ÿWPC[ ¬ÍGÔ¬ôì[‰¸»•ŸºáI»õ”W=¸j”‘ÑX¼o›ù]Z‡õHOÀ÷Àu™–§£cÛ+æO{mÝ…>6íô²ø1pŠ4½—‹ ‘ÔÐ=@¼š„˜pZ9N+„ùcì`B7«ã¶ANß¼˜—5fÄúm?•`Á)»cä.‚æ#X ¥þ'Ï0À,:ô8=¤?˜‰žTJ6æˆlþºÒ‚Ò`V¦×¥MêQÿ¶™Í¶d”KNvxÒæHjž,ÔÕÜ,êj9Á“_ÈĎ좞mVô=ÅJÄûkþûU;ÇyTÆ™¥‚kÉÒµm]úó~_žÔn|zú©ixÔí[•87)E<¶4°"²åe÷RgAc´&¼#á#‘ín¥™pü¿>*ô sX©84çÖ•àG|Íâ($OG6</Äïw¤=;%àñœ…} Ã×K°×Þ»JŒN*˜ÝCyk°[º¦›¢ºö'‰µ$tå{ßE‘Zê}¡HþÄa¤ýØú6º†VpëCö_Õw}³g²×B›hÉp·é…¬knyË>%:# ,U :7 %q 0úw AQqw@Â4  U:% Æ_ U:% U :_ U:™ 0DÓ " t9 D/­ BÜ U:ù R3…U:ˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆˆ ÂÑÎRŸ 0Dñ 0D5 0Dyy½½ BÅ D3ââââââââââââââb 0>˜HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,ü,,,,,ü0nLlÎ, øð AZ"Arial RegularX(ÒûÖ$¡¡Ñ7€ËMXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTRY3Ø' LetterY3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letter 3Ø' LetterTÑ "#$Cþÿ<< Cÿÿ 89D:E;<D=D>e?@Ó€J%sŒ&3|xJ, øð AZ"Arial RegularƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular,ó‚ AZ"Arial Regular(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó Ý ƒ9Üé$ÝÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  Óà Ø àòòÚ  Ú5Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€second€wife€responded€that€she€had€already€spent€$75,000€of€theÐ ,  Ðproceeds€on€expenses€related€to€the€decedentððs€terminal€illness. jÝ ƒ9Üé$ÝÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  Óà Ø àòòÚ  Ú6Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€dissenting€judge€opined€that€equity€dictates€that€the€plaintiffs€shouldÐ ,  Ðprevail€due€to€the€unjust€enrichment€of€the€named€beneficiaries€in€violation€of€theÏdivorce€decree.€€òòId.óó€at€220€(Fine,€J.,€dissenting).'÷ÿ dxdüÿP Pd,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular HÝ ƒ9Üé$ÝÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  Óà Ø àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý›Ó=€ñXÐXdÐd=ÓThroughout€this€opinion,€œMarilyn€Holt›€and€œElliott€Holt€will€often€be€referred€toÐ ,  Ðcollectively€as€ð ðElliott€Holt.ðð ùÝ ƒ"¯"ÝÝ  ÝÔ€X‹ÅXXXÔÔ€.$XX‹ÅÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€X‹ÅX.$ÔÐ  ÐÌApril€19,€1999ÌÌCecil€Crowson,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAhÔó ó,c½¬AZ‹"Arial Regular Ó=€ñÐXdÐd=ÓÝ ƒ9ÜéÿÝÑ7ÀñXXdìdì7ÑÑ @ ÑÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  ÓÑT@RY 3Ø' Letter3Ø' 3Ø'&Avery 5384 Name Tagÿ3Ø'TÑà Ø àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€divorce€decree€incorporating€the€marital€dissolution€agreement€will€beÐ ,  Ðcollectively€€referred€to€as€the€ð ðdivorce€decreeðð€throughout€this€opinion.€ ÇÝ ƒ9Üé$ÝÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  Óà Ø àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝThe€record€does€not€indicate€Sophia€Holtððs€relationship€with€Ms.€Lewis. HÝ ƒ9Üé$ÝÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  Óà Ø àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝAlthough€we€granted€permission€to€appeal€in€a€Tenn.€R.€App.€P.€11Ð ,  Ðapplication€in€January€of€1997€to€resolve€this€specific€issue,€the€appeal€wasÏsubsequently€dismissed€by€the€parties.€(3¯$¢¢Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý(3¯$££Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó ó d(((('ÿÿdxd- ù-(î(3$¤¤Ý ƒûÖ!ÝÑ7€+DXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTRY 3Ø' Letter3Ø'3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  Ýà Ø àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  ÚóóÝ ƒûÖ!ÝÑ7€+DXXdðXXdð7ÑÑ  ÑÓÓÒ€°ÒÒÀ°ÒÓ  ÓÑTRY 3Ø' Letter3Ø'3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  ÝÑè°ÑÑè°ÑÑ€7ÑÑTR[¤ AØ'ÿ LegalY 3Ø' Letter AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' LetterTÑÔ‡X‹ÅXXXÔÓÓÓ=€+DXÐXdÐd=Óñ?ññ>ñApril€12,€1999ñ>ññ?ññ@ñ›ñ@ññJññ@ñßr€)<,(j 8` `€€@E»é` 8ttxPóèð  rßñ@ññJññJññJññ@ñ›ñ@ñà@Ø Ø Ìàò òIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEˆÌñJñœßt€)>.*jxU` `€€@EÐ) ` 8ttxPÔ ð U tß›ñJñà@úú(ÌàAT€NASHVILLEó óˆÐ Ô ì ÐÌÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àòòFOR€PUBLICATIONóóÐ r Š ÐÌTOMMY€NEAL€HOLT,€Deceasedà 8 àà  à)à è àœò òFiled:€April€19,€1999ó ó›Ð >V Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àPlaintiff,à ˆ àà à àà 8 à€€€€€€€€€€€)à è àÐ (  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìv.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àDAVIDSON€COUNTYÔ#†X+DXXX‹Ål#ÔÔ‡X‹ÅXXX+DÔà H! àà  # àÐ Üô  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àÐ ÂÚ  ÐMARILYN€KAY€HOLLINGSWORTHà  à)Ð ¨À  ÐHOLT,à 0 àà ˆ àà à à€à 8 àà  à)Ð Ž¦  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àHon.€Frank€G.€Clement,€Jr.Ð tŒ  Ðà Ø àDefendant/Third„Party€à 8 àà  à)à è àJudgeÐ Zr Ðà Ø àPlaintiff/€and€Counter„à 8 àà  à)Ð @X Ðà Ø àDefendant/Appellee,à 8 àà  à)à è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àÐ &> Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)ÌELLIOTT€NATHAN€HOLTà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à€œÐ ò  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àSupreme€Court›Ð Øð Ðà Ø àThird€Party€Plaintiff€andà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€01S01„9809„PB„00165Ð ¾Ö Ðà Ø àCounter„Defendant/Appellee,à  à)Ð ¤¼ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìv.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð pˆ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)ÌVICKIE€LEWIS,€Administrator€Adà 8 àà  à)Ð ñ›ñ>ññ=ñÌñ=ñTRIAL›€œCOURT›€ANDÌCOURT€OF€APPEALS€œAFFIRMED›à  àà è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àDROWOTA,€J.Ô#†X+DXXX‹Å#ÔÔ‡ X+DXXX+DÔÐ  ô5 -0w ÐÓ‹ÓÑ, èÑÑ` èÑÌà Ø àIn€this€case,€we€determine€the€rights€of€parties€to€the€proceeds€of€a€$50,000Ïinsurance€policy€insuring€the€life€of€Tommy€Neal€Holt,€now€deceased.€€In€a€maritalÏdissolution€agreement€incorporated€in€a€divorce€decree,€the€decedent€had€agreed€toÏacquire€a€$100,000€life€insurance€policy€naming€his€child€as€beneficiary€and€hisÏœformer€wife€as€trustee.€€At€the€time€of€his€death,€the€decedent€owned€a€$40,000Ïinsurance€policy€naming€his€child€as€beneficiary€and€a€$50,000€policy€naming€hisÏmother,€who€subsequently€died,€as€beneficiary.€€After€suit€was€brought€before€theÏProbate€Court€of€Davidson€County,€the€trial€court€entered€summary€judgment€in€favorÏof€the€appellees€and€ordered€that€the€proceeds€of€the€$50,000€be€paid€to€the€formerÏwife€as€trustee€for€the€benefit€of€the€child.€€The€Court€of€Appeals€affirmed.€€For€theÏreasons€stated€hereinafter,€we€affirm›€the€judgments€of€the€lower€œcourts.›€ÌÌÌà@õõÌàò òI.€€FACTS€&€PROCEDURAL€HISTORYˆÐ l$@ Ðó óÌà Ø àTommy€Neal€Holt€(ð ðthe€Decedentðð)€and€Marilyn€Kay€Hollingsworth€HoltÏœdivorced›€pursuant€to€a€decree€entered€by€the€Probate€Court€for€Davidson€County€onÏMay€8,€1990.€€At€the€time€of€the€divorce,€the€couple€had€one€child,€Elliott€Nathan€œHolt,Ïborn›€in€June€of€1978.€€The€divorce€decree€incorporated€the€terms€of€a€maritalÏdissolution€agreement€between€the€œparties.€€The€parties€were€given€joint€custody€ofÏElliott€Holt,€and€Mr.€Holt€was€required€to€make€child€support€payments.€€ParagraphÏXII€of€the€marital€dissolution€agreement€provided€as€follows:Ð  l3@), Ðà@RR'ÌàòòLife€InsuranceˆàHFF3FàˆàHFF3FàˆàHFF3FàóóˆÐ ,  ÐÓÓà8 Ø àà 0 àThe€Husband€and€Wife€agree€that€the€Husband€shall€maintainÏand€keep€in€full€force€and€effect€a€life€insurance€policy€in€the€amountÏof€one€hundred€thousand€dollars€Ô#†XñXX Xñ§#Ô($100,000)Ô‡ XñXXXñÔ€to€secure€his€obligationsÐ Ü ° Ðfor€the€payment€of€child€support€and€other€debts€as€set€out€in€thisÏAgreement.€€The€Husband€and€Wife€agree€that€the€partiesðð€child,€ElliotÏNathan€Holt,€shall€be€named€as€the€sole€and€irrevocable€beneficiary€ofÏthe€Husbandððs€one€hundred€thousand€dollar€($100,000)€life€insuranceÏpolicy€as€set€out€in€this€Agreement.€€The€Husband€and€Wife€agree€thatÏthe€Wife€will€be€named€as€Trustee€for€the€benefit€of€the€partiesðð€minorÏchild.€€In€her€capacity€as€Trustee,€the€Wife€shall€be,€and€is€herebyÏauthorized€and€directed€to€use€the€proceeds€to€provide€generally€forÏthe€childððs€health,€education€and€support.€€The€Husband€and€WifeÏfurther€agree€that€any€monies€in€the€Wifeððs€possession€as€Trustee€forÏthe€benefit€of€the€partiesðð€minor€child€will€be€given€to€the€partiesðð€minorÏchild€at€age€twenty€five€with€all€proceeds€that€are€remaining€in€trust€forÏthe€benefit€of€the€child€to€be€paid€over€to€the€child€at€the€childððs€twentyÏfifth€birthday.Ð Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌà8 Ø àà 0 àThe€Husband€and€Wife€further€agree€that€within€thirty€days€ofÏthe€entry€of€the€Final€Decree€of€Divorce,€the€Husband€will€furnish€to€theÏWife€a€copy€of€the€policy€or€policies€defined€herein,€showing€theÏappropriate€beneficiary€designation€as€set€out€in€this€Agreement.€€InÏaddition,€the€Husband€will€take€whatever€steps€are€necessary€to€allowÏthe€Wife€to€determine€directly€from€the€Husbandððs€insurance€agentÏwhether€or€not€the€monthly€premiums€are€being€paid€in€accordanceÏwith€the€terms€of€the€insurance€policy€or€policies€listed€in€this€section.Ð Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌÓÓAnother€clause€in€the€divorce€decreeÔ#†XñXX Xñ®#Ô׃×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×Ô‡ XñXXXñÔ€stated€that€the€provisions€would€be€ð ðbindingÐ è$¼ Ðupon€and€inure€to€the€benefit€of€the€parties€hereto,€their€personal€representatives,Ïheirs€and€assigns.ðð€€At€the€time€of€the€divorce,€the€Decedent€did€not€own€any€lifeÏinsurance.ÌÌÔ#†XñXX XñÕ!#Ôà Ø àThe€record€reflects€that€the€Decedent€failed€to€comply€with€the€divorce€decreeÐ  .ô#' Ðby€not€procuring€a€$100,000€life€insurance€policy€listing€Elliott€Holt€as€the€beneficiaryÏand€providing€Marilyn€Holt€with€a€copy€of€the€policy.€€In€September€of€1992,€while€heÐ Ð1¤'+ Ðand€Elliott€Holt€were€apparently€living€with€the€Decedentððs€mother,€Sophie€Holt,€theÏDecedent€obtained€from€Old€Line€Life€Insurance€Company€of€America€(ð ðOld€Lineðð)Ïa€life€insurance€policy€in›€the€amount€of€$50,000.€€The€Decedent€designated€hisÏmother,€Sophie€Holt,€as€the€beneficiary€of€this€œpolicy.›€€In€1995€the€DecedentÏobtained,€as€a€benefit€from€beginning€employment€with€his€new€employer,€PattersonÏPress,€a€$40,000€policy€on€his€life.€€He€designated€œElliott€Holt€as€the€sole€beneficiaryÏof€this€$40,000€policy,€and€no€one€was€listed€as€trustee.Ô‡ XñXXXñÔÐ <  ÐÌà Ø àThe€Decedent€died€on€January€12,€1996.€€At€that€time€he€was€in€arrears€inÏmaking€child€support€payments€in€the€amount€of€$2,721.09.€€Less€than€one€weekÏafter€the€Decedentððs€death,€Sophia€Holt€altered€her€will€so€that€all€of€her€estate€wasÏbequeathed€to€Ms.€Vickie€Lewis.׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€€Following€œthe€Decedentððs›€death,€all€proceeds€ofÐ tH Ðhis€$40,000€life€insurance€policy€were€tendered€to€œElliott€Holt,›€and€this€policy€is€notÏin€controversy€in€this€œsuit.€€›€ÌÌà Ø àIn€January€of€1997,€œMarilyn€Holt›€and€œElliott€Holt׃ ×Ý ƒ#ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×›€filed€this€complaint€seekingÐ Ô%¨ Ðto€enforce€the€May€8,€1990€final€divorce€decree.€€Specifically,€the€complaint€demandsÏthat€the€proceeds€of€the€$50,000€Old€Line€policy€be€paid€to€œMarilyn€Holt€as€trusteeÏfor€the€benefit€of€the€Child€in€accordance€with€the€terms€of€the€divorce€decree.€ÏSophia€Holt€and€Old€Line€were€listed€as€defendants€in€this€action.€€The€trial€courtÏdismissed€the€complaint€against€Old€Line€after€Old€Line€interplead€the€funds.€Ð  /à$( Їà Ø àWhile€this€matter€was€pending€before€the€trial€court,€Sophie€Holt€died.€€InÏaddition€to€bequeathing€all€of€her€possessions€to€Ms.€Lewis,€Sophie€Holtððs€will€named›ÏMs.€Lewis€as€the€administrator€ad€litem€for€her€estate.€€Accordingly,€Ms.€Lewis€wasÏsubstituted€for€Sophie€Holt€in€this€action.ÌÌà Ø àœElliott€Holt›€and€Ms.€Lewis€proceeded€to€file€motions€for€summary€judgment.€ÏAfter€considering€motions,€affidavits,€and€other€documents€filed€by€the€parties,€theÏtrial€judge€granted€summary€judgment€in€favor€of€œElliott€Holt€and€ordered€that€theÏproceeds€of€the€$50,000€Old€Line€Policy€be€transferred€to€Marilyn€Holt›€as€trustee€forÏthe€use€and€benefit€of€œElliott€Holt.›€€The€trial€court€reasoned€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 Ø àà 0 àSince€on€9/8/92,€when€Tommy€Neal€Holt€applied€for€theÏ$50,000.00€Life€insurance€policy€(the€proceeds€of€which€are€the€subjectÏof€this€suit),€both€Tommy€Neal€Holt€and€Elliott€Nathan€Holt€were€livingÏwith€Mr.€Holtððs€mother€(Sophia€œHolt),›€and€since€Tommy€Neal€Holt€hadÏbeen€ordered€on€May€8th€of€1990€to€obtain€$100,000€in€life€insuranceÏon€his€life€and€to€make€Elliot€Nathan€Holt,€its€beneficiary,€the€CourtÏdraws€the€inference,€both€from€a€logical€standpoint€and€from€the€œmaxim›Ïof€equity€that€ð ðEquity€regards€that€as€done€which€ought€to€be€doneðð,Ïthat€it€was€the€intent€of€Tommy€Neal€Holt€to€comply€with€the€Order€ofÏthe€Court€(although€he€obtained€only€$50,000.00€of€the€$100,000.00Ïinsurance€that€had€been€ordered,€and€named€his€mother,€Sophia€Holt,Ïas€the€beneficiary€instead€of€his€son€(who€was€still€a€minor)€or€his€ex„¼wife)€and€that€he€intended€that€his€mother€be€the€beneficiary€only€asÏTrustee€for€the€use€and€benefit€of€his€son,€Elliott€Nathan€Holt;€and,€thatÏit€was€his€intent€to€simply€substitute€his€mother€in€place€of€his€ex„wifeÏas€such€Trustee;€and€thus,€in€effect,€creating€a€constructive€trust,€forÏthe€use€and€benefit€of€his€son.Ð Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌÔ#†XñXX Xñx&#ÔÓÓOn€appeal,€the€Court€of€Appeals€affirmed,€finding€that€the€trial€courtððs€decision€wasÐ 4-#& Ðconsistent€with€Tennessee€case€law€and€equitable€principles.€€From€this€order,€Ms.ÏLewis€appeals.ÌœÌñ=ñ›ñ=ñÐ ”4h*. Лà@RR(Ìàò òII.€€ANALYSISˆÐ ,  Ðó óÌà Ø àIt€is€undisputed€that€the€Decedent€breached€his€obligation€under€the€finalÏdivorce€decree€to€maintain€a€$100,000€life€insurance€policy€listing€œMarilyn€Holt›€asÏtrustee€and€œElliott€Holt€as€the€beneficiary.›€€Ms.€Lewis€contends€that€since€theÏDecedent€was€not€prohibited€from€purchasing€other€life€insurance€policies€listingÏother€individuals€as€beneficiaries,€œElliott€Holtððs›€only€remedy€is€an€action€against€theÏDecedentððs€estate.€€Therefore,€Ms.€Lewis€contends€that€the€trial€court€should€haveÏgranted€summary€judgment€to€her€instead.€€œElliott€Holt›€responds€that€the€trial€courtÏproperly€found€that€he€was€entitled€to€the€proceeds€of€the€$50,000€policy.€ò òÐ Ô¨ ÐÌÌà@#ÌàA.€€Standard€of€ReviewˆÌó óà Ø àIn€this€case,€both€œElliott€Holt€and€Ms.€Lewis€moved€for€summary€judgment.€€OnÐ d"8 Ðappeal,€Ms.€Lewis€appears€to€assert€both€that€the€trial€court€erred€in€grantingÏsummary€judgment€to€Elliott€Holt€and€that€the€trial€court€should€have€grantedÏsummary€judgment€to€Ms.€Lewis.€€Summary€judgment€is€appropriate€if€the€movantÏdemonstrates€that€no€genuine€issues€of€material€fact€exist€and€that€the€movant€isÏentitled€to€a€judgment€as€a€matter€of€law.€€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.03.€€We€must€take€theÏstrongest€view€of€the€evidence€in€favor€of€the€nonmoving€party,€allowing€allÏreasonable€inferences€in€favor€of€the€nonmovant€and€discarding€all€countervailingÏevidence.€€òòShadrick€v.€Cokeróó,€963€S.W.2d€726,€731€(Tenn.€1998)€(citing€òòByrd€v.€Hallóó,Ð $1ø&* Ð847€S.W.2d€208,€210„11€(Tenn.€1993)).€€Since€our€review€concerns€only€questionsÏof€law,€the€trial€courtððs€judgment€is€not€presumed€correct,€and€our€review€is€òòde€novoóóÐ Ô4¨*. Ðon€the€record€before€this€Court.€€òòWarren€v.€Estate€of€Kirkóó,€954€S.W.2d€722,€723Ð ,  Ð(Tenn.€1997);€òòBain€v.€Wellsóó,€936€S.W.2d€618,€622€(Tenn.€1997).€ò òÐ  Ø ÐÌÌà@HH&ÌàB.€€Tennessee€LawˆÌó óà Ø àTennessee€courts€have€long€recognized€that€ð ð[e]quity€regards€that€as€doneÐ ”h  Ðwhich€in€good€conscience€ought€to€be€done.ðð€€òòMcCann›€Steel€Co.€v.€Third€Nat.€Bankóó,Ð l@  Ð337€S.W.2d€886,€891€(Tenn.€App.€œ1960);€William€H.€Inman,€òòGibsonððs€Suits€inÐ D  ÐChanceryóó€ðð€21€(7th€ed.€1988);€11›€Tenn.€Jur.€òòEquityóó€ðð€œ11€(1995);›€2€Pomeroy€òòEquityÐ ð ÐJurisprudenceóó€ðð€364€(5th€ed.€œ1941).›Ð ôÈ ÐÌà Ø àJudge€Cardozo€has€articulated€the€rationale€supporting€the€judicial€recognitionÏof€one€equitable€device,€a€constructive€trust,€as€follows:ÌÓÓà8 Ø àA€constructive€trust€is€the€formula€through€which€the€conscience€ofÏequity€finds€expression.€€When€property€has€been€acquired€in€suchÏcircumstances€that€the€holder€of€the€legal€title€may€not€in€goodÏconscience€retain€the€beneficial€œinterest›€equity€converts€him€into€œa›Ïœtrustee.Ð Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌà8 Ø àà 0 àà ˆ à*à à àà 8 àà  à*à è àà @ àà ˜ à*ÐÜ'° Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌà8 Ø àA›€court€of€equity€in€decreeing€a€constructive€trust€is€bound€by€noÏunyielding€formula.€€The€equity€of€the€transaction€must€shape€theÏmeasure€of€relief.Ð Ø À!Ø À! ÐÌÓÓòòBeatty€v.€Guggenheim€Exploration€Co.óó,€122€N.E.€378,€œ380„81›€(N.Y.€1919);€òòseeóóòòalsoóóÐ d-8#& МòòAkers€v.€Gillentineóó,›€231€S.W.2d€œ369,€371€(Tenn.€1948).›€€Tennessee€courts€haveÐ