WPC >,fb11sL s>,feNI$ry}BO;b_[ĉ\y!JNw ?G*16~߉l$aGzR""̝$8H1RFꔋs Brm옝ؚ.vu=I@rOiF}e=_TǪL64$Cj 9k-(ۿ[-,Y;Ȝmr+x|]e2S O@{$5LԳS6xu?ͪ'8U)PonL_OlkW9gA  A#sE*pi9Ս zni+G^rf_RmAojP ~nv*# LU:W % 0w4 0DUN n 0Dv U: e AQ O U:Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q B  0Dn 0D 0D D/:: Bi D3HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh,  AZ"Arial Regular X(`zZ$TRY,3' Letter3'3' Letter3'T  EEUEEEEEE eDD D  E D Ӏy&3|x((2p$ zZ!TRX3' Letter3'3'*Avery 5165 Full Sheet3'T   4 %X X=Xdd=   0  (hH  Z 6Times New Roman Regular(#$  0  ,cAZ"Arial Regular !"#$&C<< C ""  XXX X4 XX   Ad FILEDXX 4  June28,1999CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdAh ,cAZ"Arial Regular dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxdP Pd 'dxd zZ!TRX3' Letter3'3'*Avery 5165 Full Sheet3'T   4 XXX X  7XXdd7   =XXdd= +X X"*US \\ (:!&)*TR[A' LegalY3' LetterA' Legal 3' LetterT  6\17\1999(2:21pm)!  :. |G:\IB013S2\OPINION\ACTIVE\STROUTH\CONCUR\RELEASED\STROUTHD.CONG:\IB013S2\OPINION\ACTIVE\STROUTH\CONCUR\RELEASED\STROUTHD.CON/  # XX +#    TR[A'Legal ManualX3' LetterA' Legal3'*Avery 5165 Full SheetT  r)<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxP,  r t)>.*jxL` `@E@` 8ttxPx4 t@PPDINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE@ii)DATKNOXVILLE DONALDWAYNESTROUTH,@##/D)   @##/D) APPELLANT,@##/D)  SULLIVANCRIMINAL \T @##/D)v.@##/D)  Hon.FrankL.Slaughter,Judge (  @##/D)STATEOFTENNESSEE,@##/D)  No.03S019707CC00079   @##/D) APPELLEE.@##/D)    @&DCONCURRINGOPINION  XP  Iagreewiththemajority'sconclusionthatthedefendant'spetitionforpost  convictionreliefshouldbedismissed.I,however,writeseparatelytovoicemydisagreementwiththemajority'sholdingthataStatev.Middlebrooks,840  S.W.2d317(Tenn.1992),erroroccurredinthiscase. Thedefendantwascharged,inafactspecificindictment,with"killingandmurdering[thevictim]inthefirstdegree."Thetrialjudgechargedthejuryonbothpremeditatedmurderandfelonymurder.Thejurydeliberatedwiththejudge'swritteninstructionsthatincludeddetailedinstructionsonboththeories.Thejuryreturnedwithasingle,orgeneral,verdictandstatedthat:"We,thejury,findthedefendantguiltyofmurderinthefirstdegree." Tennesseecourtshaveconsistentlyheldthatasinglecountindictmentchargingpremeditatedmurderissufficienttosupportaconvictionofeitherpremeditatedfirstdegreemurderorfelonymurder."Theperpetrationofthefelony,duringwhichahomicideoccurs,isthelegalequivalentofpremeditation,deliberationandmalice."Statev.Beasley,699S.W.2d565(Tenn.Crim.App. 706 1985)perm.toappealdenied(citingSullivanv.State,121S.W.2d535,538 928W (Tenn.1938)(statingtheorieswere"legalequivalent"));seealsoFarmerv.State,  296S.W.2d879,883(Tenn.1956)(holdingpremeditatedintenttocommitfelonyistransferrabletothehomicidetosupplymaliceaforethought);seegenerally   Schadv.Arizona,501U.S.624,630,111S.Ct.2491,2496(1991)("theintentto l d killandtheintenttocommitafelonyarealternativeaspectsofthesingleconceptof " maliceaforethought.").Adefendantisnotdenieddueprocesswhenchargedunderonetheoryoffirstdegreemurderbutconvictedunderadifferenttheory.Beasley,699S.W.2dat56667(nodueprocessviolationordeprivationofthe   opportunitytoprepareadefense).Accordingly,firstdegreemurderin1978wasbutasinglecrimewithvariousmeansofcommissionwhetherthekillingwaspremeditatedoroccurredduringafelony. Iagreewiththemajority'spositionthataMiddlebrookserroroccurs only   "whenadefendantisconvictedoffirstdegreemurdersolelyonthebasisoffelonymurder"andwhenthefelonymurderaggravatingcircumstanceisutilized.Iwouldconclude,however,thataMiddlebrookserrordoesnotoccurwhenajury " returnsageneralverdictconvictingadefendantofbothfelonymurderandpremeditatedmurder.Carterv.State,958S.W.2d620(Tenn.1997)(holdingno %" Middlebrookserrorwhenjuryrendersageneralverdictoffirstdegreemurder); h'` $ seegenerallySchad,501U.S.at631,111S.Ct.at2497("neversuggestedthat 4),"& ...jurorsshouldberequiredtoagreeuponasinglemeansofcommission"forfirstdegreemurder). Thejuryinthiscasewasclearlychargedthatfirstdegreemurdercanbecommittedinoneoftwoways:withpremeditationanddeliberationorduringtheperpetrationofafelony.Thejuryreturnedanonspecificverdictfindingthe defendant"guiltyofmurderinthefirstdegree."I,therefore,wouldholdthata 5.4 Middlebrookserrordidnotoccurinthiscasebecausethedefendant'sconviction  forfirstdegreemurderwasnotbasedsolelyonfelonymurder.  Finally,Iwouldnotethatevenassuming,asthemajorityconcludes,thataMiddlebrookserroroccuredoccurredinthiscase,Iaminagreementwiththemajority's 80  80  80  *#& findingthattheMiddlebrookserrorwasharmlessbeyondareasonabledoubt.     Forbothofthesereasons,Iagreewiththemajority'sconclusionthatthedismissalofthedefendant'spetitionforpostconvictionreliefshouldbeaffirmed.   <      D T$T$MT$     <      D JANICEM.HOLDER,JUSTICE