WPC  9 Ɣ-EU @yV -qAP;TMiȌV;c`v}^Bʭ + czaK/ZEtz_.NoLT235kj# %V"FY_/3W"{9qm`udJT<@.RnSom+lmk^74)YNI:fN't#5n>AoJ. ;pix<0lwYz @ wg3Bc215۲uUQA GPBlkcDy&3f%%j_`+Kp1Yw>lG'his|~VJV- jy68LW0$% m$>A(";5c [FyfO :[>/SLKGUԀ]>ҽ˜4_obUN\ % 0^ 8wD4H\ zk m # 0D   a ' 1Nt 0cvU@Eqx 1u  72UNb 0 B 0 D5 D- 0K ASa 0z 0D Ab(hH  Z6Times New Roman Regular(`$.8dd8    Ӓf) UUb) 3|x C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wptUHP LaserJet 8000 Series PS0(#$  0  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (9 Z(Times New Roman  g R/$      1  C   _C  CAlthoughtheappellantpresentstheissueinherbriefasrevocationofprobation,therecordreflectsthatshe  wasplacedonaCommunityCorrectionsprogramratherthanprobation. R/$      2  C   _C  CTheappellantwasindictedontencountsofpossession,deliveryand/orsaleofcocaine. n R/$      3  C   _C  CWenote,that,intheappellantsbrief,shearguesthatprinciplesofsentencingapplywithinaCommunity  Correctionrevocationhearing.Thispositionismisplaced.Theapplicationofsentencingprinciplesappropriatetothe t appellantscaseconcludeduponimpositionofhersentence.SeeStatev.StevieQ.Taylor,No.02C019504CC00108 8 (Tenn.Crim.App.atJackson,May1,1996). 3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(I Z6Times New Roman Regular- -(|G2/$ !.8-d d 8         0  ^q d(|3$ !.8-d d 8     VVVV)!dxdx)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3$ !.8-d d 8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8- d d8     _   8OXXdd 8@tt ZINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @%ATJACKSON# Z #Ԉ &    @  @` AssignedonBriefsOctober3,2000 L XIGX #XXIG#STATEOFTENNESSEEv._NORICO_ԀS.WOODSXIGX  J @@ DirectAppealfromtheCircuitCourtforMadisonCounty  J @@No.97450;97664;97665;97666,RoyMorgan,Jr.,Judge  6 @@*AV) ` dE<` A   @@TTNo.W200000057CCAR3CDDecidedNovember3,2000   AV) ` dE<|` A }     @( ORDER  d #XXIG#XIGX#XXIGC#  XIGXXIGXXXIGTheappellant,_Norico_ԀS.Woods,appealsfromtheorderoftheMadisonCountyCircuitCourt (x revokingherCommunityCorrectionssentencesandreinstatingheroriginalnineyearsentencein d theDepartmentofCorrection.  #  1      ׀WeaffirmthejudgmentofthetrialcourtpursuanttoRule20,Tenn. P _Crim_.App.R. <   Underthetermsofanegotiatedpleaagreement,theappellantpledguiltytoonecountof  possessionofcocainewithintenttosell,aClassBfelony,andtothreecountsofsaleofcocaine,  ClassBfelonies.  #  2      ׀Thecourtsentencedtheappellanttofourconcurrentnineyearsentencesforthese  offenses.Thetrialcourtordered120daysconfinement,withtheremainderofthesentencetobe  servedinthelocalCommunityCorrectionsprogram. t   InJanuaryof2000,aCommunityCorrectionsaffidavitwasfiled,andawarrantissued, L  allegingthattheappellanthadviolatedtheconditionsofherprogramby:(1)failingtopayrestitution, 8!  courtcostsandfines;(2)failingtoreporttoCommunityCorrections;and(3)failingtosubmitto $"t! drugscreens.InFebruaryof2000,anotherCommunityCorrectionsaffidavitwasfiled,andwarrant #`" issued,allegingthattheappellanthadviolatedtheconditionsofherprogramby:(1)leavingthe26th #L# JudicialDistrictandtheStateofTennessee;and(2)failingtoperform100hoursofCommunity $8 $ Corrections. %$!%   &"&   AhearingwasconductedonMarch7,2000,atwhichtheappellantandherprobationofficer  testified.Attheconclusionofthehearing,thetrialcourtfoundthattheappellanthadviolatedthe  termsandconditionsofherCommunityCorrectionsprogramby:   _ (5h83"3"  8  3o25h  1  .3  0`     Failingtoreporttoherprobationofficerasdirected.3o݌`` `  Ќ  "3"  8  325h  2  .3  0`     Failingtoobtainpermissiontoleavethe26thJudicialDistrict.3݌L ` `  Ќ  "3"  8  325h  3  .3  0`     Failingtopayfines,costs,andrestitution.3݌8 ` `  Ќ  "3"  8  325h  4  .3  0`     Failingtocompletehercommunitycorrectionservicework.3݌$ t` `  Ќ  "3"  8  325h  5  .3  0`     Failingtosubmittorandomdrugscreens.3݌ `` `  Ќ  Trialcounselstipulatedthattheappellantviolatedconditions1,2,and4above.Thereafter,thecourt  8  reinstatedtheoriginalnineyearsentenceofconfinementintheDepartmentofCorrection. $    ThedecisiontorevokeaCommunityCorrectionssentencerestswithinthesounddiscretion   ofthetrialcourtandthatdecisionwillnotbedisturbedonappealunlessthereisnosubstantial   evidencetosupportthetrialcourtsconclusionthataviolationhadoccurred.Statev.Harkins,811   S.W.2d79,82(Tenn.1991).Iftheevidenceissufficient,thetrialcourt,maypursuanttoits p discretionaryauthority,revoketheCommunityCorrectionssentenceandrequirethedefendantto \ servetheoriginalsentenceinconfinement.Tenn.CodeAnn.4036106(e)(4). H   Onappeal,theappellantdoesnotcontestthegroundssupportingrevocation.  #  3      ׀Rather,she  p arguesthatthetrialcourt abuseditsdiscretionbynotconsideringotherlessseverealternativesthan  \ serviceoftheentiresentenceinthepenitentiary.Thisargumentiswithoutmerit.Wefindthe H recordfullysupportsthetrialcourtsaction. 4   Therefore,thejudgmentoftheMadisonCountyCircuitCourtisaffirmedinaccordancewith   Rule20,Tenn.Ct.Crim.App.R.#XIGXXXIG#     `     h     ___________________________________ X     `     h     DAVIDG.HAYES,JUDGE D!    `     h     ___________________________________ #l!    `     h     JERRYL.SMITH,JUDGE $X"    `     h     ____________________________________ %0!$    `     h     ALANE.GLENN,JUDGE