ÿWPCJ €¨ÓRõǸ ž÷ìßÕ±ô‘öhÊÊõbgN´oaür¦àÂõ[w²ˆõÿ3l-KÑ&­ˆïp¸ÐâùbV%i­ (Ýñž±¾Ïƒà¨=»È·y¦ý5Öâ-6,V Œr£9énáËÿ¿þ/®c·º°ù[Ú¬šd „|ˆ‰Íý¦:w_)ñ‚îÏ¥9j¶‡B~öØ­ßÏ®¾¼4ì$¿e±eY]‰¸Úg [£•Hg¤Ø_ŽšŒ4òÀRit˹aØ'W7êÛ.ceõ/ÊÚGk]̉b1’Ë0’Ÿ¡‚Ã&tQëöî­0ã´z¤5Ýa¿ßOª?ìò›"g8™€>q»d¤ñHƒXÊFZ  fë{^¨ƒBaÛtÝï8>ý¥&ÕÖ0öR‘“ê–Ÿ9Íüø&&ik‡sÀÕîT÷ª ÅæÛNÄ3Îü¼š‰qqøû¼ÉUJûëªÒT}éªÙâO±Åìyd[Í/WG!ï:ª ©?ÂñÛF[©V#Mû©œa|6v,ìY§˜<ÚŽRhß-B¢B‡„ñóP¦hÎjæ6­þ³vN«æKJÍFrCŒûÈQàNÓ°2J§ƒö<_¹wŽwø~/JÐ>ÏÓCZL²* %Lw@R 0Ü’U :n4¨¼UNËU:!U*[ 0 … 0D¥ U:é æ# š U:£IÝU:&•`U:õU:/(iU:‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ BË AQèÆ9 0Dÿ 0DC 0D‡‡ D/ËË Bú D3X `aDbcdDefgDhiÓ€(´`$¡¡Ñ°ÑÒ°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€‰GXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  Ñ,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular¨F[%3|xt(ÈhH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular%ä2¼A`Arial(Ð(3­ $¤¤Ý ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€ìíXXdæXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýà ` àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó, øð AZ"Arial Regular ÜÒ°ÒÔ€ôcÞ ôXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ôÏÆô ôôcÞÔAlthough€vague€reference€was€made€to€a€ð ðò òrealó ó€gunðð€which€was€recovered€from€Mr.Ð  ÐWoodððs€vehicle€after€he€had€been€removed€from€the€car,€no€reference€to€such€weapon€was€madeÏby€Officer€Soloman,€the€principal€arresting€officer,€during€his€testimony.€€Moreover,€no€suchÏweapon€was€introduced€at€trial.€€ Ò°ÒÔ€ôãÞôXXÔÝ ƒ 3›ÿÝÑ@°ÑÒÒÑT@R[¨ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7ÀœÌXXdædæ7ÑÑ @ Ñà ` àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ ôãÞôôôãÞÔAlthough€vague€reference€was€made€to€a€ð ðò òrealó ó€gunðð€which€was€recovered€from€Mr.Ð  ÐWoodððs€vehicle€after€he€had€been€removed€from€the€car,€no€reference€to€such€weapon€was€madeÏby€Officer€Soloman,€the€principal€arresting€officer,€during€his€testimony.€€Moreover,€no€suchÏweapon€was€introduced€at€trial.€€,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular ?Ò°ÒÔ€ôãÞôXXÔÝ ƒ 3›ÿÝÑ@°ÑÒÒÑT@R[¨ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7ÀœÌXXdædæ7ÑÑ @ Ñà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ ôãÞôôôãÞÔAlthough€the€appellant€challenges€his€arrest€under€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€issueÐ  Ðis€more€properly€brought€as€a€challenge€to€an€unlawful€arrest.€€€However,€Officer€Soloman€wasÏauthorized€to€arrest€the€appellant€without€a€warrant€for€a€misdemeanor€committed€in€his€presence.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„7„103(a)(1)€(1995€Supp.);€òòSolomon€v.€Stateóó,€203€Tenn.€583,€315Ð B : ÐS.W.2d€99€(1958).€€ò òÐ  ø Ðó óÔ#†ôãÞôô ôãÞ$#Ô, øð AZ"Arial Regular ‹Ò°ÒÔ€ôcÞ ôXXÔÝ ƒ üÝÿÝà ` àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ôÏÆô ôôcÞÔAlthough€the€appellant€challenges€his€arrest€under€sufficiency€of€the€evidence,€this€issueÐ  Ðis€more€properly€brought€as€a€challenge€to€an€unlawful€arrest.€€€However,€Officer€Soloman€wasÏauthorized€to€arrest€the€appellant€without€a€warrant€for€a€misdemeanor€committed€in€his€presence.€ÏòòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„7„103(a)(1)€(1995€Supp.);€òòSolomon€v.€Stateóó,€203€Tenn.€583,€315Ð ` X ÐS.W.2d€99€(1958).€€ò òÐ (  Ðó óÔ#†ôcÞ ôô ôÏÆp#Ô,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular, øð AZ"Arial Regular Ý ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€XìíXXXÔÔ€XXìíÔÓ  ÓÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XìíXÔÐ  ÐÌò òOctober€29,€1998Ð šš ÐÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌÔ€ôÀ¡ôXXìíÔAppellate€Court€Clerkó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular d!"#$&Cþÿ<< CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó(('÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd'ÿÿdxdÝ ƒ`!ÝѰÑÒ°ÒÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÑ7€ìíXXdæXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÝ  Ýñiñ›ñiñÓ ÔþÓò òñiñßr€ )<,(j 8` `€€@EÈ ` ttx$ð Õrß›ñiñà@. . ®àIN€THE€COURT€OF€CRIMINAL€APPEALS€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ  Ðà@ÓÓ(®àAT€KNOXVILLEˆÌà@MM#®àSEPTEMBER€SESSION,€1998ˆÌÌÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à h àà À à)Ð | t Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àNo.€03C01„9707„CR„00287Ð h` Ðà ` àAppelleeà  àà h àà À à)Ð TL  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àKNOX€COUNTYÐ @8  Ðvs.à ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)Ð ,$  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  àHon.€RAY€L.€JENKINS,€JudgeÐ   ÐCHARLES€LEROY€WOODS,à À à)Ð ü  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à)à  à(Resisting€Arrest,€Disorderly€Conduct,Ð ðè  Ðà ` àAppellantà  àà h àà À à)à  àPublic€Intoxication)Ð ÜÔ  Ðó óÌÌÌòòFor€the€Appellantóó:à  àà h àà À àà  àòòFor€the€Appelleeóó:Ð zr ÐÌò òWilliam€L.€Brownó óà  àà h àò òà À àà  àJohn€Knox€Walkupó óÐ F> Ð706€Walnut€Streetà  àà h àà À àà  àAttorney€General€and€ReporterÐ 2* ÐSuite€902à ¸ àÐ  ÐKnoxville,€TN€€37902à h àà À àà  àò òMichael€J.€Fahey,€IIó óÐ þö Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAssistant€Attorney€Generalà Ð àà (# àÐ êâ Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCriminal€Justice€DivisionÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à425€Fifth€Avenue€NorthÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à2d€Floor,€Cordell€Hull€BuildingÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àNashville,€TN€37243„0493à x àà Ð àà (# àÐ ‚!z Ðà ` àÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àÌò òà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àRandall€E.€Nicholsó óÐ 4$,  Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àDistrict€Attorney€GeneralÌÌò òà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àZane€Scarlettó óÐ ì&ä# Ðà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àAsst.€District€Attorney€GeneralÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àCity„County€BuildingÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àKnoxville,€TN€37902ÌÌÌÌÌOPINION€FILED:€€òò€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€óóÐ ".'+ ÐÌœñbñAFFIRMED€AS€ñbñMODIFIED›ÌÌÌÌò òDavid€G.€Hayesó óÐ †3~,1 ÐJudgeÐ  r4j-2S ÐÓÓÔ‡X™‰XXXÔà@+®àà@@EE'ìàÔ#†XìíXXX™‰K#ÔÔ‡ X@XXXìíÔò òòòOPINIONˆÐ  Ðóóó óÔ#†XìíXX X@±#ÔÔ‡ X@XXXìíÔÌà ` àThe€appellant,€Charles€Leroy€Woods,€appeals€from€the€Knox€County€CriminalÏCourt€jury€verdict€finding€him€guilty€of€the€misdemeanor€offenses€of€resisting€arrest,Ïdisorderly€conduct,€and€public€intoxication.€€The€trial€court€imposed€a€sentence€of€sixÏ(6)€months€with€ninety€(90)€days€to€be€served€for€resisting€arrest€and€thirty€(30)€daysÏeach€for€both€disorderly€conduct€and€public€intoxication.€€The€sentences€were€to€beÏserved€concurrently.€€In€his€appeal€as€of€right,€the€appellant€challenges€theÏsufficiency€of€the€evidence€related€to€each€conviction.€€Second,€he€contends€the€trialÏcourt€abused€its€discretion€denying€his€request€for€full€probation€ordering€him€toÏserve€ninety€(90)€days€in€the€Knox€County€Jail.ÌÌà ` àAfter€a€review€of€the€record,€we€affirm€the€judgments€of€conviction;€theÏappellantððs€sentence€for€resisting€arrest€is€modified.€€ÌÌÌà@ÒÒ)®àò òBACKGROUNDˆÐ %  Ðó óÌà ` àOn€the€evening€of€November€11,€1995,€Knoxville€police€officers,€RobertÏSoloman€and€Kenneth€Robertson,€responded€to€a€domestic€disturbance€call€at€408ÏKnox€Avenue.€€The€residents€of€the€Knox€Avenue€address€included€the€appellant,Ïhis€wife,€Rebecca,€his€sister„in„law,€Sandra€Bullock,€and€the€appellantððs€parents,ÏPauline€and€Charles€Woods,€Sr.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€events€leading€to€the€police€call€involved€a€telephone€conversationÏbetween€the€appellant€and€his€brother„in„law,€David,€who€lives€in€Maynardsville.€ÏThe€appellant€is€married€to€Davidððs€sister,€Rebecca.€€The€appellant€had€called€DavidÏto€request€Davidððs€assistance€in€discouraging€Rebecca€and€her€sisters,€Sandra€andÐ ¨9 26 ÐDora,€from€ð ðbar€hopping.ðð€€The€phone€conversation€escalated€into€a€heatedÐ p9h28 Ðargument.€€After€threats€were€made€over€the€telephone,€David€advised€that€he€wouldÏbe€paying€the€appellant€a€visit.€€Anticipating€an€altercation,€the€appellantððs€wife€hadÏher€sister,€Sandra,€telephone€the€police€because€she€ð ðdidnððt€want€to€see€anybodyÏget€hurt.ððÌÌà ` àWhen€the€two€officers€arrived,€the€appellant€was€in€his€residence.€€Rebecca,ÏSandra,€and€Dora€were€standing€in€the€front€yard€and€the€appellantððs€father,ÏCharles,€Sr.,€was€seated€in€his€vehicle€which€was€parked€on€the€street.€€David€wasÏen€route€from€Maynardsville.€€One€of€the€sisters€directed€the€police€to€the€parkedÏcar.€€Upon€approaching€the€vehicle,€the€officers€observed€a€gun€on€the€floorboard.€ÏWith€weapons€drawn,€Charles,€Sr.,€was€removed€from€the€car.€€The€officers€testifiedÏthat€he€ð ðreached€in€and€got€the€gun,€and€it€was€a€òòtoyóó€gun.ððñ_ñ׃×ñ_ññ_ñ׃×ñ_ñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€As€Mr.€Woods€wasÐ ÌÄ Ðbeing€frisked€by€the€officer,€his€wife€came€out€of€the€house€and€pleaded€with€theÏofficers€not€to€ð ðmashðð€her€husband€in€the€stomach€because€ð ðheððs€sick;€heððs€gotÏeverything€under€the€sun€wrong€with€him.ðð€€Testimony€revealed€the€elder€Mr.€WoodsÏwas€72€years€old,€that€he€has€cancer€and€that€he€had€an€aneurism€which€resulted€inÏð ða€plastic€tube€in€the€large€artery€of€his€heart.€.€.€fused€into€the€arteries€of€his€legs.ðð€ÏMrs.€Woods€stated,€ð ðI€started€crying€and€begging€him€to€please€quit€before€he€killedÏhim.ððÌÌà ` àDuring€the€commotion,€the€appellant€entered€the€front€yard€yelling€at€theÏofficers€to€leave€his€father€alone.€€Witnesses€testified€the€appellant€ð ðwas€reallyÏviolent.€.€.€in€a€rage,ðð€ð ðwas€cussinðð€and€kept€runninðð€his€mouth,ðð€and€that€ð ð[h]e€wasÏvery€upset,€very€rude,€intoxicated.ðð€€Officer€Robertson€stated€the€appellant€ð ðwasÏscreaming€at€the€top€of€his€lungs.ðð€€Repeatedly,€the€officers€told€the€appellant€toÏreturn€inside,€or€they€would€arrest€him.€€The€appellant€moved€away€from€the€officers,Ïhowever,€no€one,€including€the€appellant,€went€inside.€Ð À5¸.4 Їà ` àNone€of€the€witnesses€for€the€State€saw€the€appellant€drinking;€however,€theÏappellant€testified€he€had€one€glass€of€vodka€and€orange€juice.€€Both€officersÏtestified€they€smelled€alcohol€on€the€appellant.€€€Sandra€and€Dora€both€testified€theÏappellant€appeared€ð ðdrunk.ðð€€Another€witness,€Craig€Hamilton,€a€civilian€riding€withÏOfficer€Soloman,€testified€that€the€appellant€was€irate€and€appeared€intoxicated.€ÏBoth€officers€perceived€that€the€appellant€was€a€danger€to€them.ÌÌà ` àWhile€Officer€Soloman€filled€out€a€weapon€confiscation€report€with€Charles,ÏSr.,€at€the€front€of€the€vehicle,€€the€appellant€continued€to€argue€with€the€officersÏabout€ð ðbeing€heroesðð€and€ð ðto€quit€harassing€his€parents.ðð€€The€appellant,€his€wife,Ïand€mother€all€testified€the€officers€were€yelling€and€cursing€them.€€Again,€theÏofficers€told€the€appellant€to€return€inside.€€€€ÌÌà ` àWhen€escorting€Charles,€Sr.,€back€to€the€house,€the€appellant€and€his€motherÏrecounted€an€incident€of€Officer€Solomon€putting€the€toy€gun€in€the€face€of€PaulineÏWoods€telling€her,€ð ðthis€will€get€you€killed,€little€toy€guns€like€this.ðð€€This€allegedÏincident€sparked€the€final€confrontation€between€Officer€Soloman€and€the€appellant.€ÏWhile€eight€to€ten€feet€away€from€Officer€Soloman,€the€appellant€stated,€ð ðIf€youððllÏtake€the€gun€and€[your]€badge€off,€Iððll€kick€your€ass€right€here€in€the€middle€of€theÏstreet.ðð€€The€appellant€and€his€mother€heard€Officer€Soloman€say,€ð ðIððm€tired€of€thisÏsh„„.ðð€€Officer€Soloman€proceeded€up€the€four€foot€embankment€to€place€theÏappellant€under€arrest.€€ÌÌÌà ` àOfficer€Soloman€testified€when€he€went€to€grab€the€arm€of€the€appellant€thatÏthe€appellant€lunged€at€him€causing€them€both€to€fall€and€roll€down€theÏembankment.€€The€appellant€was€ð ðkicking€and€fightingðð€until€they€stopped€rolling€atÏthe€bottom€of€the€incline.€€Officer€Robertson€turned€to€see€the€commotion€andÏimmediately€assisted€Officer€Soloman€in€handcuffing€the€appellant.€Officer€SolomanÐ X9P28 Ðtestified€he€attempted€to€use€chemical€spray€to€subdue€the€appellant,€however,€theÏattempt€failed.€€The€appellant€denied€lunging€at€the€officer€stating€he€only€tried€toÏavoid€the€falling€down€the€embankment.€€The€appellant€testified€the€officer€usedÏchemical€spray€on€his€face€and€struck€him€in€the€head€with€ð ðsomething€black.ðð€€AfterÏhandcuffing€the€appellant,€the€officers€noticed€blood€on€his€forehead€later€requiringÏsix€stitches€at€the€hospital.€€Neither€of€the€officers€were€injured.€€Finally,€DavidÏarrived€at€the€scene€but€was€quickly€sent€away€by€the€officers.€€After€the€officers€hadÏleft€the€scene€with€the€appellant,€Sandra,€Dora,€and€Rebecca,€the€appellantððs€wife,Ïwent€ð ðbar€hoppingðð€as€previously€planned.€€ÌÌÌà@®®.®àò òˆà p àà@++®àI.€€Sufficiency€of€the€EvidenceˆÐ ÌÄ ÐÌà ` àó óThe€appellant€challenges€the€sufficiency€of€the€convicting€evidence€withÐ |t Ðregard€to€each€conviction.€€When€a€challenge€is€made€on€appeal€to€the€sufficiencyÏof€the€convicting€evidence,€this€court€must€adhere€to€certain€well„establishedÏprinciples.€First,€a€jury€conviction€removes€the€presumption€of€innocence€with€whichÏa€defendant€is€initially€cloaked€and€replaces€it€with€one€of€guilt,€so€that€on€appeal,€aÏconvicted€defendant€has€the€burden€of€demonstrating€that€the€evidence€isÏinsufficient.€€òòState€v.€Tuggleóó,€639€S.W.2d€913,€914€(Tenn.€1982).€€Next,€the€State€isÐ D)<"& Ðentitled€to€the€strongest€legitimate€view€of€the€evidence€and€all€reasonable€orÏlegitimate€inferences€which€may€be€drawn€therefrom.€€òòState€v.€Harrisóó,€839€S.W.2dÐ Ü,Ô%* Ð54,€75€(Tenn.€1992),€òòcert.€deniedóó,€507€U.S.€954,€113€S.Ct.€1368€(1993).€€Moreover,Ð ¨. ', Ðthis€court€may€not€reweigh€or€reevaluate€the€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Cabbageóó,€571Ð t0l). ÐS.W.2d€832,€835€(Tenn.€1978).€€Viewing€the€evidence€under€these€criteria,€it€is€thisÏcourtððs€responsibility€to€affirm€the€conviction€if€the€proof€was€sufficient€for€anyÏrational€trier€of€fact€to€have€found€the€essential€elements€of€the€offense€beyond€aÏreasonable€doubt.€€òòJackson€v.€Virginiaóó,€443€U.S.€307,€317,€99€S.Ct.€2781,€2789Ð ¤7œ06 Ð(1979);€òòState€v.€Cazesóó,€875€S.W.2d€253,€259€(Tenn.€1994),€òòcert.€deniedóó,€513€U.S.Ð p9h28 Ð1086,€115€S.Ct.€743€(1995);€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€13(e).€€This€rule€is€applicable€toÏfindings€of€guilt€predicated€upon€direct€evidence,€circumstantial€evidence,€or€aÏcombination€of€both€direct€and€circumstantial€evidence.€€òòState€v.€Matthewsóó,€805Ð   ˜ ÐS.W.2d€776,€779€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1990).€€ò òÐ l d ÐÌà@$®àA.€€Resisting€ArrestˆÌà ` àó óWithin€this€conviction€the€appellant€avers€(1)€that€there€was€not€credibleÐ èà  Ðevidence€the€appellant€intentionally€prevented€the€officers€from€affecting€an€arrestÏ(2)€that€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„611€his€force€was€justified€when€the€lawÏenforcement€officer€used€greater€force€than€necessary€to€make€the€arrest.€€ÌÌà ` àThe€jury€found€the€appellant€guilty€of€resisting€arrest€pursuant€to€Tenn.€CodeÏAnn.€ðð€39„16„602(a)€(1991).ñ_ñ׃×ñ_ññ_ñ׃×ñ_ñÝ ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€In€order€to€obtain€a€conviction€under€this€statute,€theÐ °¨ ÐState€must€prove€that€the€defendant€intentionally€prevented€or€obstructed€a€knownÏlaw€enforcement€officer,€ð ðfrom€effecting€a€stop,€frisk,€halt,€arrest,€or€search€of€anyÏperson,€including€the€defendant,€by€using€force€against€the€law€enforcement€officerÏor€another.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„16„602(a).€€The€proof€establishes€that€theÏappellant€ð ðlungedðð€at€Officer€Soloman€upon€placing€him€under€arrest.€€The€appellantÏrolled€down€the€embankment€ð ðkicking€and€fighting.ðð€€Various€witnesses€corroboratedÏthese€facts.€€Moreover,€the€appellantððs€contention€of€self„defense€was€rejected€as€aÏdecision€properly€made€by€the€trier€of€fact.€€òòSeeóó€òòArterburn€v.€Stateóó,€216€Tenn.€240,Ð +$( Ð391€S.W.2d€648,€653€(1965);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„11„611(e)€(1)€and€(2)Ð Ü,Ô%* Ð(1991).€€The€proof€in€the€record€supports€the€appellantððs€conviction€for€resistingÏarrest.€€€€ÌÌà@tt#®àò òB.€€Disorderly€ConductˆÐ  4-2 Ðó óà ` àPursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„305(a)(1)€(1991),€the€State€must€proveÐ  Ðthe€appellant€was€in€a€public€place€with€the€intent€to€cause€public€annoyance€orÏalarm€while€engaging€in€fighting€or€in€violent€or€threatening€behavior,€as€wasÏcharged€in€count€four€of€the€indictment.€€The€evidence€presented€at€trialÏdemonstrated€that€the€appellant€was€in€front€of€the€residence,€ð ðscreaming€at€the€topÏof€his€lungs,ðð€ð ðviolent,ðð€and€threatening€to€fight€Officer€Solomon.€€This€challenge€isÏalso€without€merit.€€€€€€ò òÐ ÐÈ  Ðó óÌ€€€€€àH   àˆàH   àˆà0 ` àà  àà0` ` T$` T$àà  àà@——#®` T$` T$àò òC.€€Public€IntoxicationˆÐ h` Ðà ` àó óIn€order€sustain€a€conviction€for€public€intoxication,€this€court€must€find€thatÐ @8 Ðthe€proof€establishes€the€defendant€was€under€the€influence€of€an€intoxicant€in€aÏpublic€place€to€the€degree€that€he€is€a€danger€ð ðto€other€persons€or€property;€or.€.€.Ïunreasonably€annoys€people€in€the€vicinity.ðð€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€39„17„310(a)(2)Ïand€(3)€(1991).€€The€appellant€and€his€wife€testified€he€had€one€drink€that€evening€atÏdinner.€€Five€other€witnesses€testified€that€he€appeared€intoxicated,€while€two€ofÏthem€smelled€alcohol.€€Both€officers€testified€they€felt€he€was€a€danger€toÏthemselves€and€to€others.€€We€hold€the€evidence€was€sufficient.€€€€ÌÌÌÌÌà@êê&®à€ò òII.€€SentencingˆÐ Ð,È%* ÐÌà ` àó óThird,€the€appellant€contends€the€trial€judge€erred€in€denying€his€request€for€Ð €0x). Ðtotal€probation€requiring€him€to€serve€ninety€(90)€days€in€the€Knox€County€Jail.€€TheÏtrial€court€sentenced€the€appellant€to€ð ðthe€Knox€County€Penal€Farm€for€a€period€ofÏsix€months€at€a€misdemeanor€percentage€of€75%€percent;€however,€on€payment€ofÏthe€costs,€all€time€with€the€exception€of€90€days€will€be€suspendedðð€for€resistingÏarrest,€a€Class€B€misdemeanor.€€For€disorderly€conduct€and€public€intoxication,€bothÐ |9t28 ÐClass€C€misdemeanors,€the€trial€court€imposed€the€maximum€sentence€of€ð ð30€daysÏin€each€count€at€a€misdemeanor€percentage€of€75€percentðð€with€those€sentences€toÏbe€served€concurrently€with€the€sentence€for€resisting€arrest.€ÌÌà ` àWhen€a€challenge€is€made€to€the€length€or€manner€of€service€of€a€sentence,Ïthis€court€conducts€a€òòde€novoóó€review€with€the€presumption€that€the€determinationÐ ü  Ðmade€by€the€trial€court€is€correct.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„401(d)€(1990).€€ThisÏpresumption,€only€applies,€however,€if€the€record€demonstrates€that€the€trial€courtÏproperly€considered€relevant€sentencing€principles.€€òòState€v.€Ashbyóó,€823€S.W.2dÐ ld Ð166,€169€(Tenn.€1991).€€The€record€does€not€reveal€that€the€trial€judge€consideredÏthe€principles,€purposes,€and€goals€of€the€Sentencing€Act€in€imposing€theÏsentences.€€Moreover,€the€trial€judge€failed€to€note€the€presence€or€absence€ofÏmitigating€or€enhancing€factors€in€imposing€a€period€of€incarceration.€€Although€inÏmisdemeanor€cases€we€have€not€required€that€trial€judges€explicitly€list€on€the€recordÏapplicable€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors,€òòState€v.€Baggettóó,€No.€03C01„9401„CR„Ð 4 , Ð00031€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€July€11,€1995),€clearly€a€discussion€of€thoseÏfactors€would€be€the€better€practice€for€purposes€of€appellate€review.ÌÌà ` àThe€alternative€sentencing€provision€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„104Ïprovides€that€a€misdemeanant,€as€well€as€the€felon,€is€entitled€to€sentencingÏalternatives.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„104(a)€(1995€Supp.).€€The€appellantÏcontends€that€he€should€have€been€granted€the€sentencing€alternative€of€fullÏprobation€which€requires€a€separate€analysis€from€that€of€alternative€sentencing.€ÏòòSeeóó€òòState€v.€Binghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€448,€455€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€toóó€òòappealÐ `0X). Ðdeniedóó,€(Tenn.€1995).€€The€defendant€has€the€burden€of€establishing€his€suitabilityÐ ,2$+0 Ðfor€full€probation€in€that€probation€will€ð ðsubserve€the€ends€of€justice€and€the€bestÏinterest€of€both€the€public€and€the€defendant.ðð€€òòId.óó€(citing€òòState€v.€Dykesóó,€803€S.W.2dÐ Ä5¼.4 Ð250,€259€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.),€òòperm.€to€appeal€deniedóó,€(Tenn.€1990);€òòseeóó€òòalsoóó€Tenn.Ð 7ˆ06 ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„303(b)€(ñ[ñ1995€ñ[ñSupp.ñ\ñ€1995ñ\ñ).€€When€deciding€suitability€for€probation,Ð \9T28 Ðalthough€not€controlling,€the€sentencing€court€should€use€the€following€criteria:€(1)Ïð ðthe€nature€and€[circumstances]€of€the€criminal€conduct€involved,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ïðð€40„35„210(b)(4);€(2)€the€defendantððs€potential€or€lack€of€potential€for€rehabilitation,ÏTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„103(5);€(3)€whether€a€sentence€of€full€probation€wouldÏunduly€depreciate€the€seriousness€of€the€offense,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼103(1)(B);€and€(4)€whether€a€sentence€other€than€full€probation€would€provide€anÏeffective€deterrent€to€others€likely€to€commit€similar€crimes,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„¼35„103(1)(B).€€òòSeeóó€òòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€456.€€Denial€of€probation€may€be€basedÐ œ”  Ðsolely€upon€the€circumstances€of€the€offense€when€they€are€of€such€a€nature€as€toÏoutweigh€all€other€factors€favoring€probation.€€òòState€v.€Fletcheróó,€805€S.W.2d€785,Ð 4, Ð788„89€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991).€€€€€€ÌÌà ` àHere,€the€State€argues€these€offenses€are€serious€due€to€the€violenceÏdirected€toward€police€officers€attempting€to€diffuse€a€domestic€dispute.€ÏAdditionally,€the€State€avers€that€jail€time€will€prevent€depreciating€the€seriousnessÏof€the€offenses.€€In€considering€the€denial€of€an€alternative€sentence€based€upon€theÏseriousness€of€the€offense,€this€court€held,€ð ðthe€circumstances€of€the€offense€asÏcommitted€must€be€especially€violent,€horrifying,€shocking,€reprehensible,€offensive,Ïor€otherwise€of€an€excessive€or€exaggerated€degree.ðð€òòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€454Ð `'X $ Ð(citing€òòState€v.€Hartleyóó,€818€S.W.2d€370,€374„75€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1991)).€Ð ,)$"& ÐFurthermore,€the€nature€of€the€offense€must€outweigh€all€factors€favoring€a€sentenceÏother€than€confinement.€€òòBinghamóó,€910€S.W.2d€at€454.€€In€this€case,€we€are€unableÐ Ä,¼%* Ðto€conclude€that€the€circumstances€of€these€offenses€meet€the€standard€set€forth€inÏòòBinghamóó€and€òòHartleyóó.€Ð \0T). ÐÌà ` àAt€the€sentencing€hearing,€the€ñ]ñappellantñ]ññ^ñdefendantñ^ñ€maintained€his€innocence€in€that€hisÏanger€was€justified€considering€the€mistreatment€of€his€parents.€€He€stated€that€theÏofficers€were€giving€his€father€a€ð ðhard€timeðð€and€ð ðsix€stitches€later€and€$3000€dollarsÏto€Billy€Brown€[his€attorney]€here€we€are.ðð€€€The€trial€court€was€of€the€opinion€that€theÐ X9P28 Ðappellant€had€not€taken€the€responsibility€for€his€actions.€€The€State€argues€that€lackÏof€repentance€and€remorse€are€appropriate€factors€to€consider€in€denying€probation.€ÏòòState€v.€Piersonóó,€678€S.W.2d€905€(Tenn.€1984).€€We€agree€with€the€court€denyingÐ   ˜ Ðthe€appellant€probation€based€upon€his€lack€of€remorse.€€ÌÔ#†XœÌXX XœÌŸ#ÔÔ‡ XœÌXXXœÌÔÌà ` àHowever,€upon€òòÔ#†XœÌXX XœÌÊS#ÔÔ‡ XœÌXXXœÌÔde€novoóó€review,€we€conclude€that,€based€upon€theÐ ü  Ðcircumstances€presented€in€the€case€òòsub€judiceóó,€modification€of€the€appellantððsÐ ÔÌ  Ðsentence€is€necessary.€€In€misdemeanor€sentencing,€although€the€defendant€is€notÏentitled€to€the€presumption€of€a€minimum€sentence,€òòState€v.€Seatonóó,€914€S.W.2dÐ ph Ð129,€135€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1995)€(citations€omitted),€the€sentencing€courtÏdetermines€what€portion€of€the€sentence€must€be€served€in€confinement€after€whichÏthe€defendant€is€eligible€for€certain€rehabilitative€relief€programs.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€CodeÐ ÔÌ ÐAnn.€ðð€40-35-302(d)€(1995€Supp.).€€In€so€determining,€the€court€should€considerÏenhancement€and€mitigating€factors€as€well€as€the€legislative€purposes€andÏprinciples€related€to€sentencing.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40-35-302(d);€òòState€v.€Palmeróó€,Ð 8 0 Ð902€S.W.2d€391,€€393-94€(Tenn.€1995);€òòState€v.€Gilboyóó,€857€S.W.2d€884,€889Ð "ü Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1993).€€However,€the€statutory€enhancement€and€mitigatingÏfactors€do€not€have€to€be€the€only€factors€considered€by€the€trial€court€in€determiningÏthe€appropriate€sentence.€€The€court€should€examine€the€misdemeanor€offense€inÏthe€light€and€character€of€the€circumstances€of€the€offense.€€òòState€v.€Brannonóó,€No.Ð 4),"& Ð03C01-9508-CR-00233€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€at€Knoxville,€Apr.€3,€1996),€òòperm.€toÐ +ø#( Ðappeal€deniedóó€,€(Tenn.€Nov.€4,€1996)€(citing€òòGilboyóó,€857€S.W.2d€at€889).Ô#†XœÌXX XœÌ*T#ÔÔ‡Xâ%XXXœÌÔÐ Ì,Ä%* ÐÔ#†XœÌXXXâ%rZ#ÔÔ€ XœÌXXXœÌÔÌà ` àAccordingly,€we€conclude€that€the€following€mitigating€factors€apply€to€theÏappellantððs€convictions€for€disorderly€conduct€and€the€resulting€resisting€arrest:€(1)Ïð ðthe€defendant€acted€under€strong€provocation,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(2)Ï(1990);€€(2)€ð ð[s]ubstantial€grounds€exist€tending€to€excuse€or€justify€the€defendantððsÏcriminal€conduct,€though€failing€to€establish€a€defense,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„¼113(3);€œñcñand€ñcñ(3)›€ð ðthe€defendant,€although€guilty€of€the€crime,€committed€the€offenseÐ `9X28 Ðunder€such€unusual€circumstances€that€it€is€unlikely€that€a€sustained€intent€to€violateÏthe€law€motivated€his€conduct,ðð€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€œ40„35„113(11)ñdñ;ñdñ›œñeñ.ñeñ›€œñfñ€ñfññgñ(4)ñgññhñFurther,€we€findÏthatñhñ›€the€appellant€exhibits€a€stable€work€record,€although€presently€unable€to€workÏbecause€of€recent€back€surgery,€thereby€providing€familial€support€for€his€wife€andÏdaughter,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„113(13).€€€€We€conclude€only€one€enhancingÏfactor€applies€to€the€appellant.€€The€presentence€report€includes€one€prior€convictionÏfor€simple€assault,€however,€we€give€this€factor€little€weight€because€it€is€a€Class€AÏmisdemeanor€which€occurred€over€ten€years€ago.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð œ”  Ð114(1)€(1995€Supp.).€€€€€€€€Ìà ` àAlthough€we€do€not€minimize€the€gravity€of€the€officersðð€situation€in€diffusing€aÏdomestic€dispute,€based€upon€the€enhancing€and€mitigating€factors,€the€appellantððs€Ïœñ`ñsentenceñ`ññañjudgment›€of›€convictionñañ›€for€the€offense€of€resisting€arrest€is€modified€to€reflect€a€sentence€of€sixÏmonths€with€thirty€(30)€days€to€be€served€in€the€county€jail.€€This€sentence€is€to€runÏconcurrently€with€the€appellantððs€Class€C€misdemeanor€convictions€for€disorderlyÏconduct€and€public€intoxication.€€The€judgment€of€the€trial€court€in€all€other€respectsÏis€affirmed.€€ÌÌà ` àThis€case€is€remanded€for€entry€of€judgment€consistent€with€this€opinion.€€ÌÌÌÌÓÓÌà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À à____________________________________Ìà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àDAVID€G.€HAYES,€JudgeÌÌÌÌÌCONCUR:ÌÌÌÌ____________________________________ÌJOHN€H.€PEAY,€JudgeÌÌÌÐ >:639 Ð____________________________________ÌJOSEPH€M.€TIPTON,€Judge