ÿWPCu ÓvŸãgÊÎÈæƒ5vŽ,l]+[6 ÜU†ºÉ³þBì0„Ú@áQw­.•ÀŽAò`çã…&tÖK©jØ6ïš £eéò¿€4äÙsC`XÜhaÆìF<è9Ìš*ÌÒ¬Á%šÒ2_áÄÀfÆÁÐÛu¯ËÛ- F“jg‰Ê0†…œžô0ñå{ÿù6ç:WSû^³…ÆÔZÕêÍÖÓp<ä¸ûÇF¶ìn€@‘fìVälTt»934(-Ýj¸bݱ~K îÿJå™~Ea6¬¦£Óœö/ÛãtÎR'!¦¼JNbIÇ1!ÊÌ3Ò‰Ã5TKÞAéo*¸3Ûâ`Œ!“ ˆ[Òro @îã²ãµl¯¯˜IŸI4g:G•Qët®GÚi3`  3-Å’|û|ªVÐ÷\ë*L=„O+k 6@bû)ÄGék¢LBCN_"ö&-^+1Qx•Á˜‰üÑ”ea&# âä­µ«0I}äøG“­]UK}nؤ6 ºH-·%vg zë´”Ø&†Uv²¡Óso‚@u¡î鈬߯“MüÎ[h6XH˜ÂgYvݯDEÿl<àN ï[øŸV¸”Mò:€RÓ8¬ç5¶]ö+e#!†U :§ %á 0˜çB wÁ 4Å Ù è çð E× 0Ü 0Dø<Ã> mÔOìììììììììììììì B;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;NX 0´Z D5C AQZÆ« 0´q 0D%^ i˜HP LaserJet 8000 DN PSØÚØÚÚØØÚ0,†r‰AZ‹"Arial RegularX(p÷‹$¡¡Ò€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[  AØ'ÿ Legal[  AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ Legal AØ'ÿ LegalTÑC:\WPWIN60\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT{Z='°ÒÔ\3|x ÝÝ ƒ -$ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°Òà Ø àòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ôТòXXÔ€The€appellant€seeks€credit€for€one€year,€five€months€and€twenty„nine€days€for€the€period€ofÐ  ÐOctober€Ô#†XaXòôТ_#ÔÔ‡ôТòXXaÔ28,€1991,€to€April€26,€1993Ô#†XaXòôТ#ÔÔ‡ôТòXXaÔ,€when€his€probation€was€revoked.€€He€argues€that€he€is€entitled€toРƾ Ðcredit€for€one€year,€three€months€and€forty„two€days€for€the€period€from€July€10,€1993,€when€probationÐ „| Ðwas€reinstated,€to€November€21,€1994,€when€probation€was€revoked.€€The€appellant€also€contends€thatÐ B : Ðhe€is€entitled€to€credit€of€one€year,€three€months€and€sixteen€days€for€the€period€from€December€15,Ð  ø Ð1994,€when€his€probation€was€reinstated,€through€April€1,€1996,€when€the€final€probation€revocation€wasÐ ¾ ¶ Ðissued. ;Ñ € ÑÑ  ÑÑ#€8ØXÿÿd#Ñ(Œ(3Ù‹$¤¤Ý ƒ÷‹!ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  Ýà Ø àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó  ¹Ý ƒ -$ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°Òà Ø àòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ‡ôТòXXÔ€The€record€indicates€that€he€was€incarcerated€seventy„five€days€when€his€probation€wasÐ  Ðrevoked€in€1993€and€ninety€days€when€his€probation€was€revoked€in€1994.€€The€Court€of€CriminalРƾ ÐAppeals€credited€the€appellantððs€sentence€to€reflect€the€time€he€served€in€confinement.€€ÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ ÊÝ ƒ -$ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°Òà Ø àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý€Ô€ôТòXXÔThe€record€indicates€that€during€the€final€revocation€proceedings,€the€appellant€was€sent€to€theÐ  ÐVanderbilt€Medical€Center€for€an€evaluation.€€The€evaluation€revealed€that€the€appellant€had€a€history€ofÐ îæ Ðmanic„depressive€disorder€from€which€he€had€suffered€a€relapse€due€to€the€death€of€his€wife,€whoÐ ¬¤ Ðapparently€died€from€a€drug€overdose.€€Following€the€evaluation,€the€appellant€was€then€transferred€toÐ j b Ðthe€Department€of€Correctionððs€Special€Needs€Facility€pursuant€to€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„314(e).€ EÝ ƒ -$ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°Òà Ø àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ€ôТòXXÔ€In€the€appeal€below,€the€intermediate€court€also€addressed€issues€regarding€the€appellantððsÐ  Ðsanity€at€the€time€of€his€probation€violations€and€his€competency€to€stand€trial€at€the€time€of€his€finalРƾ Ðrevocation€hearing.€€The€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€held€that€the€trial€court€met€its€obligation€byÐ „| Ðconsidering€the€appellantððs€mental€condition€as€mitigating€evidence€at€the€revocation€hearing.€€TheÐ B : Ðintermediate€court€further€concluded€that€the€evidence€did€not€preponderate€against€the€trial€courtððsÐ  ø Ðfinding€that€the€appellant€was€competent€to€stand€trial.€€Those€issues€were€not€raised€in€this€appeal. d(Œ3Oä$££Ý ƒ÷‹!ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  Ý$$$$)ÿÿ!dxdx Ý ƒbOä"ÝÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ€wXXÔÓ  Óò òÔ Ad ÔFILEDÔ€XÇÈXwÔÐ  ÐÌSeptember€7,€1999ÌÌCecil€Ô_ÔCrowsonÔ_Ô,€Jr.ÌAppellate€Court€ClerkÔdAYÔó óab\c]Cþÿ<<CÿÿƒLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(Œ3Oä$¢¢Ý ƒ÷‹!ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  Ý($$””ò òÚ  Ú1Ú  Úó óˆ%' Ý ƒ÷‹!ÝÒ€°ÒÒX°ÒÑTR[° AØ'ÿ Legal3Ø' AØ'ÿ Legalÿ3Ø'TÑÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÑ€ µ5ÑÑ  ÑÓ=€ÇÈXÐXdÐd=Óßv€`_]@0,j:`  `€€@ÿE ±` 8ttxPX°ð  vßÔ_Ôà@‰‰ €àòòIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° ÐÌÌà@»»*€àAT€NASHVILLEóóˆÐ b² ÐÌÌò òó óÌÌÌSTATE€OF€TENNESSEE,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àò òFOR€PUBLICATIONó óÐ Æ   Ѐà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ð ²   Ðà Ø àAppellee,à ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àò òFILED:€òò€September€7,€1999óóó óÐ ˜è  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìv.à Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àWILLIAMSON€COUNTYÐ jº  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)ÌJEFFREY€D.€HUNTER,à à àà 8 àà  à)à è àHON.€CORNELIA€A.€CLARKÐ 6†  Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àAppellant.à ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è àNo.€01S01„9806„CC„00118Ð R Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à)à è à(Probation€Revocation)Ð ´ ÐÌÌòòÌÌFor€the€Appellant:à ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àFor€the€Appellee:óóÐ 2‚ ÐÌJohn€S.€Colley,€IIIà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àJohn€Knox€WalkupÐ þN ÐColumbia,€Tennesseeà à àà 8 àà  àà è àAttorney€General€&€ReporterÐ ä4 ÐÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àMichael€E.€MooreÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àSolicitor€GeneralÌÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àMarvin€E.€Clements,€Jr.Ìà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àAssistant€Attorney€GeneralÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àNashville,€TennesseeÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌò òÔ€ T!XXÔÌÌÌÌà@KK-€àOPINIONó óÔ€XÇÈX! TԈР†7Ö27 ÐÌÌAFFIRMEDà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àà ˜ àà ð àBARKER,€J.Ð :à5: ÐÓÓÐ v;Æ6; ÐÑ µ5Ñâ  âÑ€°ÑÑ°ÑÑ8€ÇÈXXdæXXdæ8Ñâ  âÑ  Ñà Ø àWe€granted€this€appeal€by€Jeffrey€D.€Hunter,€the€appellant,€in€order€to€addressÐ  Ðissues€pertinent€to€a€trial€courtððs€authority€during€probation€revocation€proceedings.€€Ð ÔÌ ÐFor€the€reasons€provided€herein,€we€hold€that€when€a€trial€court€has€determined€that€aÐ   ˜ Ðprobation€violation€has€occurred,€it€possesses€the€authority€to:€(1)€order€incarceration;Ð l d Ð(2)€order€the€original€probationary€period€to€commence€anew;€or€(3)€extend€theÐ 80 Ðremaining€period€of€probation€for€as€much€as€an€additional€two€years.€€We€furtherÐ ü  Ðconclude€that€a€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€credit€on€his€or€her€sentence€ofÐ ÐÈ  Ðincarceration€for€any€time€served€on€probation€prior€to€probation€revocation€andÐ œ”  Ðreinstatement€of€the€original€sentence.€€The€judgment€of€the€Court€of€Criminal€AppealsÐ h` Ðis€affirmed.Ð 4, ÐÌà@§§+€àò òBACKGROUNDó óˆÐ ÌÄ Ѐà Ø àÐ ¤œ Ðà Ø àOn€September€3,€1991,€the€appellant€pled€guilty€to€reckless€driving,€failure€toÐ ph Ðappear,€and€two€counts€of€possession€of€marijuana€with€the€intent€to€sell.€€AÐ < 4 Ðsentencing€hearing€was€held€on€November€13,€1991,€at€which€time€the€trial€courtÐ " Ðimposed€consecutive€two„year€sentences€for€each€marijuana€conviction€and€thenÐ Ô#Ì  Ðimmediately€granted€consecutive€two„year€probationary€periods€for€each€conviction.€Ð  %˜" ÐThe€trial€court€also€ordered€the€appellant€to€serve€a€consecutive€one„year€probationaryÐ l'd $ Ðsentence€for€the€failure€to€appear€conviction€and€a€concurrent€six„month€probationaryÐ 8)0"& Ðsentence€for€the€reckless€driving€conviction.€€Thus,€the€total€effective€sentence€for€allÐ +ü#( Ðfour€convictions€was€five€(5)€years€to€be€served€on€probation.Ð Ð,È%* Ðà Ø àApproximately€one€week€later,€on€November€21,€1991,€a€probation€violationÐ œ.”', Ðwarrant€was€issued€against€the€appellant€charging€him€with€marijuana€use.€€FollowingÐ h0`). Ða€hearing€on€January€13,€1992,€the€appellantððs€probation€was€revoked€but€thenÐ 42,+0 Ðreinstated.€Ð 4ø,2 ÐÐ Ì5Ä.4 Ðà Ø àLess€than€two€years€later,€on€February€18,€1993,€a€second€probation€violationÐ  Ðwarrant€was€issued€against€the€appellant€based€on€charges€filed€against€him€forÐ ÔÌ Ðaggravated€assault.€€The€appellant€subsequently€pled€guilty€to€aggravated€assault€andÐ   ˜ Ðreceived€a€suspended€eight„year€sentence€to€be€served€consecutively€to€his€previousÐ l d Ðfive„year€sentence.€€Again,€the€trial€court€revoked€the€appellantððs€previous€probationÐ 80 Ðand€then€immediately€reinstated€the€original€probationary€sentences.€€The€trial€courtÐ ü  Ðalso€ordered€the€appellant€incarcerated€for€seventy„five€(75)€days€before€being€placedÐ ÐÈ  Ðback€on€probation.€€The€appellantððs€total€effective€sentence€was,€therefore,€increasedÐ œ”  Ðto€thirteen€(13)€years.Ð h` ÐÌà Ø àA€third€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued€against€the€appellant€on€June€21,Ð ø Ð1994,€based€on€allegations€of€marijuana€use€and€his€arrest€for€driving€under€theÐ ÌÄ Ðinfluence.€€As€a€result,€on€December€15,€1994,€the€trial€court€again€revoked€theÐ ˜ Ðappellantððs€probation€and€reinstated€his€original€probation€sentences.€€However,€theÐ d\ Ðtrial€court€ordered€him€to€serve€ninety€(90)€days€in€jail€before€placing€him€back€onÐ 0 ( Ðprobation.Ð ü!ô ÐÌà Ø àOn€April€1,€1996,€a€final€probation€violation€warrant€was€issued€against€theÐ ”%Œ" Ðappellant.€€The€warrant€was€based€upon€the€appellantððs€use€of€alcohol,€which€wasÐ `'X $ Ðspecifically€prohibited€by€the€probationary€rules,€and€his€erratic€behavior€and€threatsÐ ,)$"& Ðmade€to€his€family.€€Following€yet€another€probation€revocation€hearing,€on€May€30,Ð ø*ð#( Ð1996,€the€trial€court€again€revoked€the€appellantððs€probation€on€all€of€his€sentencesÐ Ä,¼%* Ðand€ordered€him€to€serve€the€following€consecutive€sentences:€€two€(2)€years€for€theÐ .ˆ', Ðfirst€drug€conviction,€two€(2)€years€for€the€second€drug€conviction,€one€(1)€year€for€theÐ \0T). Ðâ âfailure€to€appear€conviction,€and€eight€(8)€years€for€the€aggravated€assault€conviction.€Ð (2 +0 ÐTherefore,€the€total€effective€sentence€was€thirteen€(13)€years€to€be€served€in€theÐ  ÐDepartment€of€Correction.׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀РÔÌ Ðâ âÌà Ø àOn€June€12,€1996,€the€appellant€filed€a€motion€to€correct€the€sentence€allegingÐ l d Ðthat€he€was€incapable€of€understanding€his€actions€at€the€time€he€violated€hisÐ 80 Ðprobation€and€that€two€of€his€four€probationary€sentences€had€expired€prior€to€theÐ ü  Ðinstitution€of€final€probation€revocation€proceedings.€€The€trial€court€denied€the€motionÐ ÐÈ  Ðand€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€affirmed,€concluding€that€the€trial€court€possessedÐ œ”  Ðthe€authority€to€revoke€the€appellantððs€probation€and€to€reinstate€his€original€sentence.€Ð h` ÐIn€so€doing€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€held€that€the€appellant€was€not€entitled€toÐ 4, Ðreceive€credit€on€his€probationary€sentence€for€time€previously€served€on€probation.€×ƒn×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ׀Рø ÐThe€appellant€now€requests€this€Court€to€reverse€the€lower€courts.Ð ÌÄ ÐÌà@,€àò òANALYSISó óˆÐ d\ ÐÌà Ø àThe€appellant€first€and€primarily€contends€that€he€successfully€completed€theÐ " Ðtwo€(2)€consecutive€two„year€probation€sentences€for€the€felony€drug€convictions€priorÐ Ô#Ì  Ðto€the€institution€of€final€revocation€proceedings€in€1996.€€He€specifically€argues€thatÐ  %˜" Ðthe€thirteen„year€sentence€imposed€upon€him€following€his€final€revocation€hearingÐ l'd $ Ðshould€be€reduced€to€a€nine„year€sentence€to€account€for€the€completion€of€theseÐ 8)0"& Ðâ âsentences.€€Based€on€the€reasons€outlined€below,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€CourtÐ +ü#( Ðof€Criminal€Appeals€and€the€appellantððs€thirteen„year€sentence€in€the€Department€ofÐ  ÐCorrection.Ð ÔÌ Ðâ âÌà Ø àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðððð€40„35„310€(1990)€and€40„35„311€(1990)€governÐ l d Ðthe€procedure€for€revocation€of€probation.€€If€a€trial€court€determines€that€a€defendantÐ 80 Ðhas€violated€the€conditions€of€probation,€it€has€the€authority€to€revoke€the€defendantððsÐ ü  Ðprobation€and€cause€execution€of€the€original€judgment.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„Ð ÐÈ  Ð311.€€Tennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„310€provides:Ð œ”  ÐÓÓà Ø àThe€trial€judge€shall€possess€the€power,€at€any€time€within€the€Ð h` Ðà Ø àmaximum€time€which€was€directed€and€ordered€by€the€court€for€suchÐ NF Ðà Ø àsuspension,€after€proceeding€as€provided€in€ðð€40„35„311,€to€revokeÐ 4, Ðà Ø àand€annul€such€suspension,€and€in€such€cases€the€original€judgmentÐ  Ðà Ø àso€rendered€by€the€trial€judge€shall€be€in€full€force€and€effect€from€Ð ø Ðà Ø àthe€date€of€the€revocation€of€such€suspension,€and€shall€be€executedÐ æÞ ÐÓÓà Ø àaccordingly.Ð ÌÄ ÐÌà Ø àWe€agree€with€the€appellantððs€argument€that€if€a€defendant€successfullyÐ d\ Ðcompletes€a€probationary€sentence,€the€trial€court€is€without€authority€to€revokeÐ 0 ( Ðprobation€and€order€service€of€the€original€sentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310Ð ü!ô Ð(1990).€€However,€in€this€case,€the€appellant€failed€to€successfully€complete€his€firstÐ È#À  Ðtwo„year€probationary€period€prior€to€any€of€his€probation€revocations.€€ApproximatelyÐ ”%Œ" Ðone€week€after€the€appellant€was€initially€placed€on€probation,€a€violation€warrant€wasÐ `'X $ Ðissued€against€him.€€Then,€in€February€of€1993,€a€second€probation€violation€warrantÐ ,)$"& Ðwas€issued€against€the€appellant.€€He€was€placed€back€on€probation€after€the€trialÐ ø*ð#( Ðcourt€first€revoked€his€probation.€€Probation€was€revoked€again€in€November€of€1994.€Ð Ä,¼%* ÐThe€second€revocation€was€less€than€two€years€after€the€court€had€reinstated€hisÐ .ˆ', Ðprobation.€€Following€reinstatement€in€December€of€1994,€the€appellantððs€probationÐ \0T). Ðwas€revoked€again€on€April€1,€1996,€sixteen€months€following€the€previousÐ (2 +0 Ðreinstatement.€€At€the€final€revocation€hearing€in€May€30,€1996,€the€trial€court€revokedÐ ô3ì,2 Ðthe€appellantððs€probation€and€imposed€an€effective€thirteen„year€sentence€in€theÐ À5¸.4 ÐDepartment€of€Correction.€Ð Œ7„06 Ðà Ø àÌà Ø àThe€record€clearly€shows€that€the€appellant€failed€to€completely€serve€an€entireÐ ÔÌ Ðprobationary€period€prior€to€any€of€his€probation€revocations.€€Before€the€appellantÐ   ˜ Ðcould€successfully€complete€his€initial€two„year€probationary€term,€he€repeatedlyÐ l d Ðviolated€the€conditions€of€his€probation.€€Each€time€when€the€trial€court€revoked€theÐ 80 Ðappellantððs€probation€and€then€reinstated€it,€the€appellant€began€serving€his€originalÐ ü  Ðsentence€anew.€€The€trial€court€had€the€authority€to€revoke€probation€and€order€serviceÐ ÐÈ  Ðof€the€original€sentence€because€he€had€failed€to€complete€an€entire€probationaryÐ œ”  Ðperiod€at€the€time€the€violation€occurred.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310€(1990).Ð h` ÐÌà Ø àThe€appellant€contends,€however,€that€when€probation€is€revoked€andÐ ø Ðreinstated,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308(c)€sets€a€limit€on€a€trial€courtððs€authority€toÐ ÌÄ Ðorder€additional€time€to€be€served€on€probation.€€The€appellant€argues€that€theÐ ˜ Ðlanguage€of€section€40„35„308(c)€reveals€a€legislative€intent€to€prohibit€a€trial€courtÐ d\ Ðfrom€imposing€a€probation€sentence€greater€than€two€years.€€We€disagree.Ð 0 ( ÐÌà Ø àTennessee€Code€Annotated€ðð€40„35„308(c)€provides€the€trial€court€with€theÐ È#À  Ðpower€to€modify,€remove,€or€release€a€condition€of€a€defendantððs€probation.€€TheÐ ”%Œ" Ðstatute€in€question€provides:€Ð `'X $ ÐÓÓà Ø àNotwithstanding€the€actual€sentence€imposed,€at€the€conclusionÐ ,)$"& Ðà Ø àof€a€probation€revocation€hearing,€the€court€shall€have€the€authority€Ð * #' Ðà Ø àto€extend€the€defendantððs€period€of€probation€supervision€for€any€Ð ø*ð#( ÐÓÓà Ø àperiod€not€in€excess€of€two€(2)€years.Ð Þ+Ö$) ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308(c).€€Under€the€statute,€the€trial€court€has€the€option€toÐ ª-¢&+ Ðextend€the€existing€probationary€period€up€to€two€additional€years€instead€of€imposingÐ v/n(- Ðthe€original€sentence.€€The€Sentencing€Commission€Comments€suggest€that€sectionÐ B1:*/ Ð40„35„308(c)€was€designed€to€address€situations€where€a€defendant€violates€probationÐ 3,1 Ðâ ânear€the€end€of€the€probation€term€and€reinstatement€of€the€defendantððs€originalÐ Ú4Ò-3 Ðsentence€would€produce€too€harsh€a€result.€€€The€Sentencing€Commission€CommentsÐ  Ðprovide:Ð ÔÌ Ðâ âÓÓà Ø àSubsection€(c)€addresses€situations€where€a€defendant€violates€Ð   ˜ Ðà Ø àhis€or€her€probation€near€the€end€of€the€term,€and€instead€of€Ð † ~ Ðà Ø àordering€complete€incarceration,€a€trial€court€might€desire€to€Ð l d Ðà Ø àextend€the€defendantððs€period€of€probation€supervision.€€ThisÐ R J ÐÓÓà Ø àsubsection€permits€such€an€extension€for€a€period€up€to€two€years.Ð 80 ÐÌTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308(Sentencing€Commission€Comments).à H! àÐ ÐÈ  Ðà Ø àThe€appellant€contends€that€section€40„35„308(c)€was€designed€to€prevent€trialÐ œ”  Ðcourts€from€repeatedly€revoking€and€reinstating€a€defendantððs€original€probation.€€WeÐ h` Ðdisagree.€€Nothing€in€the€text€of€section€40„35„308(c)€prohibits€a€trial€court€fromÐ 4, Ðcausing€execution€of€a€defendantððs€original€sentence.€€Had€the€legislature€intended€forÐ ø Ðthe€statute€to€limit€a€trial€courtððs€authority€in€probation€revocation€proceedings,€it€couldÐ ÌÄ Ðhave€so€provided€in€the€text€of€the€statute.€€It€did€not.€€Furthermore,€the€appellantððsÐ ˜ Ðinterpretation€of€section€40„35„308(c)€overlooks€the€language€in€sections€40„35„310Ð d\ Ðand€40„35„311€stating€that€upon€revocation€a€trial€court€has€the€authority€to€impose€aÐ 0 ( Ðdefendantððs€original€sentence.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„310,„311.€€Ð ü!ô ÐÌà Ø àTo€summarize,€upon€revocation,€section€40„35„308(c)€provides€a€trial€court€withÐ ”%Œ" Ðan€alternative€to€ordering€incarceration€or€reinstating€a€defendantððs€full€originalÐ `'X $ Ðsentence.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308(c);€òòState€v.€Bowlingóó,€958€S.W.2d€362,€363Ð ,)$"& Ð(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1997).€€However,€the€trial€court€also€continues€to€possess€theÐ ø*ð#( Ðauthority€to€cause€execution€of€the€original€judgment€as€it€was€originally€entered.€€òòSeeóóÐ Ä,¼%* ÐTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„310.€€Upon€a€finding€that€a€defendant€has€violated€theÐ .ˆ', Ðconditions€of€probation,€a€trial€court€has€the€authority€to€cause€execution€of€theÐ \0T). Ðdefendantððs€original€judgment€as€it€was€originally€entered,€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðððð€40„35„Ð (2 +0 Ð310,„311,€or€to€extend€probation€for€a€period€up€to€an€additional€two€years€on€theÐ ô3ì,2 Ðremaining€period€of€the€original€probation.€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„308(c);€€òòBowlingóó,Ð À5¸.4 Ð958€S.W.2d€at€363.€€Ð Œ7„06 Їà Ø àFinally,€we€address€whether€the€appellant€is€entitled€to€credit€on€hisÐ  Ðprobationary€sentence€for€time€spent€on€probation€prior€to€the€revocation.€€TheÐ ÔÌ Ðappellant€asserts€that€he€should€receive€credit€for€a€total€of€three€(3)€years,€eleven€(11)Ð   ˜ Ðmonths€and€eighty„seven€(87)€days€served€on€various€probationary€periods€betweenÐ l d Ðrevocation€and€reinstatements.׃ ×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú3Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€According€to€his€argument,€his€thirteen„year€sentenceÐ 80 Ðshould€be€reduced€by€that€amount.€€We€disagree.Ð ü  ÐÌà Ø àThe€crux€of€the€appellantððs€argument€is€that€reinstating€the€original€probationaryÐ œ”  Ðterm€every€time€probation€is€revoked€produces€a€result€which€is€too€harsh€for€someÐ h` Ðdefendants.€€He€contends€that€a€sentence€to€be€served€on€probation€should€beÐ 4, Ðcredited€in€the€same€manner€in€which€sentences€of€incarceration€are€credited€for€timeÐ ø Ðserved€in€confinement.׃Â×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú4Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€Otherwise,€according€to€the€appellant,€all€defendants€couldÐ ÌÄ Ðface€potential€lifetimes€on€probation€regardless€of€the€time€actually€served€onÐ ˜ Ðprobation.€€Ð d\ ÐÌà Ø àThis€Court€recently€held€that€the€time€a€defendant€serves€on€probation€is€notÐ ü!ô Ðcounted€toward€the€completion€of€his€or€her€sentence€unless€a€defendant€successfullyÐ È#À  Ðcompletes€the€entire€term€of€probation.€€òòState€v.€Tayloróó,€992€S.W.2d€941€(Tenn.€1999);Ð ”%Œ" Ðòòseeóó€òòalsoóó€òòYoung€v.€Stateóó,€539€S.W.2d€850,€855€(Tenn.€Crim.€App.€1976).€€To€holdÐ `'X $ Ðotherwise€would€allow€a€defendant€to€serve€his€or€her€probation€sentence€inÐ ,)$"& Ðincrements€of€time€chosen€at€the€defendantððs€convenience.€€Furthermore,€a€probationÐ ø*ð#( Ðsentence€should€not€be€credited€in€the€same€manner€as€a€sentence€of€incarcerationÐ Ä,¼%* Ðbecause€it€is€not€the€equivalent€of€an€incarceration€sentence.€€Probation€is€aÐ  Ðsignificantly€less€severe€restraint€of€liberty€than€incarceration.€€A€defendant€should€notÐ ÔÌ Ðbe€rewarded€with€a€reduction€on€his€or€her€sentence€for€abusing€the€opportunity€toÐ   ˜ Ðserve€the€sentence€without€being€subjected€to€total€confinement.€€We€therefore€holdÐ l d Ðthat€the€appellant€is€not€entitled€to€credit€on€his€sentence€for€time€served€on€probationÐ 80 Ðprior€to€the€revocation.€€€€Ð ü  ЀÌà@àà+€àò òCONCLUSIONˆÐ œ”  Ðó óÌà Ø àTo€summarize,€we€hold€that€at€the€conclusion€of€a€probation€revocation€hearing,Ð @8 Ða€trial€court€can:€(1)€order€incarceration;€(2)€cause€execution€of€the€judgment€as€it€wasÐ   Ðoriginally€entered;€or€(3)€extend€the€remaining€probationary€period€for€a€period€not€toÐ ØÐ Ðexceed€two€years.€€We€also€hold€that€a€defendant€is€not€entitled€to€credit€on€his€or€herÐ ¤œ Ðsentence€for€time€served€on€probation€unless€the€defendant€successfully€completesÐ ph Ðthe€entire€probation€term.€€The€judgment€of€the€Court€of€Criminal€Appeals€is€affirmed.Ð < 4 ÐÌà Ø àCosts€are€to€be€assessed€to€the€State€of€Tennessee.Ð Ô#Ì  ÐÌÌÌÓÓà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è à___________________________Ð +ü#( Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àWILLIAM€M.€BARKER,€JUSTICEÐ ê+â$) ÐÌÌÌÌCONCUR:Ð h0`). ÐÌANDERSON,€C.J.Ð 42,+0 ÐDROWOTA,€BIRCH,€HOLDER,€J.J.Ð 3,1 ÐÌÌÌÐ ²6ª/5 ЇÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àà ˜ à