ÿWPC± ½WR¶1t0iî;1nû™Œ÷­bó8•ë£¹®Óuw©\Ę8|BA“%Ç”ëYþœ&Ø ¸y3¢oa‘x·fÃ;JÆ# ß@×±: 2Œš¢áël º& ®û9… hu ÛVØ¢w<물Šõj:¯ÉŽ¿ËWáYÝ”ôÞ“ ò ha5y¥-VÎÈ0ÂGÁò÷秃!E¡<á²ët ž°BbO£ïÚêõé-1õXçëöÿ2ê/ížÇ‚Ô*|ÖúvÇ«NL”º¼9: g¼ Æ®6fÞZåÚ›äâÒ…_wµL[ÑcÛ'”2–è?Gûw‚Xå€7¢ù¢B ›wçµÓ ¾%Œ †ŽÈ*òþØkgZU¼žc¥!z·Å#ûî.É÷™uá{ˆUx(ÃJùÙ‚š?+÷¦«žÃ§sr…¦„Ói"‚•:üæÕ<×!ÓL¢Ç>cNCEîÕÇ»ìN—†Ž2RŠM‡‘YšðRº€ØÌçç½dêü=o{çKuiãºN2oÓb}ýQX|Ê FñÀâøº®}ÍHWÁëúC ±^fCPF,H3`*Ó¶w#Ï“³™ŠÍÔ71jËf8I]ïZ#ÁìU F­ %ó 0¦ù^ Ÿ w« 4¯ à Ò mÔ Ô 0êë 0DÕ  U N! Eo ¿q 0U @Eb…UNÛÛÛU>ðU@.Nn$ppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp B”˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 5eÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0<4šÛ 9Z+‹.Courier New RegularX(~‹ $¡¡Ñ  ÑÑTRY,3Ø' LetterY,3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letter 3Ø' LetterTÑÓ  ÓÔUSUS.,ÔxB)â ;)ê:i¢Ø+003|xÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(š(3²;$¤¤Ý ƒ‹ !ÝÑ  ÑÑTRY,3Ø' LetterXà3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  Ýà  àòòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó(#Ã$òòÚ  Ú0Ú  Úóó (í€"  Z6Times New Roman Regular µÝ ƒ ²;$ÝÓ  ÓÔUSUS.,Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_Ôò òÔ‡ôŠ òXXÔÔ‡ô  ò òôŠÔó óTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€49„5„513€states€in€pertinent€part:Ð ° ÐÌà8  à(a)€€A€teacher€under€ð ðpermanent€tenureðð€or€ð ðlimited€tenureðð€status€who€is€dismissed€or€suspended€byÐ 8ˆ Ðaction€of€the€board€may€petition€for€a€writ€of€certiorari€from€the€chancery€court€of€the€county€whereÐ üL Ðthe€teacher€is€employed.ÐÀÐ Ð  Ðà8  à(b)€€.€.€.€The€petition€shall€be€addressed€to€the€presiding€chancellor€and€shall€name€as€defendants€theÐ „Ô Ðmembers€of€the€board€and€such€other€parties€of€record,€if€such,€as€were€involved€at€the€hearing€beforeÐ H ˜ Ðthe€board.Ð \Ð Ð  ÐÔ#†ôŠ ò òô “#ÔÔ#†X±aX òôŠt#Ô Ñ  Ñ(ÈhH  Z(Times New Roman - ù-(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman Regular Ñ  Ñô\  `‹&Times New Roman(ÖÃ9 Z‹(Times New Roman  Ý ƒ ²;$ÝÓ  ÓÔUSUS.,Ôà  àòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡ôŠ òXXÔÔ‡ô  ò òôŠÔTenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€49„5„512€(1997).Ô#†X€ãX òô q#ÔÔ#†X±aXXX€ã#Ô dÝ ƒ‹ !ÝÑ  ÑÑTRY,3Ø' LetterXà3Ø' Letter 3Ø' Letterÿ3Ø'TÑÓ  ÓÔUSUS.,ÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÔ‡X€ãXXXÔÔ‡¼Ư»XX€ãÔÑ€ÑÑ  ÑÑ8€€ãXXdìdÈ8ÑÑ€P¸ÑÑ€P¸Ñà@7 7 ìàIN€THE€SUPREME€COURT€OF€TENNESSEEˆÐ ° Ðà@''%ìàAT€JACKSONˆÐ  Ðà@ff!ìàApril€2000€SessionˆÐ Ô$ ÐÔ#†X€ãX»¼ƯÈ#ÔÌò òÔ‡¼Ư»XX€ãÔÓ  ÓRONNIE€LEE€CANIPE€v.€THE€MEMPHIS€CITY€SCHOOLS€Ð Ò" ÐBOARD€OF€EDUCATIONÔ#†X€ãX»¼Ư9#Ôó óÐ æ 6 ÐÓXÓÌà@  ìàò ò€Appeal€from€the€Chancery€Court€for€Shelby€CountyˆÐ æ 6 Ðà@û û ìàNo.€109738„3€€€€€€Ô#†X±aXXX€ã©#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔD.€J.€AlissandratosÔ#†X±aXXX€ã¨#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔ,€ChancellorˆÐ Ò " ÐÌÌà@ìì*ìàßA€Y) °°` d€÷E<•` A߈Ð –æ  ÐÌà@ô ô ìàNo.€W1998„00713„SC„R11„CV€„€Filed€October€2,€Ô_Ô2000Ô_ԈР‘á  ÐÌßA€Y) °°` dE<h` AßÐ i¹  Ðó óÌÔ#†X±aXXX€ãý#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔThis€appeal€arises€from€a€decision€by€the€defendant,€the€Memphis€City€Schools€Board€of€Education,Ð d´ Ðto€terminate€the€plaintiff,€Ronnie€Lee€Canipe,€a€tenured€teacher.€€At€the€hearing,€the€Board€found€thatÐ P  ÐCanipe€had€entered€a€guilty€plea€to€sexual€battery€pursuant€to€a€diversion€agreement.€€Based€on€thisÐ <Œ Ðand€other€evidence,€the€Board€terminated€Canipeððs€employment.€€On€petition€for€certiorari,€the€trialÐ (x Ðcourt€granted€summary€judgment€to€the€Board,€and€the€Court€of€Appeals€affirmed.€€We€grantedÐ d ÐCanipeððs€application€for€review€in€order€to€determine€whether€the€Board€considered,€in€terminatingÐ P ÐCanipe,€evidence€which€was€excludable€under€the€provisions€of€the€judicial€diversion€statute,€Tenn.Ð ì< ÐCode€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313€(1997).€€Following€our€thorough€review€of€the€record€and€closeÐ Ø( Ðconsideration€of€the€authorities,€we€agree€that€the€Boardððs€decision€was€based€upon€appropriateÐ Ä Ðevidence€properly€admitted.€€Because€we€conclude€that€the€evidence€was€properly€before€the€Board,Ð ° Ðwe€hold€that€the€expungement€provisions€of€the€diversion€statute€were€not€violated€and€affirm€theÐ œì Ðjudgment€of€the€Court€of€Appeals.€Ð ˆØ ÐÔ#†X±aXXX€ã¡#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔÌò òÓ  ÓTenn.€R.€App.€P.€11€Appeal€by€Permission;€Judgment€of€the€Court€of€Appeals€Affirmedó óÐ `° ÐÓU ÓÌòòAdolpho€A.€Birch,€Jr.,óó€J.,€delivered€the€opinion€of€the€court,€in€which€òòò òó óE.€Riley€Anderson,€C.J.,Ð 8!ˆ  ÐJanice€M.€Holder€óóand€òòWilliam€M.€Barker,€JJ.,ò òó óóó€joined.òò€€Frank€F.€Drowota,€III,€óóÔ#†X±aXXX€ã2 #ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔJ.,€notÐ $"t! Ðparticipating.Ð #`" ÐÔ#†X±aXXX€ãæ #ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX±aÔÌCharles€Hampton€White,€Richard€L.€Colbert,€and€Kurtis€J.€Winstead,€Nashville,€Tennessee,€for€theÐ è$8 $ Ðappellant,€Ronnie€Lee€Canipe.Ð Ô%$!% ÐÌErnest€G.€Kelly,€Jr.,€Memphis,€Tennessee,€for€the€appellee,€the€Memphis€City€Schools€Board€ofÐ ¬'ü"' ÐEducation.Ô#†X±aXXX€ãg#ÔÐ ˜(è#( ÐÔ€X€ãXXX±aÔÌÌà@66'ìàò òOPINIONó óˆÐ \+¬&+ ÐòòóóÓ! °,X›X°œX!ÓÌÐ 4-„(-? Ðà@ìàI.€Facts€and€Procedural€HistoryˆÐ ° ÐÌÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔà  àÔ#†X€ãXXX€ãÂ#ÔThe€record€before€us€indicates€that€Canipe€began€working€as€a€music€teacher€for€theÐ ˆØ ÐMemphis€City€Schools€in€1986.€€He€taught€continuously€thereafter€and€held€tenure€at€the€time€of€hisÐ tÄ Ðdismissal€on€January€30,€1996.€€In€1992,€Canipe€was€accused€of€inappropriate€conduct€with€a€fourth„Ð `° Ðgrade€student.€€In€March€1992,€Ricks€Mason,€the€Personnel€Director,€investigated€the€accusation.€Ð L œ ÐWhile€he€determined€that€Canipe€had€used€ð ðpoor€judgment,ðð€he€was€unable€to€find€conclusiveÐ 8 ˆ Ðevidence€of€ð ðintentional€wrongdoing.ðð€€As€a€result€of€his€investigation,€Mason€suspended€Canipe€forÐ $ t Ðfive€days€without€pay.€€This€sanction€was€imposed€without€having€conducted€a€formal€hearing,€butÐ  ` ÐCanipe€was€notified€that€if€additional€information€were€to€surface,€the€case€could€be€revisited€andÐ ü L  Ðpunishment€reconsidered.Ð è 8  ÐÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÌà  àIn€November€1994,€Canipe€was€indicted€for€sexual€battery€stemming€from€the€1992€incident.€Ð À  ÐOn€January€11,€1995,€in€accordance€with€the€judicial€diversion€procedures€set€out€in€Tenn.€CodeÐ ¬ü  ÐAnn.€ðð€40„ÓÓ35„ÓÓ313€(1997),€he€pleaded€guilty€to€sexual€battery€and€ÓÓwas€placed€on€probation.€€UnderÐ ˜è  Ðthe€agreement,€upon€completion€of€a€one„ÓÓyear€probationary€period,€the€record€would€be€expungedÐ „Ô  Ðin€accordance€with€statutory€provisions.Ð pÀ ÐÌà  àÓÓThe€Board€took€no€action€regarding€Canipe€during€the€remainder€of€the€1994„95€school€year.Ô#†X€ãXXX€ãë#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÓӀРH˜ ÐOn€July€24,€1995,€òòóóa€local€newspaper€published€an€article€which€exposed€ÓÓCanipeððsò òÓÓó ó€plea€of€guilty,€theÐ 4„ Ðdiversion€agreement,€and€his€employment€as€a€teacher€in€the€Memphis€City€Schools.€€ThisÐ  p Ðinformation€led€to€a€conference€between€Mason€and€ÓÓCanipe.ÓÓ€ÓÓ€During€the€conference,€Canipeò òÓÓó óÐ  \ Ðadmitted€that€he€had€pleaded€guilty€to€the€charge€of€sexual€battery.€€He€insisted,€however,€that€theÐ øH Ðplea€had€been€entered€only€for€the€purpose€of€ending€his€legal€problems€expeditiously€andÐ ä4 Ðeconomically.€€Ð Ð  ÐÌà  àMoving€to€terminate€Canipeððs€employment,€the€Board€filed€formal€charges€on€August€14,Ð ¨ø Ð1995.€€The€charge€was€ð ðconduct€unbecoming€a€member€of€the€teaching€professionðð;€the€specificationÐ ”ä Ðwas€that€the€guilty€plea€contradicted€Canipeððsò òÓÓó ó€earlier€version€of€the€incident€and€made€the€five„dayÐ €Ð Ðsuspension€inadequate€as€a€sanction.€€Ð l¼ ÐÌà  àPursuant€to€the€Teacher€Tenure€Act,׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú1Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€the€Board€conducted€a€due€process€hearing€on€JanuaryÐ D!” Ð29,€1996,€which€was€subsequent€to€the€entry€of€an€order€expunging€records€of€Canipeððs€plea€ofÐ 0"€  Ðguilty.€€At€the€hearing,€the€Board€considered€evidence€of€Canipeððs€admission€to€Mason€that€Ô_ÔCanipeÔ_ÔÐ #l! Ðhad€entered€a€plea€of€guilty€to€sexual€battery.€€Moreover,€Canipe€himself€testified€concerning€theÐ $X" Ðcircumstances€under€which€the€plea€had€been€entered€and€his€version€of€the€conduct€with€the€student.€Ð ô$D # ÐAt€the€close€of€the€hearing,€the€Board€concluded€that€the€charge€against€Canipe€had€been€sustainedÐ à%0!$ Ðand€terminated€his€employment.Ð Ì&"% Ðâ âÐ ¸'#& ÐÔ#†X€ãXXX€ãü#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔà  àCanipe€petitioned€for€certiorari,€as€is€provided€in€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€49„5„513€(1997).׃×Ý ƒ #ÃÝòòÚ  Ú2Ú  ÚóóÝ  Ý×  ×€€TheÐ ° Ðâ âtrial€court€found€that€the€Board€had€properly€considered€Canipeððs€entry€of€a€guilty€plea€to€sexualÐ œì Ðbattery€and€the€facts€upon€which€the€plea€was€based.€€Additionally,€the€trial€court€noted€that€CanipeÐ ˆØ Ðhad€failed€to€object€at€the€hearing€to€the€introduction€of€evidence€concerning€the€guilty€plea€and€theÐ tÄ Ðunderlying€circumstances.€€Moreover,€the€trial€court€found€that€Canipe,€himself,€had€introducedÐ `° Ðproof,€including€his€own€testimony,€concerning€the€above€matters.€€Based€on€these€findings,€the€trialÐ L œ Ðcourt€granted€the€Boardððs€motion€for€summary€judgment.Ô#†X€ãXXX€ã #ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÐ 8 ˆ ÐÔ#†X€ãXXX€ãA$#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÌà  àCanipe€appealed€to€the€Court€of€Appeals.€€ÓÓHeò òÓÓó ó€contended€that€the€Boardððs€consideration€ofÐ  ` Ðrecords€subject€to€expungement€deprived€him€of€his€rights€under€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„ÓÓ35„ÓÓ313.€€HeÐ ü L  Ðinsisted€that€he€had€been€deprived€of€a€meaningful€hearing€because€he€was€regarded€as€havingÐ è 8  Ðpleaded€guilty€to€a€crime,€in€contravention€of€a€statutory€right€to€be€treated€as€though€he€had€neverÐ Ô$  Ðbeen€indicted€in€the€first€place.€€The€Court€of€Appeals€concluded€that€although€the€Board€didÐ À  Ðconsider€the€guilty€plea,€Canipe€was€precluded€from€relying€on€the€provisions€of€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.Ð ¬ü  Ððð€40„35„313€because€of€his€failure€to€object€to€the€introduction€of€such€evidence€at€the€hearing.€Ô#†X€ãXXX€ã˜$#ÔÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÐ ˜è  ÐÔ#†X€ãXXX€ãM(#ÔÌà@JJìàII.€€Standard€of€ReviewˆÐ pÀ ÐÌà  àSummary€judgment€is€appropriate€only€when€the€moving€party€demonstrates€that€there€areÐ H˜ Ðno€genuine€issues€of€material€fact€and€that€he€or€she€is€entitled€to€judgment€as€a€matter€of€law.€€òòSeeóóÐ 4„ ÐTenn.€R.€Civ.€P.€56.03;€òòByrd€v.€Hallóó,€847€S.W.2d€208,€210€(Tenn.€1993).€€Since€our€inquiry€involvesÐ  p Ðsolely€a€question€of€law,€no€presumption€of€correctness€attaches€to€the€judgment€of€the€trial€court.Ð  \ ÐOur€task,€therefore,€is€limited€to€reviewing€the€record€to€determine€whether€the€requirements€of€RuleÐ øH Ð56,€Tenn.€R.€Civ.€P.,€have€been€fulfilled.€€òòSeeóó€òòStaples€v.€CBL€&€Assocóó,€15€S.W.3d€83,€88€(Tenn.Ð ä4 Ð2000);€òòSeavers€v.€Methodist€Medical€Ctr.óó,€9€S.W.3d€86,€90„91€(Tenn.€1999).€€Courts€€should€ð ðgrantÐ Ð  Ða€summary€judgment€only€when€both€the€facts€and€the€inferences€to€be€drawn€from€the€facts€permitÐ ¼  Ða€reasonable€person€to€reach€only€one€conclusion.ðð€€òòStaplesóó,€15€S.W.3d€at€89;€òòsee€alsoóó€òòBain€v.€WellsóóÐ ¨ø Ð936€S.W.2d€618,€622€(Tenn.€1997).€€In€reviewing€the€record€to€determine€whether€the€requirementsÐ ”ä Ðof€summary€judgment€have€been€met,€we€must€view€all€of€the€evidence€in€the€light€most€favorableÐ €Ð Ðto€the€non„moving€party.€€òòEyring€v.€Fort€Sanders€Parkwest€Medical€Ctr.óó,€991€S.W.2d€230,€236€(Tenn.Ð l¼ Ð1999);€òòByrdóó,€847€S.W.2d€at€210„11.Ð X ¨ ÐÌÐ  0"€  ÐÑP¸Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  Ñà@éé#ìàIII.€€AnalysisˆÐ ° ÐÌÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔà  àCanipe€contends€that€the€Board€considered€records€that€were€subject€to€the€expungementÐ ˆØ Ðprovision€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313€when€it€decided€to€terminate€his€employment.€€The€1997Ð tÄ Ðversion€of€the€statute,€which€is€pertinent€here,€provides€that€trial€courts€may€defer€proceedings€forÐ `° Ðan€eligible€offender€without€entering€a€judgment€of€guilt€and€may€place€the€offender€on€probationÐ L œ Ðsubject€to€reasonable€conditions.€€òòSeeóó€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313.€€If€the€probationary€period€isÐ 8 ˆ Ðcompleted€and€the€conditions€are€met,€the€trial€court€enters€an€expungement€order€and€ð ðòòallÐ $ t Ðrecordationóó€relating€to€the€personððs€arrest,€indictment€or€information,€trial,€finding€of€guilty,€andÐ  ` Ðdismissal€and€dischargeðð€are€expunged.€€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313(b)€(emphasis€added).Ð ü L  ÐÌà  àCanipe€was€granted€diversion€on€January€11,€1995;€thus,€his€probation€was€in€progress€whenÐ Ô$  Ðthe€Board€initiated€formal€proceedings€to€terminate€his€employment.€€However,€the€probation€hadÐ À  Ðbeen€completed€and€the€record€had€been€expunged€prior€to€the€Board€hearing.€€Canipe€chieflyÐ ¬ü  Ðcontends€that€the€Board€considered,€in€the€hearing,€evidence€contained€in€records€that€already€hadÐ ˜è  Ðbeen€expunged.€€Thus,€he€suggests€that€the€Boardððs€decision€to€terminate€him€was€based,€at€least€inÐ „Ô  Ðpart,€upon€evidence€which€had€been€rendered€inadmissible€under€the€provisions€governingÐ pÀ Ðexpungement.Ð \¬ ÐÌà  àWe€conclude€otherwise.€€The€record€shows€that€the€Board€relied€upon€information€reportedÐ 4„ Ðin€a€local€newspaper€that€detailed€Canipeððs€plea€of€guilty€and€diversion€agreement.€€Additionally,€andÐ  p Ðeven€more€important,€the€Board€considered€Canipeððs€admission€to€Mason€that€he€had€pleaded€guiltyÐ  \ Ðto€sexual€battery.€€All€of€this€evidence€had€been€developed€well€in€advance€of€the€entry€of€theÐ øH Ðexpungement€order.€€Moreover,€neither€of€these€sources€constitutes€an€ð ðofficial€recordðð€within€theÐ ä4 Ðdefinition€of€Tenn.€Code€Ann.€ðð€40„35„313.€€It€results,€therefore,€that€the€evidentiary€protections€ofÐ Ð  Ðthe€expungement€statute€are€inapposite€here.Ð ¼  ÐÌà  àOur€conclusion€here€is€consistent€with€our€holding€in€òòState€v.€Schindleróó,€986€S.W.2d€209Ð ”ä Ð(Tenn.€1999);€òòsee€alsoóó€òòState€v.€Laneóó,€3€S.W.3d€456,€461„62€(Tenn.€1999).€€In€òòSchindleróó,€weÐ €Ð Ðconsidered€whether€records€of€prior€convictions€that€were€later€expunged€could€be€considered€inÐ l¼ Ðdetermining€a€defendantððs€eligibility€for€judicial€diversion€in€a€new€case.€€òòId.óó€at€211.€€We€concludedÐ X ¨ Ðthat€ð ð[e]xpungement€does€not€return€a€person€to€the€position€occupied€prior€to€committing€theÐ D!” Ðoffenseðð€and€that€ð ðtestimony€and€evidence€of€the€criminal€acts€preceding€the€arrest€are€admissibleÐ 0"€  Ðas€evidence€of€.€.€.€social€history€even€if€expungement€is€later€obtained.ðð€€òòId.óó€at€211„12.€€Accordingly,Ð #l! Ðin€the€case€under€submission,€we€hold€that€Canipeððs€admission€that€he€had€pleaded€guilty€to€sexualÐ $X" Ðbattery€properly€could€be€considered€by€the€Board€at€the€hearing.€€Ð ô$D # ÐÌà  àThe€Court€of€Appeals€concluded€also€that€Canipe,€by€failing€to€object€to€the€introduction€ofÐ Ì&"% Ðevidence€concerning€the€guilty€plea€and€diversion€agreement,€and€by€adducing€evidence€on€theÐ ¸'#& Ðsubject€as€well€as€testifying€about€it€himself,€waived€any€benefit€of€the€statutory€provision€regardingÐ ¤(ô#' Ðthe€admissibility€of€expunged€evidence.€€Because€we€have€concluded€that€the€protections€affordedÐ )à$( Ðby€the€expungement€statute€do€not€apply€here,€we€find€it€unnecessary€to€address€the€waiver€issue.Ô#†X€ãXXX€ã„/#ÔÐ |*Ì%) ÐÐ h+¸&* ÐÑP¸Ñâ âÑ  Ñâ âÑ  Ñà@rr#ìàIV.€€ConclusionˆÐ ° ÐÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÌà  àUnder€the€applicable€standards€recited€above,€we€hold€that€the€trial€courtððs€grant€of€summaryÐ ˆØ Ðjudgment€to€the€Board€was€proper,€and€accordingly,€we€affirm€the€judgment€of€the€Court€of€AppealsÐ tÄ Ðupholding€the€trial€courtððs€award€of€summary€judgment€to€the€Board.€€Costs€of€the€appeal€are€taxedÐ `° Ðto€the€plaintiff,€Ronnie€Lee€Ô_ÔCanipeÔ_Ô.Ô#†X€ãXXX€ã´@#ÔÐ L œ ÐÔ‡X€ãXXX€ãÔÌòòóóÌÌÌà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  à___________________________________€Ð è 8  Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àADOLPHO€A.€BIRCH,€JR.,€JUSTICEÔ#†X€ãXXX€ãÁB#Ô