WPC*+ YX@ꃛӮ2rP#[وR3ě?52cg䷑,p*0톑mj+y4A]% GJ4 u+CDže }֔g uf﹚ugu?u*6Y#.ĆF&{NNeK Qhtwt',yq:s{ pXA ɲt>99Xq\ӟkF PmUq0upy w-^ം߱^ Hmo5g@rc%T"85= =tܹ"-7Ϗ\#ܱ4õԱ,f\5֔5PkcJidѪqrG"943g~H6Z~$Uﲪ8_6R2"`YY:fx:oJl➎wHu3&Ttl#!U: %C 0YI 6 0: 0D^ Vwb4fz mrN(x>@op:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 0u8( D5( B( D-( 0K,),) AQw)w) 0u) 0D=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* A*HP LaserJet 8000 DN PS0,yAZ"Arial RegularX(1-$USUS.,XX , k$USUS., xXXT@R[A' LegalX3' Letter A' Legal3'T@ x   1    _\@RA' Legal\MemphisPublishingCompanypublishesTheCommercialAppeal,adailynewspaperof ,  generalcirculationinMemphis,Tennesseeandthesurroundingarea.((2P$ -!USUS.,ϩXX  TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'TTϩ   0  (#$  0  z'L tpO'"3|xU  k$USUS., xXXT@R[A' LegalX3' Letter A' Legal3'T@ x   2    _Statev.Drakeinvolvedclosureofpretrialproceedingsinacriminaltrial;however,the e UnitedStatesSupremeCourthasnotedthat historicallybothcivilandcriminaltrialshavebeen # presumptivelyopen.RichmondNewspapers,Inc.v.Virginia,448U.S.555,580,n.17,100_S.Ct_. | 2814,2829,n.17(1980). e   b"USUS.,ϩXX  _ϩ   Ad FILEDXX  December13,1999CecilCrowson,Jr.AppellateCourtClerkdA Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5*OLE*WPCh@!3'XXXXKKKK5139,xWPWin 6.0/OLE 1.0 Prefix Information MarkerWPDraw30.Drawingࡱ> Root Entry`.@p_=Ole WPG20CompObjt WPCh@!3'XXXXKKKK5139,x `.@pCorel Presentations 9 Drawing Embed SourceWPDraw30.Drawing9q"h 4BOlePartOlePres000  "   !Q METAFILEPICT" thereof,inorderto(_i_)controltheconductoftheproceedingsbefore $ thecourt;(ii)maintaindecorumandpreventdistractions;(iii)   guaranteethesafetyofanyparty,witness,orjuror;and(iv)ensure  thefairadministrationofjusticeinthependingcause. ! !  Whatthetrialjudgeoverlooked,however,isthatRule30pertainsto  v broadcastandrecordingmediacoverageofcourtproceedings. Coverageis n"B specificallydefinedintheruletomean anyrecordingorbroadcastingofacourt >$ proceedingbythemediausingtelevision,radio,photographic,orrecording  & equipment.SupremeCourtRule30(B)(1).Inthiscase_MPC_Ԁsoughttohaveits '! employeesattendandreportonthecourtproceedings.Rule30doesnotapplyto )v# printcoverage.Becausetherequestforaccessdidnotseektorecord, n+B!% photograph,orbroadcasttheproceedings,Rule30wasinapplicable. :-#'  Wehavereviewedtheappendixfiledwiththeapplicationforpermissionto /$) appealandcanfindnojustificationfortheclosingofjuryselectionproceedingsin 0&+ thistrialproceeding.SeeStatev.James,902S.W.2d911,914(Tenn.1995) 2r(- (discussingclosureofjuvenileproceedingsandholdingthatthecourtshallnot j4>*/ closeproceedingsunlessitdeterminesthatfailuretodosowouldresultin 66 ,1 particularizedprejudicetothepartyseekingclosurethatwouldoverridethe 8-3 publicscompellinginterestinopenproceedings);Statev.Drake,701S.W.2d 9/5 O e,    604,608(quoting_Waller_Ԁv.Georgia,467U.S.39,48,104S.Ct.2210,2216 e (1984),andstatingthatbeforeclosureofaproceedingmayoccur,theparty 1 seekingtoclosethehearingmustadvanceanoverridinginterestthatislikelyto  beprejudiced). #  2      ׀Accordingly,theordersoftheCourtofAppealsandtrialcourt  d arereversed.Theorderdenying_MPC_Ԁaccesstovoirdireandatranscriptofvoir  0 direisvacated. a   @.̀@.0  PERCURIAM,$$ 8 80 ! !-T).0 h0 h