WPCp KFN3[}x Zپy__0+ȃj0ÙEj^QƏ6UtT] F!&#ew?y*&Ay٧u_Yvě)$6\vJl"T=MZZ HkFZ6ʝ+Z0bFJ&qtR$+zaecv YƬ,ǚq"WQ G{ jS 4Z($#/00&HL&Dr3EɏP6촊)Wq`Ff{R}6Bq }7qF/4hJzŒ4,/$ <ͦgujc6@JT6iINT^IPqBļ l0W^`PHgo,~N]R^ȠX\y 82QO 6 >Jg"v W ,a#!NU>o % 0UB 4  n U: f R "Z w|  N ^  m  u ;  0  0D AQ A 0  D+ 0K D3  BSHP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0<( 9Z &Courier RegularX($  7'CXXdXXd7    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpitpO'3|x<6X9`(*Courier 12pt10cpiXXx6X@JQX@,rAZ"Arial Regular \\RA' Legal\     'L ULevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3GJ$ !  88XXdd8    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi  ($$   1    GJ"  iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi   XLXXX YX XL  _  Ad FILED  Y  December16,1999Cecil_Crowson_,Jr.AppellateCourt_ClerkdA _[_C<<C[^]&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK(3GJ$ !  88XXdd8    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi  'dxd( $ Figure  1  ````'dxd d !  88XXdd8    iUX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXi  _XTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T † : XLXXX8 L XXdXXd8_vY_@0,j: `@E tt( Wv__Ԁ8 @ D INTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALSOFTENNESSEE  @~~%DATKNOXVILLE@@66-R   NOVEMBER1999SESSIONFREDRICKB.ZONGE, h   )   80 Ѐ    h   )    Appellant, h   )  No.03C019903CR00094       h   )       h   )  MorganCounty   v.    h   )       h   )  HonorableE.EugeneEblen,Judge       h   )STATEOFTENNESSEE, h   )  (Habeascorpus) h`     h   ) Appellee. h   ) 4,  FortheAppellant:   h     FortheAppellee:  JoeH.Walker0  0h%%0h%h%0%%PaulG.Summers%% DistrictPublicDefender0 h 0h%h%0%%AttorneyGeneralofTennessee~v%% Ѐand0 0 % % h      p andd\%% SusanCoreaFuller0  0h%%0h%h%0%%EllenH.Pollack   x   (#  @(# JB%% AssistantDistrictPublicDefender  AssistantAttorneyGeneral  (#  0 ( PostOfficeBox334 h     425FifthAvenueNorth x   ! Harriman,Tennessee377480334  Nashville,Tennessee37243 !     h     J.ScottMcCluen   x   (#  #      h     DistrictAttorneyGeneral    h     PostOfficeBox703    h     Kingston,Tennessee377630703OPINIONFILED:____________________AFFIRMEDJosephM.TiptonJudge >:639 Ї@)D OPINION   Thepetitioner,_Fredrick_ԀB.Zonge,appealsasofrightfromtheMorgan   CountyCriminalCourtsdismissalofhispetitionforawritofhabeascorpus.Heis  | presentlyintheDepartmentofCorrectionservinganeffectivethirtyfiveyearsentence PH asaRangeIIoffenderforhis1994convictionsforespeciallyaggravated_kidnapping_,   especiallyaggravatedburglary,aggravatedassault,andtheftofpropertyvaluedatover   onethousanddollars.Thiscourtmodifiedthepetitionersespeciallyaggravated   burglaryconvictiontoaggravatedburglary,modifiedhissentenceonthatcounttonine x yearsandhisfinetotenthousanddollars,andaffirmedthetrialcourtinallother LD respects.Statev.Zonge,973S.W.2d250(Tenn.Crim.App.1997).Thepetitioner  contendsthat:    8 (1)byprohibitinghimfromtestifyinginhisowndefense,the  trialcourtlostitsjurisdictionoverboththesubjectmatterand  thepetitioner,therebymakingthesubsequentjudgmentvoid |t andhisresultingincarcerationillegal;bZ  8 (2)thetrialcourtsdenialofhisrequesttowithdrawascounsel .!& prosedeprivedhimofhisrighttocounseltherebyrendering "  thejudgmentsvoid;and"  8 (3)thetrialcourtactedbeyonditsauthorityanddeniedhim $! dueprocessoflawbyrefusingtogranthimacontinuance, %" whichresultedinhisbeingtriedinprisonattire.&#    Thestatecontendsthatthetrialcourtproperlydismissedthepetitionbecausethe ^(V!% judgmentsarenotvoidontheirfacenorhasthepetitionerpresentedanyevidencethat **"#' hissentencehasexpired.Weaffirmthetrialcourtsdismissalofthepetitionforawrit +$) ofhabeascorpus. -&+  Apetitionforthewritofhabeascorpusmaybebroughtifthejudgmentis Z1R*/ voidorthesentencehasexpired.Archerv.State,851S.W.2d157,164(Tenn.1993). &3,1 However,iftheclaimedillegalityrendersthejudgmentorsentencevoidable,ratherthan 4-3 void,noreliefcanbegranted.Id.at161.Allegedviolationsofconstitutionalrightsare 6/5 addressedinpostconviction,nothabeascorpus,proceedings._Luttrell_Ԁv.State,644 817 S.W.2d408,409(Tenn.Crim.App.1982).Theunderpinningofallthreeofthe  petitionersclaimsisthatthetrialcourtviolatedhisconstitutionalrights,whetheritbe  hisFifthAmendmentrighttotestifyinhisowndefense,hisSixthAmendmentrightto   counsel,orhisrighttodueprocessundertheFourteenthAmendment.Theseclaims l d arenotcognizableinahabeascorpusproceeding. 80  Thepetitionercontendsthathispetitionforawritofhabeascorpusis   properbecausebycommittingtheseconstitutionalviolations,particularlythelimitation   ofhistestimony,thetrialcourtlostitslawfulauthority,renderingthejudgmentsvoid. h` Tenn.CodeAnn.1610102grantsthecircuitcourtsexclusiveoriginaljurisdiction 4, overallcrimes.CitingStateexrel.Anglinv.Mitchell,575S.W.2d284,287(Tenn.  1979),thepetitionerarguesthatacourtcanloseitsjurisdictionduringthependencyof  thetrialifitfailstogivethedefendantdueprocessoflaw.InAnglin,oursupremecourt  statedthatatrialcourtsdenialofadefendantsrighttocounselrenderedthejudgment d\ voidandnecessitatedreleasebyhabeascorpus.Id.at288. 0 (  However,inArcher,oursupremecourtrejectedthebroadenedapplication #  ofhabeascorpusfoundinAnglin.851S.W.2dat16264;seealso_Passarella_Ԁv.State, %" 891S.W.2d619,628(Tenn.Crim.App.1994)(notingthatArcherimpliedlyoverruled `'X $ Anglinslanguageregardingtheuseofhabeascorpuswhenthetrialcourtviolatedthe ,)$"& defendantsrighttocounsel).Thecourttracedthedevelopmentofhabeascorpuslaw, *#( notingthatTennesseehaslongrequiredastrictinterpretationofthewritsapplication. ,%* Archer,851S.W.2dat16062.Inspiteofthetraditionallynarrowapplicationofhabeas .', corpus, judicialdecisionsrenderedafterthepassageofthePostConvictionProcedure \0T). Actbegantoblurthedistinctionbetweenthewritofhabeascorpusandpostconviction (2 +0 relief.Id.at162.ThecourtattributedAnglinsexpansiveviewoftheapplicabilityof 3,2 habeascorpustothistrend,butnotedthatithasnotfollowedAnglininsubsequent 5.4 decisions.Id.at16263.Archerreaffirmedthetraditionalscopeofthewrit: 706  :        8 HabeascorpusreliefisavailableinTennesseeonlywhen it  appearsuponthefaceofthejudgmentortherecordofthe  proceedingsuponwhichthejudgmentisrenderedthata  convictingcourtwaswithoutjurisdictionorauthorityto   sentenceadefendant,orthatadefendantssentenceof   imprisonmentorotherrestrainthasexpired. ~    Id.at164.Nothinginthepresentjudgmentsortherecordpresentedforourreview R J indicatesthattheObionCountyCriminalCourtlackedjurisdiction.Thepetitioners   relianceuponAnglinismisplaced.    Atrialcourtmaytreatahabeascorpusactionasapetitionforpost z  convictionrelief.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030205(c).Inthiscase,thevenueprevented NF suchtreatment.Ahabeascorpuspetitionisfiledwherethepetitionerisrestrained,the  court mostconvenientinpointofdistancetotheapplicant,unlessthepetitiongivesa   sufficientreasonotherwise.Tenn.CodeAnn.2921105.Apostconvictionpetition,  ontheotherhand,isfiledintheconvictingcourt.Tenn.CodeAnn.4030204(a). ~v ThepetitionerwasconvictedintheObionCountyCriminalCourt,andhefiledhis JB petitionforawritofhabeascorpusintheMorganCountyCriminalCourt.TheMorgan ! CountyCriminalCourtlackedjurisdictiontotreathishabeascorpuspetitionasa " petitionforpostconvictionrelief.Furthermore,acourtlackingjurisdictionoverthe $! petitiondoesnothavethepowertotransferthecasetothepropercountyabsenta z&r# statutetothecontrary.Nortonv._Everhart_,895S.W.2d317,319(Tenn.1995). F(>!%  Basedupontheforegoingandtherecordasawhole,weaffirmthetrial +$) courtsdismissalofthepetitionforawritofhabeascorpus. -&+     h      p 򀀀 3,1     h      p JosephM.Tipton,Judge 3,2  r8j17 ЇCONCUR:  _____________________________   JerryL.Smith,Judge   _____________________________ R J NormaOgle,Judge