ÿWPC° GÀcg†:è‘OØÅPŽ•åFàõ 2—¯Î¬òÐå>V•¯X’k:)øÅ“ùø¯Ó¬ç#G8i¨Í9¯1d¥ñÈê]‡6´Ã-<â®Ú‚¶†…ñú'Á5)@ãߘv#.‘gxñ›Ê†ZhíAK“åôå#4 Ë£–dØÔ¸ÒƒãÏFË)$ðú⇹RØù#¸C Öä÷1¬;ˆÚóy¾E)*硇â¿VŒÖvAg1”]N€øæg 9[¬O X2ž§èFÂà -Øœ:IJ „µ¡oül1ï+°’YLቘ!G·J4„Dw!% Ðconclusion€that€Dr.€Wells€did€not€have€notice€that€his€conduct,€while€perhapsÐ â, #' Ðconstituting€a€ð ðdisregardðð€for€accepted€standards€of€professional€conduct,€couldÐ ®.Ö$) Ðhave€also€amounted€to€a€ð ðcapriciousðð€disregard€for€those€standards.Ð z0¢&+ ÐÌÐ 4:*/ ÐÓ  Óòòò òCONCLUSIONó óóóà @ˆ à€Ð Ø  ÐÌÓÁ¦Óà Ø àWe€conclude€that€the€evidence€does€not€preponderate€against€theÐ | ¤ ÐChancellorððs€finding€that€the€record€in€this€case€fails€to€clearly€and€convincinglyÐ Hp Ðestablish€the€charge€of€ð ðcapricious€disregard€of€accepted€standards€ofÐ < Ðprofessional€conduct.ðð€€€Accordingly,€the€judgment€of€the€Chancery€CourtÐ à  Ðreversing€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Regentððs€dismissal€of€Dr.€Wells€is€affirmed.€Ð ¬Ô  ÐCosts€of€this€appeal€are€taxed€against€the€Tennessee€Board€of€Regents.Ð x   Ðà Ø àÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àà è àà @ àÌÌÓÓÌà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  à_________________________________Ð Ž¶ Ðà Ø àà 0 àà ˆ àà à àà 8 àà  àFrank€F.€€Drowota,€III,€JusticeÐ tœ ÐÌÌò òCONCUR:ó óÐ &"N ÐÌAnderson,€C.J.Ð ø#  ÐBarker,€Holder,€JJ€€Ð Þ$ ÐBirch,€J.€Not€„€ParticipatingÐ Ä%ì Ð