ÿWPCÞ  Ù<4mR¸²qA¸·q½C]`3D”Ýß[’ßߺʽp Ï·²d#>¤drýZf]…ÑÊO\‘O ´ž°;¤Ï‡!ƒ)Bü¢£âŒ§‚c§òÕ‰(i€–b|Û:Ðôy[—£QŦ–4Ý#*»_ÎÙgà”†XÖÀ'þ´%¥õþ'Ÿ]¸…¾³}+`É-±:Ã}Ñ& $Rþ:5Æ[X#Š=« W¡G —:vÅzK…^¤º ˜­ÐÙäz˜?Mq:·a!„R"âW²ÊV2ûÁšô~|¡t`µÃàÛ? …±ù>9í _XXÅp¿”̨ì÷slYÜûuÂâ×_²´~Dµ£"T¹?KWä»ôSzEã‰#œB/þ`_º] ³S€Íú˜\q0ÉWÀœg3)“~™°1 >‚Q‘x×”fÝ0(;—æ5Zà(ÖÜ‹°#‘›–<˜ĪLf³BF§7>Š*;_9¢ ¤Áv^º7ä­Ñê¡1™¦’€ÃxËû¿}A“ò(P6Í+®cU(*GùúT— ç^ô6Ì÷ÖYØ£ÚµÔm&¶VUÄ„aƒ ±/îÌ­‘,ÐÙ ™š^çúùÃ,çôS΃L7òðóRÏ›é8£G¼W#ÉÂUN‹ %Ù 0:ß ß ^  w% 4) = L mN e b} :… … … … … … … … E¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ BÁ ˜\\IB01S02\CLERKJACÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX(üœ$¡¡ÔUSUS.,ÔóyZ1Ï  ~‰/ê:i¢×+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ Rouss- ù- 0Ñ#€ÿÿXÿÿd#ÑÑ € Ñ dÝ ƒüœ!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡îÆ'îXXÔÑ  Ñà@hhìàÑ€Ö¼ÑIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@òò%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ Ó# ÐÔ#†Xk6XîîÆ'=#Ôà@„ „ ìàÔ‡¼" »XXk6ÔAssigned€on€Briefs€August€3,€2004ˆÐ öF Ðà@ìì*ìàˆÌà@” ” ìàò òSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE€v.€STEVE€A.€WHITEˆÐ  f ÐÔ#†Xk6X»¼" 5#ÔÌà@, , ìàDirect€Appeal€from€the€Criminal€Court€for€Shelby€CountyˆÐ  a Ðà@N N ìàNo.€99„09415€€€€€Joseph€B.€Dailey,€JudgeˆÐ û K Ðà  àÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<¸` A߈Ð ¹  ÐÌà@~ ~ ìàNo.€W2003„01947„CCA„R3„CD€€„€Filed€October€25,€Ô_Ô2004Ô_ԈР²  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<…` AßÐ †Ö  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓDefendant,€Steve€A.€White,€appeals€the€trial€courtððs€order€amending€Defendantððs€judgment€to€grantÐ ~Î  Ðrestitution€to€the€victim€in€his€case.€€Because€the€trial€court€did€not€have€jurisdiction€to€amendÐ g· ÐDefendantððs€judgment,€we€reverse€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court€and€remand€for€reinstatement€ofÐ P  Ðthe€judgment€of€conviction€as€originally€entered.Ð 9‰ ÐÌò òà@† † ìàTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;ˆÐ  [ Ðà@ç ç ìàJudgment€of€the€Trial€Court€Reversed€and€RemandedˆÐ õE Ðó óÌòòThomas€T.€Woodall,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòGary€R.€Wade,€Ô_ÔP.J.Ô_Ô,€óóandÐ È ÐòòNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€joined.Ð ± ÐÌJames€S.€Ô_ÔHaywoodÔ_Ô,€Jr.,€Brownsville,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Steve€A.€White.Ð ƒÓ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Michael€Markham,€Assistant€Attorney€General;Ð U¥ ÐWilliam€L.€Gibbons,€District€Attorney€General;€and€James€Ô_ÔLammeyÔ_Ô,€Assistant€District€AttorneyÐ >Ž ÐGeneral,€for€the€appellee,€the€State€of€Tennessee.€€Ð ' w Ðà  àÌà@55'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ ù!I! ÐÌò òI.€€Backgroundó óÐ Ì## ÐÌà  àDefendant€was€convicted€on€January€29,€2000,€of€theft€of€property€between€$10,000€andÐ Ÿ%ï % Ð$60,000,€violating€the€sales€tax€law,€and€attempted€first€degree€murder.€€The€trial€court,€by€judgmentÐ ˆ&Ø!& Ðentered€on€February€28,€2000,€sentenced€Defendant€as€a€Range€I€standard€offender€to€an€effectiveÐ q'Á"' Ðsentence€of€thirty„one€years€in€the€Department€of€Correction.€€The€jury€did€not€assign€a€value€to€theÐ Z(ª#( Ðstolen€property€which€formed€the€basis€of€Defendantððs€theft€conviction€as€provided€for€in€TennesseeÐ C)“$) ÐCode€Annotated€section€40„20„116,€and€the€trial€court€did€not€order€Defendant€to€pay€restitution€toÐ ,*|%* Ðthe€victim,€Phillip€Rouss,€Jr.€€The€State€did€not€raise€any€issue€on€Defendantððs€direct€appealÐ +e&+ Ðregarding€the€failure€of€the€trial€court€to€order€restitution€to€the€victim.€€òòState€v.€Steve€A.€Whiteóó,€No.Ð þ+N', ÐW2000„01148„CCA„R3„CD,€2003€WL€21338920€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Jackson,€May€23,€2003),€òòperm.Ð ç,7(- Ðto€appeal€denied€óó(Tenn.€2003).Ð Ð- ). ÐÑÖ¼Ñâ âÑ8€k6XXdédÈ8ÑÑ€ Ñâ âÑ  ÑÌà  àOn€May€27,€2003,€the€State€filed€a€motion€to€modify€Defendantððs€judgment€of€convictionÐ ™é Ðrequesting€that€the€trial€court€grant€the€victim,€Philip€Rouse€III,€€restitution.€€Relying€on€the€supremeÐ ‚Ò Ðcourtððs€analysis€in€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔBurkhartÔ_Ôóó,€566€S.W.2d€871€(Tenn.€1978),€the€State€argued€that€the€failureÐ k» Ðto€grant€restitution€conflicted€with€the€provisions€of€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€40„20„116Ð T¤ Ðand€thus€rendered€Defendantððs€judgment€illegal.€€The€State€also€argued€that€the€victim€had€aÐ =  Ðconstitutional€right€to€restitution€under€Article€I,€section€35€of€the€Tennessee€Constitution.Ð & v ÐÌà  àThe€subject€matter€underlying€Defendantððs€theft€conviction€involved€the€capital€contributionsÐ ø H Ðand€assets€of€a€partnership€in€which€Mr.€Rouss€and€Defendant€both€held€ownership€interests.€€WeÐ á 1  Ðglean€from€the€Stateððs€motion€that€the€post„trial€pleading€was€prompted€by€the€delays€Mr.€Rouss€hadÐ Ê   Ðthus€far€encountered€in€civil€court€in€his€attempts€to€secure€an€accounting€of€the€books€and€recordsÐ ³  Ðof€the€partnership,€the€clearing€of€€title€to€the€partnershipððs€realty,€and€the€dissolution€of€theÐ œì  Ðpartnership.€€The€trial€court€acknowledged€that€it€was€impossible€to€know€what€was€in€the€minds€ofÐ …Õ  Ðthe€jury€on€the€issue€of€restitution,€but€felt€that€the€trial€courtððs€failure€to€order€restitution€was€ð ðanÐ n¾  Ðerror€of€constitutional€magnitude.ðð€€Relying€on€òòÔ_ÔBurkhartÔ_Ôóó,€the€trial€court€granted€the€Stateððs€motionÐ W§  Ðto€amend€Defendantððs€judgment.€€Because€there€was€no€evidence€as€to€the€value€of€the€propertyÐ @ Ðtaken€from€Mr.€Rouss,€the€trial€court€ordered€Defendant€to€pay€$10,001€to€Mr.€Rouss€as€restitution,Ð )y Ðthe€minimum€dollar€value€of€the€property€range€supporting€Defendantððs€theft€conviction.€€òòSee€óóTenn.Ð b ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€39„14„105(4).Ð ûK ÐÌà  àInitially,€we€agree€with€the€Stateððs€argument€that€Defendant€cannot€appeal€as€of€right€fromÐ Í Ðthe€trial€courtððs€disposition€of€the€Stateððs€motion€under€Rule€3€of€the€Tennessee€Rules€of€AppellateÐ ¶ ÐProcedure.€€Rule€3€identifies€and€limits€the€conditions€under€which€an€appeal€may€lie€as€a€matter€ofÐ Ÿï Ðright,€none€of€which€are€applicable€in€this€matter.€€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€3(b);€òòCox€v.€Stateóó,€53€S.W.3dÐ ˆØ Ð287,€293€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€2001);€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔLeathÔ_Ôóó,€977€S.W.2d€132,€135€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998).€Ð qÁ ÐNonetheless,€as€the€State€suggests,€we€may€review€Defendantððs€challenge€to€the€modification€of€hisÐ Zª Ðsentence€under€what€is€commonly€referred€to€as€the€ð ðcommon„law€writ€of€certiorari.ðð€€òòÔ_ÔLeathÔ_Ôóó,€977Ð C“ ÐS.W.2d€at€135.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€section€27„8„101€provides€that€the€writ€may€be€used€toÐ ,| Ðaddress€situations€where€an€ð ðinferior€tribunal€.€.€.€has€exceeded€the€jurisdiction€conferred,€or€is€actingÐ e Ðillegally,€when,€in€the€judgment€of€the€court,€there€is€no€other€plain,€speedy€or€adequate€remedy.ðð€Ð þN ÐBecause€we€conclude€that€the€trial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€modify€Defendantððs€sentence,Ð ç 7 Ðwe€shall€treat€this€matter€as€a€petition€for€writ€of€certiorari€by€Defendant.€€òòSee€State€v.€Johnsonóó,€569Ð Ð!   ÐS.W.2d€808,€815€(Tenn.€1978).Ð ¹" ! ÐÌà  àOn€appeal,€the€State€concedes€that€the€trial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€modifyÐ ‹$Û# ÐDefendantððs€sentence€to€include€the€payment€of€restitution€to€the€victim,€and€we€agree.€€On€FebruaryÐ t%Ä $ Ð28,€2000,€the€trial€court€sentenced€Defendant€to€an€effective€sentence€of€thirty„one€years€in€theÐ ]&­!% ÐDepartment€of€Correction€for,€among€other€offenses,€attempted€first€degree€murder,€a€Class€AÐ F'–"& Ðfelony.€€òòSee€óóTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„117(a)(2).€€Once€Defendant€was€transferred€to€the€custodyÐ /(#' Ðof€the€Department€of€Correction,€the€trial€court€lost€jurisdiction€over€all€three€of€his€sentences,€and,Ð )h$( Ðas€a€general€rule,€the€power€to€amend€its€judgments.€òòId.óó€ðð€40„35„212(d);€òòState€v.€Bowlingóó,€958Ð *Q%) Ðâ âS.W.2d€362,€363€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€It€is€well„settled€that€a€judgment€beyond€the€jurisdictionÐ ê*:&* Ðof€the€court€is€void.òò€€State€v.€Ô_ÔPendergrassÔ_Ô,€óó937€S.W.2d€834,€837€(Tenn.€1996),€citing€òòBrown€v.Ð ° ÐBrownóó,€198€Tenn.€600,€281€S.W.2d€492,€497€(1955).Ð ™é Ðâ âÌà  àThe€State€agrees€that€the€failure€to€award€restitution€as€a€part€of€Defendantððs€sentencing€wasÐ k» Ðð ðmore€than€a€mere€clerical€error.ðð€€òòSee€óóTenn.€R.€Crim.€P.€36(b).€€In€òòState€v.€Mooreóó,€814€S.W.2d€381,Ð T¤ Ð383€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991),€a€panel€of€this€Court€has€previously€examined€the€ability€of€a€trialÐ =  Ðcourt€to€modify€a€defendantððs€sentence€to€include€restitution€under€Rule€36.€€In€òòMooreóó,€weÐ & v Ðconcluded€that€if€a€trial€court,€in€fact,€orders€restitution€as€a€condition€of€probation€during€theÐ  _ Ðsentencing€hearing,€but€the€judgment€omits€such€a€condition,€then€the€trial€court€retains€authorityÐ ø H Ðto€modify€the€defendantððs€judgment€to€reflect€the€payment€of€restitution€under€Rule€36.€€If,€on€theÐ á 1  Ðother€hand,€the€trial€court€ð ðorders€probation€and,€through€oversight€or€otherwise,€omits€restitutionÐ Ê   Ðas€a€condition,€its€authority€to€modify€the€conditions€to€include€restitution€ends€upon€such€orderÐ ³  Ðbecoming€final.ðð€€òòId.óó€€The€trial€court€in€the€case€òòsub€judiceóó€clearly€acknowledged€that€it€did€not€orderÐ œì  Ðrestitution€when€imposing€Defendantððs€sentence.€€Whatever€the€reasons€for€this€omission,€we€cannotÐ …Õ  Ðconclude€that€there€was€a€clerical€error€in€this€matter.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Ô_ÔHobertÔ_Ô€Dean€Davisóó,€No.€E2000„Ð n¾  Ð02879„CCA„R3„CD,€2002€WL€340597€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Knoxville,€Mar.€4,€2002),€òòno€perm.€toÐ W§  Ðappeal€filedóó,€(While€the€trial€court€may€correct€clerical€errors€pursuant€to€Rule€36,€it€is€withoutÐ @ Ðjurisdiction€to€correct€substantive€errors€after€the€judgment€has€become€final.)Ð )y ÐÌà  àInitially,€the€State€sought€a€modification€of€Defendantððs€sentence€under€òòÔ_ÔBurkhartÔ_Ôóó€whichÐ ûK Ðprovides€that€ð ða€trial€judge€may€correct€an€illegal,€as€opposed€to€a€merely€erroneous,€sentence€at€anyÐ ä4 Ðtime,€even€if€it€has€become€final.ðð€€òòÔ_ÔBurkhartÔ_Ôóó,€566€S.W.2d€at€873.€€The€òòÔ_ÔBurkhartÔ_Ô€óócourt€recognized,Ð Í Ðhowever,€that€while€a€sentence€in€direct€contravention€of€a€statute€is€illegal€and€void,€a€finalÐ ¶ Ðjudgment€which,€although€incorrect,€is€in€conformity€with€an€applicable€statute€is€not€subject€toÐ Ÿï Ðamendment.€€òòId.óó€€As€the€State€now€concedes,€regardless€of€the€juryððs€thought€processes€on€the€issueÐ ˆØ Ðof€restitution€in€this€case,€there€is€nothing€on€the€face€of€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€in€the€theftÐ qÁ Ðconviction€which€indicates€that€the€trial€court€was€without€authority€or€jurisdiction€to€issue€it.€€òòSeeÐ Zª ÐCoxóó,€53€S.W.3d€at€292,€(quoting€òòState€v.€Donald€Ô_ÔReeÔ_Ô€Jonesóó,€No.€M2000„00381„CCA„R3„CD,€2000Ð C“ ÐWL€1520012,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.,€Nashville,€Oct.€13,€2000)),€òòno€perm.€to€appeal€filedóó;€òòMooreóó,Ð ,| Ð814€S.W.2d€at€383.Ð e ÐÌà  àBased€upon€the€foregoing,€we€find€that€the€trial€court€was€without€jurisdiction€to€modifyÐ ç 7 ÐDefendantððs€sentence.€Ð Ð!   ÐÌà  àà@GG%ìàò òCONCLUSIONó óˆÐ ¢#ò" ÐÌà  àThe€judgment€of€the€trial€court€is€reversed,€and€this€case€is€remanded€for€reinstatement€of€theÐ u%Å $ Ðjudgment€of€conviction€Ô_ÔÔ_ÔÔ_ÔasÔ_Ô€originally€entered.Ð ^&®!% ÐÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð 0(€#' Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àTHOMAS€T.€WOODALL,€JUDGE