WPC  Q(pH6x/Pz.x'=^rs݄cy\S~d`*c~O\'<XrjP,:YKItul|_&ex 1<7̺[׿pL=z@q!``4TNYW@ʘ-ƻspcE܌ʈ669L F67>@AW|w Po[lY b3:F%$]&0UA)ULJXA0bqb=J gavHW#UN % 0:UN ^ _ wk 4o   m  U@ b N E B HP LaserJet 40500(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($USUS.,("  Z6Times New Roman Regular+ yG*tئ 3|xU (hH  Z(Times New Roman - - d !USUS.,  _  8XXdd8  XXINTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  ATKNOXVILLE#XX#XX & AssignedonBriefsMay23,2001 L #XX-#XX#XX# XXSTATEOFTENNESSEEv.LEWISWOODY#XX# XX 4  #XXp#XX#XX# AppealfromtheCriminalCourtforKnoxCounty n  No.59538MaryBeth_Leibowitz_,Judge Z  AV) ` dE<` A n  No.E200001363CCAR3CD i  =Ӏ____________ԀAugust2,2001 U  AV) ` dE<` A A     TheDefendant,LewisWoody,filedanoticeofappealwhichweconstruetoappealthejudgments < ofconvictionfortwoforgeriesresultingfromanegotiatedpleaagreement,andhealsoincluded ( withinthenotice,anappealfromthetrialcourtsorderdenyinghismotiontotaxcoststotheState  andto quashexecutionofgarnishment.Forthereasonssetforthherein,wedismisshisappeal.    Tenn.R.App.P.3AppealasofRight;JudgmentoftheCriminalCourtAffirmed   ThomasT._Woodall_,J.,deliveredtheopinionofthecourt,inwhichGaryR.Wade,_P.J._and ` RobertW._Wedemeyer_,J.,joined. L LewisWoody,MountainCity,Tennessee,ProSe. $t PaulG.Summers,AttorneyGeneralandReporter;PatriciaC._Kussmann_,AssistantAttorney L General;RandallE._Nichols_,DistrictAttorneyGeneral;andLeonFranks,AssistantDistrictAttorney 8 General,fortheappellee,StateofTennessee. $ @66' OPINION  !    OnJanuary20,1999,theDefendantenteredguiltypleasintheCriminalCourtofKnox #" Countytotwocountsofforgery.Fromtherecord,itappearsthatthiswasanegotiatedplea p$# agreementastotheoffensestowhichhewaspleadingguilty,thelengthofthesentences,andthe \% $ requirementthatthesentencesbeservedconsecutively.Thenoticeofappealwasnotfileduntil H&!% approximatelyoneandonehalf(1)yearslater,onJune12,2000. 4'"&   TheDefendantdoesnothavetherighttoappealasofright,pursuanttoRule3ofthe  )\$( TennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure,anegotiatedpleaagreementwhereinhehasagreedtothe )H%) offensestowhichhepleadsguiltyandallaspectsofthesentencing.SeeTenn.R.App.P.3;seee.g., *4&* Statev._Leath_,977S.W.2d132(Tenn._Crim_.App.1998).Inanyevent,thenoticeofappealwasnot + '+ timelyfiled.Whilethetimelyfilingofanoticeofappealmaybewaivedintheinterestofjustice, , (, Tenn.R.App.P.4(a),thereisnothingintherecordtoindicatethatthetimelyfilingofanoticeof -(-6 _appeal,evenifappropriate,shouldbewaived.Therefore,Defendantsappeal,insofarasitattacks  theoriginaljudgmentsofconvictionandsentencinginthiscaseisherebydismissed.    Therearenotranscriptstoanyproceedingsinthiscaseandtheappellaterecordconsists t entirelyofthetechnicalrecord.Atsomepoint,Defendantwasplacedonunsupervisedprobation ` forthesentencesresultingfromtheforgeryconvictions.Apparently,theprobatedsentencewas L  revokedbecauseDefendantcommittedadditionalcrimes,andhewasagainincarcerated.The 8  Defendantallegesthat XXXXtherewasanexecutionbygarnishmentuponhisprisoninmateaccounttopay $ t  costsandfeesrelatedtotheforgeryconvictions.TheDefendantfiledamotionintheCriminal  ` CourtofKnoxCounty,assertingthathewasindigent,andthatthe costsandfeesshouldbetaxed  L  totheStateandthatthetrialcourtshouldenteranorderto quashthegarnishment.Thetrialcourt  8  deniedthemotioninanorderfiledMay16,2000,statingtherein thatstatelawrequiresfundsbe $  takenfromtheinmatetrustfundregardlessofwhetherthedefendantisanindigentornotinthetrial   courtandthattheCourthasnoauthoritytorequiretheStatetodootherwise.     ThisCourthaspreviouslyheldthatalawsuittoenjointheDepartmentofCorrectionfrom   collectingcourtcostsfromaninmatestrustaccountisnotamongthelistedenumeratedcausesof p actionwhichmaybeappealedasofrightpursuanttoTennesseeRuleAppellateProcedure3(b). See \ Statev.CharlesJ.Smigelski,No.E2000-00533-CCA-R3-CD,2001WL87640,at*2(Tenn.Crim. H App.,Knoxville,Feb.2,2001).#XXX X~# XXXX 4   TheorderfromwhichDefendantseeksreliefisnotaninterlocutoryorder,sothereforeappeal  \ wouldalsonotliepursuanttoRule9orRule10oftheTennesseeRulesofAppellateProcedure. H Therefore,iftheDefendantwereentitledtoreliefinthiscourt,itwouldbepursuanttowritof 4 certiorari.SeeLeath,977S.W.2dat135. However,wedeclinetotreatthisasapetitionforwritof   certiorariasapanelofthisCourtdidinLeath,andthereforehold,pursuanttoSmigelski,that   Defendantsappealfromthetrialcourtsorderdenyinghis MotionforTaxtoStatetoQuash  ExecutionofGarnishmentmustalsobedismissed.    Accordingly,theDefendantsappealisdismissed. l #XXX X #XXXX   `     h     ___________________________________ D!    `     h     THOMAST.WOODALL,JUDGE#XXXX#Ԁ