WPC Ik&/.FT&D?+t/N-N\.h{J .K]m8<:¿VzO`}!:~s)FWlI@낌*z ;n$ &c!zA/ tD]8 HLZ7\"HZ$qb쫟!b8D(ݘq0ԪFL# K(}n9-2 RjEwZ?:#۠"!eh+=*(mS+@5TRWSTUɀk{H~&/>O=h !|mSb ѿ%W? &ށ{r`F IT`OJ[a.qHq%}d+-%8ſ@[q6}5x0@Ѫu)%D"tǸ(J-ܤ2?ySSb %\^ b 0nU+NwD4H\ zk m U@ #   ] #NEb 0 B 0 D5 D- 0K   ASV 0o 0D AW5-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular3j1,3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptU(9 Z(Times New Roman HP LaserJet 40500Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5 - -(|G2$ !.8-dd8         0  U d(|3`$ !.8-dd8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3`$ !.8-dd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8-dd8     _  -8\XXdd8  @ttL-INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @WW$ATKNOXVILLE#-L #Ԉ &   AssignedonBriefsJuly24,2002 L X\X- #-XX\#STATEOFTENNESSEEv.THOMASH._WHALEY_X\X-  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCriminalCourtfor_Sevier_ԀCounty  J @@No.8143RichardR.Vance,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.E200101476CCAR3CD   August21,_2002_   AV) ` dE<|` A }     The_Sevier_ԀCountyGrandJuryreturnedatwocountpresentmentallegingthedefendantcommitted x  avehicularhomicidebyintoxicationforthedeathofonevictimandavehicularassaultby d intoxicationfortheseriousbodilyinjuryofanothervictim.Thedefendantpledguiltytothe P amendedchargesofvehicularhomicidebyrecklessnessandaggravatedassaultbyrecklessnessfor < agreedconcurrentsentencesofsixyearsandthreeyears,respectively,withtheissueofalternative (x sentencingtobedeterminedbythetrialcourt.Thetrialcourtsentencedthedefendanttosplit d confinementandorderedthedefendanttoserveninemonths dayfordayinthecountyjailwith P theremainderofhissixyeareffectivesentenceonsupervisedprobation.Inthisappeal,the < defendantallegesheshouldhavereceivedcommunitycorrections,oralternatively,hereceived ( excessiveconfinement.Weconcludethetrialcourtimproperlyorderedthedefendanttoservehis  ninemonthsofconfinement dayforday,therebydeprivinghimoftheopportunitytoearngood  conductcredits.Weremandfordeletionofthedayfordayrequirement;however,weaffirmthe  trialcourtinallotherrespects.#-XX\#X\X-  #-XX\ #X\X- Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentsoftheCriminalCourtAffirmedas ` Modified;Remanded#-XX\@ #X\X-  L  5   #-XX\ #X\X-JoeG.Riley,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichDavidH.Welles#-XX\ #X\X-ԀandJerryL.Smith, $"t! JJ.,joined.#-XX\! #X\X- #`" #-XX\ #X\X-  DennisC.Campbell,_Sevierville_,Tennessee,fortheappellant,ThomasH._Whaley_. $8 $ PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;DavidH._Findley_#-XX\ #X\X-,AssistantAttorneyGeneral; &"& AlC._Schmutzer_,Jr.#-XX\J#X\X-,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andCharlesE._Atchley_,Jr.,#-XX\#X\X-ԀAssistantDistrict '"' AttorneyGeneral,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. (#( V #-XX\#X\X-    4-(- _OPINION #-XX\S#X\X-  v#-XX\#  X\X-  OnMarch15,2000,LarryMooreandTeresaAllenweretravelinginavehiclewhenthey  werestruckbyavehicledrivenbythedefendant.Moorewaskilled;Allenwasseriouslyinjured, t necessitatingnumeroussurgeriesandtheamputationofherleftfoot.Thedefendantwasdriving ` recklesslyatahighrateofspeed;heregistereda.09%bloodalcohollevel;hetoldofficers hehad L  beenconsumingmoonshinethatdayformostoftheday;andofficersfoundmoonshineinhis 8  vehicle. $ t @`` ALTERNATIVESENTENCING   8   A.StandardofReview     X\XXX\  Thiscourtsreviewofthesentenceimposedbythetrialcourtisdenovowithapresumption   ofcorrectness.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d).Thispresumptionisconditioneduponan   affirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialjudgeconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandall p relevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Pettus,986S.W.2d540,543(Tenn.1999). \   UndertheCriminalSentencingReformActof1989,trialjudgesareencouragedtouse 4 alternativestoincarceration.AnespeciallymitigatedorstandardoffenderconvictedofaClassC,  p DorEfelonyispresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencingoptionsinthe  \ absenceofevidencetothecontrary.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035102(6).However,althougha H defendantmaybepresumedtobeafavorablecandidateforalternativesentencing,thedefendanthas 4 theburdenofestablishingsuitabilityfortotalprobation.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035303(b);#X\XX X\^# X\XXX\ԀStatev.   Boggs,932S.W.2d467,477(Tenn.Crim.App.1996).Indeterminingifincarcerationis   appropriate,atrialcourtmayconsidertheneedtoavoiddepreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffense.  Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1)(B).   B.TrialCourtsFindings  l   Thetrialcourtconcludedthedefendantwasunsuitablefortotalprobationbasedonthe D! circumstancesofthecrimeandfoundincarcerationwasnecessarytoavoiddepreciatingthe 0"  seriousnessoftheoffenses.Thetrialcourtfurtherconcludedthedefendantexhibitedalackof #l! candorandhadfailedtotakeresponsibilityforhisactions.Thetrialcourtthennotedthedefendants $X" positiveattributesandsentencedthedefendanttoninemonths dayfordayinthecountyjailwith $D # theremainderofhiseffectivesixyearsentencetobeservedonsupervisedprobation. %0!$  C.Analysis  '#& #X\XX X\,#  Initially,wenotethetrialcourtenteredafinaljudgmentonMay14,2001;thedefendantfiled )$( atimelynoticeofappealonMay29,2001;adocumententitled MotiontoReconsiderwasfiled |*%) inthetrialcourtonMay29,2001;thetrialcourtoverruledtheMotiontoReconsideronOctober10, h+&* 2001;andthedefendantfiledan AmendedNoticeofAppealonNovember8,2001.Thetrialcourt  losesjurisdictionuponthefilingofanoticeofappeal.Statev.Pendergrass,937S.W.2d834,837  (Tenn.1996).Accordingly,anyactiontakenbythetrialcourtfollowingthefilingofthenoticeof  appealisvoid.Seeid.Inthissituation,thetrialcourtdeniedthemotiontoreconsider;thus,this t errorhasnopracticaleffectonthesubstantivemeritsofthisappeal. `   Thedefendantcontendsheshouldhavereceivedcommunitycorrectionsasanalternativeto 8  splitconfinement.Generally,anoffenderwhoisguiltyofa crime[]againstthepersonisnot $ t eligibleforacommunitycorrectionssentence.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4036106(a)(2).Vehicular  ` homicidebyrecklessnessandaggravatedassaultbyrecklessnessarestatutorilydelegatedascrimes  L  againsttheperson.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.3913213(a)(1),102(a)(2)(A).However,anoffender  8  whocommitsacrimeagainstthepersonandiseligibleforprobationislikewiseeligiblefora $  communitycorrectionssentenceifthetrialcourtdetermines:    X(1)theoffenderhasahistoryofchronicalcohol,drugabuse,ormentalhealth   problems;(2)thesefactorswerereasonablyrelatedtoandcontributedtothe   offender'scriminalconduct;(3)theidentifiablespecialneed(s)aretreatable;and(4) p thetreatmentofthespecialneedcouldbebestservedinthecommunityratherthan \ inacorrectionalinstitution. H % X%Statev.Grigsby,957S.W.2d541,54647(Tenn.Crim.App.1997);seeTenn.CodeAnn.4036  p 106(c).Intheinstantcase,thetrialcourtmadenosuchfindings,andforreasonsstatedhereafter,  \ wewillnotdisturbthetrialcourtsdenialofcommunitycorrections. H   Althoughthedefendantpledguiltytovehicularhomicidebyrecklessnessandaggravated   assaultbyrecklessness,thetrialcourtatsentencing maygobeyondthenegotiatedpleaandconsider   thetruenatureofthecrime."Statev.Biggs,769S.W.2d506,507(Tenn.Crim.App.1988).The  trialcourtmaydeny"fullprobation"basedonafindingthatsuchadenialisnecessarytoavoid  depreciatingtheseriousnessoftheoffense.Statev.Butler,880S.W.2d395,401(Tenn.Crim.App.  1994).Furthermore, X\XXX\thetrialcourtmayproperlyconsiderlackofcandorandfailuretotake l responsibilityastheyreflectuponpotentialforrehabilitation.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035103(5); X  Statev.Nunley,22S.W.3d282,289(Tenn.Crim.App.1999);StatevDowdy,894S.W.2d301,306 D! (Tenn.Crim.App.1994).#X\XX X\+#Thetrialcourtactedwellwithinitsdiscretionbyorderingthedefendant 0"  toserveninemonthsinsplitconfinement.Wealsoobservethatsplitconfinementisaformof #l! alternativesentencing.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035104(c)(5).Thedefendanthasnotmethis $X" burdenofshowingthisaspectofhissentencewasimproper.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d), $D # SentencingCommissionComments. %0!$   Althoughneitherarguedbythedefendantnorbroughttoourattentionbythestate,wenote '#& thetrialcourtwasnotauthorizedtoorderthedefendanttoservehisninemonthsinthecountyjail (#'  dayforday,therebydeprivingthedefendantofgoodconductcredits.Goodconductcreditsapply )$( tofelonsservinglessthanoneyearinthecountyjailorworkhouse.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.412 |*%) 111(b);Statev.JamesKevinUnderwood,No.E200001945CCAR3CD,2001Tenn.Crim.App. h+&* LEXIS585,at*8(Tenn.Crim.App.Aug.2,2001,atKnoxville);seealsoStatev.Clark,67S.W.3d  73,78(Tenn.Crim.App.2001).Accordingly,wemodifythetimeofconfinementtotheextentof  deletingthe"dayforday"language.Therefore,defendantwillbeentitledtoanygoodconduct  creditsheearns,whichwillapplytowardhisninemonthsofconfinement. t   Weremandtothetrialcourtforentryofamendedjudgmentsdeletingthe dayforday L  languageandaffirmthejudgmentsofthetrialcourtinallotherrespects.   8     `     h     ___________________________________ $     `     h     JOEG.RILEY,JUDGE