).€€In€addition,€ð ð[a]lthough€untruthfulness€is€not€mentioned€as€a€factor€in€Tenn.€CodeÐ ‹$Û# ÐAnn.€ðð€40-35-103(1),€this€court€has€continued€to€declare€it€a€relevant€factor€in€determining€theÐ t%Ä $ Ðsuitability€of€probation€subsequent€to€the€enactment€of€the€1989€Act.ðð€€òòId.óó€(citing€òòState€v.€Andersonóó,Ð ]&­!% Ð857€S.W.2d€571,€574€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1992)Ô#†XÍWX XXîk7I#ÔÔ‡Xîk XXXÍWÔ).Ð F'–"& ÐÔ#†XÍWX XXîkŒM#ÔÌà  àAccording€to€testimony€at€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€defendant€had€been€convicted€in€1997Ð )h$( Ðof€DUI€and€two€counts€of€vandalism,€all€arising€out€of€the€same€incident.€€Additionally,€as€the€resultÐ *Q%) Ðof€his€telephone€call€to€the€Obion€County€Sheriffððs€Department,€which€resulted€in€the€charge€whichÐ ê*:&* Ðis€the€basis€for€this€appeal,€he€also€was€charged€with€and€convicted€of€child€neglect.€€We€note€thatÐ Ó+#'+ Ðthe€State€has€argued€on€appeal€that€the€trial€courtððs€determination€that€the€defendant€should€beÐ ° Ðincarcerated€for€a€portion€of€his€sentence€is€not€affected€by€the€holding€in€òòBlakely€v.€Washingtonóó,Ð ™é Ð__€U.S.€__,€124€S.€Ct.€2531€(2004),€because€one€of€the€reasons€for€overcoming€the€statutoryÐ ‚Ò Ðpresumption€that€the€defendant€was€a€favorable€candidate€for€probation€was€his€prior€criminalÐ k» Ðrecord.€€€In€òòApprendi€v.€New€Jerseyóó,€530€U.S.€466,€490,€120€S.€Ct.€2348,€2362€(2000),€the€courtÐ T¤ Ðconcluded€that€the€Sixth€Amendment's€prohibition€against€increasing€punishment€beyond€theÐ =  Ðð ðstatutory€maximumðð€based€upon€additional€findings€made€by€the€trial€court€did€not€apply€to€ð ðtheÐ & v Ðfact€of€a€prior€conviction.ðð€€Accordingly,€as€to€the€present€appeal,€we€conclude€that€even€if€the€trialÐ  _ Ðcourt€erred€in€imposing€a€sixty„day€period€of€confinement€based€on€the€courtððs€determination€thatÐ ø H Ðthe€defendant€was€not€remorseful€and€was€untruthful€at€the€hearing,€his€prior€criminal€recordÐ á 1  Ðsupports€the€sentence.Ð Ê   ÐÌò òòòÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONó óóóÐ œì  ÐÓ©TÓÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing€authorities€and€reasoning,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trialÐ o¿  Ðcourt.Ð X¨  ÐÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð c Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àALAN€E.€GLENN,€JUDGE