WPC  x"h 3{l>_Y:T2 Jmn @ϳ@=B'j@'eG;ql㯽*n02-Fߵo j7(|@?RYἩ%8"F\t]~2jn#m8DQ_2^HJԻ:˵g F$9S( ᖇkM~1G^߭+EEAAt%x㤚YNCRW^iؔ M .J I>eiq#Op]'~ٶhW}BT_*j!s5I'+꛲$嬞5A55٥cfne 7,pil9|SEkY'?H_'Pm,#:hUN(Y59 Y$j-(Txr7^oy[A10\NA7 $|)# >UNI % 0DUFw@'4g{ AQ 0 0DcUF*U:   Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Ba ~ 0DD 0D 0D D/  B? D3\ HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(L$X<4 9Z .Courier New Regular rUsRtuvwxEyezӀAq$%<%3|x !"#%C<< C(8(3=$ L!X   `   0  (#$  0  4.Courier New Regular  !"  X_XXX'XX_   Ad FILEDX_X'   September28,1998  CecilCrowson,Jr.(XX_AppellateCourtClerk ,cAZ"Arial Regular dLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ''' dxdP Pd'dxd L!X   X;XXX  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T  7 ; Xdd7  =XXdd=zzr (<,(j 8` `@E  ` ttx$X rzz@DINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEEt (>.*jx` `@E3 ` ttx$kb A b tߛ@*DATJACKSONSTATEOFTENNESSEE, h      p )  ForPublication <  `     h      p ) ` Appellee,   h      p )  Filed: \   `     h      p )v. `     h      p )  MadisonCounty    `     h      p )DENNISKEITHand h      p )  Hon.WhitLaFon, @  TIMOTHYCOLLINS h      p )    Judge    `     h      p )   `   ` Appellants. h      p )  No.02S019604CC00035 6 @  &DDISSENTINGOPINION : 7;XXd Xd7 `  Irespectfullydissentfromthemajoritysjudgmentthat ! thesearchwarrantwasproperlysupportedbyaffidavit.Inmyview,an affidavitwhichdoesnotshowonitsfacethatitwasyytsworntottgivenuntuderoathuisnoaffidavitvvwatall.wv.vyyRather,itismerelyanunswornwriting.xx `  TheStateattemptstocorrectthisdeficiencybysubmittingproofthatthesupportingaffidavithadbeensworn.Butthefactremainsthatatthetimeofthesearch,thesearchwarrantwasnot supportedbyaffidavitasrequiredbyTenn.CodeAnn.406103(1997),nor supportedbyoathoraffirmationasrequiredbytheFourthAmendmenttotheUnitedStatesConstitution.Iftheoccupantofthesubjectpropertyhadinspectedthewarrantasitwasbeingexecuted,hecouldhaverightfullyrefusedtoallowthesearch.TheconstitutionalrighttosorefuseanunreasonablesearchshouldnotbelaterextinguishedsimplybecausetheState 2:/9 correcteditsmistakeafterthefact.  `  Therulethemajoritypromulgatestodayiscloselyakintothe goodfaithexceptiontotheexclusionaryrule:aslongaslawenforcementofficersacthonestlyandreasonably,thenthefruitsoftheirsearchwillbeadmittedintoevidenceeventhoughthesearchwarrantwasnotsupportedbyprobablecause.United @  Statesv.Leon,468U.S.897,104S.Ct.3405,82L.Ed.2d677 `  (1984).WehavenotyetaddressedthegoodfaithexceptioninTennessee,andIamwaryofeventheslightest,albeitoblique,movementinthatdirection. `  Therefore,IwouldfollowCommonwealthv.Dozier,366 H  N.E.2d1270(Mass.App.Ct.1977).Inthatcase,astatuterequiredthattheaffidavitsupportingthesearchwarrantbeswornbeforeajustice,specialjustice,clerk,orassistantclerk.Becausethejuratwasunsigned,theseizedevidencewasheldproperlysuppressed.Id.at1270. ($  `  Inconclusion,thisCourtoncestated:Ӝs8 ` s8 ` (#` (#8  h Theuseofprintedformshasmadetheprocurementofasearchwarrantthemerestformality,consideringthefundamentalconstitutionalrightwhichthesearchinvades.Certainly,thisCourtcandonolessthantorequirethatthefewblankspacesbefilledin,andtheotherdetailsoftheformalitybecarriedoutwithcareandprecision. xx Ӏ 7$-6 Everettv.State,182Tenn.22,28,184S.W.2d43,45(1944)   (findinganaffidavitdeficientbecausethemonthwasomittedfromthedateoftheallegedoffense).BecauseIadheretothisprinciple,Imustrespectfullydissentfromthemajoritysdecision.Iwouldppnfinditnecessarytosuppressthennaffirmthetrialcourtssuppressnoionofoevidenceppseizedpursuanttothisdefectivesearchwarrant.̀   h     _______________________________ 6  `     h     ADOLPHOA.BIRCH,JR.,Justicerr