WPCJ .Gnf?WN˭0vLYo#kuQ&6a2k_CԿD';Cz#g0Mo[tBtR"V$җ`Sd9C-Wx|}a _JRH>;~F|/z*tq{! ](y iΪ, 5Z>VM F!bgcMw6$-_?66m1{)l~rgL>d=NCd_XHY>6e0{C诧ELj3eF"N֞Swzu! =k )Lr4{ڦ(-9xOt)9Wrk1K2>́z VE|>*5T:M^CBaEN^:U[Qn4P=b'gAqaWѬA8,a}b#\ % ^ # 0/ UN w 4 z  i x mz  g-UNN 0D U>ME 0NU@b 0Y 333333333333333 0GGGG B22 0O D3 D-& 0KSS AS 0 0D[ AHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6,,,,0őz-s (`$.8dd8    ("  Z6Times New Roman Regular,-+00 C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\REVISE~1.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\revised standard opinion.wpt3|xU ABDURRAHMANAbdurRahmanAbdurRahman TranAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanRahmanAbdurAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanconclusoryAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanAbdurRahmanLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular(#$  0  \  `&Times New Roman(O$ R#$      1  }  _Tenn.CodeAnn.3913206(c)(1)(D)(2001).(nN Z(Times New Roman - -64Hyperlink    SDU_108(|G2#$ !.8RUdXXd8         0  } d(|3X$ !.8RUdXXd8     VVVV'dxd)!dxdx( $ Figure  1  ^_X`YE<<CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(|3X$ !.8RUdXXd8     ($$   1  X[Z&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK !.8RUdd8     _RU8XXdd8   @ WRUINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE  @kk$ATNASHVILLE & WW#RUW #  October2,2002Session#RURU#WRU L #RUW#XXRU #RUXX#  STATEOFTENNESSEEv.PAULDENNISREID,JR.XXRU  J  XXXX  AppealfromtheCourtofCriminalAppeals  J CriminalCourtforDavidsonCounty  6 @@ No.97C1834CherylBlackburn,Judge #XXXXM##RUXX#XXRU@@*   " @@*AV) ` dE<` A   l#RUXXq#XXRU@+ + No.M199900803SCDDTDDFiledNovember26,_2002_Ԉ   AV) ` dE<|` A }   @* XXX_Adolpho_ԀA.Birch,Jr.,J.,concurringanddissenting.#XXXXj# d   Iconcurwiththemajoritysopinionaffirmingtheconvictionofthedefendant.Withregard < #RUXXV#XXRUtotheimpositionofthedeathsentencesinthiscase,however,Icannotagree.Myconcerns,as (x expressedbelow,pertaintomycontinueddismaywiththecomparativeproportionalityreview d protocolimposedbythemajority. P   XXXX  Inaccordancewithmypreviousdissents,Imaintainthatthecomparativeproportionality ( % C #XXXX #%C XXXXreviewprocessappliedbythisCourtfailsbecauseitdoesnotprotectdefendantsfromthearbitrary  anddisproportionateimpositionofthedeathpenalty.See,e.g.,Statev.Austin,!S.W.3d!,(Tenn.  2002)(Birch,J.,concurringanddissenting);Statev._Godsey_,60S.W.3d759,793(Tenn.2001)  (Birch,J.,concurringanddissenting);Statev.Bane,57S.W.3d411,431(Tenn.2001)(Birch,J.,  concurringanddissenting);Statev._Chalmers_,28S.W.3d913,923(Tenn.2000)(Birch,J., t concurringanddissenting);Statev.Keen,31S.W.3d196,234(Tenn.2000)(Birch,J.,dissenting). ` Inthiscontext,thiscaseisnotdistinguishablefromthoselisted.#XXXX # L    Ihavegraveconcerns,asexpressedintheaforementioneddissents,aboutthecomparative $"t! proportionalityreviewprotocolemployedbythemajorityincapitalcases.Therehas,inmyopinion, #`" beennomeaningfulefforttoaddressandrectifytheseconcerns.Thislackofeffort,incombination #L# withmystronglyheldconvictionthattheCourtisnotproperlyfulfillingitsstatutoryobligationto $8 $ determinewhether thesentenceofdeathisexcessiveordisproportionatetothepenaltyimposedin %$!% similarcases, #  1      ׀causesmetorespectfullydisagreewiththedecisiontoaffirmthedeathpenalty &"& imposedinthiscase.Accordingly,Iwouldreversethesentencesofdeathandremandthecasefor '"' re_Ԅsentencing./  /  XXXX (#( #XXXX!#XXXX     `     h     _________________________________ p*%*  0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#_ADOLPHO_ԀA.BIRCH,JR.0x(#(# #XXXX##RUXX#