WPC m$GׇGE,̞ !6*L ІQe!,PǷ jd|Af!jW,4TpỲJYjvKv0T9jS{KfQМy2{=KuMj:\v_YMBe-xeJw)4 si>7o$Yɠ*]Qb!yiЀw.B4@CdE%cUdkE]j~/:jc|Z?i'g+6RPu2bfuVMn׮_UQspm`SNjc9mb?:tag|MlЖz#{>q%#l"jԠq= V[!o?G3yQ&*c3b׍ x8eJ+ lj5Zn=L4,# hUNs % 0~EU>Mw@4 0  0Dbbb #/ bF bJ bN R UFi UF UF ;  @ U:K b UF AQ  0D 0D* 0Dn B D/ B D3UFNHP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS0nLl(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(V$  XX XXX<\( 9Z &Courier Regular Z [ \ ] e^ _ P` Pa b Dc Ӏօ#%3|xl    (r(3|$ !  XXXXX   `   0  (#$  0   - -   |  XXXXX `   1    ThechargesagainstBlanton,Quintero,andHallallarose   fromthesameincident.      <4 9Z .Courier New Regular.Courier New Regular<4 9Z .Courier New Regular ""  XPXXX&XXP   Ad FILEDXPX&  September21,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAh    }  XXjXXX `   1    ThechargesagainstBlanton,Quintero,andHallallstem   fromthesameincident.,cAZ"Arial Regular <4 9Z .Courier New Regular!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1   d((' dxdP Pd%%%%'dxd<4 9Z .Courier New Regular !  XXXXX  ݛP ` X  XXXXTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T$XX XX$  7XXdXXd7 ''+XXXX^ W =\XXdd=W ^ ^ =|XXdd=^ c r )<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxP,  rߛc @ INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE     0 @ @ ATNASHVILLEhSTATEOFTENNESSEE, h     ) p FORPUBLICATION      h     ) Appellee, h     ) p FILED: <     h     )v.    h     ) p HUMPHREYSCOUNTY \      h     )WILLIAME.HALLand h     ) p HON.ALLENW.WALLACE,JUDGE   DERRICKD.QUINTERO,    ) j      h     ) p NO.01S019703CC00068 @   Appellants.    )   @ CONCURRINGANDDISSENTINGOPINION n R P ` X7XXdXXd7 Iconcurintheconclusionreachedbythemajorityin d thiscaseb ,b exceptwithrespecttotheissueofproportionality.#XXX+X#XXXXOn  thatissue,themajorityholdsthatthepunishmentofdeathisnotdisproportionateundertherecordinthiscase.Irespectfullydissent,andIdosoforthesamereasonsoutlinedinStatev. # Blanton,__S.W.2d__(Tenn.1998),1998W.L.310485(Birch,J., L%  dissenting). InBlanton,nodirectevidencewasadducedthatBlanton P*& shoteithervictimorstabbedMrs.Vester.ThesameanalysisappliesherethereisnodirectevidencethatHallorQuinteroshoteithervictimorstabbedMrs.Vester.[ a a a a  #  1      #XXXX #XXXX[ 񛀀Thus,consideringthe T/$, factorof thedefendant[s]involvementorroleinthemurder[s],theabsenceofdirectevidencethateitherdefendantwastheactualkillercompelsmyconclusionthatthepunishmentofdeathis,inthiscase,disproportionate.[ [ Z Z SeeTisonv.Arizona,481U.S.137, 6x+4   c                     c b   b a     a ^   ^ 107S.Ct.1676,95L.Ed.2d127(1987)] ] \ (discussinghowa\ c \     \ c \ defendantsroleinamurderaffectsthesentencingdecision)\ ;^ ] ] ^ Statev.Branam,855[   [ S.W.2d563,57071(Tenn.1993).Iwould,  X accordingly,remandtheZ       Z causeforanewsentencinghearing.#XXXX #+XXXX   #XXX+X#+XXXX̜_  _    h     ___________________________________ `   `  h     ADOLPHOA.BIRCH,JR.,Justice#XXX+X[#