WPC< cC}ko9 PCu]И.]I]Jlz @A a#Ƀ +Öf@3p\=O1Y}$"}o}o*P0$U3>CG+K[&MVa EVh!} >ń1u_I;Y8P4uGf!T71@œt&ڛHڱZ|4۟>sפؙc ?HKVjc=VH-}p<""Bk%f^nÃe@Sg,] h]:3PtY5od}1F &{`.ޚmT6x;dnGj>L˪Ud="9}ims( -gWO"CnS@aN[jlḠr/T2m 5>b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz 0D   a ' 0N 0 0E 0 0 0 0|^ 0f 0E 0! 0 0 0 0 0m 0@ 0 0 0 0 0f 0A! 0" 0" 0#b$ 0$ 0c% 00,& 0<\& 0& 0>V' 0v' 0` ( 0`j( 0`( 0`*) 0`) 08) 0"* 02* 0&+ 0:", 0Y\, 0_, 0 - 0j. 0/ B* 1 D/61 0e1 D/2 03 063 04 0:$5 0^^5 0<5N5U65U>06 0n6U*Y7Y7U@7 B77 08 D5E9 D-z9 0K99 AS9E: 0 ; 0D; A;HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60k1-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularYo)\Pp C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU(#$  0  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 52J+M 0_level1  X 2( ` hp x 223  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2G+M 0_level2   /%` ` hp x /23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2D+M 0_level3   ," hp x ,23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2A+M 0_level4  ` ) hp x )23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2>+M 0_level5   &hhp x &23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2;+M 0_level6   #p x #23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  28+M 0_level7  h  p x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5   25+M 0_level8   pp x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  22+M 0_level9    x 23  ..  5+ ` hp x 5  2JM 0_levsl1  X 2( ` hp x 223  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2GM 0_levsl2   /%` ` hp x /23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2DM 0_levsl3   ," hp x ,23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2AM 0_levsl4  ` ) hp x )23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2>M 0_levsl5   &hhp x &23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2;M 0_levsl6   #p x #23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  28M 0_levsl7  h  p x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  25M 0_levsl8   pp x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  22M 0_levsl9    x 23  Ԁ  5+ ` hp x 5  2JM 0_levnl1  X 2( ` hp x 223   5+ ` hp x 5  2GM 0_levnl2   /%` ` hp x /23   5+ ` hp x 5  2DM 0_levnl3   ," hp x ,23   5+ ` hp x 5  2AM 0_levnl4  ` ) hp x )23   5+ ` hp x 5  2>M 0_levnl5   &hhp x &23   5+ ` hp x 5  2;M 0_levnl6   #p x #23   5+ ` hp x 5  28M 0_levnl7  h  p x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  - -25M 0_levnl8   pp x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  22M 0_levnl9    x 23   5+ ` hp x 5  0.Normal<:Definition T<AA:Definition L , 5+ ` hp x 5  5+ ` hp x 586Definition(''&H1   XXX   (&H2 XXX (&H3 XXX (&H4 XXX XXX(&H5 XXX (&H6 XXX 20Address8MM6Blockquote , , 5+ ` hp x 5   5+ ` hp x 5,*CITE,dl*CODEKP<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS42Emphasis64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    4go2Keyboard KP<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS <:Preformatted/%  ,Kk %#/KP<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS/%  ,Kk %#/<:zBottom of 7F(X7  ?S%2A`Arial?  XXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7&  d dE)1dxd<:zTop of For7H(X7  ?S%2A`Arial?  XXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS7Z(X7E)2dxd0KS.SampleKP<6X9`(Courier NewKSQ\  `&Times New RomanS0.Strong 8dl6TypewriterKP<6X9`(Courier NewKXXXSQ\  `&Times New RomanS42Variable: 8HTML MarkupB      2 0CommentB  <6X9`(Courier New\  `&Times New Roman(|G2ċ$ !.8W-dd8         0  U%2A`Arial(hH  Z(Times New Roman  d Rċ$      1  U  _Therecorddoesnotcontainawrittenmotiontosuppress.(|3{$ !.8W-dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3{$ !.8W-dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8W-dd8     __   W-8!XXdd8@ttV<W-INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON#W-V<#Ԉ &    @  @` June4,2002Session L X!XW- #W-XX! #STATEOFTENNESSEEv.RONNIEWATSONX!XW-  J  AppealfromtheCircuitCourtforGibsonCounty  J @@No.15857L.T._Lafferty_,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200103084CCAR3CD_Ԅ_ԀFiledSeptember16,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     UX!XXX!Convictedofaggravatedrobbery,RonnieWatsonappealstheGibsonCountyCircuitCourtsdenial x  ofhismotiontosuppressthestatementshegavetoalawenforcementofficershortlyafterthe d commissionofthecrime.WeholdthattheissuehasbeenwaivedbyWatsonsfailuretoincludeit P inhismotionfornewtrial.#X!XXUX!##W-XX!#X!XW- <  Tenn.R.App.P.3;JudgmentoftheCircuitCourtAffirmed.  d   #W-X!#X!X.W-James_Curwood_Ԁ_Witt_,Jr.,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichJosephM._Tipton_and < JerryL.Smith,JJ.,joined. ( ThomasH._Strawn_,_Dyersburg_,Tennessee,AttorneyforAppellant,RonnieWatson.  PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneral&Reporter;BradenH._Boucek_,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;  GarryG.Brown,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andWilliamD.Bowen,AssistantDistrictAttorney t General,fortheAppellee,StateofTennessee. ` q@@OO& OPINION #W-XX!#X!XW- 8!  #W-XX! #  X!XW-UX!XXX!0   (#(#    ` OnMarch12,2000,LauraandBryanErnestwererobbedinsideCentralStorein #`" GibsonCounty,whichisownedbyBryanErnestsmother.Thestorewasnotopenforbusinessat #L# thetime.Theperpetrator,lateridentifiedasthedefendant,pointedthepocketofhisjacketatthe $8 $ _Ernests_Ԁinamannerindicatingthathemayhavehadaguninside.Hethreatenedtomaketherobbery %$!% a doublehomicideiftheydidnotrelinquishthemoneyfromthestorescashregister.The_Ernests_ &"& complied,andtheperpetratorfledinasilvercar. '"'    ` Shortlythereafter,theauthoritiesstoppedthedefendantaftertheyspottedhimdriving )$) asilvercarwithfrontenddamageatahighrateofspeed.Hewasdetainedandtransportedto p*%* CentralStore,wherethe_Ernests_Ԁbothidentifiedhimastheindividualwhohadrobbedthem.The \+&+ defendantwasplacedunderarrestandtransportedtothejail. H,',  4-(-  _   ` Onceatthejail,hewasquestionedbyInvestigatorSeanShepard.Thedefendant  admittedthathehadcommittedthecrimeandclaimedhedidsotoobtainmoneyforhiscrack  cocaineaddiction.HegaveInvestigatorShepardbothahandwrittenstatementandarecorded  statement. t    ` Aftercriminalproceedingswereinitiated,thedefendantfiledamotiontosuppress L  thesestatements.Heclaimedatthesuppressionhearingthathedidnotknowingly,voluntarily,or 8  intelligentlywaivehisconstitutionalrightspriortogivingthestatements.W  #  1      ׀Thetrialcourtrejected $ t thedefendantsfactualproofandruledthatthestatementswereadmissible.  `    ` Attrial,thedefendantwasconvictedofaggravatedrobbery,theftunder$500,andtwo  8  countsofassault.HewassentencedasaPersistentOffendertoserve26yearsintheDepartmentof $  Correction.Afterthetrialcourtoverruledhismotionfornewtrial,thisappealfollowed.      ` Thedefendantclaimsinthiscourtthatthetrialcourterredinitsrulingthathis   confessorystatementswereadmissible.However,hehaswaivedourconsiderationofthisissue.      ` First,thedefendantfailedtoraisethesuppressionissueinhismotionfornewtrial \ asrequiredbyTennesseeRuleofAppellateProcedure3(e)asapredicatetoappellatereview.The H defendantswrittenmotionraisesonlythequestionofsufficiencyoftheevidence.Atthehearing 4 onthemotionfornewtrial,thedefendantarguedthattheproofwasinsufficienttosupportthe  p verdict.Defensecounseldidmentioninhisargumentatthehearingthatthevoluntarinessofthe  \ statementhadbeenanissueintheearlierproceedings;however,themannerinwhichheraisedthis H issuechallengedthejurysfindingofsufficientevidenceofthedefendantsguiltnotwithstanding 4 thedefenseevidencethatthedefendantwasnotcapableofmakingvoluntarystatementsfollowing   hisarrest.Defensecounselspecificallyrequestedatthehearing thattheCourtgrantanewtrial   baseduponthefactthattheevidenceisinsufficient.(Emphasisadded.)Itisbynowwellsettled  thatfailuretoraiseanissuerelativetoevidenceadmissionorexclusioninthemotionfornewtrial  waivesthatissueforpurposesofappellatereview.SeeTenn.R.App.P.3(e).Ourreviewofthe  defendantssuppressionissuewaswaivedwhenitwasnotincludedinthemotionfornewtrial.See l id. X     ` Evenifweweretoconstruethedefendantsargumentatthehearingonthemotion 0"  fornewtrialtobeanoralamendmentincludingthesuppressionissueasafreestandingbasisfor #l! seekinganewtrial,theissueneverthelesswaswaivedwhenthedefendantfailedtoreduceanyoral $X" amendmenttowritingwithin30daysofentryoftheorderofsentence.SeeTenn.R.Crim.P.33(b); $D # Statev.ChristopherD.Lanier,No.W200100379CCAR3CD,slipop.at4(Tenn.Crim.App., %0!$ Jackson,Feb.1,2002). &"%    ` Ourconsiderationofthedefendantssuppressionissueiswaivedfortwoadditional (#' reasons.Thedefendantsappellatebriefisdeficientincitation(1)totherecordand(2)topertinent )$( authority.TheRulesofAppellateProcedurerequirethatbriefsinclude [a]statementoffacts,  settingforththefactsrelevanttotheissuespresentedforreviewwithappropriatereferencestothe  record.Tenn.R.App.P.27(a)(6).Themajorityofthefactsrecitedinthedefendantsstatement  offactshavenocorrespondingcitationtotherecord.TheRulesofAppellateProcedurealsorequire t thatcitationstoauthorityandreferencestotherecordbeincludedintheargumentportionofthe ` brief.Id.at27(a)(7).Thedefendantsbriefcontainsonlyonecitationtoauthorityandnonetothe L  record.Moreover,thesolitarycitationemployedbythedefendantsupportsanassertionoflawthat 8  islegallyinaccurate.Therulesofthiscourtdirectwaiverofissuesnotsupportedbycitationto $ t authoritiesorappropriatereferencestotherecord.SeeTenn.R.Ct.Crim.App.10(b).Theissueis  ` waivedfortheseadditionalreasons.  L     ` Accordingly,weholdthatthesuppressionissuehasbeenwaived.Weaffirmthe $  judgmentofthetrialcourt.#X!XXUX! #      `     h     ___________________________________ p    `     h     JAMESCURWOODWITT,JR.,JUDGE