WPC  7W\N)}Rucn|{\NiӤd MxNQd ۤS2Wq'lm $?(/޲"ڂ6}~%M.DX%ܳOW" r7o9^KyLH|z xx}T9A|`H=l˄SL; [qx'O2D>XQhBPs6Ik9Ee^i`㱬.I@g1 .wrWPWHAC"this<QVDhV` Qyq[ Z'`Z;c%+mDf>N:1̺[!|/Rh992KܻSI3`؇lP59ج?kdR]b%6Z/h_Tj na6v<ZW#UN % 0: UN U@g ^ w 4 V   m N  Ew w w w -y y        B HP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL6V,,,,V0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular(9 Z(Times New Roman ~1 h_B0:i+003|xU BlakelyCURIAMTiptonWedemeyerT.R.A.P.Marcum ##Cd#1245678 d !USUS.,  _XXXXXXR  @KK#XXj#XXINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @$ATNASHVILLE#XX#XXԈ  #XX~# XX%    %%  STATEOFTENNESSEEv.CHESTERWAYNEWALTERS%##XX#     %    CriminalCourt%forWhite%  % County   @&No.% ! %!]% " %"{CR599#XwXXXK#XXXXwԈ   @*AV) ` dE<p ` A߈ q  @& & No.% # %#wM200303019CCAR3CD#XwXXX#XXXXwԀFiledNovember30,2004 j   AV) ` dE<=` A >      @  @`  @  @ ORDER  6  xӀ   `      p      ThedefendanthasfiledapetitiontorehearpursuanttoRule39,T.R.A.P.,assertingthatin  Y  ouropinionfiledonOctober4,2004,wemisconstruedtheTennesseeSupremeCourt'sstatement B inStatev.Marcum,109S.W.3d300,304(Tenn.2002),thatanattemptinstructionwasnotrequired + fortherapechargebecausetherewasnoevidenceofanattemptedrape,onlythecompletedcrime.  HepointsoutthatwesaidthatMarcumheldthatanattemptinstructionwasnotrequiredbecause  proofofthecompletedcrimeexisted.ThedefendantcorrectlynotesthatMarcumdidnotdiscuss  aggravatedsexualbatteryandClassBmisdemeanorassaultaslesserincludedoffensesofrape,and  hearguesagainthatthefailuretoinstructonthemconstitutedreversibleerror. h   Weacknowledgethatouropiniondidnotstateb  _Marcum_'sholdingexactly,butwewereaware : oftheimportofMarcumandourdecisionregardinganattemptwasbasedonourconclusionthat #s therewasonlyproofofthecompletedcrime,notanattempt.Regardingtheoffensesofaggravated  \ sexualbatteryandClassBmisdemeanorassault,weconcludedintheopinionthatfailuretoinstruct E onthemwasharmlesserror.Thedefendanthasofferednothingnewtoquestionthisconclusion. . Thus,wedenyhispetitiontorehear.    Thedefendantalsorequeststhatwevacateanorderenteredbythetrialcourtafterour    opinionwasfiledbywhichitpurportedlymodifiedthedefendant'ssentencespursuanttothe !! opinion.Wenotethatthetrialcourthasnojurisdictiontoenternewjudgmentsuntilthemandate k"" issuesinthecase.b/ #XwXXX#XwXXXw T##   Finally,wehavereconsideredourrulingsregardingBlakelyv.Washingtonandhave &%v % concludedthatBlakelyerrorissubjecttoconstitutionalharmlesserroranalysis.Althoughsuchdoes &_!& notaltertheresultinthiscase,wewithdrawtheopinionfiledonOctober4,2004,andreplaceitwith &H"' anopinionthatdealswiththeharmlesserrorissue. '1#( Ѐ#XwXXXwh#XXXXwXX ($) #3#3#XX#   `     h   PERCURIAM *%+    `     h   (Tipton,Ogle,Wedemeyer,JJ.)#XwXXX#