WPC|  6ۢYKZaa]aj_뮂؄rLҀplXhκ}%m0$ › &YT4oDm} i@H\fS'N:i,7!s.|!S|m}P(Ikx^38/\͵/y8mbҁب]Ak5m H,Qp_::]Ya3YA8T ( fE2_tQ|a2t\=łr.6yaF($\~MN@]j\l)DYaRtoaC5&l6Xa"[ӨkF4l#f_9kN.N$Yg}A8`Q 90 Aɽ`@kgKmC-z}Dw.wx٥CBd;VNj8\HRrDD,]&h[.;Am3yd(?JeZ *# LUNW % 0YUFwJ4>RaNi^ kw my {(U: AQN 0D 0DX 0D D/ B B, D3I HP LaserJet 4SiHPPCL5MS,,,,,,0nLh(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularX(1y$LLXX<4 9Z .Courier New Regular(nopqrsDtuvEwxEyzD{| }~abDUbUDEEeUDbvӀu[%3|x;uT%U ($ ""  XF3XXXY2XXF3   Ad FILEDXF3XY2  November2,1998CecilW.CrowsonAppellateCourtClerkdAh ,cAZ"Arial Regular!"#$&C<< CLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 5(3$ !  (3$ !  ($$   1  ((' dxd dP Pd'''''dxd y!LLXX  T` _ XTR[A' Legal3'A' Legal3'T  L/LLLr )<,(j 8` `@E f ` 8ttxPX`  rt )>.*jx` `@E` ` 8ttxP*` t@DINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTENNESSEE@*DATJACKSONDEBORAHWILLIAMS0 h 0h%h%0%%0p%%)0p%p%Appealk %%  `  0  0h%%0h%h%0%%0p%%)0p%p%No.02S019702CV00012:%%  ` PlaintiffAppellee     p )      `     h      p )0  HenryCountyx%% v.0 ` 0 ` %` %0 % %0h%%0h%h%0%%0p%%)0p%p%No.537__________G %%  `     h      p )TECUMSEHPRODUCTSCOMPANY0  0p%%)E p%p%  `     h      p )0  JudgmentoftheTrial %%  ` DefendantAppellant0  0%%0p%%)0p%p%CourtisAFFIRMED. %%  ` ̀̀ P  @  (DJUDGMENTORDER   Ѐ `  Thiscausecametobehearduponthetbriefsandthetrecorduuponruvuewviewuvxwviewxyeviewy|ypursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.506225(e)(5)(A)y|yoftheyzonappealfromthetrialcourt,thezfindingsoffactandconclusionsoflawoftheSpecialWorkersCompensationAppealsPanel{,andthebriefsandargumentofcounsel{}}~pursuanttoTenn.CodeAnn.506225(e)(5)(A)~. `  TheCourtisoftheopinionthatunderthefactsofthiscase,theevidencedoesnotpreponderateagainstthetrialcourtsfindingsofcausation,permanency,andqextentofqvocationaldisabilitypIratingsof50percenttoIKtKheplaintiffLsrightarmand40percenttotheplaintiffsleftarmLp.TheCourtisalsooftheopinionthatthetrialcourtproperlyawardedsVtheVVVsdiscretionarycoststotheplaintiff.Wevacate,however,theorderoftheSpecialWorkersCompensationAppealsPanelinvalidatingtheTwentyFourthJudicialDistrictsproceduresforworkerscompensationcases,expressingneitherapprovalnordisapnprovalofthoseprocedures.nosufferedapermanentinjurycausedbyherworkforthedefendantHandthattheH.oInaccordancewiththeopinionfiledherewith,itisr,rtherefore,ORDEREDANDADJUDGEDbythisCourtthatthejudgmentoftheTrialCourtisaffirmed. `  Costsoftheappealaretaxedagainstthedefendant,forwhichexecutionmayissueifnecessary.Noappellatecosts,however,shallbetaxedtioieitherpartyforthereviewinthisCourtunderTenn.CodeAnn.506225(e)(5)(A).Thedefendantshallnot,however,betaxedwithanycostsaccruingsubsequenttothefilingofthePanelsmemorandumopinion. ^<2=  ^<2=  4=3> 11/2/98