ÿWPCõ+ …UNV %¤U:ªä 0 ôþ w@ 4F U .Z 0Nˆ 0DÖ 0J 0Td 0^¸ 0h 0r~ 0|ð 0†l 0ò 1u‚ 0d÷U>[B)™DC AM‹RÅÝS¢ õ D3þú1w+ 0@¢" Bâ"v~ÿ"vÓ}$ AOP*ÆŸ* 0De+ D/©+ BØ+(ÖÃ9 Z ‹6Times New Roman RegularX,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular3|x(â,A$¡¡Ñ  ÑÔ€Xå6XXXÔÔ€XÛÃXXXå6ÔÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÑÑÑ  ÑÑTRY 3Ø'Letter3Ø' 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  Ó ðEñò eóUôDõPöD÷DøDùÓ€Ô¡¨ %ä2¼A`ArialTT(þ(3PÉ$¤¤Ý ƒ,A!ÝÑ  ÑÔ€XXXXÔÔ€X»·XXXÔÑ` °ÑÑܰÑÑÑÑ  ÑÑTRY3Ø'Letter3Ø' 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó2 ÿÿ0Indent1Ô2ÔÔ3  Ô2" ÿÿ0Indent2à0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2, ÿÿ0Indent3à0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô26 ÿÿ0Indent4à0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2@ ÿÿ0Indent5à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2J ÿÿ0Indent6à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2T ÿÿ0Indent7à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô2^ ÿÿ0Indent8à0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àà0 àÔ2ÔÔ3  Ô ÿÿ?AGMSYaioIndent0I.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)P ÿÿ8Mac DefaultMac DefaultÓ ` °šXÓ< Œ 9p`(&Times New Roman% Line 7 d!!!!7Border 1dd€-"Cþÿ << Gÿÿ Ý ƒ!ÝÑ  ÑÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÔ€ ÔÓ  Óò òÔ YYY ÔFILEDÔ€ XÔÌÌMay€21,€1997ÌÌCecil€W.€CrowsonÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔ  Ôó ó »Ý ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àWe€note€that€the€notice€of€appeal€was€not€timely€filed€in€this€case.€ÏThe€trial€court€entered€its€judgment€order€on€February€15,€1996,€and€the€noticeÏof€appeal€was€not€filed€until€March€21,€1996.€€The€rules€of€appellate€procedureÏrequire€that€a€notice€of€appeal€be€filed€within€30€days€after€the€judgment€at€issueÏis€entered.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€4(a).€€However,€in€criminal€cases,€the€notice€ofÏappeal€is€not€jurisdictional,€and€this€court€may€waive€the€requirement€in€theÏinterests€of€justice.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€27„1„123€(Supp.€1996);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.Ï4(a).€€The€state€has€not€raised€this€issue,€nor€are€we€able€to€discern€anyÏprejudice€which€may€have€resulted€from€the€late€filing€of€the€notice.€€Therefore,Ïin€the€interests€of€justice,€we€ignore€the€late€filing€of€the€notice€of€appeal€in€thisÏcase.€€Ì IÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àWe€cannot€determine€the€percentage€of€service€from€the€video„tape€record€of€the€sentencing€hearing.€€At€one€point,€the€trial€judge€mistakenlyÏtold€the€assistant€district€attorney€that€he€could€not€require€100%€service€of€theÏsentence€because€only€120€days€were€required€by€law.€€Later,€he€sentencedÏthe€defendant€to€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€with€the€option€ofÏsuspending€the€ð ðlastðð€28€days€upon€petition€to€the€court.€€Ì ÿÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àAccording€to€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€55„1„403(a)(1),Ïthe€defendant€must€serve€at€least€120€days.Ì....'ÿÿdxd ðÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àThe€trial€court€found€and€our€review€of€the€record€has€disclosed€noÏmitigating€factors.€€ÌÌ mÝ ƒ!ÝÑ#€d#ÑÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° ÒÑ @ ÑÑ\R3Ø'\Ñà àòòÚ  ÚÚ  Úóóà àWe€address€the€merits€of€this€issue€although€the€appellant€hasÏwaived€it€by€failing€to€address€it€in€his€brief.€€Tenn.€R.€€Crim.€App.€P.€10(b);€òòStateÏv.€Killebrewóó,€760€S.W.2d€228,€231€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1988).€Ì("ÿÿ$££Ò  ÒÒ  Ò dPtPtHHÚ(ÿáÿâùFG(üHHÚ(d'hStyl{WP}01•ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃà Ãà Ãà Ãà Ãà ÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÃÐ ÐÐHHÐÐ  ÐÐ2ÐÐÿÿ¸æ$ÿÐÐHHÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÐ  ÐÐ ÐÐ ÐÑÑÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÑ € ÑÑ<Px–ÈÑÒÒÒ443!#4ÒÒ$ *$ÒÒ$*$ÒÒ ÿKK ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÒ  Geneva ÒÓ.,ÓÓÓÓ6ÓÓ ÓßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßßÑGenevaÑÑ ÑÒ  h HD: Geneva ÒÒ  h HD: Geneva Ò€-‚ƒCþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó„„'÷ÿ dxdüÿP PdÝ ƒ!ÝÔ . ÔÔ€ ÔÑ  ÑÔ€ ÔÑ ` ÑÑ Ü ÑÑ\R3Ø'\ÑÝ  ÝÒ  ÒÒ ° Òò òÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ\R AØ'\ÑÑ7€XXdìdÈ7ÑÑ  ÑÓ` Ü` ˜XÓÙ€€ÙßR€%&"A1-j|` ç `€€@ÿRß›Þ ÞÌà@ àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEÌÌ€à@ àAT€Ìó óÌà@ àò òNASHVILLEÌÌà@ àFEBRUARY€SESSION,€1997ó óà@ àÌÌÌÌò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,€à àà àó ó)Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àAppellee,à àà à)à àNo.€01CO1„9605„CC„00218Ìà àà àà àà àà à)Ìvs.à àà àà àà àà à)à àWilliamson€Countyà àÌà àà àà àà àà à)Ìò òKENNETH€L.€WARRENó ó,à àà àà à)à àHonorable€Donald€P.ÏHarris,€à àà àà àà àà à)à àJudge€Ìà àà àà àà àà à)à àÌà àà àAppellant.à àà à)€€€€€€€€€€(Driving€Under€the€Influence;Ìà àà àà àà àà à)€€€€€€€€€€Driving€on€Revoked€License.)€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€Ìà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àà àà àÌÌFOR€THE€APPELLANT:à àà àà àFOR€THE€APPELLEE:ÌÌJOHN€H.€HENDERSONà àà àà àCHARLES€W.€BURSONÌDistrict€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÌÌDIANE€CROSIERà àà àà àà àPATRICIA€C.€KUSSMANNÌAssistant€Public€Defenderà àà àà àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌP.O.€Box€68à àà àà àà àà à450€James€Robertson€ParkwayÌFranklin,€TN€37065„0068à àà àà àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à àÌà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àJOSEPH€D.€BAUGHÌà àà àà àà àà àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌà àà àà àà àà àÌà àà àà àà àà àJOHN€BARRINGERÌà àà àà àà àà àAssistant€District€AttorneyÌà àà àà àà àà àP.O.€Box€937Ìà àà àà àà àà àFranklin,€TN€37065„0937ÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€____________________ÌÌÌò òAFFIRMED€ÌREMANDEDó ó€ò òIN€PARTó óÌÌÌCURWOOD€WITT,€JUDGEÌÌÓ  ÓÌÌà@ àOPINIONÓÓÓ` °‚X˜XÓÌÌà àThe€defendant,€Kenneth€L.€Warren,€pleaded€guilty€in€WilliamsonÏCounty€Circuit€Court€to€one€count€of€driving€under€the€influence,€fourth€offense,Ïand€one€count€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€€Both€are€Class€AÏmisdemeanors.€€The€trial€court€sentenced€the€defendant€to€serve€eleven€monthsÏand€twenty„nine€days€for€the€fourth€offense€of€driving€under€the€influence,Ïassessed€a€fine€of€$1,100,€and€revoked€his€driverððs€license€for€five€years.€€OnÏthe€second€count,€the€trial€court€imposed€an€additional€eleven€months€andÏœtwenty„nine›€days€to€be€served€consecutively€to€the€sentence€in€the€first€count.€ÏHowever,€the€trial€court€suspended€the€second€sentence€and€ordered€theÍdefendant€to€serve€the€time€under€intensive€probation.€€As€a€condition€of€hisÏprobation,€he€must€attend€at€least€90€Alcoholics€Anonymous€meetings€within€theÏfirst€90€days€of€his€release€from€custody.€€ÌÌà àIn€this€direct€appeal,€the€defendant€contends€that€the€sentenceÏimposed€by€the€trial€court€is€not€in€accord€with€the€requirements€of€TennesseeÏCode€Annotated€Section€40„35„114.× ƒ' ××  ×€€We€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€courtÏbut€remand€the€case€for€preparation€of€an€amended€judgment€form€thatÏaccurately€reflects€the€sentence€imposed€in€the€conviction€for€driving€under€theÏinfluence,€fourth€offense.ÌÌà àWhen€an€accused€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€ofÏservice€of€a€sentence,€it€is€the€duty€of€this€court€to€conduct€a€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review€withÍa€presumption€that€the€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€Tenn.ÏCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)(Supp.€1996).€This€presumption€is€"conditioned€uponÏthe€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trial€court€considered€theÏsentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,Ï823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€€In€conducting€our€òòdeóó€òònovoóó€review,€we€mustÏconsider€the€evidence€at€sentencing,€the€presentence€report,€the€sentencingÏprinciples,€the€arguments€of€counsel,€the€statements€of€the€defendant,€theÏnature€and€characteristics€of€the€offense,€any€mitigating€and€enhancementÏfactors,€and€the€defendantððs€amenability€to€rehabilitation.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ððÏ40„35„210(b)€(Supp.€1996);€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€168.€€The€burden€forÏshowing€that€the€sentence€is€improper€is€on€the€appealing€party.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€40„35„210€sentencing€commission€comments.ÌÌà àA€misdemeanant,€unlike€a€felon,€is€not€entitled€to€the€presumptionÏof€a€minimum€sentence.€€òòState€v.€Randall€C.€Conneróó,€No.€03C01„9401„CR„00024,€slip€op.€at€6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Aug.€12,€1994);€òòState€v.€BernellÏB.€Lawsonóó,€No.€63,€slip€op.€at€7€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€May€23,€1991).€€InÏmisdemeanor€sentencing,€a€separate€sentencing€hearing€is€not€mandatory€(oneÏwas€held€here),€but€the€court€is€required€to€provide€the€defendant€with€aÏreasonable€opportunity€to€be€heard€as€to€the€length€and€manner€of€theÍsentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€€40„35„302(a).€€The€sentence€must€be€a€"specificÏnumber€of€months,€days€or€hours€.€.€.€consistent€with€the€purposes€andÏprinciples€of€[the€Criminal€Sentencing€Reform€Act€of€1989].ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€Ï40„35„302(b);€òòState€v.€Palmeróó,€902€S.W.2d€391,€393€(Tenn.€1995).€€The€trialÏcourt€must€determine€the€€percentage€of€the€sentence€which€the€misdemeanantÏmust€serve€before€becoming€eligible€for€certain€release€programs.€€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðððð€€40„35„302(b),(d).€€Generally,€a€percentage€of€not€greater€than€75%€ofÏthe€sentence€should€be€fixed€for€a€misdemeanor€offender;€however,€a€DUIÏoffender€may€be€required€to€serve€the€full€100%€of€his€sentence.€€òòPalmeróó,€902ÏS.W.2d€at€393„94;€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302(d).€In€determining€theÏpercentage€of€the€sentence,€the€court€must€consider€enhancement€andÏmitigating€factors€as€well€as€the€legislative€purposes€and€principles€related€toÏsentencing.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302(d);€òòPalmeróó,€902€S.W.2d€at€393„94;ÏòòState€v.€Gilboyóó,€857€S.W.2d€884,€888„889€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€ÌÌà àUpon€service€of€that€percentage,€the€administrative€agencyÏgoverning€the€rehabilitative€programs€determines€which€among€the€lawfulÏprograms€available€is€appropriate.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„302(d).€The€trialÏcourt€retains€the€authority€to€place€the€defendant€on€probation€eitherÏimmediately€or€after€a€period€of€periodic€or€continuous€confinement.€Tenn.€CodeÍAnn.€ðð€40„35„302(e).€The€trial€court€maintains€jurisdiction€over€a€defendantÏplaced€in€jail€and€may€reduce€or€modify€the€sentence€or€place€the€defendant€onÏprobationary€supervision.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„314(c).€€The€statute€isÏdesigned€to€provide€a€trial€court€with€continuing€jurisdiction€in€misdemeanorÏcases€and€a€wide€latitude€of€flexibility.€€òòState€v.€Dwight€Johnsonóó,€No.€03C01„9209„CR„00320,€slip€op.€at€7€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€May,€18,€1993)€òòperm.Ïto€appeal€deniedóó€(Tenn.€1994).ÌÌà àOur€review€of€the€record€in€this€case€indicates€that€the€trial€courtÏdid€not€err€in€sentencing€the€defendant€to€the€maximum€sentence€on€eachÏconviction.€€The€sentences€are€consistent€with€the€legislative€purposes€andÏprinciples€related€to€sentencing.€This€defendant€has€a€lengthy€history€of€criminalÏconduct€and€has€been€unsuccessful€in€his€attempts€to€overcome€his€addiction€toÏalcohol.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(3)(B).€€The€trial€court€was€properlyÏconcerned€about€protecting€the€public.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103)(1)(A)Ï(1990€Repl.).€ÌÌà à€€€However,€the€trial€court€did€not€indicate€on€the€judgment€form€theÏfixed€service€percentage€of€the€eleven€month€and€twenty„nine€day€sentence€forÏdriving€under€the€influence,€€fourth€offense.€€It€may€be€that€the€trial€courtÍintended€that€the€defendant€serve€the€sentence€in€its€entirety.€€The€record€is€notÏclear,€and€we€may€not€presume€that€intent€from€the€blank€judgment€form.× ƒ( ××  ×€€ThisÏcase€must€be€remanded€to€the€trial€court€so€that€the€trial€court€can€determineÏand€place€on€the€judgment€form€the€percentage€of€the€eleven€month€andÏtwenty„nine€day€sentence€the€defendant€is€required€to€serve.× ƒ) ××  ×ÌÌà àSince€the€trial€court€must€consider€the€appropriate€enhancementÏfactors€in€determining€the€percentage€to€be€served,€we€will€consider€whether€theÏrecord€supports€the€application€of€two€enhancement€factors€to€the€sentences.€× ƒ+ ××  ×€ÌÌà àThe€defendant€does€not€challenge€the€use€of€factor€(1)€to€enhanceÏhis€sentence.€Nor€could€he.€€The€defendantððs€extensive€prior€record€whichÏincludes€two€misdemeanor€assault€convictions€and€at€least€six€prior€convictionsÏfor€driving€under€the€influence€is€more€than€sufficient€to€support€a€€finding€thatÏð ð[t]he€defendant€has€a€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€.€.€.€in€addition€toÏthose€necessary€to€establish€the€appropriate€range.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114€(1)(Supp.€1996)€òòas€amendedóó€in€1994.€€ÌÌà àThe€defendant,€however,€€does€argue€that€the€trial€judge€erred€inÏfinding€that€he€had€committed€ð ðthe€offense€under€circumstances€whichÏconstituted€a€substantial€risk€that€someone€would€suffer€bodily€injury.ðð€€TheÏdefendant€contends€that€such€a€consideration€is€not€an€enhancing€factor€underÏTennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„114.€€We€disagree.€€€€ÌÌà àThe€statute€provides€that€a€proper€enhancing€factor€is€one€in€whichÏthe€crime€ð ðwas€committed€under€circumstances€under€which€the€potential€forÏbodily€injury€to€a€victim€was€great.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„114(16)€(Supp.Ï1996)€òòas€amendedóó€in€1994.€€This€court€has€previously€found€this€factor€may€beÏappropriate€in€determining€the€service€percentage€of€a€sentence€for€drivingÏunder€the€influence.€€òòState€v.€Dockeryóó,€917€S.W.2d€258,€263€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Í1995).€€The€record€clearly€shows€the€trial€court€was€referring€to€factor€(16).€€TheÏfact€that€the€trial€courtððs€language€does€not€precisely€track€the€language€of€theÏstatute€does€not€invalidate€the€use€of€the€enhancement€factor.€€The€defendantÏdrove€down€a€busy€highway€while€intoxicated.€€He€was€observed€weaving€backÏand€forth€across€the€center€line€into€the€on„coming€traffic.€€Certainly€the€potentialÏfor€bodily€injury€to€other€drivers€and€their€passengers€was€great.€€The€trial€courtÏdid€not€err€in€applying€factor€(16).€€Ìœà àWe›€also€find€that€the€evidence€in€the€record€does€notÏpreponderate€against€the€trial€courtððs€order€that€the€sentences€be€servedÏconsecutively.× ƒ, ××  ×€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€Section€40„35„115(b)€providesÏthat€a€court€may€order€consecutive€sentencing€if€a€defendant€has€an€extensiveÏhistory€of€criminal€activity.€€The€defendant€has€at€least€seven€convictions€forÏdriving€under€the€influence€and€committed€this€offense€while€he€was€releasedÏon€bond€in€a€Davidson€County€arrest€for€the€same€offense.€€He€has€twoÏconvictions€for€driving€on€a€revoked€license.€€A€lengthy€period€of€incarcerationÏfollowed€by€a€year€of€intensive€probation€is€appropriate€given€this€defendantððsÏlong€history€of€alcohol€abuse€and€disregard€for€the€law€and€the€safety€of€others.€€ÌÌà àFor€the€reasons€discussed€above€we€affirm€the€defendantððsÏsentences€in€their€entirety.€€However,€we€must€remand€the€case€so€that€the€trialÏcourt€may€fix€the€percentage€of€time€the€defendant€must€serve€in€the€convictionÏfor€driving€under€the€influence€and€record€that€determination€on€the€judgmentÏform.ÌÌÓÓà àà àà àà àà à__________________________à àÌà àà àà àà àà àCURWOOD€WITT,€JudgeÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌ___________________________ÌGARY€R.€€WADE,€JudgeÌÌœ___________________________›ÌDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JudgeÌ