WPC4? )*}crz;C$~8HCJhIԊx2[Cm$qw<< D3w>U:>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0P>HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLl(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX($   K$4XQXXXXXQ   2    Adefendantmustserveatleast120daysofthe11month29daysentenceforthirdand  subsequentDUIconvictions.Whetherthedefendantshallserveinexcessofthemandatory120daysiswithinthetrialjudge'sdiscretion. +!+"#D$%D&'+(V)v*+,D-.H/U0E1U2[34E56U7ӀAu[%x4`D3|xA C<< C(v(2$ !  4XLXXX3XXL   0  (#$  0  Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5,  AZ"Arial Regular(3$ !  ,  AZ"Arial Regular,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4XQXXXXXQ   1    InStatev.Connors,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996),theappellatecourt  apparentlyconcludedthatthemaximumpercentageofconfinementinafourthoffenseDUIcasewas75percentofthe11months29days.ThisiscontrarytopriorSupremeCourtprecedentandisoverruled.(3$ !   I  K$4XQXXXXXQ   4    Thedefendanthaspreviouslymadefailedattemptsatrehabilitationwhichinclude28  daysintheV.A.fortreatmentfollowinghiseightharrestforDUI.($$   1  ' dxd I  K$4XcXXX5XXc   4    Thedefendanthaspreviouslymadefailedattemptsatrehabilitationwhichinclude28  daysintheV.A.fortreatmentfollowinghiseightharrestforDUI.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4XQXXXXXQ   3    Casesinconsistentwiththisholdingareoverruledtotheextenttheyconflictwiththis  opinion.Seee.g.,Statev.Conners,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Dockery,  917S.W.2d258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);andStatev.Coolidge,915S.W.2d820(Tenn.Crim.  App.1995).P Pd "  KXLXXXK#kXKXL   Ad FILEDKXLXK#k  November9,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAh    I$4X XXX XX    1    InStatev.Connors,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996),theappellatecourt  apparentlyconcludedthatthemaximumpercentageofconfinementinafourthoffenseDUIcasewas75percentofthe11months29days.ThisiscontrarytopriorSupremeCourtprecedentandisoverruled.,  AZ"Arial Regular   I$4 X XXX  XX    2    Adefendantmustserveatleast120daysofthe11month29daysentenceforthirdand  subsequentDUIconvictions.Whetherthedefendantshallserveinexcessofthemandatory120daysiswithinthetrialjudge'sdiscretion. d,  AZ"Arial Regular   I$4"X XXX" XX    3    Casesinconsistentwiththisholdingareoverruledtotheextenttheyconflictwiththis  opinion.Seee.g.,Statev.Conners,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Dockery,  917S.W.2d258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);andStatev.Coolidge,915S.W.2d820(Tenn.Crim.  App.1995).,  AZ"Arial Regular I  I$4$X XXX$ XX    4    Thedefendanthaspreviouslymadefailedattemptsatrehabilitationwhichinclude28  daysintheV.A.fortreatmentfollowinghiseightharrestforDUI.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4&XcXXX&5XXc   1    InStatev.Connors,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996),theappellatecourt  apparentlyconcludedthatthemaximumpercentageofconfinementinafourthoffenseDUIcasewas75percentofthe11months29days.ThisiscontrarytopriorSupremeCourtprecedentandisoverruled.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4(XcXXX(5XXc   2    Adefendantmustserveatleast120daysofthe11month29daysentenceforthirdand  subsequentDUIconvictions.Whetherthedefendantshallserveinexcessofthemandatory120daysiswithinthetrialjudge'sdiscretion.,  AZ"Arial Regular   I$4*X XXX* XX    3    Casesinconsistentwiththisholdingareoverruledtotheextenttheyconflictwiththis  opinion.Seee.g.,Statev.Conners,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Dockery,  917S.W.2d258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);andStatev.Coolidge,915S.W.2d820(Tenn.Crim.  App.1995).,  AZ"Arial Regular  /Q+ d  -XXXX-sX-X      Last  ChanceBeforeFiling#-s'##XXF#C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT&@FZ 8CaslonOpnface BT Regular I  I$4/X XXX/ XX    4    Thedefendanthaspreviouslymadefailedattemptsatrehabilitationwhichinclude28  daysintheV.A.fortreatmentfollowinghiseightharrestforDUI.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$41XcXXX15XXc   1    InStatev.Connors,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996),theappellatecourt  apparentlyconcludedthatthemaximumpercentageofconfinementinafourthoffenseDUIcasewas75percentofthe11months29days.ThisiscontrarytopriorSupremeCourtprecedentandisoverruled.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$43XcXXX35XXc   2    Adefendantmustserveatleast120daysofthe11month29daysentenceforthirdand  subsequentDUIconvictions.Whetherthedefendantshallserveinexcessofthemandatory120daysiswithinthetrialjudge'sdiscretion.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$45XcXXX55XXc   3    Casesinconsistentwiththisholdingareoverruledtotheextenttheyconflictwiththis  opinion.Seee.g.,Statev.Conners,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Dockery,  917S.W.2d258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);andStatev.Coolidge,915S.W.2d820(Tenn.Crim.  App.1995).,  AZ"Arial Regular I  K$47XcXXX75XXc   4    Thedefendanthaspreviouslymadefailedattemptsatrehabilitationwhichinclude28  daysintheV.A.fortreatmentfollowinghiseightharrestforDUI.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$49XcXXX95XXc   1    InStatev.Connors,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996),theappellatecourt  apparentlyconcludedthatthemaximumpercentageofconfinementinafourthoffenseDUIcasewas75percentofthe11months29days.ThisiscontrarytopriorSupremeCourtprecedentandisoverruled.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4;XcXXX;5XXc   2    Adefendantmustserveatleast120daysofthe11month29daysentenceforthirdand  subsequentDUIconvictions.Whetherthedefendantshallserveinexcessofthemandatory120daysiswithinthetrialjudge'sdiscretion.,  AZ"Arial Regular   K$4=XcXXX=5XXc   3    Casesinconsistentwiththisholdingareoverruledtotheextenttheyconflictwiththis  opinion.Seee.g.,Statev.Conners,924S.W.2d362(Tenn.Crim.App.1996);Statev.Dockery,  917S.W.2d258(Tenn.Crim.App.1995);andStatev.Coolidge,915S.W.2d820(Tenn.Crim.  App.1995).,  AZ"Arial Regular TROUTMANpresentencereviewableAshbyyu5%U&'dEAHib011s19<4 9Z .Courier New Regular 88GXXdXXd8   K$4XQXXXXXQ   5    _WheretheGeneralAssemblywantedtodistinguishbetweenfeloniesand   misdemeanors,itexpresslydidso.See,e.g.,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035205(a)(1990) T  (presentenceinvestigationgenerallymandatoryinfelonycasesbutonlydiscretionaryinmisdemeanorcases).'dxd,cAZ"Arial Regular((3/Q$ !   d !  XLXXX4Қ%TR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T%&TR[A'Legal Red3'A' Legal3'T&  7̵XXdXXd7     #+#77A7r J<,(j 8` `@E ` 8ttxP,  r7AAAA77AAAAAAt J>.*jxy` `@E` 8ttxP/ tߛA@PPD INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE@ii)DATKNOXVILLEXLXXXLԈ  ̛̜   <      D   FORPUBLICATION    <      D   Filed: 򀀀$November9,1998$T$T$MT$ TL  #XLXXXLB#STATEOFTENNESSEE,@##/D)    @##/D) Appellant,@##/D)  WashingtonCounty  @##/D)v.@##/D)  Hon.ArdenL.Hill,Judge VN @##/D)KENNETHEUGENETROUTMAN,@##/D)XLXXXLԈ  No.03S019705CC00049#XLXXXL# " @##/D) Appellee.@##/D)XLXXXLԈ  FORAPPELLANT: <      D   FORAPPELLEE: 8"0 #XLXXXL#JohnKnoxWalkup <      D   FrederickM.Lance $  AttorneyGeneralandReporter   D   JohnsonCity $! MichaelE.MooreSolicitorGeneralGordonW.SmithAssociateSolicitorGeneralNashvilleXLXXXL@ss)D iXXLOPINION #XLXi #Ԉ J3B,1 AFFIRMED  CT$HOLDER,J.  L9D27' #XLXXXL< #@,D OPINION    Whilethiscasehasultimatelybeendecidedonawaiverissue,wegrantedthisappealtotaketheopportunitytoaddresstwoveryimportantissuesofstatutoryconstructioninmisdemeanorsentencing.ThegeneralissuesmaybeframedaswhetherTenn.CodeAnn.4035209andTenn.CodeAnn.4035210applytomisdemeanorsentencing.Specifically,theissueshavebeenstatedas:(1)whetheratrialjudgemuststateontherecord,pursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.4035210(f),whatenhancementormitigatingfactorswereemployedinsettingthesentencelengthinaDUIcase;(2)whetheratrialcourtmustmakespecificfindingsontherecord,pursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn4035209(c),whenfixingthepercentageofasentencetobeservedinincarcerationunderthemisdemeanorsentencingstatute;and(3)whethertheappellatecourterredinremandingthiscaseforresentencing.Weholdthat4035209,-210(f)areinapplicabletoDUIsentencingandthatthedefendant'ssentencesshouldbeaffirmed.   BACKGROUND  %"  Thedefendant,EugeneKennethTroutman,waschargedwithdrivingwhileundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant("DUI")incasenumber21092.Whileonbondandawaitingtrialincasenumber21092,thedefendantwasagainarrestedandchargedwithDUIincasenumber21372.Thedefendantwasconvictedbyajuryof" drivingwhileundertheinfluenceofanintoxicant(" "DUI" ") "incasenumber21092andpledguiltytoDUIincasenumber21372.Hewassentencedtoserveelevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysincasenumber21092andtwohundredandfiftydaysincasenumber21372.Thesentenceswereorderedtorunconsecutively.  706  Thedefendanthadaseparatesentencinghearinginwhichhepresented severalwitnesses.Apresentencereportwasalsofiledandconsideredbythetrialjudge.Therecordandthepresentencereportindicatethatthedefendanthasthefollowingcriminalrecord: 1.DUIon09/11/78,48hoursinjail; 2.DUIon02/01/79,5months29dayssentencesuspended; 3.DUI/Refusalon09/06/80,1yearprobationwith66daysinjail; 4.DUIon11/07/81,3daysinjail; 5.DUI,first,on07/12/85,15daysinjail; 6.FelonyConvictionon11/30/88,10yearsprobation; 7.DUIon12/28/88,30daysjail; 8.DUIon01/12/90,11months29daysprobationwith48hoursinjail;8 9.Contributingtoaccidentinvolvinginjuryon03/23/90(apparentlywhilelicensesuspendedorrevoked);  ! !  10.ViolationofRestrictedLicenseLawon08/28/90,2daysinjail;8 11.DUI,second,on08/28/90;11months29dayswithallsuspendedbut45daystobeservedinjailwith28dayscreditforinpatienttreatmentatV.A.;  ! !  12.Violationofprobation08/28/90,chargedismissed; 13.ContributingtoAccidentInvolvingPropertyDamageon12/2/93; 14.NoDriversLicenseon01/28/93,noprobation; 15.DUI,third,andviolationofSeatbeltLawon08/15/94; 16.DUIinAugustof1994;and8 17.Declaredhabitualmotoroffender("HMO")on01/11/95;lossofdriver'slicenseforthreeyears.  ! !   704 Thetrialjudgecitedtheneedfordeterrencewhensentencingthedefendanttoa totalperiodofincarcerationofoneyear,twohundredandfortyninedays. TheCourtofCriminalAppealsreversedthetrialjudge'ssentenceandremandedthecasetothetrialcourtforanewsentencinghearing.Theappellatecourtreasonedthat:(1)thetrialcourtfailedtomakespecificfindingsontherecordpursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.4035209,210;and(2)theappellatecourtcouldnotconductameaningfulreviewduetothedefendant'sfailuretoincludeatrialtranscript. Uponreviewoftherecordbeforeus,wefindthatthedefendanthasbeenconvictedoften(10)DUIs,onefelony,andahandfulofotherchargeswithinasixteenyearperiod.Accordingly,thereisamplebackgroundinformationtosupportthetrialjudge'ssentences.Societydemandsprotectionfromthosewhohabituallydrinkanddriveincompletedisregardforthewelfareofothersandforthelawsofthisstate.PursuanttoStatev.Palmer,902S.W.2d391(Tenn. (#  1995),thesentenceimposedbythetrialjudgeinthiscaseshouldbeaffirmed.Seeid.(holdingthattrialjudgecouldsentencethedefendanttoserve" "the" "full &" elevenmonthsandtwentyninedaysforDUIconviction). "'''8'""0"  %   #  1       (!$     ANALYSIS  ,%( 5 ThepenaltiesforviolationsofourDUIlawsarecodifiedatTenn.CodeAnn.5510403.ThedefendantwasconvictedofthirdoffenseDUI.Onthesameday,thedefendantpledguiltytoasubsequentDUIcharge.Boththirdand 4-0 subsequentDUI" "convictions" offenses ",atthetimeofthedefendant'sconviction,providedforasentenceofconfinement"notlessthanonehundredtwenty(120)daysnormorethaneleven(11)monthsandtwentynine(29)days."Tenn.CodeAnn.5510403(a)(1).TheDUIpenaltystatutefurtherprovidedthat:8 [a]llpersonssentencedundersubsection(a)shall,inadditiontotheserviceofatleasttheminimumsentence,berequiredtoservethedifferencebetweenthetimeactuallyservedandthemaximumsentenceonprobation.!  ! ! Tenn.CodeAnn.5510403(c).Accordingly,thelengthofadefendant'ssentenceforathirdorsubsequentoffenseofDUIissetatelevenmonthsandtwentyninedays.WhiletrialcourtscannotdeviatefromthelengthoftheDUIsentence,trialcourtsdoretainsomediscretionindeterminingwhatportionoftheelevenmonthandtwentyninedaysentenceadefendantwillserveinconfinement.!"''':'""2"!!'!  #  2       X P  OurinitialfocusisonwhetheratrialcourtinaDUIcasemustplaceontherecordeitherorallyorinwritinganyenhancementormitigatingfactorsitfoundpursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.4035210(f).Enhancementandmitigatingfactorsareusedprimarilytodeterminethelengthofafelonysentencewithinastatutoryrange.AsentenceforDUI,however,doesnotinvolvearange.AdefendantconvictedofDUIautomaticallyreceivesasentenceofelevenmonthsandtwentyninedays.Accordingly,enhancementandmitigatingfactorsarenotusedindeterminingthelengthofaDUIsentence.TennesseeCodeAnnotated4035210(f)isclearlyinapplicabletoDUIsentencing. 4-1  OurnextinquiryiswhetheratrialcourtmustmakespecificfindingsoffactontherecordwhendeterminingwhatportionofaDUIsentencewillbeservedinϜconfinement.ADUI,atthetimeofthedefendant'soffense,wasaClassAϜmisdemeanor.Tenn.CodeAnn.5510403(m).Accordingly,wemustdeterminewhetheratrialjudgemustmakespecificfindingsoffactinmisdemeanorsentencingwhendeterminingwhatportionofadefendant'ssentencethedefendantwillserveinconfinement. MisdemeanorsentencingguidelinesarecodifiedatTenn.CodeAnn.4035302andprovideinpertinentpart:8 Inimposingamisdemeanorsentence,thecourtshallfixapercentageofthesentencewhichthedefendantshallserve[inconfinement]....Indeterminingthepercentageofthesentencetobeservedinactualconfinementthecourtshallconsiderthepurposesofthischapter,theprinciplesofsentencing,andtheenhancementandmitigatingfactorssetforthherein,andshallnotimposesuchpercentagesarbitrarily.*  ! ! Tenn.CodeAnn.4035302(d).TheSentencingCommissionCommentsto4035302(d)notethatsubsection(d),unlikefelonysentencing,providestrialjudgeswith"neededflexibilityinmisdemeanorsentencing."XQXXXQSeeStatev.Combs, (!$ 945S.W.2d770,77374(Tenn.Crim.App.1996)(notingflexibility);seealso *#& Statev.Williams,914S.W.2d940,948(Tenn.Crim.App.1995)(holdingno ,%( presumptionregardingalternativeformofsentence).#XQXXXQ-# h.`'*  XQXXXQThesentencingconsiderationsgenerallyusedindeterminingthemanner (2 +. ofserviceforbothmisdemeanorsandfelonysentencesarecodifiedatTenn.CodeAnn.4035102,103.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035102(noting 5.2 considerationsusedindeterminingwhetherconfinementshallbeϜimposed);Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(settingforthconsiderationstobeused 926 whenissuingsentencingofconfinement).Inadditiontothestatutoryconsiderationsforissuingsentencesofconfinement,themisdemeanorsentencingstatutemerelyrequiresatrialjudgetoconsiderenhancementandmitigatingfactors#XQXXXQ?/#XQXXXQԀ#XQXXXQ$2#XQXXXQwhencalculatingthepercentageofamisdemeanorsentence   tobeservedinconfinement.#XQXXXQg2#XQXXXQCompareTenn.CodeAnn.4035302("to  considerthepurposeofthischapter,theprinciplesofsentencing,andtheenhancementandmitigatingfactorssetforthherein")withTenn.CodeAnn. H@  4035210(f)(statingcourtshallplaceonrecordeitherorallyorinwritingwhatenhancementormitigatingfactorsitfound). Thelegislaturehasclearlyindicatedthattrialcourtsmustmakespecificfindingsontherecordinfelonysentencing.SeegenerallyTenn.CodeAnn.  4035209(c),210(f).Thelanguageinthesesubsectionsisinconsistentwiththelanguageemployedinthemisdemeanorsentencingstatute.Moreover,thelegislaturehasindicatedtheabilitytoclearlymandatespecificfindingsontherecordinfelonysentencing.Hadthelegislatureintendedthispracticeinmisdemeanorsentencing,itcouldhavesostated.Accordingly,whilethebetterpracticeistomakefindingsontherecordwhenfixingapercentageofadefendant'ssentencetobeservedinincarceration,atrialcourtneedonlyconsidertheprinciplesofsentencingandenhancementandmitigatingfactorsinordertocomplywiththelegislativemandatesofthemisdemeanorsentencingstatute.!"'''<'""4"!!)!!  #  3      כ h.`'* #XQXXXQ3# Whenimposingapercentagetobeservedpursuanttothemisdemeanorsentencingstatute,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035302requiresthatatrialcourt"shall 4-0 notimposesuchpercentagesarbitrarily."Where,asinthecasenowbeforeus,thedefendantfailstoincludeallmaterialsnecessaryforresolutionofamisdemeanorsentencingissue,thesentenceshallbepresumedtobeϜcorrect.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035401(1990)(notingthatdefendantcarries   theburdenofestablishingimproprietyofsentence);seealsoTenn.CodeAnn.  4035302("shallnotimposesuchpercentagesarbitrarily"). ThedefendantinthecasenowbeforeushasfailedtoincludethetrialϜtranscript.Itwasthedefendant'sresponsibilitytoincludeacompleterecordonϜappeal.SeeStatev.Ballard,855S.W.2d557(1993)(holdingfailuretoinclude  transcriptprecludesappellatereview);Statev.Oody,823S.W.2d554(Tenn.  Crim.App.1991)(holdingtrialcourt'srulingpresumedcorrectintheabsenceofanadequaterecordonappeal).Notwithstandingwaiver,therecordbeforeusindicatesthatthedefendanthasatotaloften(10)DUIconvictions,afelonyconviction,andotherdrivingrelatedoffenses.HistenthconvictionstemsfromanarrestforDUIwhileonbondfortheinstantDUIoffense.Wefindthatthefollowingfactorspresentintherecordbeforeusamplysupportthetrialcourt'ssentences:8 1.thedefendant'slengthycriminalbackground,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103;  ! ! 8 2.thepotentialdangerousnessofhisconvictionsandhislackofhesitationtodriveundertheinfluencewhichinvolvesahighrisktohislifeandothers,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035114(10);  ! ! 8 3.thedefendant'sinabilitytorefrainfromdrivingundertheinfluencewhileonbondforapendingDUIcharge;  ! ! 8 4.thedefendant'spreviousunwillingnesstocomplywithconditionsofasentenceinvolvingreleaseintothecommunity,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035114(8);926 ! ! 8 5.measureslessrestrictivethanconfinementhavefrequentlybeenappliedunsuccessfullytothedefendant,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035103(1)(C);  ! ! 8 6.thedefendant'sapparentdishonestywiththeV.A.(factorrelevanttoabilitytoberehabilitated),Tenn.CodeAnn.40-35-103(6);!"''''""6"!!.!#  #  4      ׀and ! ! 8 7.theneedtoprotectsocietyfromchronicandhabitualoffendersofourDUIlaws,seegenerallyTenn.CodeAnn.4035102(1),(3), H@  Є103(1)(A).  ! ! Accordingly,thedefendant'ssentencesareamplysupportedbytherecord.Thedefendant'ssentencesareaffirmed,andcostsofthisappealshallbetaxedtothedefendant,KennethEugeneTroutman,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.   <      D T$T$MT$ (#     <      D JANICEM.HOLDER,JUSTICE +Concurring:+,Panel:,  &" Anderson,C.J.Drowota-,J.-//.and.2 23Sep343r345arateConcurringOpinion:52 21 +$' 1Birch,J0J.066Reid,Sp.J.,NotParticipating(  H0@), () )*)7<XXdXXd7)**_4X  $XX XX$ 7<XXdXXd7  HTR[A' Legal[A'Legal RedA'Legal RedA'Legal RedT=<XXdd=@PPDINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE   @zz)DATKNOXVILLE@$D(HEARDATJOHNSONCITY)STATEOFTENNESSEE0 h   0h%h%) p FORPUBLICATION` %%     h     )̀Appellant 0   h   )  FILED:@ %%     h     )v.    h     ) p WASHINGTONCOUNTY       h     )KENNETHEUGENETROUTMAN  0 p )  HON.ARDENL.HILL,p%p%     h     ) p JUDGE | ЀAppellee    h   ) l     h     ) p NO.03S019705CC00049 \ J@"D_SEPARATECONCURRINGOPINION !p  Themajorityinthiscaseholdsthattrialjudgesinmisdemeanorcasesarenot %0 requiredtomakespecificfindingsoffactontherecordregardingsentencingdecisions.IwriteseparatelytoexpressmyviewthatTenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c)(1990)appliesequallytomisdemeanorandfelonysentencing,therebyrequiringspecificfindingsoffactinbothcases.ApplyingTenn.CodeAnn.4035209(c)totherecordbeforeus,Iagreewiththemajoritythatthesentencemustbeaffirmedbecausedefendanthasfailedtoprovideacompleterecordforourreview. TennesseeCodeAnnotated4035209(c)ispartoftheCriminalSentencingReformActof1989,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035101etseq.(1990).Itprovides,inrelevant 6,/ part,that therecordofthesentencinghearing...shallincludespecificfindingsoffactuponwhichapplicationofthesentencingprincipleswasbased.Althoughthissection \:/3 H 7GGXXdXXd7  *6*H 7GGXXdXXd7  *6*doesnotexpresslydistinguishbetweenfelonyandmisdemeanorcases,I  #  5      ׀themajority   concludesthatitisinapplicableinmisdemeanorcasesbecauseitisinconsistentwithTenn.CodeAnn.4035302(1990). Section302governsmisdemeanorsentencingandallowsatrialcourttodecidewhethertoconductaseparatesentencinghearingortosimply allowtheparties `  areasonableopportunitytobeheardonsentencing.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035302(a).Italsospecifieshowthetrialcourtshouldsetforththelengthandmannerofserviceinamisdemeanorcase.Tenn.CodeAnn.4035302(d). Theflexibilityprovidedbysection302isnotdisruptedbyarequirementthatthetrialcourtmakespecificfindingsoffact.Permittingthetrialcourttoforgoplacingfindingsoffactontherecordmerelyservestofrustratetheexpresslegislativeintentthatthereasonsforsentencingbeappropriatelyreviewable.SeeTenn.CodeAnn.4035 "` 209(c)sentencingcommissioncomments.Sentencingdecisionsareaccompaniedbyapresumptionofcorrectness,Tenn.CodeAnn.4035401(d),402(d)(1990),whichis conditionedupontheaffirmativeshowingintherecordthatthetrialcourtconsideredthesentencingprinciplesandallrelevantfactsandcircumstances.Statev.Ashby,823 l*" S.W.2d166,169(Tenn.1991).Withoutfindingsoffact,thepresumptionismeaninglessandwehavenochoicebutmerelytoreviewsentencingdecisionsdenovo.Clearly,this ,.#& isnotwhatthelegislatureintended.  1`'* Л Arecordwithoutfindingsoffactmaystillpermitmeaningfulappellatereview eventhoughthepresumptionofcorrectnessdoesnotattach.Inthecaseundersubmission,thedefendantfailedtofileatrialtranscript.Althoughsomeevidencerelevanttosentencingisfoundinthesentencinghearingtranscriptandpresentencereport,scantifanyevidenceregardingthecircumstancesoftheoffensesisincludedinthisincompleterecord.Ordinarily,suchanincompleterecordwouldmakemereluctanttoconductaϜreview,lestsuchreviewbespeculative.Asthemajoritypointsout,however,itisthedefendantsdutytoprovideacompleterecord,andwherehehasfailedtodoso,hecannotnowcomplain.Thus,Iconcurthatthesentenceshouldbeaffirmed.̜    h      p ______________________________    h      p ADOLPHOA.BIRCH,JR.,Justice*