WPC  )@mqtIrEб t0&f}#i#pa,s?m-rVAh7[j:)a 83wz_3̄*oa ~*X~,W0-Xl]pNO<u~[O͠NIՓ5^~vE*&br<\n 2m[515/Lp/Q޷H*őQk<+H6pEጂ_Eu6kd(< \hXc|?W-qW_A_9\/vz&X9|mD7S@m){m`;b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z4    m   v < NEb 0 B 0 D3 D- 0K ASY 0r 0D- AqHP LaserJet 4000 Series PCL 60aD) (wa.$    ..8DdXXd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman RegularJ~'+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5- -(G2H$ a.!    .8Edd8         0  0$ d(3$ a.!    .8Edd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ a.!    .8Edd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK a.!    .8Edd8     _  E8$XXdd8@ttsEINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE#Es#Ԉ      @  @` September2000Session @ X$XE #EXX$#_CHARJORAY_ԀP.WEIRv.STATEOFTENNESSEEX$XE  4 @@ AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforWilsonCounty  ( @@No.981597_J.O._ԀBond,Judge   @@*AV) ` dE<o` A p  @@TTNo.M20000459CCAR3PCFiledOctober4,_2000_ e  AV) ` dE<0` A 1     TheDefendantappealsasofrightfromthetrialcourt'sorderdismissinghispetitionforpost &v  convictionreliefuponitsfindingthatthepetitionwasbarredbythestatuteoflimitations.We  \ reversethejudgmentofthetrialcourtandremandthecaseforfurtherproceedings. B  Tenn.R.App.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtReversed.     #EX$̬#X$X.EDavidH.Welles,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichNormaG.Ogle,J.,joined.Joe  G.Riley,J.,notparticipating. p _Charjoray_ԀWeir,_Henning_,Tennessee,ProSe. < PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;ToddR.Kelley,AssistantAttorneyGeneral;Tom X P.Thompson,Jr.,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andRobert_Hibbett_,AssistantDistrictAttorney > General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. $ @@OO& OPINION #EXX$#X$XE  #EXX$ #X$XE    TherecordreflectsthatonJanuary22,1999,theDefendantwasconvicted,uponhispleaof l!! guilty,ofseconddegreemurder.HewassentencedtofifteenyearsintheDepartmentofCorrection. R"" OnJanuary6,2000,theDefendantfiledapetitionforpostconvictionrelief.Thepetitionforpost 8## convictionreliefallegesthatthedateofthejudgmentofconvictionwasJanuary24,1998.Thedate $n$ whichistypedonthejudgmentofconvictionasthe DateofEntryofJudgment#EXX$A #X$XEԀisJanuary22, %T % 1998. %:!&   Itisclearfromtherecord,however,thatthedateoftheDefendant'sconvictionandsentence '#( wasJanuary22,1999,ratherthanJanuary22,1998.Therecordcontainsacopyoftheindictment, (#) whichallegesthatthehomicideoccurredonAugust14,1998.Therecordalsocontainsacopyof )$* theDefendant'srequestforacceptanceofhisguiltyplea,whichisdatedJanuary15,1999.The h*%+ judgmentofconvictionreflectstheoffensedateasAugust14,1998andstatesthattheDefendant's N+&,  guiltyplea,convictionandsentencealloccurredonJanuary22,1999.Itthusappearsthatthe Date 4,'- ofEntryofJudgmentshownonthejudgmentasJanuary22,1998wasatypographicalorclerical  error.     Fromourreviewoftherecord,itappearsthattheDefendantwasconvictedonJanuary22, b 1999.Hispetitionforpostconvictionrelief,whichwasfiledonJanuary6,2000,wasclearlyfiled H withintheoneyearallowedbythestatuteoflimitations.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4030202(a).On . ~ appeal,theStateconcedesthatthetrialcourterredbysummarilydismissingthepetitionbasedon  d thestatuteoflimitations.Weagree.  J   ThejudgmentofthetrialcourtdismissingtheDefendant'spetitionforpostconvictionrelief    basedupontheapplicationofthestatuteoflimitationsisreversed.Thiscaseisremandedforfurther    proceedings.      `     h     ___________________________________ D     `     h     DAVIDH.WELLES,JUDGE