ÿWPCì% ÊŠšî5©Pëƒí† þ/9JO1Q¸--<þQ÷¼å™Š}ÊØ„»i‘³m¥2™Ï›2Ú˜üÝ[W.À08¿|çB€z®Npx+wp+¢?‡²+äk ù§ ˆÙäñwò1¤[Ê»`Ÿ¸eŠÄ˜CO ësëƒjœj ¿û$&Àgá‚ô3˜h”!¹téÂS\C¦EB~]ï"ßtLee«{jIjƬ¨Ï!°QÇÂVåY>lEÅq«J$Ä“Ün5<çç6RÇÁ»×íRájZÞV®èÚ¾} å²ÎÄ‚•!èàR%m=8 GcŽ TäËë\SÜèj˜Ÿ›fù:ålÚóYŸç8ìUi¯Bgàr$2ˆhÇ!©]B!y y0]!ÕÉi¡ y;IQîZ¾(v5$ë^,Òìo8]–ÀÖ{I«µcs¶féTÖ§ôS¥2Ô!pâ™’ ‘Ç’X÷8>D4’8HUKwªØD¼íÜwx<‡«¸Gµ\¡ç æyXžê®ÒÀüÁÛ󼩿dŸ¥ä‚­GC£ºÔµ y@+(HPt?‚T䨿×'EÍÆXû×˱zÁH9aeqUš± yœº&”b %\Nb 0ˆdUNìU@: zzÒô zÆ Ò@ ^  w 4" 6 ÆE Æ ÆÑ Æ— ]N_ ma#ÁxE9œ ; 0D××UNxiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiibá á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á á 0ëé é é é BÔ!Ô! 0¤ñ! D3•" D-È" 0Kõ"õ" AS@#Æ“# 0¤Y$ 0Dý$ A«A%»(`£ª$¡¡Ñ€.ÑÑ8€½­»»d»»d8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  Ó(í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt{l+ ÖJ~'TÒ¬3|xLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5‚Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5„Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5…Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0 ’ Ý ƒR0û$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¥ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Specifically,€the€pre„sentence€report€showed€that€the€appellant€was€first€convicted€in€California€in€1987€onÐ ° Ðcharges€of€obtaining€aid€by€fraud.€€She€was€incarcerated€for€a€short€time€and€then€was€released€on€parole.€€In€JanuaryÐ tÄ Ð1995,€the€appellant€was€convicted€of€passing€worthless€checks€in€Marshall€County,€Tennessee,€and€received€a€sentenceÐ 8ˆ Ðof€eleven€months€and€twenty„nineÔ‡XIXòô¥Ô€Ô#†ô¥òXXI5#Ôdays€with€the€sentence€suspended€upon€payment€of€a€fine€and€public€service.€€In€MayÐ üL Ð1997,€the€appellant€was€convicted€of€two€counts€of€passing€worthless€checks€in€Marshall€County€and€received€a€sentenceÐ è8 Ðof€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€on€each€count,€to€be€served€at€seventy„five€percent€(75%),€with€the€sentencesÐ ¬ü Ðsuspended€upon€payment€of€the€checks€and€fifty€dollar€($50)€fines.€€In€August€1997,€the€appellant€was€convicted€of€creditÐ p À Ðcard€fraud€and€received€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days,€with€the€sentence€suspended€and€six€monthsÐ 4 „ Ðprobation.€€In€January€1998,€the€appellant€was€again€convicted€of€two€counts€of€passing€worthless€checks€and€receivedÐ ø H Ðsentences€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€to€be€served€at€seventy„five€percent€(75%),€with€the€sentences€Ð ¼   Ðsuspended€upon€payment€of€the€checks€and€fifty€dollar€($50)€fines.€€In€July€1998,€the€appellantððs€probation€was€revokedÐ € Ð  Ðfor€failure€to€report€to€her€probation€officer€and€for€failure€to€pay€restitution€and€costs.€€Also€in€July€1998,€the€appellantÐ D ”  Ðwas€convicted€of€passing€worthless€checks€and€received€a€sentence€of€eleven€months€and€twenty„nine€days€to€be€servedÐ X  Ðat€seventy„five€percent€(75%),€with€the€sentence€suspended€upon€payment€of€restitution€and€costs.€€On€July€13,€1998,Ð Ì  Ðthe€appellant€was€convicted€of€driving€on€a€revoked€license€and,€again,€on€July€14,€1998,€and€July€28,€1998,€wasÐ à  Ðconvicted€of€passing€worthless€checks.€€Finally,€the€appellant€was€convicted€of€theft€on€July€28,€1998.€€At€the€time€ofÐ T¤  Ðthe€theft€conviction,€the€appellant€was€on€probation.(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular nÝ ƒR0û$ÝÓ  Óà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¥ò»»ÔÝ  ÝÔ_Ô€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(a)€provides:Ð ° ÐÌà8  àà8` Ð Ð àAn€offender€who€meets€all€of€the€following€minimum€criteria€shall€be€consideredÐ 8ˆ Ðeligible€for€punishment€in€the€community€under€the€provisions€of€this€chapter:ÐüL` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(1)€Persons€who,€without€this€option,€would€be€incarcerated€in€a€correctionalÐ À Ðinstitution;ЄÔ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(2)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€property„related,€or€drug/alcohol„related€felonyÐ H ˜ Ðoffenses€or€other€felony€offenses€not€involving€crimes€against€the€person.€.€.€;Ð \` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(3)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€nonviolent€felony€offenses;ÐÐ ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(4)€Persons€who€are€convicted€of€felony€offenses€in€which€the€use€or€possession€ofÐ ” ä  Ða€weapon€was€not€involved;ÐX ¨ ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(5)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€present€or€past€pattern€of€behavior€indicatingÐ  l  Ðviolence;Ðà 0 ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(6)€Persons€who€do€not€demonstrate€a€pattern€of€committing€violent€offenses;€and€Ð¤ô ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àPersons€who€are€sentenced€to€incarceration€or€on€escape€at€the€time€of€considerationÐ h¸  Ðwill€not€be€eligible.€- ù-(|G20û$¤¤Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÔ€ô¥ò»»Ô d(|3?y$££Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝVVVV'ÿÿdxd)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx( ±þ$’’ò òFigure€Ú  Ú1Ú  Úó ó^_X`YEþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3?y$¢¢Ý ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ å»»dd8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óX[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCÿÿ HKKKKÝ ƒ£ª!ÝÑ€.ÑÑ8€ å»»ddÈ8ÑÑ ý ÑÓ  ÓÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ  ÑÑ  ÑÔ€¼ å»»»ÔÑ8€IXXdì»»d8Ñà@ttìàÔ‡î4 åÔIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@kk$ìàAT€NASHVILLEÔ#†¼ å»îî4 #ԈРÖ& ÐÓ  Óà @ àà @` à€Assigned€on€Briefs€May€16,€2001Ð üL ÐÔ‡XIX»¼ åÔÌò òÔ#†¼ å»XXI#ÔSTATE€OF€TENNESSEEòòóó€v.€MARCIA€€LYNN€WILLIAMSÔ‡XIX»¼ åÔó óÐ úJ ÐÌà@@½½ìàò ò€Appeal€as€of€Right€from€the€Circuit€Court€for€Marshall€CountyÐ ú J Ðà@@øøìàNo.€14283€€€€€€Charles€Lee,€JudgeÐ æ 6 ÐÌÌà@@ìì*ìàßA€V) °°` d€÷E<©` AßÐ ªú  ÐÌà@@TTìàNo.€M2000„02593„CCA„R3„CD€„€Filed€August€28,€Ô_Ô2001Ô_ÔÐ ¥õ  ÐÌßA€V) °°` dE<|` AßÐ }Í  Ðó óÌÓ  ÓThe€appellant,€Marcia€Lynn€Williams,€entered€a€best€interest€guilty€plea€in€the€Circuit€Court€ofÐ xÈ  ÐMarshall€County€to€one€count€of€obtaining€drugs€by€false€pretense,€a€class€D€felony.€€Following€aÐ d´ Ðsentencing€hearing,€the€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€three€years€incarceration€in€the€TennesseeÐ P  ÐDepartment€of€Correction.€€On€appeal,€the€appellant€argues€that€the€trial€court€erred€by€denying€theÐ <Œ Ðappellant€a€sentence€in€the€community€corrections€program.€€After€a€review€of€the€record€and€theÐ (x Ðparties'€briefs,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€€Ð d ÐÓ»ÓÌò òTenn.€R.€App.€P.€3€Appeal€as€of€Right;€Judgment€of€the€Circuit€Court€is€Affirmed.ó óÐ ì< ÐÌòòÓ  ÓÔ#†¼ å»àXI•#ÔÔ‡XIX.¼ åÔNorma€McGee€Ogle,€J.óó,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòJerry€L.€Smithóó€and€òòJohnÐ Ä ÐEverett€Williams,€JJ.óó,€joined.Ð ° ÐÌAndrew€Jackson€Ô_ÔDearingÔ_Ô,€III,€Ô_ÔShelbyvilleÔ_Ô,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellant,€Marcia€Lynn€Williams.Ð ˆØ ÐÌPaul€G.€Summers,€Attorney€General€and€Reporter;€Thomas€E.€Williams,€III,€Assistant€AttorneyÐ `° ÐGeneral;€W.€Michael€Ô_ÔMcCownÔ_Ô,€District€Attorney€General;€and€Ô_ÔWeakleyÔ_Ô€E.€Barnard,€AssistantÐ L œ ÐDistrict€Attorney€General,€for€the€appellee,€State€of€Tennessee.Ð 8!ˆ  ÐÓìÓÌà@@OO&ìàò òOPINIONó óÔ#†¼ å»XXI#ÔÔ‡XIX»¼ åÔÐ #`" ÐÌòòóóÔ#†¼ å»XXId #ÔÔ‡XIX»¼ åÔÓ  Óà@ìàòòò òI.€€Factual€Backgroundó óóóÔ#†¼ å»XXI #ÔÔ€XIX»¼ åԈРè$8 $ Ðà  àà ` àOn€April€19,€2000,€Parsonððs€Pharmacy€in€Ô_ÔLewisburgÔ_Ô€received€a€telephone€call,Ð Ô%$!% Ðallegedly€from€a€Dr.€Ô_ÔDelaplaneÔ_Ôððs€office,€requesting€a€prescription€for€Ô_ÔhydrocodoneÔ_Ô€for€the€appellant.€Ð À&"& ÐImmediately€suspicious,€the€owner€of€the€pharmacy€called€the€doctorððs€office€to€verify€theÐ ¬'ü"' Ðprescription.€€After€confirming€that€neither€Dr.€Ô_ÔDelaplaneÔ_Ô€nor€anyone€from€the€doctorððs€office€hadÐ ˜(è#( Ðrequested€the€prescription,€the€owner€of€the€pharmacy€called€the€Ô_ÔLewisburgÔ_Ô€Police€Department€toÐ „)Ô$) Ðreport€the€problem.€€Police€Detective€Jimmy€Ô_ÔWhitsettÔ_Ô€advised€the€pharmacy€to€notify€him€if€anyoneÐ p*À%* Ðcame€in€to€obtain€the€medication.€€When€the€appellant€arrived€at€the€pharmacy€around€noon€andÐ \+¬&+ Ðrequested€the€medication,€the€detective€was€called€to€the€scene€where€he€immediately€placed€theÐ H,˜', Ðappellant€under€arrest.€€Ð 4-„(-ý ÐÔ_Ô‡à  àà ` àThe€appellant€entered€a€best€interest€guilty€plea€to€obtaining€drugs€by€false€pretenseÐ ° Ðand€further€agreed€that€the€trial€court€determine€the€appropriate€sentence.€€The€trial€court€sentencedÐ œì Ðthe€appellant€as€a€standard€Range€I€offender€to€three€years€incarceration€in€the€Tennessee€DepartmentÐ ˆØ Ðof€Correction,€whereupon€the€appellant€requested€placement€in€the€community€corrections€program.€Ð tÄ ÐJudy€Byrd,€who€prepared€the€appellantððs€pre„sentence€report,€testified€at€the€sentencing€hearing€thatÐ `° Ðthe€appellant€had€received€some€type€of€alternative€sentencing€on€six€different€occasions€and,€on€atÐ L œ Ðleast€one€occasion,€the€appellantððs€probation€had€been€revoked.׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€The€appellant€testified€that,€at€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðtime€of€the€sentencing€hearing,€she€was€forty„three€years€old€and€the€sole€supporter€of€her€four„year„Ð $ t Ðold€daughter.€€She€was€employed€as€the€housekeeping€supervisor€at€the€Marriott€Hotel€in€Franklin.€Ð  ` ÐAfter€graduating€from€high€school,€the€appellant€attended€Tennessee€State€University€(TSU)€forÐ ü L  Ðapproximately€three€years.€€At€TSU,€she€majored€in€clinical€psychology€and€was€on€the€Deanððs€list.€Ð è 8  ÐHowever,€in€1977,€the€appellant€was€raped€on€the€TSU€campus€and€shortly€thereafter€dropped€outÐ Ô$  Ðof€school.€€The€appellant€described€1997€as€a€ð ðvery€traumatic€timeðð€during€which€she€made€poorÐ À  Ðchoices.€€She€further€related€that,€in€1997,€she€became€involved€in€an€abusive€relationship€and€passedÐ ¬ü  Ðthe€worthless€checks€out€of€desperation€to€provide€for€her€child.€€In€1998,€the€appellant€wasÐ ˜è  Ðhospitalized€at€Vanderbilt€Psychiatric€Hospital€where€she€was€diagnosed€as€manic€depressive€withÐ „Ô  Ðbipolar€disorder€and€was€placed€on€medication€which€included€Haldol,€Depakote,€Prozac,€andÐ pÀ ÐXanax.€€At€the€time€of€the€instant€offense,€she€was€not€taking€her€medication.€€The€appellantÐ \¬ Ðexplained€that€she€also€had€physical€problems.€€She€was€diagnosed€with€a€degenerative€disk€problemÐ H˜ Ðand€began€taking€Lortab€for€pain,€resulting€in€an€addiction€to€pain€medication.€€She€also€admittedÐ 4„ Ðusing€cocaine€but€reported€that€her€last€use€was€in€1999.€€The€appellant€stated€that€she€receivesÐ  p Ðpsychiatric€treatment€at€a€local€mental€health€center.€€She€contended€that€she€has€ð ðspecial€needsððÐ  \ Ðwhich€are€treatable;€therefore,€the€trial€judge€should€have€sentenced€her€to€the€community€correctionsÐ øH Ðprogram.€€Ð ä4 ÐÌà  àà ` àAfter€hearing€the€testimony,€the€trial€judge€correctly€concluded€that€the€appellant€wasÐ ¼  Ðpresumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing;€however,€the€court€concluded€thatÐ ¨ø Ðthe€State€had€successfully€provided€evidence€to€the€contrary.€€The€trial€court€noted€that€the€appellantÐ ° Ðhad€not€been€truthful€with€the€court.€€When€questioned€by€the€court€regarding€her€failure€to€make€the€Ð œì Ðcourt€ordered€payments€to€reimburse€the€State€for€the€costs€of€her€attorney,€the€appellant€implied€thatÐ ˆØ Ðshe€had€given€the€money€to€a€friend€who€had€failed€to€take€it€to€the€clerk.€€Upon€further€questioningÐ tÄ Ðby€the€court,€the€appellant€said€that€she€was€without€funds€and€had€asked€the€friend€to€make€theÐ `° Ðpayments€for€her.€€The€trial€court,€sua€sponte,€called€the€friend,€Josephine€Reinhardt,€to€testifyÐ L œ Ðregarding€the€allegations.€€Reinhardt€advised€the€court€that€the€appellant€first€called€her€on€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðmorning€of€the€sentencing€hearing€and€asked€that€Reinhardt€make€the€payments€for€her.€€ReinhardtÐ $ t Ðexplained€that€she€had€advised€the€appellant€that€she€would€be€unable€to€help€her.€€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€court€further€noted€that€the€appellant€had€been€placed€on€some€type€ofÐ è 8  Ðalternative€sentencing€numerous€times€and€these€efforts€had€proven€to€be€unsuccessful.€€Additionally,Ð Ô$  Ðthe€appellant€had€committed€an€offense€while€on€probation€and€her€probation€had€been€revoked€onÐ À  Ðone€occasion.€€The€trial€court€concluded€that€the€appellant€had€ð ðan€atrocious,€horrible€record.ðð€€HeÐ ¬ü  Ðrelated€that€ð ðthe€common€thread€that€runs€throughout€all€of€these€offenses€is€untruthfulness€andÐ ˜è  Ðfraud.ððÐ „Ô  ÐÌà  àà ` àAfter€reviewing€the€appellantððs€request€without€the€presumption€in€favor€of€alternativeÐ \¬ Ðsentencing,€the€trial€judge€described€the€appellantððs€work€history€as€ð ðsporadic.ðð€€He€also€determinedÐ H˜ Ðthat€granting€the€appellant€some€type€of€alternative€sentence€would€not€act€as€a€deterrent€to€othersÐ 4„ Ðlikely€to€commit€similar€offenses.€€In€support€of€this€contention,€the€court€considered€that€theÐ  p Ðappellant€had€been€charged€with€a€felony€and€that€the€community€was€aware€that€she€had€at€least€sixÐ  \ Ðother€convictions.€€Ð øH ÐÌà@éé$ìàò òòòII.€€Analysisóóó óˆÐ Ð  Ðà  àà ` àWhen€a€criminal€appellant€challenges€the€length,€range,€or€manner€of€service€of€aÐ ¼  Ðsentence,€the€reviewing€court€must€conduct€a€de€novo€review€of€the€sentence€with€a€presumption€thatÐ ¨ø Ðthe€determinations€made€by€the€trial€court€are€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1997).€Ð ”ä ÐThis€presumption,€however,€is€ð ðconditioned€upon€the€affirmative€showing€in€the€record€that€the€trialÐ €Ð Ðcourt€considered€the€sentencing€principles€and€all€relevant€facts€and€circumstances.ðð€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,Ð l¼ Ð823€S.W.2d€166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€In€the€event€that€the€record€fails€to€show€such€consideration,€theÐ X ¨ Ðreview€of€the€sentence€is€purely€de€novo.€€òòState€v.€Sheltonóó,€854€S.W.2d€116,€123€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð D!” Ð1992).€€Because€the€trial€court€incorrectly€used€deterrence€as€a€basis€to€deny€the€appellant€a€sentenceÐ 0"€  Ðof€community€corrections,€our€review€of€the€appellantððs€sentence€is€de€novo€without€a€presumptionÐ #l! Ðof€correctness.Ð $X" ÐÌà  àà ` àIn€making€its€sentencing€determination,€the€trial€court,€at€the€conclusion€of€theÐ à%0!$ Ðsentencing€hearing,€first€determines€the€range€of€sentence,€and€then€determines€the€specific€sentenceÐ Ì&"% Ðand€the€propriety€of€sentencing€alternatives€by€considering:€(1)€the€evidence,€if€any,€received€at€theÐ ¸'#& Ðtrial€and€the€sentencing€hearing,€(2)€the€pre„sentence€report,€(3)€the€principles€of€sentencing€andÐ ¤(ô#' Ðarguments€as€to€sentencing€alternatives,€(4)€the€nature€and€characteristics€of€the€criminal€conductÐ )à$( Ðinvolved,€(5)€evidence€and€information€offered€by€the€parties€on€the€enhancement€and€mitigatingÐ |*Ì%) Ðfactors,€(6)€any€statements€the€appellant€wishes€to€make€in€the€appellantððs€behalf€about€sentencing,Ð h+¸&* Ðand€(7)€the€potential€for€rehabilitation€or€treatment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5)€(1997),€„210Ð ° Ð(a)€(2000€Supp.);€òòState€v.€Williamsóó,€920€S.W.2d€247,€258€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995).Ð œì ÐÌà  àà ` àWhen€imposing€a€sentence,€the€trial€court€must€make€specific€findings€of€fact€on€theÐ tÄ Ðrecord€supporting€the€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„209(c)€(1997).€€The€record€should€alsoÐ `° Ðinclude€any€enhancement€or€mitigating€factors€applied€by€the€trial€court.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð L œ Ð210(f).€€Thus,€if€the€trial€court€wishes€to€enhance€a€sentence,€the€court€must€state€its€reasons€on€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðrecord.€€The€purpose€of€recording€the€courtððs€reasoning€is€to€guarantee€the€preparation€of€a€properÐ $ t Ðrecord€for€appellate€review.€€òòState€v.€Ervinóó,€939€S.W.2d€581,€584€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1996).€Ð  ` ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€presumptive€sentence€to€be€imposed€by€the€trial€court€for€a€Class€B,€C,€D,€or€EÐ è 8  Ðfelony€is€the€minimum€within€the€applicable€range€unless€there€are€enhancement€or€mitigating€factorsÐ Ô$  Ðpresent.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„210(c).€€If€there€are€enhancement€and€mitigating€factors,€the€courtÐ À  Ðmust€start€at€the€presumptive€sentence,€enhance€the€sentence€as€appropriate€for€the€enhancementÐ ¬ü  Ðfactors,€and€then€reduce€the€sentence€in€the€range€as€appropriate€for€the€mitigating€factors.€€òòId.óó€at€(e).€Ð ˜è  ÐNotably,€the€weight€to€be€given€each€factor€is€left€to€the€discretion€of€the€trial€judge.€€òòSheltonóó,€854Ð „Ô  ÐS.W.2d€at€123.€€However,€the€sentence€must€be€adequately€supported€by€the€record€and€comply€withÐ pÀ Ðthe€purposes€and€principles€of€the€1989€Sentencing€Reform€Act.€€òòState€v.€Mossóó,€727€S.W.2d€229,Ð \¬ Ð237€(Tenn.€1986).€€Nonetheless,€if€our€review€reflects€that€the€trial€court€followed€the€statutoryÐ H˜ Ðsentencing€procedure,€that€the€court€imposed€a€lawful€sentence€after€having€given€due€considerationÐ 4„ Ðand€proper€weight€to€the€factors€and€principles€set€out€under€the€sentencing€law,€and€that€the€trialÐ  p Ðcourtððs€findings€of€fact€are€adequately€supported€by€the€record,€then€we€may€not€modify€the€sentenceÐ  \ Ðð ðeven€if€we€would€have€preferred€a€different€result.ðð€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,€789€(Tenn.Ð øH ÐCrim.€App.€1991).€€Additionally,€we€note€that€the€appellant€bears€the€burden€of€showing€theÐ ä4 Ðimpropriety€of€the€sentence€imposed.€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€169.Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àà ` àOn€appeal,€the€appellant€argues€that€she€should€have€been€granted€alternativeÐ ¨ø Ðsentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(5)€(1997)€provides:Ð ”ä Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àIn€recognition€that€state€prison€capacities€and€the€funds€to€build€andÐ €Ð Ðmaintain€them€are€limited,€convicted€felons€committing€the€mostÐ l¼ Ðsevere€offenses,€possessing€criminal€histories€evincing€a€clearÐ X ¨ Ðdisregard€for€the€laws€and€morals€of€society,€and€evincing€failure€ofÐ D!” Ðpast€efforts€at€rehabilitation€shall€be€given€first€priority€regardingÐ 0"€  Ðsentencing€involving€incarceration.€.€.€.€Ð#l!` x` x ÐA€defendant€who€does€not€fall€within€this€class€of€offenders€ð ðand€who€is€an€especially€mitigated€orÐ $X" Ðstandard€offender€convicted€of€a€Class€C,€D€or€E€felony€is€presumed€to€be€a€favorable€candidate€forÐ ô$D # Ðalternative€sentencing€options€in€the€absence€of€evidence€to€the€contrary.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð à%0!$ Ð102(6).€€In€other€words,€unless€sufficient€evidence€rebuts€the€presumption,€ð ð[t]he€trial€court€mustÐ Ì&"% Ðpresume€that€a€defendant€sentenced€to€eight€years€or€less€and€not€an€offender€for€whom€incarcerationÐ ¸'#& Ðis€a€priority€is€subject€to€alternative€sentencing,€and€that€a€sentence€other€than€incarceration€wouldÐ ¤(ô#' Ðresult€in€successful€rehabilitation.ðð€€òòState€v.€Byrdóó,€861€S.W.2d€377,€379„80€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993)Ð )à$( Ð(citation€omitted);€òòÔ‡XIXXXIÔsee€alsoóóÔ#†XIXXXI@#Ô€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(a)€(1997).€€Ð |*Ì%) Ðà  àÐ h+¸&* Ðà  àà ` àThe€appellant€contends€that,€because€of€her€history€of€drug€use,€she€has€ð ðspecialÐ ° Ðneedsðð€and€thus€falls€within€the€provisions€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(c)€(2000€Supp.),€whichÐ œì Ðstates€thatÐ ˆØ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[f]elony€offenders€not€otherwise€eligible€under€subsection€(a),׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€andÐ tÄ Ðwho€would€be€usually€considered€unfit€for€probation€due€to€historiesÐ `° Ðof€chronic€alcohol,€drug€abuse,€or€mental€health€problems,€but€whoseÐ L œ Ðspecial€needs€are€treatable€and€could€be€served€best€in€the€communityÐ 8 ˆ Ðrather€than€in€a€correctional€institution,€may€be€considered€eligible€forÐ $ t Ðpunishment€in€the€community€under€the€provisions€of€this€chapter.Ð `` x` x ÐWhile€we€agree€with€the€appellant€that,€because€she€is€a€standard€Range€I€offender€convicted€of€aÐ ü L  Ðclass€D€felony,€she€is€eligible€for€a€community€corrections€sentence€due€to€the€nonviolent€nature€ofÐ è 8  Ðher€offenses,€òòseeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(a);€òòÔ‡XIXXXIÔsee€alsoóóÔ#†XIXXXIŸE#Ô€òòState€v.€Jimmy€A.€Salyeróó,€No.€03C01„Ð Ô$  Ð9803„CR„00093,€1999€WL€812484,€at€*12€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€October€8,€1999),€weÐ À  Ðnote€that€the€appellant€is€eligible€under€subsection€(a),€but€note€that€an€offender€is€not€automaticallyÐ ¬ü  Ðentitled€to€such€relief€if€he€or€she€meets€the€requirements€for€eligibility.€€òòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Ballóó,€973Ð ˜è  ÐS.W.2d€288,€294€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1998);€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€744€S.W.2d€919,€922€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð „Ô  Ð1987).€€Rather,€the€statute€provides€that€the€criteria€shall€be€interpreted€as€minimum€standards€toÐ pÀ Ðguide€a€trial€courtððs€determination€of€whether€that€offender€is€eligible€to€be€considered€forÐ \¬ Ðcommunity€corrections.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„36„106(d).€€Even€if€a€defendant€is€presumed€to€beÐ H˜ Ða€favorable€candidate€for€alternative€sentencing€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„102(6),€the€statutoryÐ 4„ Ðpresumption€of€an€alternative€sentence€may€be€overcome€ifÐ  p Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(A)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€protect€society€by€restraining€aÐ  \ Ðdefendant€who€has€a€long€history€of€criminal€conduct;ÐøH` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(B)€[c]onfinement€is€necessary€to€avoid€depreciating€the€seriousnessÐ ä4 Ðof€the€offense€or€confinement€is€particularly€suited€to€provide€anÐ Ð  Ðeffective€deterrence€to€others€likely€to€commit€similar€offenses;€or€Ð¼ ` x` x Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à(C)€[m]easures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€orÐ ¨ø Ðrecently€been€applied€unsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.€Ð”ä` x` x ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(A)„(C).Ð ° ÐÌà  àà ` àMoreover,€this€court€has€previously€found€that,€in€determining€an€appellantððsÐ ˆØ Ðentitlement€to€a€community€corrections€sentence,€Ð tÄ Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àthe€appellantððs€rehabilitative€potential€is€central€in€the€selectionÐ `° Ðprocess.€€Each€case€must€be€guided€by€its€individual€facts€andÐ L œ Ðcircumstances.€€Additionally,€given€their€ability€to€review€theÐ 8 ˆ Ðoffenderððs€demeanor€and€characteristics€first€hand,€trial€courts€are€inÐ $ t Ðthe€best€position€to€ascertain€an€offenderððs€amenability€to€aÐ  ` Ðcommunity€corrections€program.€€Acknowledging€the€wide€discretionÐ ü L  Ðavailable€to€trial€courts,€this€court€will€not€disturb€a€trial€courtððsÐ è 8  Ðdecision€absent€a€clear€abuse€of€that€discretion.ÐÔ$ ` x` x ÐòòState€v.€Grigsbyóó,€957€S.W.2d€541,€547€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).Ð À  ÐÌà  àà ` àThe€trial€court€specifically€denied€the€appellant€a€sentence€of€community€correctionsÐ ˜è  Ðbecause€the€appellant€has€been€granted€probation€numerous€times€in€the€past€and€has€failed€toÐ „Ô  Ðrehabilitate.€€The€trial€court€also€considered€the€deterrent€effect€of€the€appellantððs€incarceration€onÐ pÀ Ðthose€similarly€situated€in€the€community.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(B).€€We€mustÐ \¬ Ðconclude,€however,€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€denying€the€appellant€community€corrections€on€theÐ H˜ Ðbasis€of€the€deterrent€effect€of€her€incarceration.€€In€òòState€v.€Hooperóó,€29€S.W.3d€1,10„12€(Tenn.Ð 4„ Ð2000),€our€supreme€court€established€guidelines€for€determining€when€deterrence€is€a€proper€factorÐ  p Ðfor€denying€a€form€of€alternative€sentencing.€€Such€guidelines€are€necessary€because€Ô‡XIXXXIÔð ððð[a]n€elementÐ  \ Ðof€deterrence€is€present€in€every€case€but€the€degree€of€significance€of€this€factor€in€restraining€theÐ øH Ðoffender€or€curbing€the€propensity€for€criminal€activity€in€others,€varies€widely€with€the€class€ofÐ ä4 Ðoffense€and€the€facts€of€each€case.ððððÔ#†XIXXXIôT#Ô€€òòAshbyóó,€823€S.W.2d€at€170€(citing€òòState€v.€Michaelóó,€629€S.W.2dÐ Ð  Ð13,€14€(Tenn.€1982)).€€The€trial€court€found€that€Ð ¼  Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð à[if€the€appellant]€walks€out€of€this€court€after€having€been€in€CircuitÐ ¨ø ÐCourt€charged€with€a€felony€and€has€five€or€six€other€crimes€that€theÐ ”ä Ðgeneral€community€knows€that€she€has€been€convicted€of,€whatÐ €Ð Ðdeterrent€is€there€to€those€persons€who€think,€ð ðWell,€gosh,€you€get€toÐ l¼ Ðgo€up€to€that€courthouse€and€keep€going€up€to€that€courthouse€and€youÐ X ¨ Ðalways€get€to€go€home.ððÐD!”` x` x ÐHowever,€there€is€nothing€in€the€record€to€indicate€that€others€in€the€general€community€know€of€theÐ 0"€  Ðappellantððs€criminal€history€or€to€suggest€that€the€appellantððs€incarceration€would€ð ðÔ‡XIXXXIÔserve€as€aÐ #l! Ðdeterrent€to€others€similarly€situated€and€likely€to€commit€similar€crimes,Ô#†XIXXXIZ#Ôðð€nor€do€we€find€theÐ $X" Ðpresence€of€any€other€fact€suggesting€the€deterrent€effect€of€the€appellantððs€incarceration.€€òòHooperóó,Ð ô$D # Ð29€S.W.3d€at€10.Ð à%0!$ ÐÌà  àà ` àRegardless,€the€record€amply€supports€the€trial€courtððs€denial€of€a€communityÐ ¸'#& Ðcorrections€sentence€due€to€the€appellantððs€€lack€of€rehabilitative€potential,€which€is€evidenced€byÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthe€fact€that€ð ð[m]easures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€frequently€or€recently€been€appliedÐ )à$( Ðunsuccessfully€to€the€defendant.ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(1)(C).€€The€appellantððs€recordÐ |*Ì%) Ðreflects€that€she€has€received€alternative€sentencing€numerous€times€in€the€past,€has€had€her€probationÐ h+¸&* Ðrevoked€on€at€least€one€occasion€for€failure€to€comply€with€the€terms€of€her€probation,€and€has€failedÐ ° Ðto€rehabilitate.€€òòSeeóó€òòGrigsbyóó,€957€S.W.2d€at€547;€òòState€v.€Thomas€L.€Matthewsóó,€No.€02C01„9704„Ð œì ÐCR„00158,€1998€WL€148317,€at€*2€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Jackson,€March€31,€1998);€òòState€v.€JohnÐ ˆØ ÐMiller,€Jr.óó,€No.€03C01„9512„CC„00382,€1997€WL€106677,€at€*6€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,Ð tÄ ÐMarch€11,€1997).€€In€sum,€Ð `° Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àmeasures€less€restrictive€than€confinement€have€recently€been€appliedÐ L œ Ðunsuccessfully€to€the€[appellant].€€This,€in€conjunction€with€theÐ 8 ˆ Ð[appellantððs]€previous€history€of€criminal€convictions€and€criminalÐ $ t Ðbehavior,€indicates€that€the€[appellantððs]€potential€for€rehabilitationÐ  ` Ðis€poor.€€Given€these€circumstances,€denial€of€alternative€sentencingÐ ü L  Ðseems€appropriate.Ðè 8 ` x` x ÐòòState€v.€Larry€D.€Johnsonóó,€No.€02C01„9807„CC„00218,€1999€WL€412700,€at€*3€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.Ð Ô$  Ðat€Jackson,€June€18,€1999)€(citations€omitted).Ð À  ÐÌà@MM"ìàòòò òIII.€€Conclusionóóó óˆÐ ˜è  Ðà  àà ` àFinding€no€reversible€error,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.€Ð „Ô  Ðà8  àà8` Ð Ð àÐ ` x` x ÐÌà  àÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð  \ Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNORMA€McGEE€OGLE,€JUDGE